Trump's top black campaign surrogate says blacks were better off under Jim Crow

[Mac-7]

Except that's not what he said.

If you cherry pick one sentence or two you will get the wrong impression

 

[Mac-7]

Trolling^

Trolling from canada where issues in America are none of his business

 

[Mac-7]

Where’s the rule the NFL has for Asians? Or Jews, or midgets, or any other group that would like a chance to win the Superbowl?

IM2 wants proportional representation based on skin color rather than ability everywhere in society except sports

Because athletics is the rare exception to black failure

 

[IM2]

My closest neighbor lives 11 miles away.

And it is whites like you who don't want to change that allows racism to continue.

 

[IM2]

"Blacks were better off under Jim Crow!," howls black man elected to Congress from Florida.

Donalds is what white right wingers say is a black person who thinks for themselves.

 

[IM2]

At least the black unemployment rate was zero back then.

Slaves weren't employees, so black unemploymemt was about 100 percent.

 

[IM2]

They believe in the same things... what you are told Trump thinks is not true... and even if Trump wasn't running the GOP candidate who was would be called a racist and maybe dragged into court and impeached...

If the GOP believes what they have over the past 40 years, yes they would be called what they are. And Trump broke laws.

 

[Lastamender]

Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., who was described in March by CNN as trump's most trusted advisor, and on the short VP list is out making sure that black voters clearly understand trump's attitude toward black voters. Mr Donalds said at an event that blacks were better off under Jim Crow. A quick unscientific survey of every black person I asked, seemed to disagree with Donald's remark. Whether blacks think they were better off of not doesn't really matter because trump's surrogate has made it clear what he thinks of the situation. Check the survey whether you agree with trump or not.

MSN

What kind of question is that in the poll? Trump did not say that.

 

[Lastamender]

If the GOP believes what they have over the past 40 years, yes they would be called what they are. And Trump broke laws.

And Joe ruined his children's lives.

 

[g5000]

Certainly blacks were not “better off” in every way during Jim Crow

What the trump spokesman is saying is that the black family was more intact and there was less social disfunction as a result

Who can disagree with that?

Sure, sure. Black families were more intact back then as members of their families were lynched at will.

 

[IM2]

And Joe ruined his children's lives.

Wrong.

 

[Mac-7]

Sure, sure. Black families were more intact back then as members of their families were lynched at will.

Maybe not for libs, but conservatives value a stable two-parent, one male and one female, home

Where children are raised with strong Christian values

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Either discuss the topic or leave the thread

 

[OKTexas]

Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., who was described in March by CNN as trump's most trusted advisor, and on the short VP list is out making sure that black voters clearly understand trump's attitude toward black voters. Mr Donalds said at an event that blacks were better off under Jim Crow. A quick unscientific survey of every black person I asked, seemed to disagree with Donald's remark. Whether blacks think they were better off of not doesn't really matter because trump's surrogate has made it clear what he thinks of the situation. Check the survey whether you agree with trump or not.

MSN

Damn, the lies started in the very first sentence. Donalds can't be on the short list for VP, can you figure out why?

Also if you ignore the spin of the commie site, Donalds said blacks were better off when they had cohesive family units. As with any family with strong father figures, the family is usually more prosperous over the long run.

.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Irrelevant.

Then why are you concerned about the percentage of blacks in those jobs?

Listen and listen closely you stupid bitch. Either DEI apply equally to every race in every organization or it’s just racism.

You don’t get to use blacks not having a percentage of jobs being racist and then get to tell everyone else to fuck off. YOU made these positions race or lifestyle based thinking it should only apply to blacks. Once the bar is lowered for you, it’s lowered for everyone.

The NFL will never be woke until their player rosters, coaching, offices, field keepers and souvenir sales people are fucking exactly matching the makeup of the US census.

You want DEI bitch? Let’s roll. Once merit is no longer the goal then performance and skill are over. Just fill each team with an equal percentage of races and handicaps and there’s your fucking team.

This should make for a fun season.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Damn, the lies started in the very first sentence. Donalds can't be on the short list for VP, can you figure out why?

Also if you ignore the spin of the commie site, Donalds said blacks were better off when they had cohesive family units. As with any family with strong father figures, the family is usually more prosperous over the long run.

.

