VIDEO: How Can We Win?

I don't know why blacks underachieve on average.
Maybe because when you're playing that Monopoly game she talked about, blacks never get enough of a "bank" to buy anything but Baltic Avenue; never Boardwalk or Park Place.
It matters.
Not only that, you always land on Park Place and its full of hotels.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
And try and fire em.
They'll scream racism everytime.
Ain't that the truth. ... :cool:
Usually these hood rats would work just long enough to get up their boyfriends bail money and then quit.
Two the worst workers sued the company over a bogus racism claim and the Judge threw the case out of court.

The Wife had one that worked for Her at a bank headquarters here in Houston.
She ended up embezzling just shy of 500k.
The sorry bitch only got four years in club fed.
 
And try and fire em.
They'll scream racism everytime.
Ain't that the truth. ... :cool:
Usually these hood rats would work just long enough to get up their boyfriends bail money and then quit.
Two the worst workers sued the company over a bogus racism claim and the Judge threw the case out of court.

The Wife had one that worked for Her at a bank headquarters here in Houston.
She ended up embezzling just shy of 500k.
The sorry bitch only got four years in club fed.
Of course, and only blacks embezzle so that means you can't hire any more.
 
And try and fire em.
They'll scream racism everytime.
Ain't that the truth. ... :cool:
Usually these hood rats would work just long enough to get up their boyfriends bail money and then quit.
Two the worst workers sued the company over a bogus racism claim and the Judge threw the case out of court.
Of course...
 
And try and fire em.
They'll scream racism everytime.
Ain't that the truth. ... :cool:
Usually these hood rats would work just long enough to get up their boyfriends bail money and then quit.
Two the worst workers sued the company over a bogus racism claim and the Judge threw the case out of court.

The Wife had one that worked for Her at a bank headquarters here in Houston.
She ended up embezzling just shy of 500k.
The sorry bitch only got four years in club fed.
Of course, and only blacks embezzle so that means you can't hire any more.

Funny thing...
She worked at the same banking institute for over 25 years and had zero problems with white,asian and mexican/S. American employees.
Yet she was constantly having to deal with blacks claiming racism.
Of course she always won because She learned early on to document everything.
They usually settled it by offering the miscreants a couple thousand bucks to go away.
It was amazing how fast they accepted the money.
 
I don't know why blacks underachieve on average.
Maybe because when you're playing that Monopoly game she talked about, blacks never get enough of a "bank" to buy anything but Baltic Avenue; never Boardwalk or Park Place.
It matters.
We are actually playing the game of life and each of us have different starting points regardless of race. Malia and Sasha Obama for example have much more starting the game of life than 99.9% of whites. One rule of the game of life is that it isn't fair. All the whining in the world isn't going to change that rule.
 
I know a lot of Black people who have worked hard and become successful. How did they do that being held down and oppressed with their skin color? :confused-84:
Because there are always exceptions to everything. But what we want are the same opportunites for everyone else, not just those of us who were fortunate.

Did you even listen to her explain how our econmics are managed and destroyed by a system of institutional racism?
She is a powerful speaker. Taking those two incidents from the early 1920's (Rosewood and Greenwood) and using them as a blanket condemnation of whites, as if it were SOP, routine and ongoing, is an unfair argument, though.
I didn't see any blanket condemnation in what she said. Her monopoly analogy was very apropos. We are chided for not being self-sufficient as if our struggle to do so is some type of character flaw. All while completely ignoring the stacked game of monopoly that we were thrust into. Yet everytime we bring up the accomplishment that were achieved in the most affluent black community in the nation demonstrating our abilities to achieve self-sufficiency and how it was burnt to the ground by envious whites, we're scolded on how long ago that was while completely ignoring two things.

The first one is that whites have learned that lynching, murdering and burning black people out is a very effective way to shut down our progress knowing that the fear has been implanted that even if you rebuild and regain the things that were lost, there is absolutely nothing that will prevent the racists from coming and downing it down again.

The other thing that is always conveniently overlooked is how not a single white person out of that mob of 3,000 was ever arrested, let alone charged with any crime while hundreds of black people were charged and run of out town as a result of the unrest.

