Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And pay more for imports.Lower dollar, we sell more exports,
No, idiot, we start making things here instead of importing them. Lower the cost and employ our people.
Wrong dude. Very wrong.
80% of my consumables are made in China.
Don’t you think I could have done that if it’s lower to manufacture them here locally?
Where in the world are you getting your information?
Mexican and Canadian currency soars as a result of an agreement.
So for the libtarded left, this means Mexico's and Canaduh's purchasing power goes up and our products become cheaper in their country. They can buy more for less and we can sell more there for a profit.
But really any one with a brain knew this in advance and Trump had to drag these idiots kicking and screaming to do what was best for all three of our countries.
Hint, libtardos, Capitalism is forcing Socialism in to doing the smart thing for everyone.
The Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar are ripping higher after the new NAFTA deal
He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.Nearly as ignorant as the many commenting economists who think it NAFTA with a few minor tweaks.Seriously, how ignorant must one be to think that the new agreement is nothing more than NAFTA with a new name?
The same economists who said electing Trump will ruin our economy? Or the ones who think big government debt spending isn't an issue?
Trump does not think big government debt spending is an issue. Trump just increased the deficit by 91% in a single year, the second largest increase ever.
The jump in the deficit between FY 2017 and 2018 is the single biggest increase to the deficit in a single year dollar wise...ever.
Oh, and the new agreement is just NAFTA with a few tweaks and a pretty new name.
He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.Nearly as ignorant as the many commenting economists who think it NAFTA with a few minor tweaks.
The same economists who said electing Trump will ruin our economy? Or the ones who think big government debt spending isn't an issue?
Trump does not think big government debt spending is an issue. Trump just increased the deficit by 91% in a single year, the second largest increase ever.
The jump in the deficit between FY 2017 and 2018 is the single biggest increase to the deficit in a single year dollar wise...ever.
Oh, and the new agreement is just NAFTA with a few tweaks and a pretty new name.
He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.The same economists who said electing Trump will ruin our economy? Or the ones who think big government debt spending isn't an issue?
Trump does not think big government debt spending is an issue. Trump just increased the deficit by 91% in a single year, the second largest increase ever.
The jump in the deficit between FY 2017 and 2018 is the single biggest increase to the deficit in a single year dollar wise...ever.
Oh, and the new agreement is just NAFTA with a few tweaks and a pretty new name.
He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
Can you explain how?
He signs off on the spending and keeps asking for more. That's just a fact.He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.Nearly as ignorant as the many commenting economists who think it NAFTA with a few minor tweaks.
The same economists who said electing Trump will ruin our economy? Or the ones who think big government debt spending isn't an issue?
Trump does not think big government debt spending is an issue. Trump just increased the deficit by 91% in a single year, the second largest increase ever.
The jump in the deficit between FY 2017 and 2018 is the single biggest increase to the deficit in a single year dollar wise...ever.
Oh, and the new agreement is just NAFTA with a few tweaks and a pretty new name.
He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.Trump does not think big government debt spending is an issue. Trump just increased the deficit by 91% in a single year, the second largest increase ever.
The jump in the deficit between FY 2017 and 2018 is the single biggest increase to the deficit in a single year dollar wise...ever.
Oh, and the new agreement is just NAFTA with a few tweaks and a pretty new name.
He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
Can you explain how?
What do you mean how? The wall is maybe $15 to 20 Billion to get done, far less to maintain.
Trade deficits with mexico are many times that. Closing the gap will raise our income from trade by more than the wall costs, thus offsetting the cost entirely.
He signs off on the spending and keeps asking for more. That's just a fact.He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.The same economists who said electing Trump will ruin our economy? Or the ones who think big government debt spending isn't an issue?
Trump does not think big government debt spending is an issue. Trump just increased the deficit by 91% in a single year, the second largest increase ever.
The jump in the deficit between FY 2017 and 2018 is the single biggest increase to the deficit in a single year dollar wise...ever.
Oh, and the new agreement is just NAFTA with a few tweaks and a pretty new name.
He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
Can you explain how?
What do you mean how? The wall is maybe $15 to 20 Billion to get done, far less to maintain.
