You like this one better?You really get mad when the truth comes out.I never lie.You are a horrible liar and too cowardly to admit your lame attempt at bullcrap.
Just hate fake news.
If you have a link to an official cause of death, please post it.
Apparently you do, since back at the start of this thread you CLAIMED to have "heard" the "media lied" and shoveled "propaganda", whereupon I asked you for a link to that as a fucking STARTING POINT, and all you've done since then is go "humma humma" and try to pawn off your hallucination on three other posters who aren't even here.
Wassamatta? Were you LYING? Are you a "Missourian" who can't "show me"?
We sit, and we wait.
The media reported that Officer Sicknick was killed as a direct result of the riots.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand BINGO you just did it again. Same assertion, same lack of link.
SHOW ME where "the media" --- any media --- said that. Trot it out here and let us examine what it actually says.
And quit pussyfooting. Ain't got all night.Cop Brian Sicknick may have been 'killed by chemical agent' in Capitol riots
A US Capitol cop who was hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during clashes in DC may have been killed by a “chemical agent”, say new reports. Officer Brian D. Sicknick – tod…www.thesun.co.uk
I should go into dentistry, having chalked up all this experience in pulling teeth.
Now that that's F I N A L L Y here does it not enter your synapses that YOUR OWN LINK right in its title uses the words "MAY HAVE"?
Is that what you "heard" that you referenced a hundred posts ago? A speculation about "may have"?
Are you telling us that you INFERRED something that was not there because reading comprehension?
And then with that level of illiteracy you want to call them "fake news" on your own failing? Is that where we are?
My work here is done. DIS missed.
The title is "He dreamed of being a police officer...then was killed by a pro-Trump mob" from the Newspaper of Record... The New York Times...
He Dreamed of Being a Police Officer, Then Was Killed by a Pro-Trump Mob (Published 2021)
The death of Brian Sicknick, a military veteran and experienced Capitol Police officer, amplified the tragedy of Wednesday’s riots and undermined President Trump’s pro-law-enforcement claims.www.nytimes.com
^^ Takes a lickin', jest keeps on diggin'.
YOUR OWN MEDIA (link):
>> Law enforcement officials initially said Mr. Sicknick was struck with a fire extinguisher, but weeks later, police sources and investigators were at odds over whether he was hit. Medical experts have said he did not die of blunt force trauma, according to one law enforcement official.
Instead, investigators increasingly believe that a factor may have been an irritant such as mace or bear spray that was sprayed in the face of Mr. Sicknick, the law enforcement official said. The Capitol Police said in a statement that Officer Sicknick died from injuries sustained “while physically engaging with protesters.” <<
WHO THE FUCK is making as assertion there? Open book test.
Here's the same passage with the answer emphasized. See if you can find it.
>> Law enforcement officials initially said Mr. Sicknick was struck with a fire extinguisher, but weeks later, police sources and investigators were at odds over whether he was hit. Medical experts have said he did not die of blunt force trauma, according to one law enforcement official.
Instead, investigators increasingly believe that a factor may have been an irritant such as mace or bear spray that was sprayed in the face of Mr. Sicknick, the law enforcement official said. The Capitol Police said in a statement that Officer Sicknick died from injuries sustained “while physically engaging with protesters.” <<
Whereas YOUR original claim:
I heard that the media was [sic] lying and were reporting unsubstantiated propaganda about a fire extinguisher when he actually tragically died from an undiagnosed health condition.
Is your link "lying" here when it says "Law enforcement officials said..."? Did law enforcement officials NOT say....? And you have proof that they did not say that?
Is your link "lying" here when it says "investigators believe..."? Do investigators NOT believe....? And you have proof that they do not believe....?
Is your link "lying" here when it says "The Capitol Police said..."? Did the Capitol Police NOT say that? And you have proof that they did not say that?
SUBJECTS: Law enforcement officials/investigators/Capitol police
VERBS: said/believe/said
Your EVIDENCE that they did NOT say/did NOT believe/did NOT say .... is WHERE?
WHERE is the "lying" in there?
So to sum up:
You're alleging "fake news" entirely on the basis that YOU are unable to figure out what the subject of a sentence is. A sentence that is written that way consciously and intentionally so that it DOES NOT make an assertion itself but rather attributes that assertion to its sources. Which is basic, Day One Journalism 101.
And you can't figure that out, so you want to blame "them" for YOUR failure.
SMGDFH Reading comprehension is a lost art
Last edited: