Trumpsters, please don't read this

[Faun]

You're such an idiot.

The words of a person who has nothing intelligent to say, otherwise they would have said it. No further point reading you.

By the time Frank became chairman of that committee, the economy train had already come off the rails, it just hadn't crashed yet.

Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it. Bye.

Name one

Already did, bonehead. Learn to read. People shouldn't have to post everything twice just because you can't read it once.

View attachment 271505

No you didn't, ya poor loser. All you said was...

"it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it."​

... you didn't actually cite any bill. Which of course you can't since there was no such bill.

Don't you ever feel stupid for posting such nonsense?

Look! My own personal Private Ass Licker and troll shows up one more time to show how deep inside his head I really am! He follows me around hoping I misspell a word or something so he can call me out on it and hopefully win at SOMETHING. BET ME, my little kumquat. BET ME that I didn't cite any bills!
Bet me under the terms that if I prove you wrong, that USMB bans you for 6 months. Show us you stand by your word. You said I didn't actually cite any bills. Let's see who is full of nonsense and ends up feeling stupid!

And no technicalities, no parsing words, no "it depends on what the meaning of is is." You said I didn't cite any bills, I say I did. I'll get a moderator on here and live by his decision! C'mon, little dewdrop, I'm waiting. Don't keep me waiting too long or I'll think of something better.

I will bet you that you didn't cite any Frank bills that caused the crash and that 6 month ban applies to you when you can't show you did.

 

[Faun]

The words of a person who has nothing intelligent to say, otherwise they would have said it. No further point reading you.
Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it. Bye.

Name one

Already did, bonehead. Learn to read. People shouldn't have to post everything twice just because you can't read it once.

View attachment 271505

No you didn't, ya poor loser. All you said was...

"it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it."​

... you didn't actually cite any bill. Which of course you can't since there was no such bill.

Don't you ever feel stupid for posting such nonsense?

Look! My own personal Private Ass Licker and troll shows up one more time to show how deep inside his head I really am! He follows me around hoping I misspell a word or something so he can call me out on it and hopefully win at SOMETHING. BET ME, my little kumquat. BET ME that I didn't cite any bills!
Bet me under the terms that if I prove you wrong, that USMB bans you for 6 months. Show us you stand by your word. You said I didn't actually cite any bills. Let's see who is full of nonsense and ends up feeling stupid!

And no technicalities, no parsing words, no "it depends on what the meaning of is is." You said I didn't cite any bills, I say I did. I'll get a moderator on here and live by his decision! C'mon, little dewdrop, I'm waiting. Don't keep me waiting too long or I'll think of something better.

Looks like shitstain is going to stand me up.

You're nothing if not consistently stupid.

 

[RealDave]

The Conservative Review isn't playing along. Good for them. Anyone who brings up Trump's exploding debt and flagging economy are immediately mocked by his obedient Trumpsters, but fortunately there are still some Conservatives who are not willing to lie and spin for him.

But I know, I know. The Trumpsters don't care.

Trump can’t be both the president of growth and the president of debt

Earlier today, the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced that the economy had grown just 2.1 percent during the second quarter of this year (ending June 30). It also revised Q4 of 2018 down to just 1.1 percent, which now means that growth during the 12 months ending Q4 of 2018 was only 2.5 percent, not 3 percent as previously thought. This means that the U.S. economy has now gone 14 years without a year-over-year growth of 3 percent. It’s been 19 years since we’ve hit 4 percent, which was during 1997-2000.

While the numbers don’t portend a coming recession, it is highly unusual for us to go for 16 consecutive months with unemployment below 4 percent and 43 months below 5 percent, yet never attain 3 or 4 percent annual GDP growth. In fact, that has never happened before. During the late 1990s, the unemployment rate ranged from 5.3 percent to 3.9 percent – not even as good as today’s 3.7 percent – yet GDP growth was over 4 percent. Ditto for the late 1960s, when we saw years of 6 percent growth. During the mid 1980s, we saw this growth even with higher unemployment rates.

