Unless you're gay, on the dole, or a commie why would you vote Democrat ?

[rightwinger]

 

[ScreamingEagle]

no they don't....it's the ideas/philosophy/track record of the candidate that really matters....

however i had Obama pegged as a muslim commie before he was elected the first time...

First time around, I was optimistic (regarding Obama). Second time around, I was fully aware of who he is and thus did not vote for him.

smart of you to figure it out....the media is a bitch when it comes to exposing facts....before BO was elected the first time even my posts here on a discussion board about his communist-related history got relegated to the 'conspiracy' files...'political correctness' prevented some from facing the facts....even to this day....

 

[kiwiman127]

If they have candidates that are more moderate/centralist.
Both parties are moving more and more anyway from where most Americans are located on the political spectrum and that's the center.
There are politicians who lean towards the center in both parties but they get scorned by the parties.
Throughout history, the has never been success for a country when they are being led by the political fringe.
Moderates and centralist decided the last election as two exit polls in 2012 clearly showed they are the largest voting bloc. They are also the most under-represented in DC. No wonder this country is a complete mess.

 

[rightwinger]

Why would you vote Democrat?

 

[bripat9643]

Thanks for posting the perfect caricature of what libturds like you believe.

It's sad that anyone would have a mind that operates on such a shallow level.

 

[rightwinger]

Thanks for posting the perfect caricature of what libturds like you believe.

It's sad that anyone would have a mind that operates on such a shallow level.

Like this pie better?

Who do Republicans want to raise taxes on?

The portion of the population that only has 0.2% of the wealth

 

[The Rabbi]

If they have candidates that are more moderate/centralist.
Both parties are moving more and more anyway from where most Americans are located on the political spectrum and that's the center.
There are politicians who lean towards the center in both parties but they get scorned by the parties.
Throughout history, the has never been success for a country when they are being led by the political fringe.
Moderates and centralist decided the last election as two exit polls in 2012 clearly showed they are the largest voting bloc. They are also the most under-represented in DC. No wonder this country is a complete mess.

Your post is self contradictory and incorrect. If moderates decided the last election then how could the politiicans they voted for be distant from where they stand? Did moderstes vote extreme candidates?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Thanks for posting the perfect caricature of what libturds like you believe.

It's sad that anyone would have a mind that operates on such a shallow level.

Like this pie better?

Who do Republicans want to raise taxes on?

The portion of the population that only has 0.2% of the wealth

The wealthy are all saints in his fantasyland. That's why they are rich.

 

[KevinWestern]

Who do Republicans want to raise taxes on?

The portion of the population that only has 0.2% of the wealth

[MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION], why do Democrats ALSO get funding from Goldman Sachs, other Big Banks, the Pharma industry, Big Business, etc if they are just going to (supposedly) screw them over?

If the Democrats represent only the poor (ie people without money) then how did they consistently out-raise Republicans in virtually every Presidential campaign in the past 20 years?

These are questions you need to ask yourself. Goldman Sachs doesn't give anyone $1mm for "fun", so why'd they give that to Obama in 2008????

Questions need answers, RW.....

 

[rightwinger]

 

[kwc57]

If I owned a business and I was interested in keeping wages and benefits low while cutting all Government oversight....I would vote Republican

Republicans have delivered what they promised during the Reagan Revolution. A destruction of the middle class

Nice revisionist history. The middle class thrived under Reagan and beyond. It's now dying under Obama's leadership.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Thanks for posting the perfect caricature of what libturds like you believe.

It's sad that anyone would have a mind that operates on such a shallow level.

Like this pie better?

Who do Republicans want to raise taxes on?

The portion of the population that only has 0.2% of the wealth

Nothing is as moronic about the modern left as its espousing of socialist values, like wealth redistribution and state-determined equality of outcomes, and its simultaneous backing of politicians and leftist celebrities who defy every one of those purported values. The cognitive dissonance it takes to support a left-wing party headed by wealthy oligarchs is truly breathtaking.
....
Much ink could be spilled about the ideological inadequacy of a political movement whose advocates preach a utopian society of perfect equality, yet dismiss their own political leaders as examples of how the system would work in practice. Instead, a short list of prominent socialist and left-wing politicians and their personal fortunes will be provided.

