Welfare Queen says Working is Stupid

[bripat9643]

Listening to this bitch is enough to make you vomit:

Well, you should know, because the states getting more money from the government than they send in are almost all red. If you lazy ass ' Conservatives' would get off your asses, shovel the beer cans away from the door, and get a job, we would all be better off.

You just proved you're a racist because the people getting welfare in "red states" are mostly blacks and Hispanics.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Listening to this bitch is enough to make you vomit:

Well, you should know, because the states getting more money from the government than they send in are almost all red. If you lazy ass ' Conservatives' would get off your asses, shovel the beer cans away from the door, and get a job, we would all be better off.

States don't get welfare--people get welfare. Learn the difference.

 

[Old Rocks]

What the resulting map shows is that the most “dependent states,” as measured by the composite score, are Mississippi and New Mexico, each of which gets back about $3 in federal spending for every dollar they send to the federal treasury in taxes. Alabama and Louisiana are close behind.

If you look only at the first measure—how much the federal government spends per person in each state compared with the amount its citizens pay in federal income taxes—other states stand out, particularly South Carolina: The Palmetto State receives $7.87 back from Washington for every $1 its citizens pay in federal tax. This bar chart, made from Wallet Hub's data, reveals the sharp discrepancies among states on that measure.

On the other side of this group, folks in 14 states, including Delaware, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska, and Ohio, get back less than $1 for each $1 they spend in taxes.

It’s not just that some states are getting way more in return for their federal tax dollars, but the disproportionate amount of federal aid that some states receive allows them to keep their own taxes artificially low. That's the argument Wallet Hub analysts make in their 2014 Report on Best & Worst States to be a Taxpayer.

Part of the explanation for why southern states dominate the “most dependent” category is historical. During the many decades in the 20th century when the South was solidly Democratic, its congressional representatives in both the House and the Senate, enjoying great seniority, came to hold leadership positions on powerful committees, which they used to send federal dollars back to their home states in the form of contracts, projects, installations.

Another part of the explanation is easier to discern. The reddest states on that map at the top—Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, New Mexico, Maine—have exceptionally high poverty rates and thus receive disproportionately large shares of federal dollars. Through a variety of social programs, the federal government disburses hundreds of billions of dollars each year to maintain a “safety net” intended to help the neediest among us. Consider, for example, the percentage of each state’s residents who get “food stamps” through the federal government’s SNAP program. This chart tells the story.

Which States Are Givers and Which Are Takers?

Typical truck driver, not very bright. What the states don't pick up, we taxpayers in other states do.

 

[bripat9643]

What the resulting map shows is that the most “dependent states,” as measured by the composite score, are Mississippi and New Mexico, each of which gets back about $3 in federal spending for every dollar they send to the federal treasury in taxes. Alabama and Louisiana are close behind.

If you look only at the first measure—how much the federal government spends per person in each state compared with the amount its citizens pay in federal income taxes—other states stand out, particularly South Carolina: The Palmetto State receives $7.87 back from Washington for every $1 its citizens pay in federal tax. This bar chart, made from Wallet Hub's data, reveals the sharp discrepancies among states on that measure.

On the other side of this group, folks in 14 states, including Delaware, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska, and Ohio, get back less than $1 for each $1 they spend in taxes.

It’s not just that some states are getting way more in return for their federal tax dollars, but the disproportionate amount of federal aid that some states receive allows them to keep their own taxes artificially low. That's the argument Wallet Hub analysts make in their 2014 Report on Best & Worst States to be a Taxpayer.

Part of the explanation for why southern states dominate the “most dependent” category is historical. During the many decades in the 20th century when the South was solidly Democratic, its congressional representatives in both the House and the Senate, enjoying great seniority, came to hold leadership positions on powerful committees, which they used to send federal dollars back to their home states in the form of contracts, projects, installations.

Another part of the explanation is easier to discern. The reddest states on that map at the top—Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, New Mexico, Maine—have exceptionally high poverty rates and thus receive disproportionately large shares of federal dollars. Through a variety of social programs, the federal government disburses hundreds of billions of dollars each year to maintain a “safety net” intended to help the neediest among us. Consider, for example, the percentage of each state’s residents who get “food stamps” through the federal government’s SNAP program. This chart tells the story.

