Wake Up Call 2013- Obama's DHS Prepares For Civil War

[JakeStarkey]

Rott posts nothing of worth and has not repeated his threat.

Smart Rott.

Clear indication you were out of factual options.

But like opinions....

-Geaux

He threatened, Geaux, but has backed off. Vey smart. So should you.

 

[Redfish]

The founders did it as well.

You're a loon. The executive branch was miniscule in relation to the population during the Founders' era compared to the behemoth in place today.

The founders did not have the capability to maintain a strong federal government. The colonies were dispersed, communications took weeks, travel between states was difficult plus the new country had no money and no credit

Times have changed and so has our government

Yes, and for the worse. Do you really want the govt to know every aspect of your personal life? Why is it any of the govt's business to know what you buy on line, or who you call on your cell phone, or who you owe money to, or where you travel in the usa?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I agree with much of Redfish says.

However, Redfish wants to replace a government run his way, and we all would be in far worse places if that happened.

 

[Geaux4it]

Rott posts nothing of worth and has not repeated his threat.

Smart Rott.

Clear indication you were out of factual options.

But like opinions....

-Geaux

He threatened, Geaux, but has backed off. Vey smart. So should you.

I should what?

Thanks

-Geaux

 

[JakeStarkey]

Geaux, back off. Just like Rott. Stop the implied threats.

 

[candycorn]

Spying on AP

Summoning of phone records (see NSA) in a criminal investigation...happens quite often.

What "crime" did the AP reporters commit - telling the TRUTH?

While Obama, you, and other propaganda-loving libtards certainly consider the truth to be a crime, the reality is, it is in fact not.

[/QUOTE]

If they printed state secrets...it's a crime. You may remember the Patriot Act...this is part of it.

So you're sponsoring absolutely no State secrets? Gee, you're a professional idiot.

 

[Geaux4it]

Geaux, back off. Just like Rott. Stop the implied threats.

It would help if you could be more specific if at all possible.

Mahalo

-Geaux

 

[Redfish]

I agree with much of Redfish says.

However, Redfish wants to replace a government run his way, and we all would be in far worse places if that happened.

no, I want a government that is in compliance with the constitution, I want a government that operates on a balanced budget, I want a government that does not think we are the world's police force, I want a government that puts this country first in all things. I want a government that learns from its mistakes, like viet nam and obama.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I agree with much of Redfish says.

However, Redfish wants to replace a government run his way, and we all would be in far worse places if that happened.

no, I want a government that is in compliance with the constitution, I want a government that operates on a balanced budget, I want a government that does not think we are the world's police force, I want a government that puts this country first in all things. I want a government that learns from its mistakes, like viet nam and obama.

You want a government that does not enforce every citizen's civil liberties.

 

[Redfish]

Spying on AP

Summoning of phone records (see NSA) in a criminal investigation...happens quite often.

What "crime" did the AP reporters commit - telling the TRUTH?

While Obama, you, and other propaganda-loving libtards certainly consider the truth to be a crime, the reality is, it is in fact not.

If they printed state secrets...it's a crime. You may remember the Patriot Act...this is part of it.

So you're sponsoring absolutely no State secrets? Gee, you're a professional idiot.[/QUOTE]

wrong, better do some research. AP did not print secret material.

 

[Redfish]

I agree with much of Redfish says.

However, Redfish wants to replace a government run his way, and we all would be in far worse places if that happened.

no, I want a government that is in compliance with the constitution, I want a government that operates on a balanced budget, I want a government that does not think we are the world's police force, I want a government that puts this country first in all things. I want a government that learns from its mistakes, like viet nam and obama.

You want a government that does not enforce every citizen's civil liberties.

absolutely wrong, just the opposite in fact. The government that you support is violating our civil liberties,--------right now, as we speak.

 

[JakeStarkey]

no, I want a government that is in compliance with the constitution, I want a government that operates on a balanced budget, I want a government that does not think we are the world's police force, I want a government that puts this country first in all things. I want a government that learns from its mistakes, like viet nam and obama.

You want a government that does not enforce every citizen's civil liberties.

absolutely wrong, just the opposite in fact. The government that you support is violating our civil liberties,--------right now, as we speak.

Thank you for refusing to state you want government to enforce everyone's civil liberties.

 

[Redfish]

You want a government that does not enforce every citizen's civil liberties.

absolutely wrong, just the opposite in fact. The government that you support is violating our civil liberties,--------right now, as we speak.

Thank you for refusing to state you want government to enforce everyone's civil liberties.

stop with the juvenile word games, which civil liberties do you think I do not want enforced?

 

[Geaux4it]

I agree with much of Redfish says.

However, Redfish wants to replace a government run his way, and we all would be in far worse places if that happened.

no, I want a government that is in compliance with the constitution, I want a government that operates on a balanced budget, I want a government that does not think we are the world's police force, I want a government that puts this country first in all things. I want a government that learns from its mistakes, like viet nam and obama.

You want a government that does not enforce every citizen's civil liberties.

Most Americans would agree that we want a government that enforces the laws it makes.

Build the fence

-Geaux

 

[JakeStarkey]

no, I want a government that is in compliance with the constitution, I want a government that operates on a balanced budget, I want a government that does not think we are the world's police force, I want a government that puts this country first in all things. I want a government that learns from its mistakes, like viet nam and obama.

You want a government that does not enforce every citizen's civil liberties.

Most Americans would agree that we want a government that enforces the laws it makes.

Build the fence

-Geaux

And, at the same time, enforce economic sanctions and start the ten year reform process.

All three, or nothing.

 

[Geaux4it]

You want a government that does not enforce every citizen's civil liberties.

Most Americans would agree that we want a government that enforces the laws it makes.

Build the fence

-Geaux

And, at the same time, enforce economic sanctions and start the ten year reform process.

All three, or nothing.

We agree on one area. Build the fence

When that is complete, we can start to address those here. Not a minute before

-Geaux

 

[Redfish]

Yo, snake jockey, where did you go? I asked you which civil liberties that you think I don't want enforced.

 

[Redfish]

You want a government that does not enforce every citizen's civil liberties.

Most Americans would agree that we want a government that enforces the laws it makes.

Build the fence

-Geaux

And, at the same time, enforce economic sanctions and start the ten year reform process.

All three, or nothing.

secure the border first, without that the rest is meaningless.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Most Americans would agree that we want a government that enforces the laws it makes.

Build the fence

-Geaux

And, at the same time, enforce economic sanctions and start the ten year reform process.

All three, or nothing.

secure the border first, without that the rest is meaningless.

No, because then you will renege. Not going to give you a chance to do that.

 

[candycorn]

So let me get this straight - you point to your criticism of GWB's TARP bailout as "proof" of how you criticize the Obama Administration?!?

No. You didn't read the thread at all.

Then how did I know that it was about TARP, stupid? You're really humiliating yourself (well, more than usual) by trying to prove you have ever criticized Oabama for anything...

You didn't understand it; like most things. The old malady of the GOP only wanting to hear what it wants rears it's ugly head once more.