Trump's Tax Plan Will Pay for Itself

Retard 2016 deficit was 650 billion.

Obama deficits: DECREASED by 1 Trillion
Bush deficits: INCREASED by 1 Trillion

Bush_Obama_Deficit_2014.jpg


You fail at thought at every turn.

Republicans will argue the debt, or the area under the curve.
 
Year #1
Bush (2002) $421 billion
Obama (2010) $1.652 trillion

Year #7

Bush (2008) $1.017 trillion
Obama (2016) $1.423 trillion

Well that was short-lived! Once again, Obama has a higher deficit than Bush. Does that sound like a "reduction" to you, liar?

Which President Added Most to the U.S. Debt?

Retard 2016 deficit was 650 billion.

Obama deficits: DECREASED by 1 Trillion
Bush deficits: INCREASED by 1 Trillion

Bush_Obama_Deficit_2014.jpg


You fail at thought at every turn.

Sorry, turd, but Obama gets almost full credit for the 2009 deficit.

LOL - because you say so? :rolleyes:

Bush SUBMITTED 2009 budget in Oct 2008.
Obama's actual policy deficit in 2009 was about 150 billion of about 1.45T.

Where the fuck did you get your idea that entirety of 2009 deficit is on Obama? Oh yes of course, your ass.
 
2009 deficit (submitted by Bush in 2008) - 1300 Billion.
2016 deficit - 587 billion
How convenient of you to leave out 2010 when Obama's deficit was $1.652 trillion.

That's right dimwit - $1.652 trillion. Does that look like a "cut" deficit to you? :lmao:

If Obama was a president for 1 year you may have a point...but he wasn't and you again simply underscored your silliness.

Other then that your 1.65T number is nonsense. Here is no bullshit picture of deficits under Obama, including components:

10-10-12bud_rev2-28-13-f1.jpg


Notice something? Obama stimulative spending is temporary, but tax cuts passed in 2000s and made permanent under Obama are an ongoing burden on the budget. CBO estimates our deficit today would be 300B lower this year without them.

How many times are you douche bags going to post your graph that blames all of Obama's deficits on someone else?
 
Retard 2016 deficit was 650 billion.

Obama deficits: DECREASED by 1 Trillion
Bush deficits: INCREASED by 1 Trillion

Bush_Obama_Deficit_2014.jpg


You fail at thought at every turn.

Republicans will argue the debt, or the area under the curve.

Area under the curve is a very straight forward function of deficits.

When you get into office amid Trillion dollar deficits OF COURSE the area under the curve will be high even as you reduce the deficits.
 
Year #1
Bush (2002) $421 billion
Obama (2010) $1.652 trillion

Year #7

Bush (2008) $1.017 trillion
Obama (2016) $1.423 trillion

Well that was short-lived! Once again, Obama has a higher deficit than Bush. Does that sound like a "reduction" to you, liar?

Which President Added Most to the U.S. Debt?

Retard 2016 deficit was 650 billion.

Obama deficits: DECREASED by 1 Trillion
Bush deficits: INCREASED by 1 Trillion

Bush_Obama_Deficit_2014.jpg


You fail at thought at every turn.

Sorry, turd, but Obama gets almost full credit for the 2009 deficit.

LOL - because you say so? :rolleyes:

Bush SUBMITTED 2009 budget in Oct 2008.
Obama's actual policy deficit in 2009 was about 150 billion of about 1.45T.

Where the fuck did you get your idea that entirety of 2009 deficit is on Obama? Oh yes of course, your ass.

His "stimulus" bill passed on Feb 2009.
 
Retard 2016 deficit was 650 billion.

Obama deficits: DECREASED by 1 Trillion
Bush deficits: INCREASED by 1 Trillion

Bush_Obama_Deficit_2014.jpg


You fail at thought at every turn.

Republicans will argue the debt, or the area under the curve.

Area under the curve is a very straight forward function of deficits.

When you get into office amid Trillion dollar deficits OF COURSE the area under the curve will be high even as you reduce the deficits.

Obama is the main reason it was high. What do you think a $1 trillion "stimulus" bill will do to the deficit?
 
2009 deficit (submitted by Bush in 2008) - 1300 Billion.
2016 deficit - 587 billion
How convenient of you to leave out 2010 when Obama's deficit was $1.652 trillion.

That's right dimwit - $1.652 trillion. Does that look like a "cut" deficit to you? :lmao:

If Obama was a president for 1 year you may have a point...but he wasn't and you again simply underscored your silliness.

Other then that your 1.65T number is nonsense. Here is no bullshit picture of deficits under Obama, including components:

10-10-12bud_rev2-28-13-f1.jpg


Notice something? Obama stimulative spending is temporary, but tax cuts passed in 2000s and made permanent under Obama are an ongoing burden on the budget. CBO estimates our deficit today would be 300B lower this year without them.

How many times are you douche bags going to post your graph that blames all of Obama's deficits on someone else?

As many times as deficit components necessitate us to?

It is not Obama's fault Bush passed tax cuts, it is his fault that he extended them (except for top bracket one) in 2012.
 
Retard 2016 deficit was 650 billion.

Obama deficits: DECREASED by 1 Trillion
Bush deficits: INCREASED by 1 Trillion

Bush_Obama_Deficit_2014.jpg


You fail at thought at every turn.

Republicans will argue the debt, or the area under the curve.

Area under the curve is a very straight forward function of deficits.

When you get into office amid Trillion dollar deficits OF COURSE the area under the curve will be high even as you reduce the deficits.

Obama is the main reason it was high. What do you think a $1 trillion "stimulus" bill will do to the deficit?

Stimulus was ~800 billion OUT OF ~10 TRILLION debt accumulated.

Obama main reason? You are clueless.
 
Retard 2016 deficit was 650 billion.

Obama deficits: DECREASED by 1 Trillion
Bush deficits: INCREASED by 1 Trillion

Bush_Obama_Deficit_2014.jpg


You fail at thought at every turn.

Republicans will argue the debt, or the area under the curve.

Area under the curve is a very straight forward function of deficits.

When you get into office amid Trillion dollar deficits OF COURSE the area under the curve will be high even as you reduce the deficits.

Obama is the main reason it was high. What do you think a $1 trillion "stimulus" bill will do to the deficit?

Stimulus was ~800 billion OUT OF ~10 TRILLION debt accumulated.

Obama main reason? You are clueless.

That increased spending was incorporated into budget baselines, which means it was added in every year.
 
Retard 2016 deficit was 650 billion.

Obama deficits: DECREASED by 1 Trillion
Bush deficits: INCREASED by 1 Trillion

Bush_Obama_Deficit_2014.jpg


You fail at thought at every turn.

Republicans will argue the debt, or the area under the curve.

Area under the curve is a very straight forward function of deficits.

When you get into office amid Trillion dollar deficits OF COURSE the area under the curve will be high even as you reduce the deficits.

Obama is the main reason it was high. What do you think a $1 trillion "stimulus" bill will do to the deficit?

Stimulus was ~800 billion OUT OF ~10 TRILLION debt accumulated.

Obama main reason? You are clueless.

That increased spending was incorporated into budget baselines, which means it was added in every year.

No silly, it wasn't. 800 billion was the total expense stretched over about 5-6 years.

You need to stop posting on this. You clearly have no idea what you are saying.
 
Bush SUBMITTED 2009 budget in Oct 2008.
Obama's actual policy deficit in 2009 was about 150 billion of about 1.45T.

Where the fuck did you get your idea that entirety of 2009 deficit is on Obama? Oh yes of course, your ass.

Republicans have a habit of using leading and lagging indicators opposite to their usual meaning. The first year a president is in office, is mostly the economic result of the previous administration, unless acted on by their own legislation, such as the $150 billion added by Obama or the $2.6 trillion Bush tax cut.
 
When you have people protesting for a wage that exceeds their labor market value then you have a problem. Used to be if you wanted a higher wage you tried to find some way to increase your skills or value to an employer. It also used to be that people lived within their means and you didn't buy stuff you couldn't afford. I don't know when it happened but somewhere along the line we started demanding what we thought we deserved rather than what we earned.

You mean like engineers with masters and doctorates? Who got laid off wholesale,.
Fiat Pay

The plutocratic parasites who control the market arbitrarily determine market value. Before the pro athletes unionized, the fake "market value" of their skills was between fifty and a thousand times less than what it is today.
It's not as simple as you paint it. There are principles of supply and demand at play.
 
Tax cuts do not have to pay for themselves since they cost nothing to begin with

22% of GDP ...

... Ouch!
tax cuts do not cost anything

I can't make it any simpler than that
What are you talking about about? Taxs are the governments primary source of revenue, they are the balancing factor that determines our debt and deficit. If your paycheck gets cut in half does that make a difference in your lifestyle? Economics 101 dude

no spending determines the balance of our debt and deficit not revenue.

no government spending is sacrosanct
Deficit spending and servicing the debt have their own economic strategy that can be essential and beneficial for an economy. It's not just straight irresponsible spending. while I do agree that our government is too big and has been fiscally irresponsible, you should understand more about the economics of our country so we can have a fair discussion on the topic
 

Forum List

Back
Top