Twitter and Facebook Execs Should be Indicted for Interfering in a US Election

[bripat9643]

They aren't abiding by the rules, dumbass.

What rules?

First Amendment, censorship.

It’s a private platform. They set the rules of what content gets presented. You should have seen the video of Mandingo doing anal with Donny that was posted yesterday. Don’t know why they deleted that one either!!!!

We've heard this shit a million times. You know that it's bullshit. Twitter doesn't even follow its own rules.

They are Twitters rules! Haha.

What twitter rules?

Content guidelines

Twitter doesn't follow them, so how are they rules?

 

[Slade3200]

No article here. I just want to start a discussion on the subject.

Typically you need to break a law to be indicted

They broke several laws.

Name them.

They broke an election law that says you can't provide material aid to a campaign. They broke a law about interfering in federal elections. And the, of course, they have violated rule 230 on a daily basis.

They just deleted fake news from their website. They got in trouble for letting fake news flow through their site last election so it looks like they are being extra careful.

here is a tip. Run an honest campaign, stick to the facts and you won’t have these problems

 

[Slade3200]

They aren't abiding by the rules, dumbass.

What rules?

First Amendment, censorship.

It’s a private platform. They set the rules of what content gets presented. You should have seen the video of Mandingo doing anal with Donny that was posted yesterday. Don’t know why they deleted that one either!!!!

We've heard this shit a million times. You know that it's bullshit. Twitter doesn't even follow its own rules.

They are Twitters rules! Haha.

What twitter rules?

Content guidelines

Twitter doesn't follow them, so how are they rules?

Because that’s what they set up for their Business.

Ever seen a cop make a lane change without their blinker or drive faster than the speed limit? Ever see them give themselves a ticket for doing so?

 

[bripat9643]

No article here. I just want to start a discussion on the subject.

Typically you need to break a law to be indicted

They broke several laws.

Name them.

They broke an election law that says you can't provide material aid to a campaign. They broke a law about interfering in federal elections. And the, of course, they have violated rule 230 on a daily basis.

They just deleted fake news from their website. They got in trouble for letting fake news flow through their site last election so it looks like they are being extra careful.

here is a tip. Run an honest campaign, stick to the facts and you won’t have these problems

They have fake news all over their web site. What about the Steel dossier? What about Trump's tax returns? What about the fraud of claim Trump claim service people were suckers?

The fact that Dims got mad at Twitter because Hillary lost is not "getting in trouble," at least not in the sense that any decent person cares about. What you're saying is that they didn't Kow-Tow to the establishment.

Here's a tip: Quite blowing horseshit all over the internet. Your credibility is zero.

 

[bripat9643]

They aren't abiding by the rules, dumbass.

What rules?

First Amendment, censorship.

It’s a private platform. They set the rules of what content gets presented. You should have seen the video of Mandingo doing anal with Donny that was posted yesterday. Don’t know why they deleted that one either!!!!

We've heard this shit a million times. You know that it's bullshit. Twitter doesn't even follow its own rules.

They are Twitters rules! Haha.

What twitter rules?

Content guidelines

Twitter doesn't follow them, so how are they rules?

Because that’s what they set up for their Business.

Ever seen a cop make a lane change without their blinker or drive faster than the speed limit? Ever see them give themselves a ticket for doing so?

Huh? What part of "they don't follow their so-called rules" didn't you understand? Rules that aren't followed aren't rules. They are nothing more than suggestions.

All you're saying is that cops are corrupt. Yes, a lot of them are.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Big yes vote from me!

Got it, you and the author of the OP want to repeal and replace the First Amendment. That will take a long time, it might be better for you and finger boy to apply for citizenship in N. Korea, Iran, China, Saudia Arabia or Russia.

But you might as well stay in the United States, if and only if Donald Trump is elected for four more years, then you won't need to worry, he will by EO incarcerate any media source who insults his excellency.

 

[Turtlesoup]

No article here. I just want to start a discussion on the subject.

last i checked they're run by americans.....?

It's not illegal lol

Actually it is illegal ......and made far worse once you realize that they have gotten rich and largely tax free because the swamp politicians like Biden for their special tax and regulation loopholes... so out of pure greed to keep their corruption going they are attempting to take away any dissenters civil rights and free speech to affect the political process.

That's alike a double whammy----------------that should be used to go after them both criminally and civilly.

 

[Slade3200]

No article here. I just want to start a discussion on the subject.

