Tulsi Gabbard defends Steve Bannon…

The first line of her tweet is that Bannon was charged and found guilty of contempt of Congress. It’s literally the first thing in her tweet.
yep, Charged........ and then she asks the second statement, you're far too stupid to follow along. It is a short coming with demofks. I've come to accept your ability to be stupid.
 
yep, and then she asks the second statement, you're far too stupid to follow along. It is a short coming with demofks. I've come to accept your ability to be stupid.
You said subpoenas had nothing to do with the tweet but it’s the subject of the tweet.

You are really stupid.
 
You said subpoenas had nothing to do with the tweet but it’s the subject of the tweet.

You are really stupid.
it didn't, it was the charges. You still can't comprehend what you just wrote.
 
You keep deflecting. 5 people who lied to Congress were never charged because their politics agreed with those in power. That is fascism, which you support, and therefore you are a fascist.
Proving somebody lied is much much different than defying a subpoena. Bannon couldn’t even put up a defense.
 
The charges were for refusing to comply with a subpoena. Didn’t you know this?
who cares, it wasn't her point. you should actually read what she was complaining about. you're still stupid.
 
who cares, it wasn't her point. you should actually read what she was complaining about. you're still stupid.
You’re an idiot who can’t even understand the subject of the tweet so you can’t understand the second part of the tweet.
 
You’re an idiot who can’t even understand the subject of the tweet so you can’t understand the second part of the tweet.
and yet you aren't comprehending her tweet. It's okay, just stay stupid.
 
and yet you aren't comprehending her tweet. It's okay, just stay stupid.
Says the guy who thought it had nothing to do with Bannon defying a subpoena

You couldnt explain the tweet in a coherent way and haven’t even tried other than to get it wrong and tell others they don’t get it.
 
People aren’t charged if there’s no case.
Trump has never been charged with any crime despite endless investigations and false claims. Guess that means the Dems have never had any case against him neither.


Anyway, Bannon’s offense is totally different.
You mean there is an actual case there? Maybe YOU should have realized there has always been a case against Clapper, Brennan and Comey despite their NOT being charged because they are being protected by a corrupt DOJ.
 
The charges were for refusing to comply with a subpoena. Didn’t you know this?
yep, good for you, the charges.......... Has nothing to do with what the charge was, the fact others haven't been charged was her point. That's why she said what those charges should have been; while Brennan, Clapper & others who lied to Congress have never been charged or prosecuted. So, I won't post it again.
 
Says the guy who thought it had nothing to do with Bannon defying a subpoena

You couldnt explain the tweet in a coherent way and haven’t even tried other than to get it wrong and tell others they don’t get it.
it didn't. I just posted what she tweeted. Again, you're still playing stupid.
 
Trump has never been charged with any crime despite endless investigations and false claims. Guess that means the Dems have never had any case against him neither.

You mean there is an actual case there? Maybe YOU should have realized there has always been a case against Clapper, Brennan and Comey despite their NOT being charged because they are being protected by a corrupt DOJ.
Proving someone lied is really hard. Proving Bannon defied a subpoena is really easy.

This isn’t complicated.

Why weren’t there charges against Barr, DeVos, Mnuchin and others for lying under oath? Because it’s hard to prove they lied.

We will see if there is a case against Trump. He’s the subject of multiple investigations.
 
yep, good for you, the charges.......... Has nothing to do with what the charge was, the fact others haven't been charged was her point. That's why she said what those charges should have been; while Brennan, Clapper & others who lied to Congress have never been charged or prosecuted. So, I won't post it again.
The charges have a lot to do with why Bannon faced prosecution but Brennen and Clapper haven’t.

It’s incredibly hard to prove lying to Congress. The reason it is different is because the allegations and crimes are different. If one crime is extremely easy to prosecute, and one is extremely difficult to prosecute, only a moron would wonder why it seems like one is pursued and one isn’t.

You’re just that kind of moron.
 
Proving someone lied is really hard. Proving Bannon defied a subpoena is really easy.

This isn’t complicated.

Why weren’t there charges against Barr, DeVos, Mnuchin and others for lying under oath? Because it’s hard to prove they lied.

We will see if there is a case against Trump. He’s the subject of multiple investigations.
we know they lied, it's already been explained to you. Even Tulsi knows it. It's why she tweeted it. I know, you are still stupid and don't understand english.
 

Forum List

Back
Top