Which States Are Givers and Which Are Takers?

Typical truck driver, not very bright. What the states don't pick up, we taxpayers in other states do.

<YAWN!>

 

[Old Rocks]

What the resulting map shows is that the most “dependent states,” as measured by the composite score, are Mississippi and New Mexico, each of which gets back about $3 in federal spending for every dollar they send to the federal treasury in taxes. Alabama and Louisiana are close behind.

If you look only at the first measure—how much the federal government spends per person in each state compared with the amount its citizens pay in federal income taxes—other states stand out, particularly South Carolina: The Palmetto State receives $7.87 back from Washington for every $1 its citizens pay in federal tax. This bar chart, made from Wallet Hub's data, reveals the sharp discrepancies among states on that measure.

On the other side of this group, folks in 14 states, including Delaware, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska, and Ohio, get back less than $1 for each $1 they spend in taxes.

It’s not just that some states are getting way more in return for their federal tax dollars, but the disproportionate amount of federal aid that some states receive allows them to keep their own taxes artificially low. That's the argument Wallet Hub analysts make in their 2014 Report on Best & Worst States to be a Taxpayer.

Part of the explanation for why southern states dominate the “most dependent” category is historical. During the many decades in the 20th century when the South was solidly Democratic, its congressional representatives in both the House and the Senate, enjoying great seniority, came to hold leadership positions on powerful committees, which they used to send federal dollars back to their home states in the form of contracts, projects, installations.

Another part of the explanation is easier to discern. The reddest states on that map at the top—Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, New Mexico, Maine—have exceptionally high poverty rates and thus receive disproportionately large shares of federal dollars. Through a variety of social programs, the federal government disburses hundreds of billions of dollars each year to maintain a “safety net” intended to help the neediest among us. Consider, for example, the percentage of each state’s residents who get “food stamps” through the federal government’s SNAP program. This chart tells the story.

Which States Are Givers and Which Are Takers?

Typical truck driver, not very bright. What the states don't pick up, we taxpayers in other states do.

<YAWN!>

Not much else you can say.

 

[bripat9643]

What the resulting map shows is that the most “dependent states,” as measured by the composite score, are Mississippi and New Mexico, each of which gets back about $3 in federal spending for every dollar they send to the federal treasury in taxes. Alabama and Louisiana are close behind.

If you look only at the first measure—how much the federal government spends per person in each state compared with the amount its citizens pay in federal income taxes—other states stand out, particularly South Carolina: The Palmetto State receives $7.87 back from Washington for every $1 its citizens pay in federal tax. This bar chart, made from Wallet Hub's data, reveals the sharp discrepancies among states on that measure.

On the other side of this group, folks in 14 states, including Delaware, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska, and Ohio, get back less than $1 for each $1 they spend in taxes.

It’s not just that some states are getting way more in return for their federal tax dollars, but the disproportionate amount of federal aid that some states receive allows them to keep their own taxes artificially low. That's the argument Wallet Hub analysts make in their 2014 Report on Best & Worst States to be a Taxpayer.

Part of the explanation for why southern states dominate the “most dependent” category is historical. During the many decades in the 20th century when the South was solidly Democratic, its congressional representatives in both the House and the Senate, enjoying great seniority, came to hold leadership positions on powerful committees, which they used to send federal dollars back to their home states in the form of contracts, projects, installations.

Another part of the explanation is easier to discern. The reddest states on that map at the top—Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, New Mexico, Maine—have exceptionally high poverty rates and thus receive disproportionately large shares of federal dollars. Through a variety of social programs, the federal government disburses hundreds of billions of dollars each year to maintain a “safety net” intended to help the neediest among us. Consider, for example, the percentage of each state’s residents who get “food stamps” through the federal government’s SNAP program. This chart tells the story.

Which States Are Givers and Which Are Takers?

Typical truck driver, not very bright. What the states don't pick up, we taxpayers in other states do.

