Arianrhod
Gold Member
- Jul 24, 2015
- 11,060
- 1,076
- 255
I knew you couldn't answer it because you're full of it, we spend way more on kids, rich, poor and in between so your theory is a sack of excrement. The only explanation you CAN give is "I believe it because I want to".No. It is not possible to explain anything to you. Anyone who cannot tell the difference between poverty and the amount of money spent on children in a classroom is not worth engaging with.The US spends 11 to 12k per student on average annually. That's double of other developed nations. Explain to me how poverty fits in?Comparing the statistics from different countries is, of course, difficult, methodologically. Nonetheless, the correlation between educational outcomes and poverty is well established.Except the poor here live better than the poor anywhere. Upward mobility of women causes problems with education? Does not compute.There are many factors involved in America's educational decline. Many are never considered, including upward mobility for women, which has greatly affected the teaching ranks. The single greatest factor is poverty. We are the richest country on the planet, and yet we allow more and more of our children to be raised in poverty.
So your answer is "throw money at it"? It costs anywhere from $14,000-60,000 a year to keep an inmate in prison. Using your argument, that should solve crime. Why doesn't it?