'VICTORY': Judge orders Clinton to provide written answers to Judicial Watch questions on emails

[Care4all]

They investigated a possible security issue or something of the sort, as was the request from the inspector general....that started this whole thing.

 

[easyt65]

Asked whether Clinton's testimony that she did not email "any classified material to anyone on my email" and "there is no classified material" was true, Comey responded, "No, there was classified material emailed."

NO, THERE WAS CLASSIFIED - PERJURY!

Comey challenges truthfulness of Clinton's email defenses
Follow us: Politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

 

[easyt65]

"Secretary Clinton said she used one device. Was that true?" Gowdy asked, to which Comey answered, "She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state."

Hillary LIED - PERJURY


Comey challenges truthfulness of Clinton's email defenses
Follow us: Politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

 

[easyt65]

She testified that she turned over everything that was government related emails that were on her server....which was accurate.

YOU LIE! Comey testified this was a LIE - perjury!

I posted the transcripts of his tetimony and link.

YOU LIE.

Hillary said what you just did & 3 fact check sites gave her 1 x 'FALSE', 1 × 'PANTS ON FIRE', & 4 × 'PINOCCHIOS'....proving BOTH of you LIE!

NOPE! Comey did not testify that what she said to congress was a lie....

Nice repeated OPINION, but - again - YOU LIE!

The transcripts of Comey's testimony say you and Hillary LIE.

3 Fact Check sites you and Hillary LIE.

NOPE! Comey testified he DID NOT KNOW what Hillary Clinton even said when testifying before Congress, and if Congress Critters wanted him to evaluate such, they would need to send him a formal request in writing.

YOU LIE!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They investigated a possible security issue or something of the sort, as was the request from the inspector general....that started this whole thing.

The problem here is all kinds of people claim they have these emails including Russia. If Hilliar gets in, she can be blackmailed by the threat of the release of those emails to the public.

I think that is much more of a consideration than Trump's tax records.

 

[Care4all]

"During an extended exchange with Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), Comey affirmed that the FBI's investigation found information marked classified on her server even after Clinton had said that she had neither sent nor received any items marked classified.

"That is not true," Comey said. "There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents."

THAT IS NOT TRUE = PERJURY!


Comey challenges truthfulness of Clinton's email defenses
Follow us: Politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Politico is putting their own opinion, while leaving out the rest of what Comey testified to...

that there were multiple devices, because they were upgraded over the 4 years....NOT used at the same time

clinton was answering questions before Congress on how many phones she used at a time, because Clinton's statements to the public were that she only wanted to use one device, (and not carrying two phones in order to keep her personal business separated from her public business) and how many servers she used at a time, and that is what Clinton's answers were to...

MARKED CLASSIFIED has meaning, and it comes with markings at the top of the classified information, marked with what level it was classified at, marked with what department of the govt Classified it, with markings of who the person was that classified it, marked with the date it became classified...etc

On the 2-3 emails that comey said had markings, Comey stated they were only partially marked in the body of the email WITH NO FULL CLASSIFICATION MARKINGS at the top of the content.

Did Politico post that, the rest of the testimony by Comey? NOOOOOO, OF COURSE NOT, it wouldn't make for a good STORY.

Lack of true grit journalism, from ALL media on this 'story'.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Nice cherry picking...when asked several times if what she said was true Comey responded by saying, "That is NOT TRUE."

Rather cherry pick than be a disingenuous fool. You do know people can 'not tell the truth' and still not be lying?

Lets us say out of ignorance, you look up something and post it and it is only partially correct, Not that you would ever succumb to such a thing, would you be guilty of lying? Or would you be ill informed, misinformed, ignorant of all of the facts?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

He never repeatedly said she did not tell the truth to Congress, he didn't even know what she said and testified to congress... he said he knew nothing about what she testified to before congress and if they wanted him to investigate such that congress would have to put a request in to him for it....

it was Republican congress critters that claimed she did not tell the truth....and they are simply lying about it and they KNOW they are lying about it and know she did not commit perjury, but they believe they are getting paid by we the people to make up these accusations that THEY KNOW WILL NOT STICK....to benefit their own POLITICAL interests.....this is your Republican establishment.