The debt is not just a problem for future generations in terms of a fiscal cost that will be borne by taxpayers. The exclusive focus on the future is what has fostered the Louis XV mentality of “after me, the deluge.” Let’s face it, we are a nation that doesn’t care about the future of our children. What is missing from the discussion is that the debt is permanently weighing down economic growth now.

Let’s peek into the numbers behind today’s topline GDP report. GDP comprises personal consumption expenditures, gross private domestic investment, government spending, and net exports. Seventy percent of the equation is consumption, and the robust 4.3 percent growth in consumption this quarter is a big part of what is keeping us even at 2.1 percent growth. This is not artificial and is good news. Consumption is a sign of a healthy job market, with more people earning money, as well as the tax cuts putting more cash in people’s pockets to spend. No matter whether our economy is fully free market or quasi-socialist, whenever there is more money in people’s pockets, these numbers will go up. We are now in a boom period, and the numbers are good.

But what else is propping up the number? Government spending! Gross government spending, which accounts for about 17.5 percent of the GDP pie, spiked 5 percent. Non-defense spending rose by 15.9 percent!
,

Conservatives?
You mean the neo-Cons like GW who opened our borders like Kamala Harris’s legs?

So you are also a misogynistic piece of shit.

Trump is the biggest slut ever & you voted for him.

 

[Indeependent]

The Conservative Review isn't playing along. Good for them. Anyone who brings up Trump's exploding debt and flagging economy are immediately mocked by his obedient Trumpsters, but fortunately there are still some Conservatives who are not willing to lie and spin for him.

But I know, I know. The Trumpsters don't care.

Trump can’t be both the president of growth and the president of debt

Earlier today, the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced that the economy had grown just 2.1 percent during the second quarter of this year (ending June 30). It also revised Q4 of 2018 down to just 1.1 percent, which now means that growth during the 12 months ending Q4 of 2018 was only 2.5 percent, not 3 percent as previously thought. This means that the U.S. economy has now gone 14 years without a year-over-year growth of 3 percent. It’s been 19 years since we’ve hit 4 percent, which was during 1997-2000.

While the numbers don’t portend a coming recession, it is highly unusual for us to go for 16 consecutive months with unemployment below 4 percent and 43 months below 5 percent, yet never attain 3 or 4 percent annual GDP growth. In fact, that has never happened before. During the late 1990s, the unemployment rate ranged from 5.3 percent to 3.9 percent – not even as good as today’s 3.7 percent – yet GDP growth was over 4 percent. Ditto for the late 1960s, when we saw years of 6 percent growth. During the mid 1980s, we saw this growth even with higher unemployment rates.

The debt is not just a problem for future generations in terms of a fiscal cost that will be borne by taxpayers. The exclusive focus on the future is what has fostered the Louis XV mentality of “after me, the deluge.” Let’s face it, we are a nation that doesn’t care about the future of our children. What is missing from the discussion is that the debt is permanently weighing down economic growth now.

Let’s peek into the numbers behind today’s topline GDP report. GDP comprises personal consumption expenditures, gross private domestic investment, government spending, and net exports. Seventy percent of the equation is consumption, and the robust 4.3 percent growth in consumption this quarter is a big part of what is keeping us even at 2.1 percent growth. This is not artificial and is good news. Consumption is a sign of a healthy job market, with more people earning money, as well as the tax cuts putting more cash in people’s pockets to spend. No matter whether our economy is fully free market or quasi-socialist, whenever there is more money in people’s pockets, these numbers will go up. We are now in a boom period, and the numbers are good.

But what else is propping up the number? Government spending! Gross government spending, which accounts for about 17.5 percent of the GDP pie, spiked 5 percent. Non-defense spending rose by 15.9 percent!
,

Conservatives?
You mean the neo-Cons like GW who opened our borders like Kamala Harris’s legs?

So you are also a misogynistic piece of shit.

Trump is the biggest slut ever & you voted for him.

What’s worse?
Spreading your legs to advance or stating what she did?

 

[RealDave]

I'm thinking about applying for a job a chairperson for the GOP for the 2020 election. I figure that they will have to hire me when I tell them my suggestion for the 2020 platform.
"America is $74 trillion dollars in debt. TIME FOR ANOTHER TAX CUT!"

