Trumps Tax Cut Is History's Greatest Daylight Robbery Gutting The Nation To Benefit The Wealthy

[LA RAM FAN]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

/———/ You’re wrong again, you pathetic Impeachtard.
Companies Repatriated 1 Trillion Dollars, Thanks to Trump Tax Cuts
Before that, in order to bring money home, companies would have had to pay a corporate tax of 35%.

But under the Trump tax cuts, they only pay a one-time 15.5% tax rate on cash, and 8% on non-cash or illiquid assets.

If Trump had real balls, he'd ONLY give tax cuts to productive pro- American companies that serve American interests.


NOT Hollywood, NOT Facebook, NOT Amazon, NOT McDonalds, NOT Walmart, NOT MSNBC, NOT CNN, you get the drift.

indeed.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

It’s a settled and accepted fact that Trump’s tax scam is a failure.

It’s official: The Trump tax cuts were a bust

That’s news to me. I saw about $25 a week more in my paycheck AND a larger than normal tax refund last year. Not a whole lot more, but a noticeable difference.

That's interesting, because in Costco I've noticed about a 10 - 15% price increase since a couple of years ago.

/——/ That’s interesting, because I’ve noticed the prices are mostly flat at Costco.

I suspect you notice little, Individualists are truly ignorant savage beasts of mankind.

 

[karpenter]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

There's Only Like 100x More Millionaires Than Ever Before
And What Exactly, Are 'Public Enterprises'
Gov't Programs ??

So You're Saying
Money Has Been Stolen From The Gov't
To Be Used By The The Private Sector ??

A Truly Skewed Authoritarian Phallicy

 

[Rambunctious]

Trickle down, baby, trickle down!

Its better than gushing up like dems always give us....

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

There's Only Like 100x More Millionaires Than Ever Before
And What Exactly, Are 'Public Enterprises'
Gov't Programs ??

So You're Saying
Money Has Been Stolen From The Gov't
To Be Used By The The Private Sector ??

Spoken Like A Truly Skewed Authoritarian Phallicy

My household is worth about 2 million.

Still, I don't mind paying a little more in taxes for the betterment of society.

Also, that doesn't make many businesses any less degenerate, or anti-American.

 

[karpenter]

My household is worth about 2 million.

Proves My Point About The Reality

Still, I don't mind paying a little more in taxes for the betterment of society.

That's Not Skew's Point
He's Driving From The Perennial Lie:
'The Rich Get Richer, And The Poor Get Poorer'
Because To Get Rich, You Steal From The Poor
Nevermind How Much Better The Average American Has It Than Before
These Types See It As A Zero Sum Game
It's Not So Much As What They Believe
As So Much Of What They Believe, Just Isn't True

Also, that doesn't make many business any less degenerate, or anti-American.

Whatever That Gibberish Means
Considering Most Corporations Are Actually Small Businesses
With Far Fewer Than 500 Employees

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

My household is worth about 2 million.

Proves My Point About The Reality

Still, I don't mind paying a little more in taxes for the betterment of society.

That's Not Skew's Point
He's Driving From The Perennial Lie:
'The Rich Get Richer, And The Poor Get Poorer'
Because To Get Rich, You Steal From The Poor
Nevermind How Much Better The Average American Has It Than Before
These Types See It As A Zero Sum Game
It's Not So Much As What They Believe
As So Much Of What They Believe, Just Isn't True

Also, that doesn't make many business any less degenerate, or anti-American.

Whatever That Gibberish Means
Considering Most Corporations Are Actually Small Businesses
With Far Fewer Than 500 Employees

Most businesses are degenerate, and anti-American.
-Illegals hired.
- H2B people hired.
- Outsourced jobs.
- Automated jobs.
- Porn.
- Strip clubs.
- Hollywood smut.
- Facebook - Silencing Right Wingers.
- Twitter silencing Right-Wingers
- Youtube - silencing Right-Wingers.
- Google - Liberal biases.
- MSNBC.- Liberal biases.
- CNN.- Liberal biases.
- ABC.- Liberal biases.
- CBS.- Liberal biases.
- Gay Bar & Gay Tavern owners.
-Abortions by Hospital Capitalists.
- Sex change operations by Hospital Capitalists.
- Gangster Rap smut by the music industry.
-Amazon helping knock out 1 million retail jobs.
- McDonald's selling processed junk creating mass obesity & contributing to Diabetes, all while mass hiring Illegals.

 

[mikegriffith1]

How many times are liberals going to repeat this silly myth? Just go look at the income tax brackets for 2017 and compare them to those for 2018. The tax tables are readily available online. You'll see that the largest rate cuts in the Trump tax cuts went to the middle class, not to the rich.

As for the corporate income tax cut, from 35% to 21%, that cut merely, finally, brought our corporate income tax rate down to the level in Europe and Asia, where the corporate income tax rate ranges from 18% to 21%. Plus, the Trump tax cuts removed the graduation in the corporate income tax, so now it's a flat 21%, period.

Furthermore, the Trump tax cuts imposed a huge tax on the rich by way of the $10K on SALT (state and local taxes) deduction. The rich have been hit far, far harder by this cap than anyone else.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

There's Only Like 100x More Millionaires Than Ever Before
And What Exactly, Are 'Public Enterprises'
Gov't Programs ??

So You're Saying
Money Has Been Stolen From The Gov't
To Be Used By The The Private Sector ??

