Very simply, why I cannot stand Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is that good?

This statement alone makes me realize how much hate and anger has destroyed your life...

So why would all of your so called Asylum Seekers want to be here?

DING, DING, DING!!!

Tell her what she’s won Johnny!

Your response doesn't seem to match what I said. So, to repeat (in answer to unfettered capitalism) - is this good?
 
Why should it matter whether they are related by blood?
Because the marriage contract establishes a next of kin relationship. Blood relatives already enjoy that relationship.
We both know that isn't the reason, douchebag. It's because having sex with close biological relatives produces offspring with a high incidence of birth defects.
The next of kin relationship is part and parcel of the marriage contract. It's what grants the privileges of hospital visitation and sharing of benefit packages. It cannot be relegated to one reason.

That is the reason, and only an absolute idiot would deny it. That's why that rule has existed for thousands of years. It's not a recent legal invention.

LIke all defenders of the queer mafia, you're totally dishonest.
Thousands of years? Try again.

hmmmm, nope. You think it was OK to marry your sister in the Roman empire?
 
Because the marriage contract establishes a next of kin relationship. Blood relatives already enjoy that relationship.
We both know that isn't the reason, douchebag. It's because having sex with close biological relatives produces offspring with a high incidence of birth defects.
The next of kin relationship is part and parcel of the marriage contract. It's what grants the privileges of hospital visitation and sharing of benefit packages. It cannot be relegated to one reason.

That is the reason, and only an absolute idiot would deny it. That's why that rule has existed for thousands of years. It's not a recent legal invention.

LIke all defenders of the queer mafia, you're totally dishonest.
Thousands of years? Try again.

hmmmm, nope. You think it was OK to marry your sister in the Roman empire?
Caligula did.
 
I concluded Trump's lack of morality by his words and deeds. By his preternatural ability to demean his critics as low I.Q., ugly, slovenly and crooked. His attitude toward immigrants as an 'infestation', rapists, murderers, drug dealers and terrorists. By his philandering with porn stars as his wife is pregnant with his child. With his glee over saying he can grab women by the genitals. By his defense of White Nationalist violent criminals as 'fine people'.

well there's your problem, you bastardized/liberalized his words and deeds, that's enough to see mother Theresa as immoral...truth is he beheaded your queen and that is his real crime

None of those examples hold water when one considers the Golden Rule. Anyway, I can't rationalize them as moral. But it might be easier if I was willing to sell my morals down the river just to enjoy what I might consider "winning".
or you could just take the advice of liberals concerning public morality
 
I do not recognize a demarcation between President Obama and American ideals, principles and values

What you meant to say is “my brain has no idea what being a American is”, I get that, there are millions just like you...

The “demarcation” is he is a Socialist / Progressive, you would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to have missed that...
And there is nothing about being a Progressive or a Socialist is anything but American. Unfettered Capitalism and regressive social attitudes have never brought any benefits to themAmerican people at large, only to the wealthiest.
Unfettered capitalism is what made the USA the wealthiest country in the world, dumbass.


Is that good?
If you're American...can't speak for the rest of the world but I do know that prior to American capitalism the number one cause of death in the world was famine, since America is pretty much the reason that isn't true anymore the liberals are now attacking and blaming Americans for obesity...can't have America seen in glowing terms now can we?
Capitalism put an end to famine as a cause of death. It's also reducing the incidence of poverty in the world at an astounding rate. Something like 500 million people were lifted out of the lowest kind of poverty in China in the last 20 years.
 
If you're American...can't speak for the rest of the world but I do know that prior to American capitalism the number one cause of death in the world was famine, since America is pretty much the reason that isn't true anymore the liberals are now attacking and blaming Americans for obesity...can't have America seen in glowing terms now can we?

Infectious diseases were the most common cause of death throughout human history, by a wide margin.