<YAWN!>

Not much else you can say.

I could say a lot, but why bother? Only leftwing douche bags put any credence in that horseshit.

If you don't like people in red states getting welfare, there's a simple solution: put an end to the welfare programs. Otherwise posts like yours are nothing but useless petulant whining.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What the resulting map shows is that the most “dependent states,” as measured by the composite score, are Mississippi and New Mexico, each of which gets back about $3 in federal spending for every dollar they send to the federal treasury in taxes. Alabama and Louisiana are close behind.

If you look only at the first measure—how much the federal government spends per person in each state compared with the amount its citizens pay in federal income taxes—other states stand out, particularly South Carolina: The Palmetto State receives $7.87 back from Washington for every $1 its citizens pay in federal tax. This bar chart, made from Wallet Hub's data, reveals the sharp discrepancies among states on that measure.

On the other side of this group, folks in 14 states, including Delaware, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska, and Ohio, get back less than $1 for each $1 they spend in taxes.

It’s not just that some states are getting way more in return for their federal tax dollars, but the disproportionate amount of federal aid that some states receive allows them to keep their own taxes artificially low. That's the argument Wallet Hub analysts make in their 2014 Report on Best & Worst States to be a Taxpayer.

Part of the explanation for why southern states dominate the “most dependent” category is historical. During the many decades in the 20th century when the South was solidly Democratic, its congressional representatives in both the House and the Senate, enjoying great seniority, came to hold leadership positions on powerful committees, which they used to send federal dollars back to their home states in the form of contracts, projects, installations.

Another part of the explanation is easier to discern. The reddest states on that map at the top—Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, New Mexico, Maine—have exceptionally high poverty rates and thus receive disproportionately large shares of federal dollars. Through a variety of social programs, the federal government disburses hundreds of billions of dollars each year to maintain a “safety net” intended to help the neediest among us. Consider, for example, the percentage of each state’s residents who get “food stamps” through the federal government’s SNAP program. This chart tells the story.

Which States Are Givers and Which Are Takers?

Typical truck driver, not very bright. What the states don't pick up, we taxpayers in other states do.

Are Welfare Recipients mostly Republican?
Posted on February 22, 2012 by Tino


Paul Krugman is in puzzlement, having observed that Red States get more welfare funding, while Republican voters oppose the welfare state. He portrays Republicans as “Moochers” who are either hypocritical or too stupid to know their own best interest.

But as we know, states do not vote, individuals do. There is only a paradox if Republican voters receive welfare at above average rates while voting against it. From the Gellman-paradox we know that the low-income voters who drag down the Red States average tend to vote disproportionally for Democrats. Republican voters earn significantly more than Democrats, even though Red state earn less than Blue states.

Krugman reports no individual level data, so let me. The Maxwell Poll has detailed information about welfare use. The data is from 2004-2007. During this period in these polls a plurality of voters supported Democrats. I will graph the two-party vote, more data is at the end.


Hardly surprising, we see that in a two-party split, 60-80% of welfare recipients are Democrats, while full time Workers are evenly divided between parties.

You have similar results in this recent NPR-Poll. Among the Long Term Unemployed, 72% of the two-party support goes to Democrats.

Share of Recipients of each program that self-identified as supporters of Republican party in 2004-2007 Maxwell Poll:

Gov. Subsidized Housing 12%
Medicaid: 16%
Food Stamps: 20%
Unemployment Compensation: 21%
Welfare or public assistance: 22%
Disability benefits from government 25%

Are Welfare Recipients mostly Republican? | Tino Sanandaji

 

[Wilbur Right]

Waste is like funding PBS, NPR, Planned Parenthood.

LMAO. You know what's really a waste? Your breathing. What a waste of oxygen.

Prove trucking pays for all the roads. Or stfu.

And remember, I drive a Chevy PU. The ones you didn't believe were high milage, low maintenance capable. My wife drives the CRV. Get your shit straight before you run your mouth. Ok?

