Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't understand physics...so the physics must be wrong.What's even more laughable is you don't know the 9E Commission Report states the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds.
It's pretty obvious all 9E sites, regardless of position have bias. So, the best thing to do is first, get to know basic facts. (Step two is a waste of time until step one has been walked.)
Is that what you're using instead of an argument?
Lol.........slime away you stoopid bitch. You didn't know the CR said the south tower collapsed in ten seconds so instead of being honest you give a classic non-sequitur.
In case you haven't figured it out, genius, I'm laughing at you.This is an extremely poor argument but somehow it lives on.
1. How many people would it take? (You can't give a ridiculous range or wild guess). If you're claiming a necessary number of conspirators you must have come up with a theory on how they did it, which would give a fairly precise number.
2. You're assuming they are wracked by guilt.
3. There are many legal/illegal organizations with members who committed murder and other crimes yet they survive by people not confessing.
4. They have nothing to gain and everything to lose. They would be painted as fringe binge lunatics seeking attention while being subjected to getting whacked for talking.
Your premise is clearly baseless.In other words:
![]()
Why do you keep showing how much of a fat ass coward you are? Whenever you can't respond to arguments you whine like a little girl.
he'd have to have a functioning brain to figure that outIn case you haven't figured it out, genius, I'm laughing at you.In other words:
![]()
Why do you keep showing how much of a fat ass coward you are? Whenever you can't respond to arguments you whine like a little girl.![]()
Troofers don't have a lot of synapses in spark-gap range, true.he'd have to have a functioning brain to figure that out
something he clearly LACKS
If we're in agreement the Towers fell straight down through their central cores and, according to Wiki, each core was "a combined steel and concrete structure...87 by 135 feet and contained 47 steel columns running from the bedrock to the top of the tower," what moved the tons of steel and concrete out of the way after the initiation of a collapse that traveled 90 floors in only 10 seconds?Are you disputing the 9/11 Commission's observation that the South Tower collapsed in 10 seconds?No. But I'm not making a claim I have to back up, either. You are, so you do, and you haven't.
The time of collapse would be as difficult to lie about as the height of the Towers.
Not that some elected Republicans AND Democrats aren't up to the challenge.
I'm not disputing the time. I'm disputing your analysis of the cause of that time.
Insisting it was controlled demolition is simply ludicrous.
Momentum. The floors above (still basically one structure weighing hundreds of tons) fell ten feet to the floors below, building up incredible momentum in even that short distance. More energy than the building was designed to withstand. So the whole thing collapsed.If we're in agreement the Towers fell straight down through their central cores and, according to Wiki, each core was "a combined steel and concrete structure...87 by 135 feet and contained 47 steel columns running from the bedrock to the top of the tower," what moved the tons of steel and concrete out of the way after the initiation of a collapse that traveled 90 floors in only 10 seconds?Are you disputing the 9/11 Commission's observation that the South Tower collapsed in 10 seconds?
The time of collapse would be as difficult to lie about as the height of the Towers.
Not that some elected Republicans AND Democrats aren't up to the challenge.
I'm not disputing the time. I'm disputing your analysis of the cause of that time.
Insisting it was controlled demolition is simply ludicrous.
Alright. For the failures that lead to the crimes of 9/11.you mean for the failures that lead to it?In your opinion should any Bush Administration political appointees been held accountable for the crimes of 9/11/2001?because it wasnt really necessary
one of the few things Bush was actually right on
it turned out being nothing but a political CYA job
which is what you get when you have politicians appointing people that will make sure that no one political gets caught
Gorelick would have been a good startAlright. For the failures that lead to the crimes of 9/11.you mean for the failures that lead to it?In your opinion should any Bush Administration political appointees been held accountable for the crimes of 9/11/2001?
If yes, where in the chain of command would you begin and where would you end your inquiry?
How about Rummy?Gorelick would have been a good startAlright. For the failures that lead to the crimes of 9/11.you mean for the failures that lead to it?
If yes, where in the chain of command would you begin and where would you end your inquiry?
the failures spanned 2 administrations, at the least
what about him?How about Rummy?Gorelick would have been a good startAlright. For the failures that lead to the crimes of 9/11.
If yes, where in the chain of command would you begin and where would you end your inquiry?
the failures spanned 2 administrations, at the least
How about Rummy?Gorelick would have been a good startAlright. For the failures that lead to the crimes of 9/11.
If yes, where in the chain of command would you begin and where would you end your inquiry?
the failures spanned 2 administrations, at the least
Or we could tax the profits from the "War of Terror" that 9/11 made possible to pay for that new investigation.You know, your path of least resistance would seem to go through the Towers' 47 steel core central columns that anchored each high-rise directly to bedrock? (Why Indeed...P.34)
Why don't you explain how this doesn't violate the laws of physics?
"It is physically impossible for a building (or anything else) to fall at near free-fall speed and do work (smashing steel and concrete) on the way down.
"An external energy input (like explosives) is absolutely essential. In addition, for the top of one of the towers to tip about 30 degrees and NOT continue tipping and falling off violates the law of conservation of angular momentum.
"The symmetrical collapse of building 7 due to highly asymmetrical damage is also unbelievable. We have not yet been told the truth...
"Why not a new and truly independent investigation?"
You Know?
We here at USMB have been down this path of logic before and the answer is the same as always.
We the taxpayers are perfectly happy with the investigation we have.
If you twoofers want a new investigation, then pay for it!
Take some of the money that is being made by selling books, pictures, fake building plans and radio shows and pay for a new investigation!
In case you havn't noticed, the country is having tough times, if you want a new investigation, pay for it.