One of their biggest complaints is white people have generational wealth. All generational wealth starts with one father and one mother building a family that stays together. You aren’t getting generational wealth from a single mom on welfare.

 

[IM2]

Damn, the lies started in the very first sentence. Donalds can't be on the short list for VP, can you figure out why?

Also if you ignore the spin of the commie site, Donalds said blacks were better off when they had cohesive family units. As with any family with strong father figures, the family is usually more prosperous over the long run.

.

Evidence shows that blacks are better off now.

"The median white single parent has 2.2 times more wealth than the median black two-parent household and 1.9 times more wealth than the median Latino two-parent household."
"In 1965, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s report, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, attributed racial inequality as well as poverty and crime in the black community to family structure, particularly the prevalence of families headed by single mothers. Not only did research at the time cast doubt on this causality, but evidence over the last the 50 years demonstrates that rates of child poverty, educational attainment, and crime do not track rates of single parenthood. Thus, even though the share of children living with a single mother rose for all racial and ethnic groups through the mid-1990s and has remained high since then, school completion and youth arrests for violent crimes have declined significantly, while poverty rates have fluctuated according to economic conditions. Family structure does not drive racial inequity, and racial inequity persists regardless of family structure."

-Amy Traub, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede and Thomas Shapiro, DEMOS, “The Asset Value of Whiteness: Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap.”

 

[ColonelAngus]

Evidence shows that blacks are better off now.

"The median white single parent has 2.2 times more wealth than the median black two-parent household and 1.9 times more wealth than the median Latino two-parent household."
"In 1965, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s report, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, attributed racial inequality as well as poverty and crime in the black community to family structure, particularly the prevalence of families headed by single mothers. Not only did research at the time cast doubt on this causality, but evidence over the last the 50 years demonstrates that rates of child poverty, educational attainment, and crime do not track rates of single parenthood. Thus, even though the share of children living with a single mother rose for all racial and ethnic groups through the mid-1990s and has remained high since then, school completion and youth arrests for violent crimes have declined significantly, while poverty rates have fluctuated according to economic conditions. Family structure does not drive racial inequity, and racial inequity persists regardless of family structure."

-Amy Traub, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede and Thomas Shapiro, DEMOS, “The Asset Value of Whiteness: Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap.”

Blacks were better off under Jim Crow is the subject.

”Trump's top black campaign surrogate says blacks were better off under Jim Crow”

How were you better off under Jim Crow?

 

[IM2]

One of their biggest complaints is white people have generational wealth. All generational wealth starts with one father and one mother building a family that stays together. You aren’t getting generational wealth from a single mom on welfare.

Wrong. Generational wealth was created by government programs whites were alowed to enter that blacks were excluded from.

According to the study, “Black Reparations for Twentieth Century Federal Housing Discrimination: the Construction of White Wealth and the Effects of Denied Black homeownership” written by Jane Kim, Federal housing policies that excluded blacks from funding provided the equivalent of 1.239 quintillion dollars to create white wealth in the 20th century.

Black Reparations for Twentieth Century Federal Housing Discrimination: The Construction of White Wealth and the Effects of Denied Black Homeownership

This year marks the 400th anniversary of the first documented arrival of Africans to the United States, which resulted in the enslavement of approximately 4 mil

deliverypdf.ssrn.com

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Evidence shows that blacks are better off now.

"The median white single parent has 2.2 times more wealth than the median black two-parent household and 1.9 times more wealth than the median Latino two-parent household."
"In 1965, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s report, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, attributed racial inequality as well as poverty and crime in the black community to family structure, particularly the prevalence of families headed by single mothers. Not only did research at the time cast doubt on this causality, but evidence over the last the 50 years demonstrates that rates of child poverty, educational attainment, and crime do not track rates of single parenthood. Thus, even though the share of children living with a single mother rose for all racial and ethnic groups through the mid-1990s and has remained high since then, school completion and youth arrests for violent crimes have declined significantly, while poverty rates have fluctuated according to economic conditions. Family structure does not drive racial inequity, and racial inequity persists regardless of family structure."

-Amy Traub, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede and Thomas Shapiro, DEMOS, “The Asset Value of Whiteness: Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap.”

White single moms have generations of families behind them. Of course they have more than a third generation single mom black. Given enough time time that single white mom and her single white daughter will have nothing as well. It’s much harder to maintain wealth than just waste it.