We all know that skyrocketing taxes will boost the economy and, and the government will automaticaly spend responsibly. The only responsible thing to do is squeeze people until they need welfare. The only reason you hate tax cuts is because it gives people a fighting chance. Don't pretend it has anything to do with the debt.

1) The major problem with the tax cut is the cuts given to the wealthy & well off corporations. Wealthy people are not spending that extra cash because they could aslreasdy buy whatever they needed.

2) Corpotations did not raise he pay of their employees as promised.

3) No spending was cut to make up the lost income. Instead, they increased it.

4) The tax cut the people who needed one got has beern nibbled way with higher pricing thanks to the tariffs.

5_ This leads to higher debt. This is the 2nd at a trillion & next year expected to be 1.3 trillion.

 

[Indeependent]

I'm thinking about applying for a job a chairperson for the GOP for the 2020 election. I figure that they will have to hire me when I tell them my suggestion for the 2020 platform.
"America is $74 trillion dollars in debt. TIME FOR ANOTHER TAX CUT!"

We all know that skyrocketing taxes will boost the economy and, and the government will automaticaly spend responsibly. The only responsible thing to do is squeeze people until they need welfare. The only reason you hate tax cuts is because it gives people a fighting chance. Don't pretend it has anything to do with the debt.

1) The major problem with the tax cut is the cuts given to the wealthy & well off corporations. Wealthy people are not spending that extra cash because they could aslreasdy buy whatever they needed.

2) Corpotations did not raise he pay of their employees as promised.

3) No spending was cut to make up the lost income. Instead, they increased it.

4) The tax cut the people who needed one got has beern nibbled way with higher pricing thanks to the tariffs.

5_ This leads to higher debt. This is the 2nd at a trillion & next year expected to be 1.3 trillion.

People making over 100K got tax cuts.

 

[toobfreak]

The words of a person who has nothing intelligent to say, otherwise they would have said it. No further point reading you.
Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it. Bye.

Name one

Already did, bonehead. Learn to read. People shouldn't have to post everything twice just because you can't read it once.

View attachment 271505

No you didn't, ya poor loser. All you said was...

"it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it."​

... you didn't actually cite any bill. Which of course you can't since there was no such bill.

Don't you ever feel stupid for posting such nonsense?

Look! My own personal Private Ass Licker and troll shows up one more time to show how deep inside his head I really am! He follows me around hoping I misspell a word or something so he can call me out on it and hopefully win at SOMETHING. BET ME, my little kumquat. BET ME that I didn't cite any bills!
Bet me under the terms that if I prove you wrong, that USMB bans you for 6 months. Show us you stand by your word. You said I didn't actually cite any bills. Let's see who is full of nonsense and ends up feeling stupid!

And no technicalities, no parsing words, no "it depends on what the meaning of is is." You said I didn't cite any bills, I say I did. I'll get a moderator on here and live by his decision! C'mon, little dewdrop, I'm waiting. Don't keep me waiting too long or I'll think of something better.

I will bet you that you didn't cite any Frank bills that caused the crash and that 6 month ban applies to you when you can't show you did.

Chicken shit liar coward as I knew you were. If you stand by your word, you don't need conditions. Now you trying to change what I said to YOUR definition of "Frank Bills," which then you will deny is a Frank Bill no matter what, when you said I didn't cite ANY BILLS, assfuck. And why should the ban apply to me? I'm not the one who attacked someone calling them out making false absolute claims YOU DID, Hemorrhoid. Now you run with your tail between your legs, scalded and castrated balless for all the world to see again as the fucking asshat lying chickenshit 2-bit loser you are. Exactly what I expected.

TAKE THE BET or STFU and get off this board you useless POS. After all, IF YOU ARE RIGHT, then YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE.

 

[Unkotare]

Name one

Already did, bonehead. Learn to read. People shouldn't have to post everything twice just because you can't read it once.

View attachment 271505

No you didn't, ya poor loser. All you said was...

"it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it."​

... you didn't actually cite any bill. Which of course you can't since there was no such bill.

Don't you ever feel stupid for posting such nonsense?