The number of people who lived between 50,000 BC and AD 2011 has been guesstimated at 107,602,707,791 by demographer Carl Haub (see Haub’s article How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth?, and Wesley Stephenson, Do the dead outnumber the living? - BBC News). The number of people alive in 2011 was 6,987,000,000 according to Haub, so the balance of ca. 100,615,707,791 (100.6 billion) had died. Most deaths prior to the 20th Century (which saw about 5.5 billion deaths, according to Worldwide Statistics of Casualties, Massacres, Disasters and Atrocities, leaving 95.1 billion deaths for previous centuries) were caused by infectious diseases.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-common-cause-of-human-death-in-history

derp

wingers just make shit up on the fly, like their dear leader
 
We both know that isn't the reason, douchebag. It's because having sex with close biological relatives produces offspring with a high incidence of birth defects.
The next of kin relationship is part and parcel of the marriage contract. It's what grants the privileges of hospital visitation and sharing of benefit packages. It cannot be relegated to one reason.

That is the reason, and only an absolute idiot would deny it. That's why that rule has existed for thousands of years. It's not a recent legal invention.

LIke all defenders of the queer mafia, you're totally dishonest.
Thousands of years? Try again.

hmmmm, nope. You think it was OK to marry your sister in the Roman empire?
Caligula did.
He was regarded to be a sick freak.
 
If you're American...can't speak for the rest of the world but I do know that prior to American capitalism the number one cause of death in the world was famine, since America is pretty much the reason that isn't true anymore the liberals are now attacking and blaming Americans for obesity...can't have America seen in glowing terms now can we?

Infectious diseases were the most common cause of death throughout human history, by a wide margin.

The number of people who lived between 50,000 BC and AD 2011 has been guesstimated at 107,602,707,791 by demographer Carl Haub (see Haub’s article How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth?, and Wesley Stephenson, Do the dead outnumber the living? - BBC News). The number of people alive in 2011 was 6,987,000,000 according to Haub, so the balance of ca. 100,615,707,791 (100.6 billion) had died. Most deaths prior to the 20th Century (which saw about 5.5 billion deaths, according to Worldwide Statistics of Casualties, Massacres, Disasters and Atrocities, leaving 95.1 billion deaths for previous centuries) were caused by infectious diseases.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-common-cause-of-human-death-in-history

derp

wingers just make shit up on the fly, like their dear leader
Capitalism also gets the credit for eliminating most of those.
 
Your response doesn't seem to match what I said. So, to repeat (in answer to unfettered capitalism) - is this good?

Well first, unfettered Capitalism is no we’re close to reality, never has...

So to clean up your question and deal with reality, yes Capitalism is good, can you provide another economic model that is better for the masses?

I’ll be patiently waiting...
 
What you meant to say is “my brain has no idea what being a American is”, I get that, there are millions just like you...

The “demarcation” is he is a Socialist / Progressive, you would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to have missed that...
And there is nothing about being a Progressive or a Socialist is anything but American. Unfettered Capitalism and regressive social attitudes have never brought any benefits to themAmerican people at large, only to the wealthiest.
Unfettered capitalism is what made the USA the wealthiest country in the world, dumbass.


Is that good?
If you're American...can't speak for the rest of the world but I do know that prior to American capitalism the number one cause of death in the world was famine, since America is pretty much the reason that isn't true anymore the liberals are now attacking and blaming Americans for obesity...can't have America seen in glowing terms now can we?
Capitalism put an end to famine as a cause of death. It's also reducing the incidence of poverty in the world at an astounding rate. Something like 500 million people were lifted out of the lowest kind of poverty in China in the last 20 years.

Capitalism is a mixed bag (and before you erupt, I am a supporter of the capitalist economic system) - the mixed bag is in "unfettered". Child labor, the Triangle Shirt Factory fire, coal mine disasters from cutting corners etc...those are "unfettered" capitalism.
 
Damn, sounds like you have one hell of a personal problem, 6.5 years to go.

BTW, when is your neighbor and their kids moving in with you?


.
It's not a personal problem. It's a marginal problem.

