Welfare Recipients Now Outnumber Workers

\end thread ;)

And then you say something stupid like that .com Obama and Dems have never at any point made subsidies or corporate welfare an issue... They have in fact increased it dramatically. So while Republicans track record on welfare is horrid (by expanding it), we are in the year 2013, where if McDonald's is abusing welfare it's under Dems watch.

you people have the House as you are want to remind us :eusa_whistle:

I'm not a republican... You're mindless tricks to redirect the conversation from how you said something stupid to "Ra rarararar" is pointless. Did Dems and Obama put up bills to get rid of all corporate subsides and the house vetoed it? Nope... So shut it~

Seriously, everyday I want to meet you people, in person to debate so I can look deep into your shallow ass eyes and tell you "Hey, you're fucking stupid" when you say crap like you just did.

Me: Obama and Dems do more subsidies than Bush/reps did, but Reps and Bush were bad about subsidies.

You: Reps have the house!

Me: You're fucking stupid...

What would be spectacular is to debate you people live in front of others. That would just be golden.
 
If that is true, and the welfare recipients indicate an unwillingness to ever go back to work, it's over. The democrats have their dictatorship until the nation has its final economic collapse. Eventually the unwillingness to get off one's ass will end up in Leninesque forced labor camps.

nope.
it is not over.
however it does not mean anything good.
generally.
reversing the couxrse in order to restore the homeostasis of the system is much more difficult than to maintain it in the first place.
the only other possibility in the system is even worse.

Democrats have an ace. Legalize drugs. A majority not only dependent on the government for subsistance, but dependent on the government to ensure a drug supply as well. A majority population of drug addicts who feel like they are owed a living.
 
No dude I was saying ppl who call Obama a socialist are retards if they look at the record.

he is a socialist. of a nazi style, not a stalin's style

Lol he's Black. You realize that the Nazi's thought that blacks were an inferior race right?

lol, youare a leftard, aren't you?
lacking the basic simple logic and brainwashed by leftards agenda?

nazis being racist do not prevent the other socialist embrace their ideology and style in a reverse racial mode. or is it too much for you to grasp?
 
If that is true, and the welfare recipients indicate an unwillingness to ever go back to work, it's over. The democrats have their dictatorship until the nation has its final economic collapse. Eventually the unwillingness to get off one's ass will end up in Leninesque forced labor camps.

nope.
it is not over.
however it does not mean anything good.
generally.
reversing the couxrse in order to restore the homeostasis of the system is much more difficult than to maintain it in the first place.
the only other possibility in the system is even worse.

Democrats have an ace. Legalize drugs. A majority not only dependent on the government for subsistance, but dependent on the government to ensure a drug supply as well. A majority population of drug addicts who feel like they are owed a living.

well, you realize that the pail with goodies is not bottomless for everybody to have their share.
and the bottom is very near. What I was hinting at is the very near future right after we hit the bottom and find out there is a dire shortage of goodies and too damn big amount of takers.
 
Last edited:
OP- This is not the Dem plan for the future, brainwashed dingbats, this is taking care of the victims of Reaganism's pandering to the greedy idiot rich- SEE SIG, PARA 1- and, mainly, of the victims of the Pub cronyism/corruption economic meltdown/depression/Great Recession, and lately the 24/7/365 Pub obstruction and phony crises that have almost killed the recovery.

The other disgrace is the greedy idiot billionnaire Pub Propaganda Machine, which produces huge numbers of now functional morons who blame Dems for ANY of this. Most idiotic voters in the modern world- the ugly American Pub dupe. see sig and get some facts...
 
Last edited:
If you think Nazis were socialists, BINGO- You're a RW nutjob, on another planet- change the chanel. Hint- That book and Beck are a joke in the real world- like the OP....
 
And then you say something stupid like that .com Obama and Dems have never at any point made subsidies or corporate welfare an issue... They have in fact increased it dramatically. So while Republicans track record on welfare is horrid (by expanding it), we are in the year 2013, where if McDonald's is abusing welfare it's under Dems watch.

you people have the House as you are want to remind us :eusa_whistle:

I'm not a republican... You're mindless tricks to redirect the conversation from how you said something stupid to "Ra rarararar" is pointless. Did Dems and Obama put up bills to get rid of all corporate subsides and the house vetoed it? Nope... So shut it~

Seriously, everyday I want to meet you people, in person to debate so I can look deep into your shallow ass eyes and tell you "Hey, you're fucking stupid" when you say crap like you just did.

Me: Obama and Dems do more subsidies than Bush/reps did, but Reps and Bush were bad about subsidies.

You: Reps have the house!

Me: You're fucking stupid...

What would be spectacular is to debate you people live in front of others. That would just be golden.

I don't speak retard. Are you saying the House, which controls the purse strings can have no effect on those programs? You might be right if they acted like retards, which the tea party hijacked majority do ;) Witness :up: their colossal defeat last week. Theres a reason libertarians aren't taken seriously at the national level. Same reason Randians aren't taken seriously.
 