Trade deficits with mexico are many times that. Closing the gap will raise our income from trade by more than the wall costs, thus offsetting the cost entirely.
If the trade deficit lessens it does not mean more money for the federal government. It means more money for exporters. Mexican consumers will pay more to the exporters, not the US federal government.
Try again
Because you don't make any sense, he signs off on the spending. Every time there is a budget he asks for more spending for his wall. Stop your silly lies already.He signs off on the spending and keeps asking for more. That's just a fact.He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.Trump does not think big government debt spending is an issue. Trump just increased the deficit by 91% in a single year, the second largest increase ever.
The jump in the deficit between FY 2017 and 2018 is the single biggest increase to the deficit in a single year dollar wise...ever.
Oh, and the new agreement is just NAFTA with a few tweaks and a pretty new name.
He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
You just ignored everything I said. You're wrong if you think our $900B plus budgets are new or in any way are made mostly of things that Trump "asks for". Stop blaming Trump for shit he's not responsible for.
You aren't close to an intelligent thought in that babble...He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
Can you explain how?
What do you mean how? The wall is maybe $15 to 20 Billion to get done, far less to maintain.
Trade deficits with mexico are many times that. Closing the gap will raise our income from trade by more than the wall costs, thus offsetting the cost entirely.
If the trade deficit lessens it does not mean more money for the federal government. It means more money for exporters. Mexican consumers will pay more to the exporters, not the US federal government.
Try again
You're forgetting about the tariffs that come with imports. If the deficit shrinks, it means imports are up, which means tariffs are up. Furthermore, it's simply not true that the trade deficit is without cost to the government. It's a loss of both tax revenue and leads to more potential subsidies.
Because you don't make any sense, he signs off on the spending. Every time there is a budget he asks for more spending for his wall. Stop your silly lies already.He signs off on the spending and keeps asking for more. That's just a fact.He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.He does indeed care about the deficit. Congress writes the budget, not the president. He could veto it, but doing so is just symbolic. It won't actually do anything with the paper thin republican congress margins.
Unlike Obama, who gleefully signed off on the doubling our debt, Trump speaks publicly constantly about how terrible these spending bills are and has called repeatedly for them to be thrown out.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
You just ignored everything I said. You're wrong if you think our $900B plus budgets are new or in any way are made mostly of things that Trump "asks for". Stop blaming Trump for shit he's not responsible for.
You aren't close to an intelligent thought in that babble...The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
Can you explain how?
What do you mean how? The wall is maybe $15 to 20 Billion to get done, far less to maintain.
Trade deficits with mexico are many times that. Closing the gap will raise our income from trade by more than the wall costs, thus offsetting the cost entirely.
If the trade deficit lessens it does not mean more money for the federal government. It means more money for exporters. Mexican consumers will pay more to the exporters, not the US federal government.
Try again
You're forgetting about the tariffs that come with imports. If the deficit shrinks, it means imports are up, which means tariffs are up. Furthermore, it's simply not true that the trade deficit is without cost to the government. It's a loss of both tax revenue and leads to more potential subsidies.
Congress is controlled by Republicans. The republicans are trumps party and his bitches. They do what he says. Don't be such a fool. Their spending hasn't even been enough, he asks for more!Because you don't make any sense, he signs off on the spending. Every time there is a budget he asks for more spending for his wall. Stop your silly lies already.He signs off on the spending and keeps asking for more. That's just a fact.He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
You just ignored everything I said. You're wrong if you think our $900B plus budgets are new or in any way are made mostly of things that Trump "asks for". Stop blaming Trump for shit he's not responsible for.
Why are you people so dishonest? Seriously. Is it intentional?
You are blaming Trump for congress' 1 TRILLION dollar budges because he wants $15 billion for a wall that they don't give him any ways? Delusional dude. Seriously. I don't like the debt any more than you do. Atleast I am focusing my attention on the real source of the problem though.
I can't possibly explain what you are trying to say, it was nonsense.You aren't close to an intelligent thought in that babble...Can you explain how?
What do you mean how? The wall is maybe $15 to 20 Billion to get done, far less to maintain.