And wishful thinking with that 6.5 years business. Trump, hopefully, won't have the opportunity to run for re-election.


You remind me of my neighbors Chihuahua, running around yapping like a big dog, while praying the whole time no one steps on ya. Things could be worse for ya, you could have a President Pence picking the next SCOTUS judge.

OH! And when did you say your neighbor and kids are moving in with ya?


.
I doubt that Pence would ask for a personal loyalty oath from a Supreme Court appointee. And Pence is not the subject of a federal investigation, while Trump is. Should Trump pack the court in which his case may very well be heard?


Sure he should, he a duly elected president, filling vacancies on the court if part of his job. How about you prove your insinuation that Trump asked Gorsuch for a loyalty oath to anything but the Constitution.


.
For nearly eight months, President Trump has boasted that appointing Neil M. Gorsuch to the Supreme Court ranks high among his signature achievements.


But earlier this year, Trump talked about rescinding Gorsuch's nomination, venting angrily to advisers after his Supreme Court pick was critical of the president's escalating attacks on the federal judiciary in private meetings with legislators.


Trump, according to several people with knowledge of the discussions, was upset that Gorsuch had pointedly distanced himself from the president in a private February meeting with Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), telling the senator he found Trump's repeated attacks on the federal judiciary "disheartening" and "demoralizing."



The president worried that Gorsuch would not be "loyal," one of the people said, and told aides that he was tempted to pull Gorsuch's nomination — and that he knew plenty of other judges who would want the job.


It is unclear whether Trump's "explosion," as another administration official described it, truly put Gorsuch's nomination in jeopardy or whether the president was expressing his frustration aloud, as he often does. But at the time, some in the White House and on Capitol Hill feared that Gorsuch's confirmation — which had been shaping up to be one of the clearest triumphs of Trump's tumultuous young presidency — was on the verge of going awry.

Trump talked about rescinding Gorsuch’s nomination

of course like any good trumpling, you'll claim it's fake news.

i posted it for the normal people


Actually, I'm saying it's irrelevant. Can you say Justice Grosuch? LMAO


.
 
Damn, sounds like you have one hell of a personal problem, 6.5 years to go.

BTW, when is your neighbor and their kids moving in with you?


.
It's not a personal problem. It's a marginal problem.

And wishful thinking with that 6.5 years business. Trump, hopefully, won't have the opportunity to run for re-election.


You remind me of my neighbors Chihuahua, running around yapping like a big dog, while praying the whole time no one steps on ya. Things could be worse for ya, you could have a President Pence picking the next SCOTUS judge.

OH! And when did you say your neighbor and kids are moving in with ya?


.
I doubt that Pence would ask for a personal loyalty oath from a Supreme Court appointee. And Pence is not the subject of a federal investigation, while Trump is. Should Trump pack the court in which his case may very well be heard?


Sure he should, he a duly elected president, filling vacancies on the court if part of his job. How about you prove your insinuation that Trump asked Gorsuch for a loyalty oath to anything but the Constitution.


.
Why then wasn't it part of President Obama's job in 2016?


He did his job.


.
 
I concluded Trump's lack of morality by his words and deeds. By his preternatural ability to demean his critics as low I.Q., ugly, slovenly and crooked. His attitude toward immigrants as an 'infestation', rapists, murderers, drug dealers and terrorists. By his philandering with porn stars as his wife is pregnant with his child. With his glee over saying he can grab women by the genitals. By his defense of White Nationalist violent criminals as 'fine people'.

well there's your problem, you bastardized/liberalized his words and deeds, that's enough to see mother Theresa as immoral...truth is he beheaded your queen and that is his real crime

None of those examples hold water when one considers the Golden Rule. Anyway, I can't rationalize them as moral. But it might be easier if I was willing to sell my morals down the river just to enjoy what I might consider "winning".
or you could just take the advice of liberals concerning public morality
I see that you are comfortable with politicizing morality.
 
Your response doesn't seem to match what I said. So, to repeat (in answer to unfettered capitalism) - is this good?

