That's your opinion. We are a nation of laws. How do you justify this?
We aren't anymore. The democrats have gone full fascist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's your opinion. We are a nation of laws. How do you justify this?
According to Lara and Eric trump, Donald collected photos, newspaper articles, magazines.What was Trump doing with TOP SECRET documents in Florida in the first place, fool?
(because I realized he was intentionally making up lies to be facetious) He was mocking people like you...Whoa, I wasn't expecting this, spot on question, too. Too bad it may have been directed at the wrong poster. Friendly fire maybe?
View attachment 679537
It really doesn't matter.I have not said I believe them. I have simply said they had warrants and served them.
But I can point out examples of cops, prosecutors, judges and jurors breaking the law. Should we just throw out the entire system?
All this speculation about the warrants is ridiculous. Until we see what was in the warrants, it is just guessing and hoping.
Archives or not. They do not belong to him. It is criminal. A federal crime. AKA stealing.If it had been his shit, he would have gotten to keep it. Again, he chose to operate outside the law.
Actually on the Night of the Long Knives, Hitler had tricked his brown shirt leaders like Ernst Fromm to getting motel rooms for a meeting as well as I remember but it was a trap. Hitler had the hotel raided and had the guys shot.You are correct on the trajectory, but the camps never started out as hotels.
You certainly didn’t use that logic when it came to wanting to nail Hillary to the wall.
Hey moron, the president does not have the authority to direct the Justice Department to direct the FBI to commit a seizure that has no cause. Hell even with cause he does not have that authority. Only a JUDGE can make this call idiot.Hahahahahahahahahahahah!!!
Egads, you are out of your league here, Billy.
The President is the head of the Executive Branch, to which both the FBI and DOJ belong. He can issue orders to them anytime he wants to.
It's the times we live in, FFI.Totally! A broad conspiracy of corrupt civil servants is so much simpler and easier to believe than the idea that there was good reason to believe evidence of a crime was at Mar A Lago. You just can't find brilliant insight like this anywhere else.
It's not classified when he took it. Since he had no need to write it down, document it, log it, when he declassified something, he had the right to declassify anything he wanted - and no one can second guess him now if he said he did it before he left office. It's his word against no one because there's no one who has the authority to review his decision to declassify anything.Trump lost his security clearance upon leaving the office. Only Joe Biden can grant Trump a security clearance.
This is like when Trump rescinded the security clearances of several former agency heads.
Any grant or privilege given by EO (executive order) can be undone by the next president rescinding that EO.If Trump says it was not classified it's not classified. If he said, as President, that he can keep it in his home, on his coffee table, for the rest of his life, then that is what he can do.
Raided? No. Thrown in jail, but had to be released without charges and then they had to pay to fix all damages to my property, so a Federal Judge did not issue arrest warrant and charges on the head of that law enforcement agency, YES.Did you miss out on being raided during the Great Drug War the last fifty years?
A judge signed off on it. It is perfectly legal.That's your opinion. We are a nation of laws. How do you justify this?
I don't know where don'tpay.com went to law school, but you might want to get a new source for legal advice:
"Federal sovereign immunity. In the United States, the federal government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued unless it has waived its immunity or consented to suit. The United States as a sovereign is immune from suit unless it unequivocally consents to being sued."
![]()
Sovereign immunity in the United States - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Only municipalities can be sued for civil rights violations, and only where the violation occurred as a result of an official policy or custom, commonly known as the Monell doctrine.
Of course it does. Fake libertarian that you are.I just have to admit....this makes me laugh out loud
Trump declined to say why the FBI agents were at Mar-a-Lago, but the former President said the raid was unannounced and "they even broke into my safe."
"My beautiful home, Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents," he said in a statement.
Do you recall what Sandy Berger did?Archives or not. They do not belong to him. It is criminal. A federal crime. AKA stealing.
You said to wait until the evidence that they gathered is released. There IS no evidence.
Face it, the fbi is the new gestapo, and they are acting like it.
Well they had plenty of time to do something. There was definitely nothing political in their way. Republicans controlled all three branches for the first two years.James comey detailed three felonies that hillary committed.
DURRRRRRT
Nice try attempting to turn that around on me. You asked a very salient question to Billy, too bad you didn't have the balls to keep it up.(because I realized he was intentionally making up lies to be facetious) He was mocking people like you...