Look! My own personal Private Ass Licker and troll shows up one more time to show how deep inside his head I really am! He follows me around hoping I misspell a word or something so he can call me out on it and hopefully win at SOMETHING. BET ME, my little kumquat. BET ME that I didn't cite any bills!
Bet me under the terms that if I prove you wrong, that USMB bans you for 6 months. Show us you stand by your word. You said I didn't actually cite any bills. Let's see who is full of nonsense and ends up feeling stupid!

And no technicalities, no parsing words, no "it depends on what the meaning of is is." You said I didn't cite any bills, I say I did. I'll get a moderator on here and live by his decision! C'mon, little dewdrop, I'm waiting. Don't keep me waiting too long or I'll think of something better.

I will bet you that you didn't cite any Frank bills that caused the crash and that 6 month ban applies to you when you can't show you did.

Chicken shit liar coward as I knew you were. If you stand by your word, you don't need conditions. Now you trying to change what I said to YOUR definition of "Frank Bills," which then you will deny is a Frank Bill no matter what, when you said I didn't cite ANY BILLS, assfuck. And why should the ban apply to me? I'm not the one who attacked someone calling them out making false absolute claims YOU DID, Hemorrhoid. Now you run with your tail between your legs, scalded and castrated balless for all the world to see again as the fucking asshat lying chickenshit 2-bit loser you are. Exactly what I expected.

TAKE THE BET or STFU and get off this board you useless POS. After all, IF YOU ARE RIGHT, then YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE.

View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593

Whoa, clam down hero. Slowly remove your hand from the little baggie of salt...

 

[Faun]

Name one

Already did, bonehead. Learn to read. People shouldn't have to post everything twice just because you can't read it once.

View attachment 271505

No you didn't, ya poor loser. All you said was...

"it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it."​

... you didn't actually cite any bill. Which of course you can't since there was no such bill.

Don't you ever feel stupid for posting such nonsense?

Look! My own personal Private Ass Licker and troll shows up one more time to show how deep inside his head I really am! He follows me around hoping I misspell a word or something so he can call me out on it and hopefully win at SOMETHING. BET ME, my little kumquat. BET ME that I didn't cite any bills!
Bet me under the terms that if I prove you wrong, that USMB bans you for 6 months. Show us you stand by your word. You said I didn't actually cite any bills. Let's see who is full of nonsense and ends up feeling stupid!

And no technicalities, no parsing words, no "it depends on what the meaning of is is." You said I didn't cite any bills, I say I did. I'll get a moderator on here and live by his decision! C'mon, little dewdrop, I'm waiting. Don't keep me waiting too long or I'll think of something better.

I will bet you that you didn't cite any Frank bills that caused the crash and that 6 month ban applies to you when you can't show you did.

Chicken shit liar coward as I knew you were. If you stand by your word, you don't need conditions. Now you trying to change what I said to YOUR definition of "Frank Bills," which then you will deny is a Frank Bill no matter what, when you said I didn't cite ANY BILLS, assfuck. And why should the ban apply to me? I'm not the one who attacked someone calling them out making false absolute claims YOU DID, Hemorrhoid. Now you run with your tail between your legs, scalded and castrated balless for all the world to see again as the fucking asshat lying chickenshit 2-bit loser you are. Exactly what I expected.

TAKE THE BET or STFU and get off this board you useless POS. After all, IF YOU ARE RIGHT, then YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE.

View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593

LOLOL

Poor, deranged boobtoob has become completely unhinged.

Moron, I quoted you idiotically claiming Frank's bills caused the crash...

Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it. Bye.

... to which RealDave challenged you to cite a single Frank bill that caused the crash...

Name one

... to which you lied and falsely claimed you did, when you actually never cited any such bill that caused the crash...

Already did, bonehead. Learn to read. People shouldn't have to post everything twice just because you can't read it once.

... to which I quoted you falsely claiming Frank's bills caused the crash and I pointed out you couldn't site a bill because no such bill exists ..

you didn't actually cite any bill. Which of course you can't since there was no such bill.

So granted, since you're a flaming imbecile, I concede you're too stupid to know what I meant by "such bill" in that you never cited any Frank bills that caused the crash, which was your claim which is what you were challenged to prove.