All of this injustice is a wound that was never treated and continues to fester. Until it is treated, the eruptions will continue.
 
I know a lot of Black people who have worked hard and become successful. How did they do that being held down and oppressed with their skin color? :confused-84:
Because there are always exceptions to everything. But what we want are the same opportunites for everyone else, not just those of us who were fortunate.

Did you even listen to her explain how our econmics are managed and destroyed by a system of institutional racism?
She is a powerful speaker. Taking those two incidents from the early 1920's (Rosewood and Greenwood) and using them as a blanket condemnation of whites, as if it were SOP, routine and ongoing, is an unfair argument, though.
I didn't see any blanket condemnation in what she said. Her monopoly analogy was very apropos. We are chided for not being self-sufficient as if our struggle to do so is some type of character flaw. All while completely ignoring the stacked game of monopoly that we were thrust into. Yet everytime we bring up the accomplishment that were achieved in the most affluent black community in the nation demonstrating our abilities to achieve self-sufficiency and how it was burnt to the ground by envious whites, we're scolded on how long ago that was while completely ignoring two things.

The first one is that whites have learned that lynching, murdering and burning black people out is a very effective way to shut down our progress knowing that the fear has been implanted that even if you rebuild and regain the things that were lost, there is absolutely nothing that will prevent the racists from coming and downing it down again.

The other thing that is always conveniently overlooked is how not a single white person out of that mob of 3,000 was ever arrested, let alone charged with any crime while hundreds of black people were charged and run of out town as a result of the unrest.

All of this injustice is a wound that was never treated and continues to fester. Until it is treated, the eruptions will continue.

Woah!!!!
Are you posting from the 1930's?
 
I know a lot of Black people who have worked hard and become successful. How did they do that being held down and oppressed with their skin color? :confused-84:
Lol!

Why do blacks earn 82 cents for every dollar whites earn?

Why does the average white family have 15 times the wealth of black?

These are not questions you are willing to answer honestly.
You keep pretending that "blacks" and "whites" are some monolithic entity where individual responsibility, drive, work ethic, intelligence, creativity and good attitude are non factors. The reality is all of those traits shape the trajectory of our lives. I don't know why blacks underachieve on average. Maybe the fact that 2/3rds of the kids grow up with no adult role model to guide them is part of it?
If you were given 65% of available resources and advantages and someone else was given 35%, in how many areas do you think you would be able to accomplish more?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
I know a lot of Black people who have worked hard and become successful. How did they do that being held down and oppressed with their skin color? :confused-84:
Because there are always exceptions to everything. But what we want are the same opportunites for everyone else, not just those of us who were fortunate.

Did you even listen to her explain how our econmics are managed and destroyed by a system of institutional racism?
She is a powerful speaker. Taking those two incidents from the early 1920's (Rosewood and Greenwood) and using them as a blanket condemnation of whites, as if it were SOP, routine and ongoing, is an unfair argument, though.
I didn't see any blanket condemnation in what she said. Her monopoly analogy was very apropos. We are chided for not being self-sufficient as if our struggle to do so is some type of character flaw. All while completely ignoring the stacked game of monopoly that we were thrust into. Yet everytime we bring up the accomplishment that were achieved in the most affluent black community in the nation demonstrating our abilities to achieve self-sufficiency and how it was burnt to the ground by envious whites, we're scolded on how long ago that was while completely ignoring two things.

The first one is that whites have learned that lynching, murdering and burning black people out is a very effective way to shut down our progress knowing that the fear has been implanted that even if you rebuild and regain the things that were lost, there is absolutely nothing that will prevent the racists from coming and downing it down again.

The other thing that is always conveniently overlooked is how not a single white person out of that mob of 3,000 was ever arrested, let alone charged with any crime while hundreds of black people were charged and run of out town as a result of the unrest.

All of this injustice is a wound that was never treated and continues to fester. Until it is treated, the eruptions will continue.