 

[Wilbur Right]

What the resulting map shows is that the most “dependent states,” as measured by the composite score, are Mississippi and New Mexico, each of which gets back about $3 in federal spending for every dollar they send to the federal treasury in taxes. Alabama and Louisiana are close behind.

If you look only at the first measure—how much the federal government spends per person in each state compared with the amount its citizens pay in federal income taxes—other states stand out, particularly South Carolina: The Palmetto State receives $7.87 back from Washington for every $1 its citizens pay in federal tax. This bar chart, made from Wallet Hub's data, reveals the sharp discrepancies among states on that measure.

On the other side of this group, folks in 14 states, including Delaware, Minnesota, Illinois, Nebraska, and Ohio, get back less than $1 for each $1 they spend in taxes.

It’s not just that some states are getting way more in return for their federal tax dollars, but the disproportionate amount of federal aid that some states receive allows them to keep their own taxes artificially low. That's the argument Wallet Hub analysts make in their 2014 Report on Best & Worst States to be a Taxpayer.

Part of the explanation for why southern states dominate the “most dependent” category is historical. During the many decades in the 20th century when the South was solidly Democratic, its congressional representatives in both the House and the Senate, enjoying great seniority, came to hold leadership positions on powerful committees, which they used to send federal dollars back to their home states in the form of contracts, projects, installations.

Another part of the explanation is easier to discern. The reddest states on that map at the top—Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, New Mexico, Maine—have exceptionally high poverty rates and thus receive disproportionately large shares of federal dollars. Through a variety of social programs, the federal government disburses hundreds of billions of dollars each year to maintain a “safety net” intended to help the neediest among us. Consider, for example, the percentage of each state’s residents who get “food stamps” through the federal government’s SNAP program. This chart tells the story.

Which States Are Givers and Which Are Takers?

Typical truck driver, not very bright. What the states don't pick up, we taxpayers in other states do.

Are Welfare Recipients mostly Republican?
Posted on February 22, 2012 by Tino


Paul Krugman is in puzzlement, having observed that Red States get more welfare funding, while Republican voters oppose the welfare state. He portrays Republicans as “Moochers” who are either hypocritical or too stupid to know their own best interest.

But as we know, states do not vote, individuals do. There is only a paradox if Republican voters receive welfare at above average rates while voting against it. From the Gellman-paradox we know that the low-income voters who drag down the Red States average tend to vote disproportionally for Democrats. Republican voters earn significantly more than Democrats, even though Red state earn less than Blue states.

Krugman reports no individual level data, so let me. The Maxwell Poll has detailed information about welfare use. The data is from 2004-2007. During this period in these polls a plurality of voters supported Democrats. I will graph the two-party vote, more data is at the end.


Hardly surprising, we see that in a two-party split, 60-80% of welfare recipients are Democrats, while full time Workers are evenly divided between parties.

You have similar results in this recent NPR-Poll. Among the Long Term Unemployed, 72% of the two-party support goes to Democrats.

Share of Recipients of each program that self-identified as supporters of Republican party in 2004-2007 Maxwell Poll:

Gov. Subsidized Housing 12%
Medicaid: 16%
Food Stamps: 20%
Unemployment Compensation: 21%
Welfare or public assistance: 22%
Disability benefits from government 25%

Are Welfare Recipients mostly Republican? | Tino Sanandaji

LMAO. You found you a Kurd, born in Iran, who trys to make the case for republicans being successful that they (republicans) are to stupid to make for themselves.

You know this guy's a wack job right. Even in his own country (Iran, sweden) he's a wack job.

But then, so are you.

 

[Wyatt earp]

One question?

Why aren't the Father's of these children paying their "fair share" of their obligation to these children?

A cursory search has child support obligations at or around 40% in some cases.

Because many of them are lowlifes. The mother either doesn't know who the father is, or the father doesn't work and on some sort of welfare program himself.

A couple of years back, I heard there was a street game that went on in NYC. The objective was for the males to impregnate as many females as they could within a certain time frame; sort of like a bet. The report I heard didn't say what the prize was, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't much. It didn't matter. The government will not hold lowlife men responsible for their actions. Instead, it becomes the burden of the taxpayers.