And I note again, you have still not posted even one.

 

[Faun]

Already did, bonehead. Learn to read. People shouldn't have to post everything twice just because you can't read it once.

View attachment 271505

No you didn't, ya poor loser. All you said was...

"it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it."​

... you didn't actually cite any bill. Which of course you can't since there was no such bill.

Don't you ever feel stupid for posting such nonsense?

Look! My own personal Private Ass Licker and troll shows up one more time to show how deep inside his head I really am! He follows me around hoping I misspell a word or something so he can call me out on it and hopefully win at SOMETHING. BET ME, my little kumquat. BET ME that I didn't cite any bills!
Bet me under the terms that if I prove you wrong, that USMB bans you for 6 months. Show us you stand by your word. You said I didn't actually cite any bills. Let's see who is full of nonsense and ends up feeling stupid!

And no technicalities, no parsing words, no "it depends on what the meaning of is is." You said I didn't cite any bills, I say I did. I'll get a moderator on here and live by his decision! C'mon, little dewdrop, I'm waiting. Don't keep me waiting too long or I'll think of something better.

I will bet you that you didn't cite any Frank bills that caused the crash and that 6 month ban applies to you when you can't show you did.

Chicken shit liar coward as I knew you were. If you stand by your word, you don't need conditions. Now you trying to change what I said to YOUR definition of "Frank Bills," which then you will deny is a Frank Bill no matter what, when you said I didn't cite ANY BILLS, assfuck. And why should the ban apply to me? I'm not the one who attacked someone calling them out making false absolute claims YOU DID, Hemorrhoid. Now you run with your tail between your legs, scalded and castrated balless for all the world to see again as the fucking asshat lying chickenshit 2-bit loser you are. Exactly what I expected.

TAKE THE BET or STFU and get off this board you useless POS. After all, IF YOU ARE RIGHT, then YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE.

View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271593 View attachment 271591 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271592 View attachment 271593

Whoa, clam down hero. Slowly remove your hand from the little baggie of salt...

Poor guy is so unhinged, he's gonna pop an aneurysm.

 

[Unkotare]

Hey, Barney Frank: The Government Did Cause the Housing Crisis

 

[toobfreak]

Poor guy is so unhinged, he's gonna pop an aneurysm.

So what's it going to be Little Pawn, are you going to keep running from me like the little POS we all know you are or are you going to stand by your words? Let me make it real easy for you. Here are your own words:

And here is my offer:

Now it seems to me YOU CAN'T LOSE. The only way you CAN lose is if I cited any bill related to Barney Frank. What's stopping you from taking the bet? What's stopping you Chicken Shit? Afraid to stand behind your own claims? STILL WAITING.

 

[Faun]

Poor guy is so unhinged, he's gonna pop an aneurysm.

So what's it going to be Little Pawn, are you going to keep running from me like the little POS we all know you are or are you going to stand by your words? Let me make it real easy for you. Here are your own words:

View attachment 271628


And here is my offer:

View attachment 271629

Now it seems to me YOU CAN'T LOSE. The only way you CAN lose is if I cited any bill related to Barney Frank. What's stopping you from taking the bet? What's stopping you Chicken Shit? Afraid to stand behind your own claims? STILL WAITING.

Poor, demented boobfreak, if you're still incapable of comprehending the context was on your idiotic comment that Frank's bills caused the crash, even after I spelled that out for you as clearly as possible, I can't help you more than that.

Not to mention your bet is beyond ridiculous in that I would be banned for six months if you're right but you suffer no consequences if I'm right.

Now then, if you're actually interested in a wager, you claimed Frank's bills caused the crash.... I'll wager you can't prove that....

 

[toobfreak]

if you're still incapable of comprehending

Not to mention your bet is beyond ridiculous

I'm comprehending loud and clear Prawn:

1. You're a lying chickenshit, just one more mud-slinging troll here like so many others who has so little confidence in your own claims that you won't even stand behind your own words. YOU SAID:

What is so "ridiculous?" All I said is that you shouldn't have any problem then standing behind your words by agreeing to have a senior mod come on here and ban you half a year if I can show you're wrong! I'm still waiting! Why won't you stand behind your own claims! You sure are loose with the cowardly insults! Now show us you're a man. I'm calling you out, Pawn; getting you tards to stand behind your words is honestly harder than getting Obama to release his original Birth Certificate! Let's resolve this! If you are RIGHT as you so ADAMANTLY claimed, then you haven't a thing to worry about! What are you waiting for???

