Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 53,204
- 15,927
- 2,180
It's meaningless. the minute he's sentenced, the plea agreement is null and void.Oh, Brit knows nothing. And he's proud of it. The thing to remember is that to conservatives, the law is whatever they FEEL it is. They don't actually care what the real law says, or how plea agreements work, or even what the Supreme Court rules.This idiot seems to have latched on the phrase "plea agreement" as if that means something in this context. That is an agreement between the accused and the prosecutor. The Court can be advised of it but his TESTIMONY is all the court is really concerned about. Testimony like "Yes your honor I am guilty and this is why and what I did"Why don't you bother these morons who believe a plea agreement constitutes valid evidence of something?The judge is going to throw out the charges, so there won't be any jail time, fool.
Says the soul so wildly ignorant about the law that he insisted that miranda rights have to be read to people who aren't in custody.
Yeah, your command of the topic really doesn't amount to much.
They only care about how they FEEL the law should be. Which is what Brit is arguing.
Alas, the court's don't give a fiddler's fuck what some online hack FEELS about the law. Courts abide the actual law, the actual court rulings.
And in the actual plea agreement......Flynn accepted the Statement of Offense and signed his name and stipulates to its accuracy under the penalty of perjury.
Which they don't know.....because they refuse to look at the plea agreement. And then laughably argue that if they won't look at the agreement, then it doesn't have any evidence.
You can't fix stupid.
Says you, citing your imagination.
Again, you don't know a thing about the law. You keep citing your imagination.....as if it has some relevance. You keep inventing 'requirements' of the federal authorities that simply don't exist. And the pseudo-legal gibberish you make up has no relevance in any court of law.
Back in reality, Flynn stipulated to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.