We Must BAN "Assault Trucks"!

[Eaglewings]

We need to get on the liberal band wagon about this folks!
"Assault Trucks" are Killing people!

The French thus far have REFUSED to ban these "Assault Trucks" and are dying because of it.

Only the military should have "Assault Trucks" because there is no reason for a private person to own one.

Our Constitution was written back in the days of Horse&Buggy's and NEVER intended to cover "Assault Trucks".
The ownership of those evil 4x4s and pickup trucks NEEDS to be heavily regulated. One should have to prove a need for an evil "Assault Truck".

"Assault Trucks" kill more people world wide than anything produced on earth.
There is simply NO REASON for the public to have full auto "Assault Trucks".
We have a government who will ensure the fact we get food/supplies and medicine.

#BAN Assault Trucks.

Fury

I do agree with you Fury..thing is that these evil people will use planes, trains and automobiles.

They can destroy our water supply , or poison our air...fucking assholes I feel so bad for our children and generations to come .

 

[The Great Goose]

DF has peaked way too early today!!!!

Either that, or we'll see his greatest master thread, in the very dark, very early hours of tomorrow morning.

 

[jc456]

Isn't that obvious?

 

[DarkFury]

Neither were pressurized cooking pots. And underwear and shoes weren't made to tuck explosives into.

Heard on CNN --- France is 10% Muslim --- 70% of their prison population is NOW Muslim. Think the immigration policy has anything to do with that statistic?

Irrelevant. Nobody made the specious argument to "ban pressurized cooking pots". Or underwear. Or shoes.

Try to stay on topic, K?

You brought up that trucks weren't invented for such a purpose. I thought I'd help you EXPAND your meme. Although it DOES show how clueless and focused the left is on the "weapon" and not the problem..
Wanna make a LONGER list of things not designed to kill that make EXCELLENT terrorist weapons? Like fertilizer or screws and ball bearings? Or fire?

What the hell would be the point?

Don't know.. To me all this EXPECTED finger pointing is pointless. Unlike that statistic I posted where 70% of French prison inmates are NOW Muslim.. You'd THINK -- that might be more productive. But it's not the topic.

Indeed it isn't. I have a question out to Pinkie on the table and you're jumping up and down trying to distract it away.
Why might that be?


Still waiting, Pinkie....

The point is something will ALWAYS be the weapon until you recognize its the person/group that is the problem. Why is this attack any different to liberals and their anti-gun agenda? Because no gun was used.

So using liberal logic you ban trucks because banning the person or group is anti-PC.

 

[Old Rocks]

Assault weapons were invented for only one purpose. Killing people. And they do that very effectively. Of course, other things, such as jet passenger planes, cars, and even crescent wrenches can be used for killing people, also. But they have many other uses, and are not used that much for the purpose of killing people. That the terrorist used a truck in this case as an effective weapon is no different than the three planes that were used here in the use to kill people. Time to have international cooperation on watching for this kind of psychotic.

Assault weapons are figment of leftist ignorance about firearms. I had a 10 round rotary cartridge Ruger rifle that looked like something out of a Western.. And I could fire that JUST as fast and accurately as a "nasty looking" gun..

How fast could you reload it? In the hands of a skilled rifleman, even a single shot .22 is a very dangerous weapon. However, in the hands of an incompetent, an AR or AK is a very dangerous weapon. That is the difference.

All of my guns were designed for hunting. However, both high powered rifles are man accurate to 600 yards. Not good for cleaning out grade school classrooms and crowded night clubs, but more than adaquete for self defense.

 

[Old Rocks]

So, recognize groups that are dangerous, but make sure that they can buy guns? That seems to be what you 'Conservatives' are saying. And let those guns by high rate of fire semi-automatics. LOL.

Ah well, you are a disappearing breed.

 

[Pogo]

Irrelevant. Nobody made the specious argument to "ban pressurized cooking pots". Or underwear. Or shoes.

Try to stay on topic, K?

You brought up that trucks weren't invented for such a purpose. I thought I'd help you EXPAND your meme. Although it DOES show how clueless and focused the left is on the "weapon" and not the problem..
Wanna make a LONGER list of things not designed to kill that make EXCELLENT terrorist weapons? Like fertilizer or screws and ball bearings? Or fire?

What the hell would be the point?

Don't know.. To me all this EXPECTED finger pointing is pointless. Unlike that statistic I posted where 70% of French prison inmates are NOW Muslim.. You'd THINK -- that might be more productive. But it's not the topic.

Indeed it isn't. I have a question out to Pinkie on the table and you're jumping up and down trying to distract it away.
Why might that be?


Still waiting, Pinkie....

The point is something will ALWAYS be the weapon until you recognize its the person/group that is the problem. Why is this attack any different to liberals and their anti-gun agenda? Because no gun was used.

So using liberal logic you ban trucks because banning the person or group is anti-PC.

There's nothing "Liberal" about "banning guns". That's your own strawman.

What you actually posted, and you're running away from, was this:

Must suck when your own ignorant argument is thrown back in your face.

---- which is what I did to you when I got here. Guns are designed to kill; trucks are designed to transport. So you have a completely false analogy.