Woah!!!!
Are you posting from the 1930's?
"All of this injustice is a wound that was never treated and continues to fester. Until it is treated, the eruptions will continue"
 
I don't know why blacks underachieve on average.
Maybe because when you're playing that Monopoly game she talked about, blacks never get enough of a "bank" to buy anything but Baltic Avenue; never Boardwalk or Park Place.
It matters.
We are actually playing the game of life and each of us have different starting points regardless of race. Malia and Sasha Obama for example have much more starting the game of life than 99.9% of whites. One rule of the game of life is that it isn't fair. All the whining in the world isn't going to change that rule.
Exactly. There are so many opportunities in this country if you just work hard and have a good attitude. If you are a good worker or a good student you will rise, and it won't be because of your skin color.
 
I know a lot of Black people who have worked hard and become successful. How did they do that being held down and oppressed with their skin color? :confused-84:
Serious questions;

do you think they would have had to work just as hard if they were white?

do you think they would have even more success had they been white?

How exactly do you quantify that?
 
I know a lot of Black people who have worked hard and become successful. How did they do that being held down and oppressed with their skin color? :confused-84:
Because there are always exceptions to everything. But what we want are the same opportunites for everyone else, not just those of us who were fortunate.

Did you even listen to her explain how our econmics are managed and destroyed by a system of institutional racism?
She is a powerful speaker. Taking those two incidents from the early 1920's (Rosewood and Greenwood) and using them as a blanket condemnation of whites, as if it were SOP, routine and ongoing, is an unfair argument, though.
I didn't see any blanket condemnation in what she said. Her monopoly analogy was very apropos. We are chided for not being self-sufficient as if our struggle to do so is some type of character flaw. All while completely ignoring the stacked game of monopoly that we were thrust into. Yet everytime we bring up the accomplishment that were achieved in the most affluent black community in the nation demonstrating our abilities to achieve self-sufficiency and how it was burnt to the ground by envious whites, we're scolded on how long ago that was while completely ignoring two things.

The first one is that whites have learned that lynching, murdering and burning black people out is a very effective way to shut down our progress knowing that the fear has been implanted that even if you rebuild and regain the things that were lost, there is absolutely nothing that will prevent the racists from coming and downing it down again.

The other thing that is always conveniently overlooked is how not a single white person out of that mob of 3,000 was ever arrested, let alone charged with any crime while hundreds of black people were charged and run of out town as a result of the unrest.

All of this injustice is a wound that was never treated and continues to fester. Until it is treated, the eruptions will continue.

Woah!!!!
Are you posting from the 1930's?
"All of this injustice is a wound that was never treated and continues to fester. Until it is treated, the eruptions will continue"

So Doc..
What's your recommendation regarding treatment?
 
I know a lot of Black people who have worked hard and become successful. How did they do that being held down and oppressed with their skin color? :confused-84:
Because there are always exceptions to everything. But what we want are the same opportunites for everyone else, not just those of us who were fortunate.

Did you even listen to her explain how our econmics are managed and destroyed by a system of institutional racism?
She is a powerful speaker. Taking those two incidents from the early 1920's (Rosewood and Greenwood) and using them as a blanket condemnation of whites, as if it were SOP, routine and ongoing, is an unfair argument, though.
I didn't see any blanket condemnation in what she said. Her monopoly analogy was very apropos. We are chided for not being self-sufficient as if our struggle to do so is some type of character flaw. All while completely ignoring the stacked game of monopoly that we were thrust into. Yet everytime we bring up the accomplishment that were achieved in the most affluent black community in the nation demonstrating our abilities to achieve self-sufficiency and how it was burnt to the ground by envious whites, we're scolded on how long ago that was while completely ignoring two things.

The first one is that whites have learned that lynching, murdering and burning black people out is a very effective way to shut down our progress knowing that the fear has been implanted that even if you rebuild and regain the things that were lost, there is absolutely nothing that will prevent the racists from coming and downing it down again.

The other thing that is always conveniently overlooked is how not a single white person out of that mob of 3,000 was ever arrested, let alone charged with any crime while hundreds of black people were charged and run of out town as a result of the unrest.

All of this injustice is a wound that was never treated and continues to fester. Until it is treated, the eruptions will continue.

Woah!!!!
Are you posting from the 1930's?
"All of this injustice is a wound that was never treated and continues to fester. Until it is treated, the eruptions will continue"

So Doc..
What's your recommendation regarding treatment?
I'll let you know once I've submitted it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top