Last edited:
Pure propaganda.

Obama is coming to your house to kill grandma, steal your guns and ship you off to a FEMA concentration camp
 
Shocked?

I'm not. Not really. It is, afterall, the goal of the democrat party

Census Bureau: Welfare Recipients Now Outnumber Full-Time Workers…

we-accept-ebt.jpg


Work harder everyone, millions of Obamabots are depending on you.

Via CNS News:

Americans who were recipients of means-tested government benefits in 2011 outnumbered year-round full-time workers, according to data released this month by the Census Bureau.

They also out-numbered the total population of the Philippines.

There were 108,592,000 people in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2011 who were recipients of one or more means-tested government benefit programs, the Census Bureau said in data released this week. Meanwhile, according to the Census Bureau, there were 101,716,000 people who worked full-time year round in 2011. That included both private-sector and government workers.

That means there were about 1.07 people getting some form of means-tested government benefit for every 1 person working full-time year round.

- See more at: Weasel Zippers | Scouring the bowels of the internet | Weasel Zippers

Well now, so anyone working full time or part time, but at such low wages that they need help just to have a roof over their head is considered on welfare in your opinion? Perhaps the problem is the wages they recieve for their work, as opposed to the profits the 1% make off of that work. These figures in the video tell the story;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM]Wealth Inequality in America - YouTube[/ame]


What makes you think wages ought to be reached by anything other than education degree level achieved, knowledge attained to fulfill a task based on the complexity and stress of that position, and the replacement "value" of that individual seated at that position? Surely a corporate CEO has more responsibility and value than that of a sales employee at a Best Buy. You want that high income position? Then you have to be willing to confront the problems and stress associated with that job and EARN it !! To many individuals complain about ATTAINING the reward, but they are not willing to undergo the sacrifice of long hours, higher education, hard work and extreme stress that can be associated with that higher pay grade.
 
If you think Nazis were socialists, BINGO- You're a RW nutjob, on another planet- change the chanel. Hint- That book and Beck are a joke in the real world- like the OP....

Nazi stood for National Socialist Party dumbass

well, that is beyond the talking points for the leftards.

their head will blow if you tell them that what they consider "socialism" is not even close to it and what they were told not to be socialism is exactly that.
otherwise they would know and recognize the classic fascist features of the signature program of this administration - government prosecution and control of robbing the citizens for the benefit of the chosen big businesses - a Hitler's model.

However, the way the program is "functioning" is a typical way of the soviet failure :lol:
 
Shocked?

I'm not. Not really. It is, afterall, the goal of the democrat party

Census Bureau: Welfare Recipients Now Outnumber Full-Time Workers…

we-accept-ebt.jpg


Work harder everyone, millions of Obamabots are depending on you.

Via CNS News:



- See more at: Weasel Zippers | Scouring the bowels of the internet | Weasel Zippers

Well now, so anyone working full time or part time, but at such low wages that they need help just to have a roof over their head is considered on welfare in your opinion? Perhaps the problem is the wages they recieve for their work, as opposed to the profits the 1% make off of that work. These figures in the video tell the story;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM]Wealth Inequality in America - YouTube[/ame]

Not "In my opinion" dope.

In the opinion of the United States Census Bureau

Not even gonna touch that video though.. huh? :lol:

Those numbers in that video are the problem, not the people on the services they need in order to survive.

See, you cons are always talking about "wealth redistribution" and you are right.. It's happening right now as we speak.. All of our money is going right up to the top.
 
If you think Nazis were socialists, BINGO- You're a RW nutjob, on another planet- change the chanel. Hint- That book and Beck are a joke in the real world- like the OP....

Nazi stood for National Socialist Party dumbass

And USSR stood for Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, so you think they were socialists AND Republicans lol- I guess you believe ANY RW propaganda, hater dupes...

I've got a Masters in history, with a concentration on Nazis, WWII, and the Battle of France. YOU...are pathetic. Change the channel...

For a little reality- should be refreshing for you- socialism has LONG been defined in the real world as always democratic- unlike communism which has always been put in by violent revolution, and always fails...
 
If you think Nazis were socialists, BINGO- You're a RW nutjob, on another planet- change the chanel. Hint- That book and Beck are a joke in the real world- like the OP....

Nazi stood for National Socialist Party dumbass

And USSR stood for Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, so you think they were socialists AND Republicans lol- I guess you believe ANY RW propaganda, hater dupes...

I've got a Masters in history, with a concentration on Nazis, WWII, and the Battle of France. YOU...are pathetic. Change the channel...

For a little reality- should be refreshing for you- socialism has LONG been defined in the real world as always democratic- unlike communism which has always been put in by violent revolution, and always fails...

idiot, BOTH regimes were socialist. If one actually knows how to distinguish socialism from communism ( which never existed)

but they did not tell you this in your brainwashing talking point, did they, leftard dupe?
 

Forum List

Back
Top