So I agree. That must suck.

 

[flacaltenn]

Assault weapons were invented for only one purpose. Killing people. And they do that very effectively. Of course, other things, such as jet passenger planes, cars, and even crescent wrenches can be used for killing people, also. But they have many other uses, and are not used that much for the purpose of killing people. That the terrorist used a truck in this case as an effective weapon is no different than the three planes that were used here in the use to kill people. Time to have international cooperation on watching for this kind of psychotic.

Assault weapons are figment of leftist ignorance about firearms. I had a 10 round rotary cartridge Ruger rifle that looked like something out of a Western.. And I could fire that JUST as fast and accurately as a "nasty looking" gun..

How fast could you reload it? In the hands of a skilled rifleman, even a single shot .22 is a very dangerous weapon. However, in the hands of an incompetent, an AR or AK is a very dangerous weapon. That is the difference.

All of my guns were designed for hunting. However, both high powered rifles are man accurate to 600 yards. Not good for cleaning out grade school classrooms and crowded night clubs, but more than adaquete for self defense.

I just push a button -- drop the mag and pop another 10 rounds in. The mags were more compact storable It was a DORKY LOOKING gun is the point. Works the same way as AR but with better safety and only a SLIGHTLY longer shot rate..

Cleaning out a crowded nightclub or classroom (lord forgive me) best done with a wide open choke on a semi-auto shotgun. Could EVEN saw off the barrel if you were a criminal type. (although not all multi round shotguns can be sawed)

Might not have the "kill rate", but the number of wounded would be VERY impressive. NO skill required at all.

ASSAULT is what happens --- not what type of gun was used. And HUNTING is not the only valid use. I have coyotes and rabid skunks that want to eat stuff I don't want them to eat. AND I don't want to face criminals with a single shot hunting rifle.

 

[Rustic]

We need to get on the liberal band wagon about this folks!
"Assault Trucks" are Killing people!

The French thus far have REFUSED to ban these "Assault Trucks" and are dying because of it.

Only the military should have "Assault Trucks" because there is no reason for a private person to own one.

Our Constitution was written back in the days of Horse&Buggy's and NEVER intended to cover "Assault Trucks".
The ownership of those evil 4x4s and pickup trucks NEEDS to be heavily regulated. One should have to prove a need for an evil "Assault Truck".

"Assault Trucks" kill more people world wide than anything produced on earth.
There is simply NO REASON for the public to have full auto "Assault Trucks".
We have a government who will ensure the fact we get food/supplies and medicine.

#BAN Assault Trucks.

Fury

If only there'd been a good guy with an assau......

Actually fuck you DF. Go fuck yourself and die in a fire. 80 people died. Have some fucking shame.

Says the pussy whipped bitch...

 

[Rustic]

We need to get on the liberal band wagon about this folks!
"Assault Trucks" are Killing people!


The French thus far have REFUSED to ban these "Assault Trucks" and are dying because of it.



Only the military should have "Assault Trucks" because there is no reason for a private person to own one.



Our Constitution was written back in the days of Horse&Buggy's and NEVER intended to cover "Assault Trucks".
The ownership of those evil 4x4s and pickup trucks NEEDS to be heavily regulated. One should have to prove a need for an evil "Assault Truck".

"Assault Trucks" kill more people world wide than anything produced on earth.
There is simply NO REASON for the public to have full auto "Assault Trucks".
We have a government who will ensure the fact we get food/supplies and medicine.

#BAN Assault Trucks.

Fury

Isn't that special that you think this is "funny", Pinkie.

Must suck that the truck wasn't invented for such a purpose, huh?

Dipwad.

An ar15 was developed for varmit hunting. Shit for brains

 

[TheOldSchool]

We need to get on the liberal band wagon about this folks!
"Assault Trucks" are Killing people!

The French thus far have REFUSED to ban these "Assault Trucks" and are dying because of it.

Only the military should have "Assault Trucks" because there is no reason for a private person to own one.

Our Constitution was written back in the days of Horse&Buggy's and NEVER intended to cover "Assault Trucks".
The ownership of those evil 4x4s and pickup trucks NEEDS to be heavily regulated. One should have to prove a need for an evil "Assault Truck".

"Assault Trucks" kill more people world wide than anything produced on earth.
There is simply NO REASON for the public to have full auto "Assault Trucks".
We have a government who will ensure the fact we get food/supplies and medicine.

#BAN Assault Trucks.

Fury

If only there'd been a good guy with an assau......

Actually fuck you DF. Go fuck yourself and die in a fire. 80 people died. Have some fucking shame.

Says the pussy whipped bitch...

 

[DarkFury]

We need to get on the liberal band wagon about this folks!
"Assault Trucks" are Killing people!

The French thus far have REFUSED to ban these "Assault Trucks" and are dying because of it.

Only the military should have "Assault Trucks" because there is no reason for a private person to own one.

Our Constitution was written back in the days of Horse&Buggy's and NEVER intended to cover "Assault Trucks".
The ownership of those evil 4x4s and pickup trucks NEEDS to be heavily regulated. One should have to prove a need for an evil "Assault Truck".