As if that was a real problem...Now, except in mindless red states, there is free birth control- actually better than free, dupes.

They have free birth control in redstates it is called abstenatce , they didint evolve from the primitive animal world like you and can not control their sexual urges to fuck everything that moved even monkeys which tragically gave your ilk the aids virus.

The redstates folks Have decency , morals and were created in the image of Jesus Christ . ....




.



.

 

[Wilbur Right]

Maxwell Poll Appendix Material


About the Survey: The Calling Process, the Sample and Weighting

The 2007 survey was conducted during the last two weeks of September. A sample of telephone numbers was obtained from Survey Sampling, Inc. The sample of telephone was representative of households within the continental United States. That excludes Hawaii and Alaska.





Hey Ray. Your link. Surveyed all over the country. No info on welfare being democrats or republicans.

Maybe you need to stick with the Iranian guy.

 

[Wilbur Right]

They have free birth control in redstates it is called abstenatce

Do they have a fucking dictionary? Spell check? Stupidity checks?

Evidently not.

Do us all a favor. Abstain from posting till you learn to spell.

 

[Wilbur Right]

The redstates folks Have decency , morals and were created in the image of Jesus Christ . ....

LMAO. Now that's funny. I heard Jesus is a robot in a Nissan assembly plant. Any truth to that?

 

[Wyatt earp]

They have free birth control in redstates it is called abstenatce

Do they have a fucking dictionary? Spell check? Stupidity checks?

Evidently not.

Do us all a favor. Abstain from posting till you learn to spell.

Go fuck off monkey boy I have spell check on my phone and my glasses are dirty. So do you have some substance to add to my post? Or do you just want to act like an unemployed spelling and grammar police around here?




.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The redstates folks Have decency , morals and were created in the image of Jesus Christ . ....

LMAO. Now that's funny. I heard Jesus is a robot in a Nissan assembly plant. Any truth to that?

I thought you couldn't read it or understand it monkey boy?




.

 

[Wilbur Right]

Go fuck off monkey boy I have spell check on my phone and my glasses are dirty

LMAO. You know what? That's the excuse you gave last time. Matter of fact all you got is excuses. And Bullshit.

So do you have some substance to add to my post? Or do you just want to act like an unemployed spelling and grammar police around here?

You want me to add a comment on your fucking bullshit post?
Why in the hell would I do that? That would mean I thought you had some sort of valid point.

All I want to know is if the story about Jesus being a robot in a NIssan plant is true.

If you don't know, just say so.

 

[Wilbur Right]

thought you couldn't read it or understand it monkey boy?

Of course I could read it you dumb shit. How do you think I knew you couldn't spell.

You really aren't very smart. I think you have breathed in to much injection molding fumes. Wear a respirator, see if that helps.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The redstates folks Have decency , morals and were created in the image of Jesus Christ . ....

LMAO. Now that's funny. I heard Jesus is a robot in a Nissan assembly plant. Any truth to that?

Just for you needle sick a lesson on what" image of God" means since you're to fucking stupid to figure it out .



The Hebrew root of the Latin phrase for image of God

—imago Dei—means image, shadow or likeness of God.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Go fuck off monkey boy I have spell check on my phone and my glasses are dirty

LMAO. You know what? That's the excuse you gave last time. Matter of fact all you got is excuses. And Bullshit.

So do you have some substance to add to my post? Or do you just want to act like an unemployed spelling and grammar police around here?

You want me to add a comment on your fucking bullshit post?
Why in the hell would I do that? That would mean I thought you had some sort of valid point.

All I want to know is if the story about Jesus being a robot in a NIssan plant is true.

If you don't know, just say so.

I don't make excuses you little maggot...


Take it or leave it you cock sucking spelling police morons....

 

[Wilbur Right]

Just for you needle sick a lesson on what" image of God" means since you're to fucking stupid to figure it out .

I think you meant "needle dick". Not needle sick. Must be a southern thing eh? You know, not being able to.communicate very well. Did you go to school? Chi town wasn't it? You miss lot of days?

The hits just keep on a rolling with you dude.