>sits back and waits for the inevitable excuses as to why this is not possible<
PS: How much tax does someone living in a non-existent congressional district pay?
typical for youi guess you havent noticed, but there are people from ALL spectrums of the political world kicking your ass in here
Cuuuulassic divebomb bitch move. You fucked up, completely ignored it, and are trying to deflect by making stoopid ass comments.
Maybe one day you'll learn that these organizations:
"PM, Discovery channel, Nat geo, the history channel, time, the NYT"
Are not 9E websites. Dumbfuck. Now obey like the **** you are and ignore it again.
resort to calling someone a "****"
Answer me this:
If this was all a big conspiracy, why have none of the conspirators, wracked by guilt, come forward? It would have taken an awful lot of people to pull off.
This is an extremely poor argument but somehow it lives on.
1. How many people would it take? (You can't give a ridiculous range or wild guess). If you're claiming a necessary number of conspirators you must have come up with a theory on how they did it, which would give a fairly precise number.
2. You're assuming they are wracked by guilt.
3. There are many legal/illegal organizations with members who committed murder and other crimes yet they survive by people not confessing.
4. They have nothing to gain and everything to lose. They would be painted as fringe binge lunatics seeking attention while being subjected to getting whacked for talking.
Your premise is clearly baseless.In other words:
![]()
typical for youi guess you havent noticed, but there are people from ALL spectrums of the political world kicking your ass in here
Cuuuulassic divebomb bitch move. You fucked up, completely ignored it, and are trying to deflect by making stoopid ass comments.
Maybe one day you'll learn that these organizations:
"PM, Discovery channel, Nat geo, the history channel, time, the NYT"
Are not 9E websites. Dumbfuck. Now obey like the **** you are and ignore it again.
resort to calling someone a "****"
Troofers don't have a lot of synapses in spark-gap range, true.he'd have to have a functioning brain to figure that out
something he clearly LACKS
Momentum. The floors above (still basically one structure weighing hundreds of tons) fell ten feet to the floors below, building up incredible momentum in even that short distance. More energy than the building was designed to withstand. So the whole thing collapsed.If we're in agreement the Towers fell straight down through their central cores and, according to Wiki, each core was "a combined steel and concrete structure...87 by 135 feet and contained 47 steel columns running from the bedrock to the top of the tower," what moved the tons of steel and concrete out of the way after the initiation of a collapse that traveled 90 floors in only 10 seconds?I'm not disputing the time. I'm disputing your analysis of the cause of that time.
Insisting it was controlled demolition is simply ludicrous.
Now you will predictably respond with a "Yeah, but...".
Oh, yes, I am. I'm laughing at you, your retardery, and your obscenity-laden insistence that everyone else share your delusions.You arent laughing at anyone.
No perp walk for BUSHCHENEYROVE.Momentum. The floors above (still basically one structure weighing hundreds of tons) fell ten feet to the floors below, building up incredible momentum in even that short distance. More energy than the building was designed to withstand. So the whole thing collapsed.If we're in agreement the Towers fell straight down through their central cores and, according to Wiki, each core was "a combined steel and concrete structure...87 by 135 feet and contained 47 steel columns running from the bedrock to the top of the tower," what moved the tons of steel and concrete out of the way after the initiation of a collapse that traveled 90 floors in only 10 seconds?
Now you will predictably respond with a "Yeah, but...".
What is the free fall speed on a 110 story skyscraper?
Oh, yes, I am. I'm laughing at you, your retardery, and your obscenity-laden insistence that everyone else share your delusions.
Face it, Curvy: You hate George Bush so deeply and irrationally that you're willing to ignore science, physics, engineering, and reality itself. By denying that I'm laughing at you, you think you can divine the emotions of others.
Here's what's going to happen: There will be no perp walk for BUSHCHENEYROVE. No trial at the Hague. You're going to go through life enraged, bitter, and terribly disappointed because reality refuses to bend to your will. Your emotional state will take years off your life span. You will alienate those around you. You will consider getting a weapon and taking "justice" into your own hands, but you will not. You will console yourself with the knowledge that you're smarter than other people, you see more clearly, and that you know more than everybody else, but it will be bitter, joyless consolation indeed. You will continue to visit Troofer websites to feed your delusion, which will only deepen your psychosis.
Your only hope is to turn off the internet, enjoy the people around you, and forget this nonsense.
But you will not do that.
That's what's going to happen. And for the moment, at least, I'm not laughing. I'm just terribly sad for you.
And now I'm laughing again.Oh, yes, I am. I'm laughing at you, your retardery, and your obscenity-laden insistence that everyone else share your delusions.
Face it, Curvy: You hate George Bush so deeply and irrationally that you're willing to ignore science, physics, engineering, and reality itself. By denying that I'm laughing at you, you think you can divine the emotions of others.
Here's what's going to happen: There will be no perp walk for BUSHCHENEYROVE. No trial at the Hague. You're going to go through life enraged, bitter, and terribly disappointed because reality refuses to bend to your will. Your emotional state will take years off your life span. You will alienate those around you. You will consider getting a weapon and taking "justice" into your own hands, but you will not. You will console yourself with the knowledge that you're smarter than other people, you see more clearly, and that you know more than everybody else, but it will be bitter, joyless consolation indeed. You will continue to visit Troofer websites to feed your delusion, which will only deepen your psychosis.
Your only hope is to turn off the internet, enjoy the people around you, and forget this nonsense.
But you will not do that.
That's what's going to happen. And for the moment, at least, I'm not laughing. I'm just terribly sad for you.
What is the free fall speed on a 110 story skyscraper?