It should be a split-second decision: call me out, let me fall on my own sword then get to laugh again! Come on! Agree to my bet, Ace! If you are right as you claim, then it is money in the bank!

 

[Faun]

if you're still incapable of comprehending

Not to mention your bet is beyond ridiculous

I'm comprehending loud and clear Prawn:

1. You're a lying chickenshit who has so little confidence in your own claims that you won't even stand behind your own words. YOU SAID:

View attachment 271632

And all I said is that you shouldn't have any problem then standing behind your words by agreeing to have a senior mod come on here and ban you half a year if I can show you're wrong! I'm still waiting! Why won't you stand behind your own claims! You sure are loose with the cowardly insults! Now show us you're a man. I'm calling you out, Pawn; getting you tards to stand behind your words is honestly harder than getting Obama to release his original Birth Certificate! Let's resolve this! If you are RIGHT as you so ADAMANTLY claimed, then you haven't a thing to worry about! What are you waiting for???

View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641 View attachment 271641

LOLOL

You remain the forum boob, boobtoob. You say I won't stand behind my words because I won't accept a bet on your terms, which is to take my words out of context (as evidenced by you cutting out where I quoted you saying Frank's bills caused the crash, and where I referred to said bills as "any such bills," and to accept a bet where you suffer no consequences if you lose.

By the very definition of a bet, that is not one.

Regardless of your insanity to think any normal person would agree to such nonsense, everyone here sees it's actually you who flat out refuses to stand behind his words as you ran like a pussy when challenged to name one single bill you were talking about when you said...

Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it.

Keep running, pussy.

 

[toobfreak]

You remain the forum boob, boobtoob.

I very seriously doubt that.

You say I won't stand behind my words because I won't accept a bet on your terms, which is to take my words out of context (as evidenced by you cutting out where I quoted you saying Frank's bills caused the crash, and where I referred to said bills as "any such bills," and to accept a bet where you suffer no consequences if you lose.

There you go lying again.

1. My bet, my terms. Terms are irrelevant anyway since YOU CAN'T LOSE unless you are wrong. Quit running, Chicken Little. Time to MAN UP.
   
2. How can I be taking your words out of content when they are YOUR WORDS! I merely removed the irrelevant parts (I do that to most every post, even my own) to make it easy for the reader to focus on the salient point to which I'm referring (it's called TRUNCATING): You said I DID NOT CITE ANY BILL.
3. Quit trying to parse words. If anyone wants to see the full original post, they are right there.

Keep running, pussy.

Keep running? Damn, you really are batshit crazy. I'm right here! I've not gone anywhere. Not only won't you even stand behind your own words, what next, gonna call me a racist, too? Dave asked me to cite some of the bills to which I wad referring and I told him I already did then you opened your big fat dumb mouth and claimed I NEVER CITED ANY BILL.

And all I said is that if you are so sure, then BACK IT UP. If I can prove you wrong, you're banned 6 months. Now since you won't take that bet, YOU'RE ADMITTING YOU WERE WRONG.



Show some character for once and ADMIT IT. You were wrong.

 

[Faun]

You remain the forum boob, boobtoob.

I very seriously doubt that.

You say I won't stand behind my words because I won't accept a bet on your terms, which is to take my words out of context (as evidenced by you cutting out where I quoted you saying Frank's bills caused the crash, and where I referred to said bills as "any such bills," and to accept a bet where you suffer no consequences if you lose.

There you go lying again.

1. My bet, my terms. Terms are irrelevant anyway since YOU CAN'T LOSE unless you are wrong. Quit running, Chicken Little. Time to MAN UP.
   