Spoken Like A Truly Skewed Authoritarian Phallicy

My household is worth about 2 million.

Still, I don't mind paying a little more in taxes for the betterment of society.

Also, that doesn't make many businesses any less degenerate, or anti-American.

/——/ Nothing is stopping you from writing a check to the Treasury Dept to pay down the debt. You can also donate directly to the charity of your choice as opposed to higher taxes where the money is squandered by bureaucrats. So which one will you do?

 

[22lcidw]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

I am betting you if the Progs offered a great tax cut to the working class peons you would have a right to spout. You don't. The last real tax cut was Kennedy. And he would be a Democrat that would be lost in your party today.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

It is not our money
Someone else earned it
Support yourself

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

^^^^unhinged lunacy

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The money doesn't belong to The State, uncle Karl....Therefore the term "robbery" is just more typical intellectually dishonest leftbat hyperbole.

But congrats on yet another tree-fddy commission, from your corporate paymasters at Daily Kooks.


View attachment 297430

Lol awesome

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

There's Only Like 100x More Millionaires Than Ever Before
And What Exactly, Are 'Public Enterprises'
Gov't Programs ??

So You're Saying
Money Has Been Stolen From The Gov't
To Be Used By The The Private Sector ??

Spoken Like A Truly Skewed Authoritarian Phallicy

My household is worth about 2 million.

Still, I don't mind paying a little more in taxes for the betterment of society.

Also, that doesn't make many businesses any less degenerate, or anti-American.

/——/ Nothing is stopping you from writing a check to the Treasury Dept to pay down the debt. You can also donate directly to the charity of your choice as opposed to higher taxes where the money is squandered by bureaucrats. So which one will you do?

Considering the military industrial complex.
I'd much rather pay out of pocket to help save Animals, save Parkland, and feed the needy.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

I am betting you if the Progs offered a great tax cut to the working class peons you would have a right to spout. You don't. The last real tax cut was Kennedy. And he would be a Democrat that would be lost in your party today.

Why Did Obama Extend the Bush Tax Cuts in 2010?

 

[SAYIT]

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

Yanno ... I dare the Dems to run on the economy. I double dare 'em. They should absolutely explain just how damaging will be their socialist proposals and how long it will take them to drop this country into a Venezuela-like morass from which we will never recover.
"Very, very few."

US economy means a merry Christmas for many

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...ssion-fears-striking-turnaround-since-august/

 

[Andylusion]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

Alright! So lets move out of the realm of opinion, and into the realm of fact. Claim:

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth.​

And now, let us look at the facts.

So look at the facts.... the amount of money sucked into the government (which you mistakenly call 'public enterprise'), has remained about 20% roughly, for the last almost 70 years.

CONCLUSION....

Since your very first claim is a well know, well documented, empirical lie..... I declare your entire thread partisan, and dismiss it as trash. Thank you, have a nice day. Class is now dismissed.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth. That shift has done more than drive a huge increase in income inequality; it’s also impoverished the nation to make a handful of people more wealthy than anyone has been in history. And in just three years in office, Donald Trump has made the situation much, much worse.

Republicans seem anxious that Trump should get off Twitter and “run on the economy.” After all, the stock market is up, though not as much as under Obama, and unemployment is down—again, not as much as in the previous administration.

But it’s Democrats who should be running on the economy. Because the Trump economy is fueled by history’s greatest daylight robbery: a historic shift of funds from the public trust into the hands of an extraordinary wealthy few.

The effects of that shift aren’t going to be paid for by those at the top. They’re going to be a gut-punch for those who are not in the billionaire club. And that punch will land all too soon after Election Day in 2020.

How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration

Instead of a once-in-a-generation shift of wealth from the public to the wealthy, Trump has created a once-in-history gutting of the many to benefit a very, very few.

Alright! So lets move out of the realm of opinion, and into the realm of fact. Claim:

Ronald Reagan’s implementation of supply-side economics in the 1980s began a cascade of money away from public enterprise and into private wealth.​

And now, let us look at the facts.

View attachment 297448

So look at the facts.... the amount of money sucked into the government (which you mistakenly call 'public enterprise'), has remained about 20% roughly, for the last almost 70 years.

CONCLUSION....

Since your very first claim is a well know, well documented, empirical lie..... I declare your entire thread partisan, and dismiss it as trash. Thank you, have a nice day. Class is now dismissed.

Chart of the day: Tax rates on the rich and the rest of us

 

[karpenter]

Most businesses are degenerate, and anti-American.

Pure Bullshit
Most Businesses
Are Family Businesses
With Fewer Than 50 Employees
Restaurants, Farms, Service Franchises
Rehabbers, Landscapers, Hair Dressers,
Doctor's Offices, Anything You Can See, Etc.,
Just Take A Walk Around Your Own Area
Look At All The Small Businesses
Pretty Much A Sample Of Anywhere You Can Go Coast-To-Coast

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Most businesses are degenerate, and anti-American.

Pure Bullshit
Most Businesses
Are Family Businesses
With Fewer Than 50 Employees
Restaurants, Farms, Service Franchises
Rehabbers, Landscapers, Hair Dressers,
Doctor's Offices, Anything You Can See, Etc.,
Just Take A Walk Around Your Own Area
Look At All The Small Businesses
Pretty Much A Sample Of Anywhere You Can Go Coast-To-Coast

Small businesses are the worst for hiring Illegal Immigrants.