Well first, unfettered Capitalism is no we’re close to reality, never has...

So to clean up your question and deal with reality, yes Capitalism is good, can you provide another economic model that is better for the masses?

I’ll be patiently waiting...


Key term you seem to be missing: "unfettered"

1rqmt1.jpg

What you meant to say is “my brain has no idea what being a American is”, I get that, there are millions just like you...

The “demarcation” is he is a Socialist / Progressive, you would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to have missed that...
And there is nothing about being a Progressive or a Socialist is anything but American. Unfettered Capitalism and regressive social attitudes have never brought any benefits to themAmerican people at large, only to the wealthiest.
Unfettered capitalism is what made the USA the wealthiest country in the world, dumbass.


Is that good?
If you're American...can't speak for the rest of the world but I do know that prior to American capitalism the number one cause of death in the world was famine, since America is pretty much the reason that isn't true anymore the liberals are now attacking and blaming Americans for obesity...can't have America seen in glowing terms now can we?
Capitalism put an end to famine as a cause of death. It's also reducing the incidence of poverty in the world at an astounding rate. Something like 500 million people were lifted out of the lowest kind of poverty in China in the last 20 years.

It is a mixed bag. Capitalism has no moral compass. I agree, it is the best economic system - but not unregulated (unfettered) - that leads to abuse of labor.
 
His policies and his lack of character. Make no mistake, I am not indicting his supporters. I assume they are all adults and can make up their own minds. But Trump himself is a loathesom person.

He could have devised a policy to control the border without breaking families. But he chose to do just that. Thus he has shown me that he has no empathy for the human race. He uses divisive and intentionally hurtful language to describe these unfortunate people. He has shown a lack of basic respect for his neighbor.

Meanwhile, I, for one, have been taught to treat my neighbor as I would be treated.

Trump decided to cut taxes for those who can afford it while providing no benefit to those who could least afford it. That tired old doctrine of trickle down economics has been roundly disproved as truth.

Trump doesn't just disagree with American institutions but demonizes them. This sets folks up to be cynical at best, dismissive at worst for our most valued institutions such as a free press (not the enemy of the people, but certainly the enemy of tyrants and Authoritarians), our justice system and law enforcement.

I cannot be inspired by someone who comports himself as such a brazen bully. I would opt for inspirational politics, not instigational politics.

I'm sorry, but I was raised as an American and maintain my love for this great country. And I cannot be convinced that selling,out my ordained morality to support such a buffoon.


He could have devised a policy to control the border without breaking families.


Build the wall.
 
His policies and his lack of character. Make no mistake, I am not indicting his supporters. I assume they are all adults and can make up their own minds. But Trump himself is a loathesom person.

He could have devised a policy to control the border without breaking families. But he chose to do just that. Thus he has shown me that he has no empathy for the human race. He uses divisive and intentionally hurtful language to describe these unfortunate people. He has shown a lack of basic respect for his neighbor.

Meanwhile, I, for one, have been taught to treat my neighbor as I would be treated.

Trump decided to cut taxes for those who can afford it while providing no benefit to those who could least afford it. That tired old doctrine of trickle down economics has been roundly disproved as truth.

Trump doesn't just disagree with American institutions but demonizes them. This sets folks up to be cynical at best, dismissive at worst for our most valued institutions such as a free press (not the enemy of the people, but certainly the enemy of tyrants and Authoritarians), our justice system and law enforcement.

I cannot be inspired by someone who comports himself as such a brazen bully. I would opt for inspirational politics, not instigational politics.

I'm sorry, but I was raised as an American and maintain my love for this great country. And I cannot be convinced that selling,out my ordained morality to support such a buffoon.


He could have devised a policy to control the border without breaking families.


Build the wall.

Is that the only policy?
 
What you meant to say is “my brain has no idea what being a American is”, I get that, there are millions just like you...