Ladies and gentlement, here are your socialist one-percenters

1.Francois Hollande, the new socialist president of France, is a great example of a man who talks the talk, but in no wise walks the walk. As Bloomberg aptly put it, “French President-elect Francois Hollande, who portrayed himself as a ‘normal man’ during the election campaign, owns properties worth… $15.1 million, according to a government publication.” Not too shabby for a man who is supposed to be ‘down for the little people.

2.Dominic Strauss-Kahn, the former managing director of the IMF, recently embroiled in a sexual assault case that was dismissed. Also a member of the French Socialist Party, he is estimated to be worth $10 million. French socialists recently denounced DSK as a way of getting some ideological distance from the creep. Nice try, shysters.

3.Hugo Chavez, unofficial dictator-for-life in socialist Venezuela. Born in a mud hut, he rose to tyrannical control over the country, and is now worth an estimated $1 billion dollars. Chavez claims to have recovered from cancer treatment provided in Cuba, and will “run” again for tinpot dictator over the country. He would have been constitutionally forbidden to do so, but he supposedly won a referendum in 2009 to ban term limits. Because, you know, he’s for democracy and stuff.

4.Fidel Castro, communist leader of Cuba, is worth a cool $900 million, according to a Forbes estimate. After ruling Cuba with an iron fist from 1961 until 2011, he finally turned power over to his brother Raul Castro. (Because communists have evolved past all that nepotism business.) In any event, while the Cuban communist brothers lived high off the hog, the majority of Cubans struggled to put food on the table. Is that a lifestyle we Americans are supposed to envy? While it is debatable whether or not Fidel Castro is dead, it’s not debatable that communism is a dead ideology, except in the minds of delusional fools.

5.Daniel Ortega is the new socialist leader on the Latin American block, and is said to be worth at least $1 million. Bankrolled by fellow lefty Hugo Chavez, this budding Nicaraguan despot is sure to be worth more than this low-ball estimate. Extensive real estate holdings attained through state expropriation give this man a healthy boost in the wealth category. Although he sounds like he could be the heir to a taco empire, he got his money the old-fashioned socialist way — by stealing it.

6.Julia Gillard is the current prime minister of Australia. Notorious for posing as an environmentalist moderate during her election, and then pivoting to a hardline “green” stance, she is currently worth $2 million. Gillard’s predecessor and mentor as Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd, has been described as the “Richie Rich” of prime ministers, and is himself estimated to be worth around $156 million. There is also solid evidence that a Gillard staffer engineered a mini-race riot on Australia Day, showing the left’s shared penchant for scumbaggery transcends national borders.

7.Paul Martin is a former prime minister of Canada. Although he attained a fortune of $225 million as CEO of CSL Group, among other things, he felt compelled to co-author the Liberal Party platform of “Creating Opportunity,” colloquially known as the “Red Book.” Since 1993, when the Liberal Party won a landslide, the Canadian economy is yet to break free of the seven percent to nine percent unemployment range.

8.Vladimir Putin is the authoritarian head of Russia, an ex-KGB colonel who has maintained many socialist policies from the USSR days, as both president and prime minister. Putin has been slow to privatize the numerous industries of the Soviet era, and has allowed little economic freedom, bullying any industry titans unless the predatory controllers of those firms pay obeisance to the Kremlin. Worth about $40 billion.

9.Al Gore was vice president under Clinton and ‘almost the next president of the United States.’ A global warmist by occupation, he has called for increasingly tight controls over the market economy. An “unregulated” market is supposedly going to lead to a manmade climate change apocalypse, that is, unless we fork over — $76 trillion dollars. As a man who jet sets around the planet preaching the green gospel, while racking up a hefty utilities bill in his numerous mansions (including ocean front property), he is worth about $100 million.