Comey said there were 2 or 3 emails that were improperly marked and only partially marked classified...

So, they were NOT fully and properly MARKED Classified.... NO PERJURY THERE for Clinton.

she testified she only used one device and had one server running at the same time.... Well what Cmey testified to is that server was upgrade in 2013 and maybe once before that as well? Her testimony was that she only used one device at a time....which is true, she did not carry multiple phones but one phone, she did not have multiple servers running at the same time in different places etc, she only had one server running.... NO PERJURY THERE....

Your republican congress critters are just doing the 'usual' dog and pony show for their own political posturing and on my tax dime, which is par for the course, for the Republican so called "elite"....

You talk like you never even played the video. Why don't you try it?

If Comey is so uninformed as to Clinton's testimony, he has no business in that job. How could anybody claim they investigated somebody properly and didn't know about Hiliar's testimony to Congress? Any political junkie knows that. Millions of us knew that, but Comey didn't? You really believe that?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I'm going to wait until they bring criminal contempt charges against her just like they did against Sherriff Joe.

Who? The courts?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Media Matters is calling Judicial Watch a "joke"? That's amusing!

More amusing is you people loved the guy that heads Media Matters when he was part of the Arkansas Project. that right wing group that made shit up about the Clintons going as far back as the 1970s. :rolf:

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

"During an extended exchange with Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), Comey affirmed that the FBI's investigation found information marked classified on her server even after Clinton had said that she had neither sent nor received any items marked classified.

"That is not true," Comey said. "There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents."

THAT IS NOT TRUE = PERJURY!


Comey challenges truthfulness of Clinton's email defenses
Follow us: Politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

COMEY:
THREE E-MAILS BORE "Q" MARKINGS DOWN IN THE BODY. NONE HAD HEADERS, WHICH IS AT THE TOP OF A DOCUMENT THAT SAYS CLASSIFIED. THREE HAD WITHIN THE BODY THE PORTION MARKING FOR "C."

Question:
DID SECRETARY CLINTON OR ANY MEMBER OF HER STAFF INTENTIONALLY VIOLATE FEDERAL LAW?

FBI Director Comey >> WE DID NOT DEVELOP CLEAR EVIDENCE OF THAT.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

E]

The problem here is all kinds of people claim they have these emails including Russia.

lots of claims. Maybe they have evidence she had Vince Foster killed?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

If Comey is so uninformed as to Clinton's testimony, he has no business in that job.

It was a team of experienced professionals at the FBI along with Comey.

What were they charged with investigating?

you're a waste of good air and life

 

[JakeStarkey]

Easyt is now trolling the OP. He cannot sustain his opposition through common sense, logic, or other evidence.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

lots of claims. Maybe they have evidence she had Vince Foster killed?

And what if they do have these emails? Is it worth the chance of electing her President?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

lots of claims. Maybe they have evidence she had Vince Foster killed?

And what if they do have these emails? Is it worth the chance of electing her President?

What are you talking about? If Hillary is already President what the fruck would she care?

You people hate her already. Why would she care what you think after she is President?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

And what if they do have these emails? Is it worth the chance of electing her President?

And what if Trump and his former campaign manager are really Russian agents or dupes? Would it be worth the chance of electing him President?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It was a team of experienced professionals at the FBI along with Comey.

What were they charged with investigating?

you're a waste of good air and life

Correct. In other words, it's almost impossible that Comey didn't know anything about Hiliary's testimony to Congress. I believe he knew every word of it. So what we have here are people going out of their way to protect their own, and this is the kind of nonsense we the citizens are getting sick of, and I don't mean that in a partisan way.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What are you talking about? If Hillary is already President what the fruck would she care?

You people hate her already. Why would she care what you think after she is President?

For one, she will be historic as the first female President. Two, she likely is looking for two terms. So of course she will pander to people that can make her look criminal and bad. A Democrat politician would sell their own mother for power and money.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And what if Trump and his former campaign manager are really Russian agents or dupes? Would it be worth the chance of electing him President?

When Russia makes such a claim, then we'll talk about it. But right now, their claim is they have copies of these classified and sensitive emails.