2. How can I be taking your words out of content when they are YOUR WORDS! I merely removed the irrelevant parts (I do that to most every post, even my own) to make it easy for the reader to focus on the salient point to which I'm referring (it's called TRUNCATING): You said I DID NOT CITE ANY BILL.
3. Quit trying to parse words. If anyone wants to see the full original post, they are right there.

Keep running, pussy.

Keep running? Damn, you really are batshit crazy. I'm right here! I've not gone anywhere. Not only won't you even stand behind your own words, what next, gonna call me a racist, too? Dave asked me to cite some of the bills to which I wad referring and I told him I already did then you opened your big fat dumb mouth and claimed I NEVER CITED ANY BILL.

And all I said is that if you are so sure, then BACK IT UP. If I can prove you wrong, you're banned 6 months. Now since you won't take that bet, YOU'RE ADMITTING YOU WERE WRONG.



Show some character for once and ADMIT IT. You were wrong.

"My bet, my terms."

LOLOLOL

Yeah, you're terms... bet on my words out of context where you don't lose even if you're wrong.

My terms... we bet on my words in context where you risk the same consequence I risk. And from that, you run like the pussy you are.

And I note, you still have not proven this idiotic claim of yours...

Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it. Bye

"How can I be taking your words out of content when they are YOUR WORDS!"

By removing your words from my quote which I quoted to show the context of what I wrote. My very next sentence referring to "any such bills" which you also removed under the guise that my words in response to your post are "irrelevant."

In other words, boobtoob.... you're fucking deranged. I believe I've pointed that out in the past.

 

[toobfreak]

You remain the forum boob, boobtoob.

I very seriously doubt that.

You say I won't stand behind my words because I won't accept a bet on your terms, which is to take my words out of context (as evidenced by you cutting out where I quoted you saying Frank's bills caused the crash, and where I referred to said bills as "any such bills," and to accept a bet where you suffer no consequences if you lose.

There you go lying again.

1. My bet, my terms. Terms are irrelevant anyway since YOU CAN'T LOSE unless you are wrong. Quit running, Chicken Little. Time to MAN UP.
   
2. How can I be taking your words out of content when they are YOUR WORDS! I merely removed the irrelevant parts (I do that to most every post, even my own) to make it easy for the reader to focus on the salient point to which I'm referring (it's called TRUNCATING): You said I DID NOT CITE ANY BILL.
3. Quit trying to parse words. If anyone wants to see the full original post, they are right there.

Keep running, pussy.

Keep running? Damn, you really are batshit crazy. I'm right here! I've not gone anywhere. Not only won't you even stand behind your own words, what next, gonna call me a racist, too? Dave asked me to cite some of the bills to which I wad referring and I told him I already did then you opened your big fat dumb mouth and claimed I NEVER CITED ANY BILL.

And all I said is that if you are so sure, then BACK IT UP. If I can prove you wrong, you're banned 6 months. Now since you won't take that bet, YOU'RE ADMITTING YOU WERE WRONG.



Show some character for once and ADMIT IT. You were wrong.

"My bet, my terms."

LOLOLOL

Yeah, you're terms... bet on my words out of context where you don't lose even if you're wrong.

My terms... we bet on my words in context where you risk the same consequence I risk. And from that, you run like the pussy you are.

And I note, you still have not proven this idiotic claim of yours...

Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it. Bye

"How can I be taking your words out of content when they are YOUR WORDS!"

By removing your words from my quote which I quoted to show the context of what I wrote. My very next sentence referring to "any such bills" which you also removed under the guise that my words in response to your post are "irrelevant."

In other words, boobtoob.... you're fucking deranged. I believe I've pointed that out in the past.

WOW. What a fucking cowardly, whining snowflake! Context, bets, terms, blah blah blah. The bet is SIMPLE.

YOU SAID I DID NOT CITE ANY BILLS.

I SAID I DID.

I SAID I CAN PROVE IT.

You made the accusation, so all I said is that if I can show you're wrong, you get banned! FIN.

You can't lose. You risk NOT A THING unless you lied. STILL WAITING FUCKFACE. Take the bet or admit you're a fucking chickenshit liar.

 

[Faun]

You remain the forum boob, boobtoob.

I very seriously doubt that.