10.Barack Obama is the historic first black president of the United States. A man who was backed big time by Wall Street in his 2008 campaign and yet claimed that the Occupy Wall Street kids were the reason he ran for office, he has constantly demagogued the class warfare argument for wealth redistribution. Although he has constantly framed America as a country that is heartless and oppresses minorities, he is a walking parody of that insipid line of attack. Since writing a couple of biographies, sold mainly in the capitalist market (though it’s questionable if any read them), he is now worth about $10.5 million.

Not only millionaire politicians, but fabulously wealthy left-wing celebrities like Michael Moore and Jane Fonda spout off radical talking points about wealth redistribution, yet pursue personal fortunes in the capitalist system. Billionaires like George Soros and Warren Buffett, among others, talk up redistributionist policies, but do not “pay their fair share.” That’s beyond the scope of this article and could be the subject of a forthcoming post.

This is just a taste of left-wing hypocrisy, which actually disproves their entire ideology in practice. One is loathe to find a single, solitary example of a socialist who has attained power in a country and hasn’t made himself materially better off than his fellow comrades.

Millionaire Socialists and the Morons Who Love Them

 

[Rozman]

How about being black?....
That's a big one ....
Prolly what Joe Biden said to Obama... heh heh

 

[kiwiman127]

If they have candidates that are more moderate/centralist.
Both parties are moving more and more anyway from where most Americans are located on the political spectrum and that's the center.
There are politicians who lean towards the center in both parties but they get scorned by the parties.
Throughout history, the has never been success for a country when they are being led by the political fringe.
Moderates and centralist decided the last election as two exit polls in 2012 clearly showed they are the largest voting bloc. They are also the most under-represented in DC. No wonder this country is a complete mess.

Your post is self contradictory and incorrect. If moderates decided the last election then how could the politiicans they voted for be distant from where they stand? Did moderstes vote extreme candidates?

Really?
The Danger of Misreading the Make-up of the Electorate | The American Conservative

Demographics of How Groups Voted in the 2012 Presidential Election

You do realize that there are voters who are conservative or liberal but lean to the center don't you?

 

[kwc57]

Liberal stoopidity thinks that wealth is a single pie and has to be cut smaller and smaller so everyone can have an equal sized slice. Here is the conservative secret they don't know........you can bake another pie......and another.....and another......and have your own pie.

 

[kwc57]

Thanks for posting the perfect caricature of what libturds like you believe.

It's sad that anyone would have a mind that operates on such a shallow level.

Like this pie better?

Who do Republicans want to raise taxes on?

The portion of the population that only has 0.2% of the wealth

The wealthy are all saints in his fantasyland. That's why they are rich.

Who exactly is keeping you personally from being a 1%'er?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Liberal stoopidity thinks that wealth is a single pie and has to be cut smaller and smaller so everyone can have an equal sized slice. Here is the conservative secret they don't know........you can bake another pie......and another.....and another......and have your own pie.

If the conditions are right, that's partly true. The conditions aren't right and the wealth is all at the top currently. And either way, Capitalism does not support or create a Middle Class, the strength of a once more decent America.

 

[Ame®icano]

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Like this pie better?

Who do Republicans want to raise taxes on?

The portion of the population that only has 0.2% of the wealth

The wealthy are all saints in his fantasyland. That's why they are rich.

Who exactly is keeping you personally from being a 1%'er?

Me. You see I have morals. It's a problem.

 

[The Rabbi]

If they have candidates that are more moderate/centralist.
Both parties are moving more and more anyway from where most Americans are located on the political spectrum and that's the center.
There are politicians who lean towards the center in both parties but they get scorned by the parties.
Throughout history, the has never been success for a country when they are being led by the political fringe.
Moderates and centralist decided the last election as two exit polls in 2012 clearly showed they are the largest voting bloc. They are also the most under-represented in DC. No wonder this country is a complete mess.

Your post is self contradictory and incorrect. If moderates decided the last election then how could the politiicans they voted for be distant from where they stand? Did moderstes vote extreme candidates?

Really?
The Danger of Misreading the Make-up of the Electorate | The American Conservative

Demographics of How Groups Voted in the 2012 Presidential Election

You do realize that there are voters who are conservative or liberal but lean to the center don't you?

That's not an answer.
How could moderates vote for people who were alien from their views? How could people whose views were not moderate get elected?