Vaccines are about politics not science

[AzogtheDefiler]

https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ID/ID-507-w.pdf

2. Form the hypothesis. Describe what you think the result of your study will be. In other words an opinion, and why I said this.


The next step is setting up a way to support what you think

So you're taking a vaccine that in people's opinion works but may not? LOL

 

[forkup]

So you're taking a vaccine that in people's opinion works but may not? LOL

Yes, I am. So is everybody else. From the beginning, those that made the vaccine told everybody it might not work. It doesn't provide 100 percent immunity. We know that because they used the scientific method to establish just how effective it was.

The scientific method does not deal in absolute truth or certainty, it's simply a method to establish the most likely answer. You want certainty? I suggest religion. They claim they have both truth and certainty.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Yes, I am. So is everybody else. From the beginning, those that made the vaccine told everybody it might not work. It doesn't provide 100 percent immunity. We know that because they used the scientific method to establish just how effective it was.

The scientific method does not deal in absolute truth or certainty, it's simply a method to establish the most likely answer. You want certainty? I suggest religion. They claim they have both truth and certainty.

Nope. I took Pfizer. FDA approved.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Science is opinion based? OMG....I can't.

And there are 73 genders. And no such thing as male and female. Consensus says so. Good old consensus science.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Yes, I am. So is everybody else. From the beginning, those that made the vaccine told everybody it might not work. It doesn't provide 100 percent immunity. We know that because they used the scientific method to establish just how effective it was.

The scientific method does not deal in absolute truth or certainty, it's simply a method to establish the most likely answer. You want certainty? I suggest religion. They claim they have both truth and certainty.

O
M
G

"The scientific method does not deal in absolute truth or certainty"

CommonCore education has finally killed American intellect.

 

[forkup]

5Nope. I took Pfizer. FDA approved.

Congratulations. 95 percent effective. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices...

So it might not work, but it probably will. And that is more than a good enough reason to take it.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So you're taking a vaccine that in people's opinion works but may not? LOL

And not only is there no guarantee that it will even work -- if it harms you, there is ABSOLUTELY NO ACCOUNTABILITY.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Congratulations. 95 percent effective. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices...

So it might not work, but it probably will. And that is more than a good enough reason to take it.

95% is pretty good. Since I also have natural immunity it is closer to 99.9%...thanks for playing.

 

[forkup]

O
M
G

"The scientific method does not deal in absolute truth or certainty"

CommonCore education has finally killed American intellect.

SCIENCE IS NOT ABOUT CERTAINTY: A PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS | Edge.org

www.edge.org

I seem to be saying two things that contradict each other. On the one hand, we trust scientific knowledge, on the other hand, we are always ready to modify in-depth part of our conceptual structure about the world. But there is no contradiction, because the idea of a contradiction comes from what I see as the deepest misunderstanding about science: the idea that science is about certainty.

This guy is a quantum physicist. Not sure he uses CommonCore.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

SCIENCE IS NOT ABOUT CERTAINTY: A PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS | Edge.org

www.edge.org

I seem to be saying two things that contradict each other. On the one hand, we trust scientific knowledge, on the other hand, we are always ready to modify in-depth part of our conceptual structure about the world. But there is no contradiction, because the idea of a contradiction comes from what I see as the deepest misunderstanding about science: the idea that science is about certainty.

This guy is a quantum physicist. Not sure he uses CommonCore.

Well, that was a mouthful.















Of bullshit.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That is the theory. You see many deaths out there where someone caught the virus a 2nd time and died?

It’s not. A simple search is all that’s needed.

DHHS: Nearly 11,000 reinfection cases & 94 reinfection deaths in state

DHHS says most of the reinfection cases are between 25 and 49 years old, while 61% are women.

www.witn.com

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It’s not. A simple search is all that’s needed.

DHHS: Nearly 11,000 reinfection cases & 94 reinfection deaths in state

DHHS says most of the reinfection cases are between 25 and 49 years old, while 61% are women.

www.witn.com

You found one link...any more? That are non leftist?

 

[forkup]

Well, that was a mouthful.















Of bullshit.

Could be. Something tells me though that a quantum physicist has a somewhat better idea of what science does and doesn't do.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You found one link...any more? That are non leftist?

That’s the first on page one and only represents one state. Your “one and done” declaration just went poof.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Could be. Something tells me though that a quantum physicist has a somewhat better idea of what science does and doesn't do.

Who is this particular quantum physicist?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

That’s the first on page one and only represents one state. Your “one and done” declaration just went poof.

Find others.....

Quantifying the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 reinfection over time

Despite over 140 million SARS‐CoV‐2 infections worldwide since the beginning of the pandemic, relatively few confirmed cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 reinfection have been reported. While immunity from SARS‐CoV‐2 ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Despite over 140 million SARS‐CoV‐2 infections worldwide since the beginning of the pandemic, relatively few confirmed cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 reinfection have been reported.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Find others.....

Quantifying the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 reinfection over time

Despite over 140 million SARS‐CoV‐2 infections worldwide since the beginning of the pandemic, relatively few confirmed cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 reinfection have been reported. While immunity from SARS‐CoV‐2 ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Despite over 140 million SARS‐CoV‐2 infections worldwide since the beginning of the pandemic, relatively few confirmed cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 reinfection have been reported.

I’m not finding anything. Do your own diligence. Your link only confirms what I’ve said while undermining your own position. The vaccine is a good idea even for those who’ve had Covid.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I’m not finding anything. Do your own diligence. Your link only confirms what I’ve said while undermining your own position. The vaccine is a good idea even for those who’ve had Covid.

It is a good idea. My questions is why not differentiate between those who had the virus and those that didn't? That just builds distrust.

 

[forkup]

Who is this particular quantum physicist?

The illusion of time

Andrew Jaffe probes Carlo Rovelli’s study arguing that physics deconstructs our sense of time.

www.nature.com

Home page of Carlo Rovelli

Loop Quantum Gravity

Theoretical physicist and renowned author Carlo Rovelli is a key mastermind of a theory that attempts to bridge the divide between quantum mechanics and general relativity. Join him as he gives a detailed overview of loop quantum gravity..wdm-content-image::after {content: 'Photograph: Jon...

worldscienceu.com

I gave you his credentials. You mind giving yours?

 

[forkup]

It is a good idea. My questions is why not differentiate between those who had the virus and those that didn't? That just builds distrust.

They DO differentiate. I showed you how they differentiated and I showed you studies that they did that examined how they differentiate.

Your problem simply is that that differentiation doesn't extend to you not having to get stuck in order to be considered safe.