"Assault Trucks" kill more people world wide than anything produced on earth.
There is simply NO REASON for the public to have full auto "Assault Trucks".
We have a government who will ensure the fact we get food/supplies and medicine.

#BAN Assault Trucks.

Fury

I do agree with you Fury..thing is that these evil people will use planes, trains and automobiles.

They can destroy our water supply , or poison our air...fucking assholes I feel so bad for our children and generations to come .

The water supply is all to possible and they have already used poison gas in other places.

 

[Rustic]

Assault weapons were invented for only one purpose. Killing people. And they do that very effectively. Of course, other things, such as jet passenger planes, cars, and even crescent wrenches can be used for killing people, also. But they have many other uses, and are not used that much for the purpose of killing people. That the terrorist used a truck in this case as an effective weapon is no different than the three planes that were used here in the US to kill people. Time to have international cooperation on watching for this kind of psychotic.

An ar15 is not a "assault weapon" dipshit.
Get your shit eating head out of your ass, and educate yourself on what the differences between an AR15 as opposed to a real military grade weapon…
Lol

 

[Rustic]

You brought up that trucks weren't invented for such a purpose. I thought I'd help you EXPAND your meme. Although it DOES show how clueless and focused the left is on the "weapon" and not the problem..
Wanna make a LONGER list of things not designed to kill that make EXCELLENT terrorist weapons? Like fertilizer or screws and ball bearings? Or fire?

What the hell would be the point?

Don't know.. To me all this EXPECTED finger pointing is pointless. Unlike that statistic I posted where 70% of French prison inmates are NOW Muslim.. You'd THINK -- that might be more productive. But it's not the topic.

Indeed it isn't. I have a question out to Pinkie on the table and you're jumping up and down trying to distract it away.
Why might that be?


Still waiting, Pinkie....

The point is something will ALWAYS be the weapon until you recognize its the person/group that is the problem. Why is this attack any different to liberals and their anti-gun agenda? Because no gun was used.

So using liberal logic you ban trucks because banning the person or group is anti-PC.

There's nothing "Liberal" about "banning guns". That's your own strawman.

What you actually posted, and you're running away from, was this:

Must suck when your own ignorant argument is thrown back in your face.

---- which is what I did to you when I got here. Guns are designed to kill; trucks are designed to transport. So you have a completely false analogy.

So I agree. That must suck.

Well, that "truck" killed... Of course much like a firearm it needed someone operating it to kill somebody. Dumbass
Lol

 

[yiostheoy]

trucks, cars.............roller skates

Just not skate boards though.

Even though skate boards are like skates they are not assault weapons.

Kids have a constitutional right to skate boards for transportation.

 

[yiostheoy]

An ar15 is not a "assault weapon" …

California recently revised their definition of an assault weapon to include any firearm with a pistol grip -or- folding stock -and- detachable magazine.

The AR's and the AK's are now doomed.

Bill Text - AB-1135 Firearms: assault weapons.

 

[Rustic]

An ar15 is not a "assault weapon" …

California recently revised their definition of an assault weapon to include any firearm with a pistol grip -or- folding stock -and- detachable magazine.

The AR's and the AK's are now doomed.

Bill Text - AB-1135 Firearms: assault weapons.

Too bad progressives have no clue what a real military grade weapons are. Education is not real high on their list of priorities

 

[aris2chat]

trucks, cars.............roller skates

Just not skate boards though.

Even though skate boards are like skates they are not assault weapons.

Kids have a constitutional right to skate boards for transportation.

Have you seen one fly through the air, without the owner?

 

[SmokeALib]

An ar15 is not a "assault weapon" …

California recently revised their definition of an assault weapon to include any firearm with a pistol grip -or- folding stock -and- detachable magazine.

The AR's and the AK's are now doomed.

Bill Text - AB-1135 Firearms: assault weapons.

Who gives a fuck what California thinks an assault weapons is?

 

[Roudy]

We need to get on the liberal band wagon about this folks!
"Assault Trucks" are Killing people!

The French thus far have REFUSED to ban these "Assault Trucks" and are dying because of it.

Only the military should have "Assault Trucks" because there is no reason for a private person to own one.

Our Constitution was written back in the days of Horse&Buggy's and NEVER intended to cover "Assault Trucks".
The ownership of those evil 4x4s and pickup trucks NEEDS to be heavily regulated. One should have to prove a need for an evil "Assault Truck".

"Assault Trucks" kill more people world wide than anything produced on earth.
There is simply NO REASON for the public to have full auto "Assault Trucks".
We have a government who will ensure the fact we get food/supplies and medicine.

#BAN Assault Trucks.

Fury

And since the terrorist used assault weapons, it's time for the Democraps do another sit-in at the French Parlaiment to seriously, really ban the assault weapons that are already banned in France. And Obama should give a long speech, talking down to the French people, informing them that this is yet another example of the evil NRA blocking the banning of assault weapons that are already banned in France.

Obama should also inform the French people that once again, for the thousandth time, this has nothing to do with Islam or Islamic terrorists, and the evil French whites are going to see more of these incidents if they don't stop oppressing the poor Muslims, because Muslim lives matter!