You say I won't stand behind my words because I won't accept a bet on your terms, which is to take my words out of context (as evidenced by you cutting out where I quoted you saying Frank's bills caused the crash, and where I referred to said bills as "any such bills," and to accept a bet where you suffer no consequences if you lose.

There you go lying again.

1. My bet, my terms. Terms are irrelevant anyway since YOU CAN'T LOSE unless you are wrong. Quit running, Chicken Little. Time to MAN UP.
   
2. How can I be taking your words out of content when they are YOUR WORDS! I merely removed the irrelevant parts (I do that to most every post, even my own) to make it easy for the reader to focus on the salient point to which I'm referring (it's called TRUNCATING): You said I DID NOT CITE ANY BILL.
3. Quit trying to parse words. If anyone wants to see the full original post, they are right there.

Keep running, pussy.

Keep running? Damn, you really are batshit crazy. I'm right here! I've not gone anywhere. Not only won't you even stand behind your own words, what next, gonna call me a racist, too? Dave asked me to cite some of the bills to which I wad referring and I told him I already did then you opened your big fat dumb mouth and claimed I NEVER CITED ANY BILL.

And all I said is that if you are so sure, then BACK IT UP. If I can prove you wrong, you're banned 6 months. Now since you won't take that bet, YOU'RE ADMITTING YOU WERE WRONG.



Show some character for once and ADMIT IT. You were wrong.

"My bet, my terms."

LOLOLOL

Yeah, you're terms... bet on my words out of context where you don't lose even if you're wrong.

My terms... we bet on my words in context where you risk the same consequence I risk. And from that, you run like the pussy you are.

And I note, you still have not proven this idiotic claim of yours...

Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it. Bye

"How can I be taking your words out of content when they are YOUR WORDS!"

By removing your words from my quote which I quoted to show the context of what I wrote. My very next sentence referring to "any such bills" which you also removed under the guise that my words in response to your post are "irrelevant."

In other words, boobtoob.... you're fucking deranged. I believe I've pointed that out in the past.

WOW. What a fucking cowardly, whining snowflake! Context, bets, terms, blah blah blah. The bet is SIMPLE.

YOU SAID I DID NOT CITE ANY BILLS.

I SAID I DID.

I SAID I CAN PROVE IT.

You made the accusation, so all I said is that if I can show you're wrong, you get banned! FIN.

You can't lose. You risk NOT A THING unless you lied. STILL WAITING FUCKFACE. Take the bet or admit you're a fucking chickenshit liar.

"YOU SAID I DID NOT CITE ANY BILLS."

LOL

Poor, deranged boobtoob. I said that in context to your idiotic claim, which you still can't prove. Hence, all the unhinged cyber-screaming in all caps.

All because you prove to be a pussy who's running away from his own words as fast as his walker will allow...

Pretty neat trick considering it was Bawney's bills that derailed and crashed it. Bye

 

[toobfreak]

"YOU SAID I DID NOT CITE ANY BILLS."

LOL

Poor, deranged boobtoob. I said that in context to your idiotic claim, which you still can't prove.

What claim was that, butthead? Still trying to weasel out by parsing words? Real Dave asked me to cite the bills to which I said Frank had been involved in after my actually posting them straight to him and telling him to go back and read! Then you stepped in and said that I had never cited any bills at all in the first place! Then you claimed my bet of challenging you on that claim ridiculous, now you lie again and say I can't prove it at all! THAT IS THE BET, Chicken Shit. You remind me of the Three Stooges: Duck, Dodge and Hide. Oh I can absolutely prove it asshole, and you know it. You went back and saw I cited three bills and now you are running chicken. Typical lying sack of shit troll bomb thrower. Now caught in your own bullshit. You're yellow like every other leftard on this forum who can never back up a thing you claim. That's why you keep running and trying to deflect from my challenge otherwise you would take it.

For you see, if you thought you were right, if you were SURE you were right, it wouldn't matter if the bet was to jump in front of a locomotive or leap into the Sun. There would be no risk, nothing to lose and everything to gain by PROVING ME WRONG.

C.Mon, Fuckhead, let's get the moderator on here right now to settle the bet so that you can begin your 6 month ban. The forum will be all the better for it.