The “demarcation” is he is a Socialist / Progressive, you would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to have missed that...
And there is nothing about being a Progressive or a Socialist is anything but American. Unfettered Capitalism and regressive social attitudes have never brought any benefits to themAmerican people at large, only to the wealthiest.
Unfettered capitalism is what made the USA the wealthiest country in the world, dumbass.


Is that good?
If you're American...can't speak for the rest of the world but I do know that prior to American capitalism the number one cause of death in the world was famine, since America is pretty much the reason that isn't true anymore the liberals are now attacking and blaming Americans for obesity...can't have America seen in glowing terms now can we?
Capitalism put an end to famine as a cause of death. It's also reducing the incidence of poverty in the world at an astounding rate. Something like 500 million people were lifted out of the lowest kind of poverty in China in the last 20 years.
When and where has the United States operated under unfettered Capitalism?. American Capitalism operates today, and in the past, with a smattering of Socialism and has been refined through Progressivism.
 
His policies and his lack of character. Make no mistake, I am not indicting his supporters. I assume they are all adults and can make up their own minds. But Trump himself is a loathesom person.

He could have devised a policy to control the border without breaking families. But he chose to do just that. Thus he has shown me that he has no empathy for the human race. He uses divisive and intentionally hurtful language to describe these unfortunate people. He has shown a lack of basic respect for his neighbor.

Meanwhile, I, for one, have been taught to treat my neighbor as I would be treated.

Trump decided to cut taxes for those who can afford it while providing no benefit to those who could least afford it. That tired old doctrine of trickle down economics has been roundly disproved as truth.

Trump doesn't just disagree with American institutions but demonizes them. This sets folks up to be cynical at best, dismissive at worst for our most valued institutions such as a free press (not the enemy of the people, but certainly the enemy of tyrants and Authoritarians), our justice system and law enforcement.

I cannot be inspired by someone who comports himself as such a brazen bully. I would opt for inspirational politics, not instigational politics.

I'm sorry, but I was raised as an American and maintain my love for this great country. And I cannot be convinced that selling,out my ordained morality to support such a buffoon.


He could have devised a policy to control the border without breaking families.


Build the wall.

Is that the only policy?

That is a policy that wouldn't separate families.
 
It's not a personal problem. It's a marginal problem.

And wishful thinking with that 6.5 years business. Trump, hopefully, won't have the opportunity to run for re-election.


You remind me of my neighbors Chihuahua, running around yapping like a big dog, while praying the whole time no one steps on ya. Things could be worse for ya, you could have a President Pence picking the next SCOTUS judge.

OH! And when did you say your neighbor and kids are moving in with ya?


.
I doubt that Pence would ask for a personal loyalty oath from a Supreme Court appointee. And Pence is not the subject of a federal investigation, while Trump is. Should Trump pack the court in which his case may very well be heard?


Sure he should, he a duly elected president, filling vacancies on the court if part of his job. How about you prove your insinuation that Trump asked Gorsuch for a loyalty oath to anything but the Constitution.


.
Why then wasn't it part of President Obama's job in 2016?


He did his job.


.
His job included naming appointees to the bench. His last year as President was rescinded by Republicans.
 
And there is nothing about being a Progressive or a Socialist is anything but American. Unfettered Capitalism and regressive social attitudes have never brought any benefits to themAmerican people at large, only to the wealthiest.
Unfettered capitalism is what made the USA the wealthiest country in the world, dumbass.


Is that good?
If you're American...can't speak for the rest of the world but I do know that prior to American capitalism the number one cause of death in the world was famine, since America is pretty much the reason that isn't true anymore the liberals are now attacking and blaming Americans for obesity...can't have America seen in glowing terms now can we?
Capitalism put an end to famine as a cause of death. It's also reducing the incidence of poverty in the world at an astounding rate. Something like 500 million people were lifted out of the lowest kind of poverty in China in the last 20 years.
When and where has the United States operated under unfettered Capitalism?. American Capitalism operates today, and in the past, with a smattering of Socialism and has been refined through Progressivism.

I think it was unfettered for a long time....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top