Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It isn't single family homes that prevents black families from building intergenerational wealth, nor was it bootstraps that helped poor and middle class white families build their wealth. Those are results of the segregated assistance programs during the 20th century that subsidized white home ownership and the moving of the white middle class to subsidized white suburbs while pushing black families into red lined communities.
are you doing anything to end black racism?And it is whites like you who don't want to change that allows racism to continue.
Why are you white Americans so fucking ignorant of your own history?I call BS. Blacks have had GI benefits for all that served, including VA guaranteed home loans and educational assistance since the 40s.
.
What it is that people learn to play a system and not take responsibility for themselves to achieve the right way. There is a lot of money spent to help over the decades. For some reason when government offers resources it can become massively corrupted. And for your information. The illegal immigrants will take more and more resources forcing decline to African Americans. And last year the World Economic Forum collected 104 billion dollars on carbon taxes. The globalists want world taxes to be standardized. So, you will see a world tax on your pay stub. And of course it will keep rising in taxation.The claim is that black families were ruined by The Great Society programs. And I'm not the one saying we were better off during Jim Crow. I say Byron Donalds is an idiot.
They believe the propaganda they've been fed since birth, it's like water to them, it has no taste.Why are you white Americans so fucking ignorant of your own history?
No excuses, those things I mention are sports. The players in the leagues you mention compete for jobs and whoever performs the best in competition gets the job regardess of color. You are racist because you did not point all all the other sports where whites are the majority. Your claim of not enough black representation is weak. More whites play football and basketball than blacks. And your argument is racist because you tried to use that when in jobs that are not sports the potential empoyees are not hired after several months of performing the job tasks until the candidate(s) who performed the best are selected. You are called a racist because you only identify the participants on the field while ignoring all the off field employees that actually have longer careers than the players.
The NFL is 53 percent black payers. What about coaches?
6 out of 32. 18 percent. And thats a record that just happened this year. So 53 percent of the players are back but 18 percent of the coaches are and that happened only after a rule was made forcing owners to interview, INTERVIEW, black/minority candidates. And still whites wjne because the NFL made that rule as if without it white owners were going to interview black candidates.
They were selectively excluded from the new post war suburbs and relegated to the old deteriorating\depreciating inner city properties.I call BS. Blacks have had GI benefits for all that served, including VA guaranteed home loans and educational assistance since the 40s.
.
Again, I'm black. That's not the problem and hispanics do not do much better. Whites have 15 times the wealth of blacks and 13 times the wealth of hispanics. You don't know the stats, so you and every other white person making this claim don't know what you are talking about.
"In 1965, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s report, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, attributed racial inequality as well as poverty and crime in the black community to family structure, particularly the prevalence of families headed by single mothers. Not only did research at the time cast doubt on this causality, but evidence over the last the 50 years demonstrates that rates of child poverty, educational attainment, and crime do not track rates of single parenthood.
Thus, even though the share of children living with a single mother rose for all racial and ethnic groups through the mid-1990s and has remained high since then, school completion and youth arrests for violent crimes have declined significantly, while poverty rates have fluctuated according to economic conditions. Family structure does not drive racial inequity, and racial inequity persists regardless of family structure."
-Amy Traub, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede and Thomas Shapiro, DEMOS, “The Asset Value of Whiteness: Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap.”
In 1959 the poverty rate for all American families was 20.8 percent. For white families, it was 16.5 percent. For black families, 54.9 percent. During the time people declare that black families were “intact,” black family poverty was 3.33 times that of white ones. In 1966, the American poverty rate was 13.1 percent. For white families, the poverty rate was 9.7 percent, and for black families, 40.9 percent. In 1966, black family poverty was 4.2 times that of white families.
In 2020 the poverty rate for all American families was 9.5 percent. Poverty for black families was 17.4 percent, white families 8.2 percent. In 2020, black family poverty remained two times that of white families.
From 1959 through 2020 blacks have consstently lived at double the rate of poverty while whites have lived below the American poverty rate. It has not mattered whether America was practicing segregation. It has not mattered that blacks have become better educated. It has not mattered if black households were traditional two parent families. The single parent claim is bs, so is the claim of how LBJ's Great Society caused the decline of the black family.
That changed with the Fair Housing Act around 1965They were selectively excluded from the new post war suburbs and relegated to the old deteriorating\depreciating inner city properties.
Redlining didn't start to be addressed until the CRA in 1977.That changed with the Fair Housing Act around 1965
I am very libertarian when it comes to this issueRedlining didn't start to be addressed until the CRA in 1977.
Blacks were shot out of hand during Jim Crow and nothing happened. Black Women and Girls were raped and nothing happeded. Lynchings were spectator sport
No Blacks were NOT better off under Jim Crow.
Doing better than we were during Trump. And we would do even better if more whites got off their asses and worked to end the racism in their communities.
www.marketplace.org
But one bit of bad news caught our attention: Unemployment among Black workers rose sharply, up to 6.4%, in March, a 0.8% increase from March 2023.
It hasn’t been that high since the middle of 2022.
www.cnbc.com
The jobless rate for Hispanics hit a record low of 3.9% in September, while African Americans maintained its lowest rate ever, 5.5%.
Why are you white Americans so fucking ignorant of your own history?
How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black WWII Veterans | HISTORY
Do I? I wasn't born then either and my family didn't even come to this country until the 1980s so it's really funny to watch you claim I love Segregationists Democrats just to mask your own admitted ignorance. So now that you know Black Americans didn't get to enjoy the same benefits as whites have your feelings on the matter changed?Not my history, I wasn't born then. But you folks still worship the commiecrats that did all that. Go figure.
.
In broad terms, blacks were not better off under Jim Crow.
But that’s also not what he said.
All he did was point out that at least they still had an essentially nuclear family back then. To that very limited extent, black culture was “better.”
Did he say it in a way open to criticism? Obviously. But that’s all our libtards need to go off half cocked. As usual.
ExactlyAll he did was point out that at least they still had an essentially nuclear family back then. To that very limited extent, black culture was “better.”