Typically you need to break a law to be indicted

They broke several laws.

Name them.

They broke an election law that says you can't provide material aid to a campaign. They broke a law about interfering in federal elections. And the, of course, they have violated rule 230 on a daily basis.

They just deleted fake news from their website. They got in trouble for letting fake news flow through their site last election so it looks like they are being extra careful.

here is a tip. Run an honest campaign, stick to the facts and you won’t have these problems

They have fake news all over their web site. What about the Steel dossier? What about Trump's tax returns? What about the fraud of claim Trump claim service people were suckers?

The fact that Dims got mad at Twitter because Hillary lost is not "getting in trouble," at least not in the sense that any decent person cares about. What you're saying is that they didn't Kow-Tow to the establishment.

Here's a tip: Quite blowing horseshit all over the internet. Your credibility is zero.

I don’t really trust your judgement on what qualifies as a decent person. And it doesn’t sound like you doing an apples to apples comparison there

 

[Slade3200]

They aren't abiding by the rules, dumbass.

What rules?

First Amendment, censorship.

It’s a private platform. They set the rules of what content gets presented. You should have seen the video of Mandingo doing anal with Donny that was posted yesterday. Don’t know why they deleted that one either!!!!

We've heard this shit a million times. You know that it's bullshit. Twitter doesn't even follow its own rules.

They are Twitters rules! Haha.

What twitter rules?

Content guidelines

Twitter doesn't follow them, so how are they rules?

Because that’s what they set up for their Business.

Ever seen a cop make a lane change without their blinker or drive faster than the speed limit? Ever see them give themselves a ticket for doing so?

Huh? What part of "they don't follow their so-called rules" didn't you understand? Rules that aren't followed aren't rules. They are nothing more than suggestions.

All you're saying is that cops are corrupt. Yes, a lot of them are.

Call them guidelines then... they are how Twitter wants to moderate their own private platform.

 

[bripat9643]

Big yes vote from me!

Got it, you and the author of the OP want to repeal and replace the First Amendment. That will take a long time, it might be better for you and finger boy to apply for citizenship in N. Korea, Iran, China, Saudia Arabia or Russia.

But you might as well stay in the United States, if and only if Donald Trump is elected for four more years, then you won't need to worry, he will by EO incarcerate any media source who insults his excellency.

Recent events have made it clear that we can't allow Tech monopolies to censor our information. They are done for if Trump gets reelected. That's the bottom line. If he doesn't get reelected, then our freedoms are done for.

 

[bripat9643]

They aren't abiding by the rules, dumbass.

What rules?

First Amendment, censorship.

It’s a private platform. They set the rules of what content gets presented. You should have seen the video of Mandingo doing anal with Donny that was posted yesterday. Don’t know why they deleted that one either!!!!

We've heard this shit a million times. You know that it's bullshit. Twitter doesn't even follow its own rules.

They are Twitters rules! Haha.

What twitter rules?

Content guidelines

Twitter doesn't follow them, so how are they rules?

Because that’s what they set up for their Business.

Ever seen a cop make a lane change without their blinker or drive faster than the speed limit? Ever see them give themselves a ticket for doing so?

Huh? What part of "they don't follow their so-called rules" didn't you understand? Rules that aren't followed aren't rules. They are nothing more than suggestions.

All you're saying is that cops are corrupt. Yes, a lot of them are.

Call them guidelines then... they are how Twitter wants to moderate their own private platform.

They aren't entitled to protection from lawsuits if they want to censor based on their arbitrary whims.

What part of that don't you understand?

 

[bripat9643]

No article here. I just want to start a discussion on the subject.

Typically you need to break a law to be indicted

They broke several laws.

Name them.

They broke an election law that says you can't provide material aid to a campaign. They broke a law about interfering in federal elections. And the, of course, they have violated rule 230 on a daily basis.

They just deleted fake news from their website. They got in trouble for letting fake news flow through their site last election so it looks like they are being extra careful.

here is a tip. Run an honest campaign, stick to the facts and you won’t have these problems

They have fake news all over their web site. What about the Steel dossier? What about Trump's tax returns? What about the fraud of claim Trump claim service people were suckers?

The fact that Dims got mad at Twitter because Hillary lost is not "getting in trouble," at least not in the sense that any decent person cares about. What you're saying is that they didn't Kow-Tow to the establishment.

Here's a tip: Quite blowing horseshit all over the internet. Your credibility is zero.

