Iceweasel
Diamond Member
Well that's my position, a person should be too valuable at that point to let go. Your scenario is that he could be replaced by a couple of young part timers. I don't see why a company should be obligated to keep them on if that's the level of work they are doing.Because we are all human beings and should be above the pack mentality of an animal.
I do not, or would not, work for a company who does not have ethical policies.
A business is not a charity, I get that. Completely.
At the same time a business should have an obligatory humaneness and appreciation for years of dedication and value when that employee reaches an age where they may not be as fast and productive as a new recruit. I am speaking of course of a laborer, or someone whose contributions are mainly physical.
I personally have no worries. My contacts and reputation in the industry make me far more valuable than an inexperienced person with little to no contacts/experience. Just so you know where I stand.
Yes, it would be nice, especially if the CEO is buying a bigger yacht but I don't have much faith in mankind in general. I don't expect kindness or someone looking out for my best interests. I guess it's why I work for myself.