Trade deficits with mexico are many times that. Closing the gap will raise our income from trade by more than the wall costs, thus offsetting the cost entirely.
If the trade deficit lessens it does not mean more money for the federal government. It means more money for exporters. Mexican consumers will pay more to the exporters, not the US federal government.
Try again
You're forgetting about the tariffs that come with imports. If the deficit shrinks, it means imports are up, which means tariffs are up. Furthermore, it's simply not true that the trade deficit is without cost to the government. It's a loss of both tax revenue and leads to more potential subsidies.
Then why don't you explain? You're good at talking down other points of view, but so far not very good at actually giving counter points.
I can't possibly explain what you are trying to say, it was nonsense.You aren't close to an intelligent thought in that babble...What do you mean how? The wall is maybe $15 to 20 Billion to get done, far less to maintain.
Trade deficits with mexico are many times that. Closing the gap will raise our income from trade by more than the wall costs, thus offsetting the cost entirely.
If the trade deficit lessens it does not mean more money for the federal government. It means more money for exporters. Mexican consumers will pay more to the exporters, not the US federal government.
Try again
You're forgetting about the tariffs that come with imports. If the deficit shrinks, it means imports are up, which means tariffs are up. Furthermore, it's simply not true that the trade deficit is without cost to the government. It's a loss of both tax revenue and leads to more potential subsidies.
Then why don't you explain? You're good at talking down other points of view, but so far not very good at actually giving counter points.
Congress is controlled by Republicans. The republicans are trumps party and his bitches. They do what he says. Don't be such a fool. Their spending hasn't even been enough, he asks for more!Because you don't make any sense, he signs off on the spending. Every time there is a budget he asks for more spending for his wall. Stop your silly lies already.He signs off on the spending and keeps asking for more. That's just a fact.The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
You just ignored everything I said. You're wrong if you think our $900B plus budgets are new or in any way are made mostly of things that Trump "asks for". Stop blaming Trump for shit he's not responsible for.
Why are you people so dishonest? Seriously. Is it intentional?
You are blaming Trump for congress' 1 TRILLION dollar budges because he wants $15 billion for a wall that they don't give him any ways? Delusional dude. Seriously. I don't like the debt any more than you do. Atleast I am focusing my attention on the real source of the problem though.
Because Mexico is supposed to pay for itCongress is controlled by Republicans. The republicans are trumps party and his bitches. They do what he says. Don't be such a fool. Their spending hasn't even been enough, he asks for more!Because you don't make any sense, he signs off on the spending. Every time there is a budget he asks for more spending for his wall. Stop your silly lies already.He signs off on the spending and keeps asking for more. That's just a fact.
You just ignored everything I said. You're wrong if you think our $900B plus budgets are new or in any way are made mostly of things that Trump "asks for". Stop blaming Trump for shit he's not responsible for.
Why are you people so dishonest? Seriously. Is it intentional?
You are blaming Trump for congress' 1 TRILLION dollar budges because he wants $15 billion for a wall that they don't give him any ways? Delusional dude. Seriously. I don't like the debt any more than you do. Atleast I am focusing my attention on the real source of the problem though.
If they do what he wants, why can't he get an extra $15 Billion on a $1 Trillion budget for the wall? Stop being so ignorant.
Okay. Who pays the tariffs? Do you think the exporter pays them or the importer pays them?He keeps asking for more spending on a wall. You are really delusional.
The wall is a drop in the bucket. It's not even a rounding error. Besides, closing the trade deficit would pay for it automatically (What he means when he says Mexico would pay for it.)
Can you explain how?
What do you mean how? The wall is maybe $15 to 20 Billion to get done, far less to maintain.
Trade deficits with mexico are many times that. Closing the gap will raise our income from trade by more than the wall costs, thus offsetting the cost entirely.
If the trade deficit lessens it does not mean more money for the federal government. It means more money for exporters. Mexican consumers will pay more to the exporters, not the US federal government.
Try again
You're forgetting about the tariffs that come with imports. If the deficit shrinks, it means imports are up, which means tariffs are up.
Furthermore, it's simply not true that the trade deficit is without cost to the government. It's a loss of both tax revenue and leads to more potential subsidies.