I don’t really trust your judgement on what qualifies as a decent person. And it doesn’t sound like you doing an apples to apples comparison there

How is it not apples to apples? Did twitter and Facebook "verify" the Steele dossier? Did they verify the NYT claims about Trump's tax returns? What about the claim that Trump called service people "suckers?" Of course they didn't, but they didn't care about that because it served their leftwing agenda. The actual rule is that they will "verify" only those items that are damaging to Democrats.

I know you don't like my evaluation of your decency. Thieves don't like being called thieves.

 

[bripat9643]

They aren't abiding by the rules, dumbass.

What rules?

First Amendment, censorship.

It’s a private platform. They set the rules of what content gets presented. You should have seen the video of Mandingo doing anal with Donny that was posted yesterday. Don’t know why they deleted that one either!!!!

We've heard this shit a million times. You know that it's bullshit. Twitter doesn't even follow its own rules.

They are Twitters rules! Haha.

What twitter rules?

Content guidelines

Twitter doesn't follow them, so how are they rules?

Because that’s what they set up for their Business.

Ever seen a cop make a lane change without their blinker or drive faster than the speed limit? Ever see them give themselves a ticket for doing so?

Huh? What part of "they don't follow their so-called rules" didn't you understand? Rules that aren't followed aren't rules. They are nothing more than suggestions.

All you're saying is that cops are corrupt. Yes, a lot of them are.

Call them guidelines then... they are how Twitter wants to moderate their own private platform.

Calling them "guidelines" means they are abitrary. Rule 230 doesn't allow them to have "guidelines" they can ignore whenever they like. Only a douchebag would be comfortable with such an arrangement.

 

[colfax_m]

Twitter and Facebook are American companies with American executives and they are constitutionally allowed to participate in the election.

 

[bripat9643]

Twitter and Facebook are American companies with American executives and they are constitutionally allowed to participate in the election.

No they aren't, moron. Check our election laws. The are definitely not allowed to make donations worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

 

[colfax_m]

No they aren't, moron. Check our election laws. The are definitely not allowed to make donations worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

They didn’t.

 

[Juicin]

No article here. I just want to start a discussion on the subject.

last i checked they're run by americans.....?

It's not illegal lol

Actually it is illegal ......and made far worse once you realize that they have gotten rich and largely tax free because the swamp politicians like Biden for their special tax and regulation loopholes... so out of pure greed to keep their corruption going they are attempting to take away any dissenters civil rights and free speech to affect the political process.

That's alike a double whammy----------------that should be used to go after them both criminally and civilly.

Lotta industries run around basically tax free

And what they're doing isn't some loophole. It's specifically designed to work that way.

This forum would not function without it

The only people left on the internet would be people who could afford lawyers to defend themselves without it. Vastly increasing the cost of doing business on the internet for just about anyone but retailers

What you're talking about is rolling back the whole internet to some archaic age. Search engines might not even survive that change. Back to AOL

 

[bripat9643]

No they aren't, moron. Check our election laws. The are definitely not allowed to make donations worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

They didn’t.

Of course they did. They censored news that was vry incriminating to Biden. That was worth at least 100 million to him.

 

[bripat9643]

No article here. I just want to start a discussion on the subject.

last i checked they're run by americans.....?

It's not illegal lol

Actually it is illegal ......and made far worse once you realize that they have gotten rich and largely tax free because the swamp politicians like Biden for their special tax and regulation loopholes... so out of pure greed to keep their corruption going they are attempting to take away any dissenters civil rights and free speech to affect the political process.

That's alike a double whammy----------------that should be used to go after them both criminally and civilly.

Lotta industries run around basically tax free

And what they're doing isn't some loophole. It's specifically designed to work that way.

This forum would not function without it

The only people left on the internet would be people who could afford lawyers to defend themselves without it. Vastly increasing the cost of doing business on the internet for just about anyone but retailers

What you're talking about is rolling back the whole internet to some archaic age. Search engines might not even survive that change. Back to AOL

"Doing business" means flushing our democracy down the toilet. I have no trouble if they go bankrupt trying to accomplish that.

You actually believe censoring people who dont' support your agenda to be some kind of advance to society? In the old days we called that tyranny. Of course, you're a Stalinist, so it's no surprise that you defend it.

 

[Cecilie1200]

An American can not interfere in an American election dumbshits. They all apart of the American electorate.

Then why are there so many laws restricting what Americans can do in elections?