beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 44,235
- 16,483
And you say all this to get what sort of point accross ???Yep, the fake news MSM would never cover such an event. It goes against their narrative that Europe hates Trump.
.
The truth is, that crowd was comprised of all white people, that event wasn't even reported by Fox....there's a major revolt taking place worldwide among whites right now and that's scaring the fuck out of everybody. The shit may soon hit the fan.
I find it pathetic you can't just accept good news without inserting race into it.
.
Agreed. He is a disgraceful excuse for an American, a conservative, a republican, a Christian, a human being, or any of the aforementioned.Yep, the fake news MSM would never cover such an event. It goes against their narrative that Europe hates Trump.
.
The truth is, that crowd was comprised of all white people, that event wasn't even reported by Fox....there's a major revolt taking place worldwide among whites right now and that's scaring the fuck out of everybody. The shit may soon hit the fan.
I find it pathetic you can't just accept good news without inserting race into it.
.
That's awesome, I'm totally cool with that...I find it pathetic that so many nutless cucks are scared shitless to discuss or address anything with regard to ethnicity....all nutless fools are owned by the PC movement...I get that.
Remember, I'm extreme, I'm that guy hoping to distance himself from the sackless pukes who have got their asses handed to them for decades. You cucks just sit there on your hands like you've done for years and ride the coattails of this new age Republican....We got your sorry asses..we'll carry all you pussies.
I'm perfectly fine discussing evolutionary divergence.
When folks aren't educated to know that all humans experience life the same, they are ignorant, and thus, they FEAR the other.
Biologists and Anthropologists have noted, this is a totally normal reaction. What really bugs me, is the elite ruling class journalists brainwash folks to make it seem like it is just the reverse. I had a liberal friend of mine just the other day on her FB, post a meme saying that HATE is learned. Factually, it is not, it is empathy and love that is learned.
HATE, fear, suspicion, it is all a product of ignorance. If folks go into the armed forces or off to University, they get exposed to many different life styles and different types of people, THEY LEARN EMPATHY. Folks may not like differences, but they understand the life of different people.
Folks that never leave their cloistered community, do not get it.
Biologists have even noted, that among animal species, like wolves, or lions, different sub-groupings are preferential to in-groups, versus out-groupings, IT IS NATURAL. It takes exposure and education to the out-group to overcome fear and suspicion. This is only ever done if there is some evolutionary or economic advantage in doing so.
The left would make all of society believe that babies are born accepting of the out-group, and are raised to hate and fear the out group by ignorant red necks, when, in fact, it takes exposure to different groups and different types of people to condition empathy and love. It takes a very affluent society to make diversity and multiculturalism work.
. . . IN CONCLUSION, more than likely, you have never served in the military, nor have you been forced to live in a dorm or shipped off far away and been exposed to many different types of people much more diverse than yourself.
We understand your fear and suspicion of the OUT-GROUP.
I have no problem understanding or discussing the dynamics of relations between IN-GROUP and OUT-GROUP exchanges.
I don't think you really know anything beyond your fear and suspicion. Nor do I think you have an interest in learning love and empathy either, for it would confer no evolutionary or economic advantage to you in the short term.
Evolution of in-group favoritism
http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/spcl/documents/Richeson_SommersAR16.pdf
Do you think that all people's are harmless for whom chooses to come together as a group under a specific ideology or thought process of some sort ????
Once the people create standards and moral guidelines to go by, and another group or groups become something in contrast to those sacred standards or moral guidelines chosen freely by participating groups, then comes the separation of the groups along those guidelines that were chosen if aren't respected or honored.
Now groups can exist side by side as long as each group respects the standards and moral guidelines that each group sets forth for themselves to follow. They can even mingle together in the percieved public sqaures as long as guidelines and standards are respected and abided by in these things when such intermingling takes place.
Now who controls the public square for all groups to use ???? You might say well the government does... But I say who controls the government at any given time, and what ideology does the grouped members taking control of said government have at any given time ????? These things have since become some kind of an issue these days, and this has come about by what ???
Was it for one example due to the fundemental change Obama talked about ???? How did that work out for the country as a whole ???? If done right it could have been productive, but it wasn't done right in which is the problem.
I say that it has become an issue all due to the disrespectful attitudes, strange ideologies, underhandedness, radicalness, and chaos used by the smaller groups that allow very influential individuals from within to use such things and/or tactics listed, in order to cast out the larger groups from the percieved public square (i.e. isolating them), in which those smaller groups wanted badly in order to take total control of that public square, and so the public square really no longer exists for the larger groups whom at this point chooses to stay home.
Plan accomplished right or is it an ongoing thing ??