Were you surprised by the result of the Mueller investigation?

[Crixus]

Seems to me, this caught the left flat-footed -- they really and truly believed this was a slam-dunk case conspiracy and obstruction.

- Did you allow your partisan rage to cloud your objectivity?
- Did you believe your own hype and that fed to you by the likes on MSNBC, CNN, and ABC?
- Were you more surprised by this than the 2016 election?
- Are you more emotionally let down by this than the 2016 election?
- If this - after 2 years of waiting with baited breath for the report, telling us daily that Mueller had the goods and it was a matter of time - does not convince you there was no collusion w/ Russia and/or obstruction of justice, what will?
- Why should we believe you?

No. Not surprised by the reaction either.

 

[iceberg]

You don't have to look far. Switch over to MSNBC and see all the breathless moving of the goalposts saying Barr is hiding something and by gawd, the House investigations will turn up something. You're going to get another two years of the MSM telling your gullible rubes, "ANY DAY NOW". Blind I an appropriate avie. Wake the fuck up.

That's entertainment for you. Pretty amusing considering the 8 year rhetorical war waged by the Fauxrage machine against Obama. Hell they're still keeping that fucking cell warm for old Hillary, Obama, Holder, or anyone, even Lerner.

The dog was easy to fool because she could see shadows, but she would always sniff out where I threw that smelly old pull toy of hers..........unless we washed it!

Kharma looks like a ravenous beast here in America, but we always like to supersize shit!

What does FOX News have to do with the fact that all you lefty Trump haters are supremely gullible morons who believe whatever your propaganda organs feed you?

Kwc was playing on the meme about "Any Day Now...." and I reminded him that Fauxfans still have a cell ready to jail any number Obama administration officials. I mean, you believe old Hillary and all of them should be jailed, don't you?

I have confidence we will eventually get to see all the non-classified data from the investigation.

Wrong. It's illegal to release Grand Jury testimony.

Report will be made avaiable in classified version to Congress and un-classified version to the public and you,as always, will be wrong yet again.

so let me get this straight - you were swearing trump would go down for his activities with russia and you're now telling someone who said that he would NOT that THEY are wrong?

you should start writing for the onion man.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The DOJ "office" reviewed and summarized. It is over. Rosenstein was in on the summay. They quoted the Mule team.

No one from the Mules 20 DEMs are squaking, "the summary is wrong"!

Even dodo-brain Brennan-Clapper are saying "musta been bad info" huh?
And many more.....

What more do you stay-ar-home-red-commie SSDI posters need?
Land O' Goshen!

 

[OldLady]

I'm shocked so many in the media got it so wrong....

The list is endless.....Chris Matthew's, Don Lemon, Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, Rachel Maddow, Mika B et. al.......I mean, c'mon now! Their credibility is forever shot!

Every single one of these guys is either CNN or MSNBC. Big news flash that they are as partisan as Fox. If you folks don't like their slant, don't watch them. It is as simple as that. Why must everyone act as if these two heavily partisan stations represent the entire media?

 

[mudwhistle]

We don't KNOW what the results of the Mueller Probe sare since Barr has so far refused to release it

He can't release it by law.
He can only release an edited version.

You progressives talk a good game when it comes to the rule of law and due process, but every time they get in your way you try to trounce it into the dust.

 

[BlindBoo]

He can only release an edited version.

I'm good with waiting for it to be edited and release.

 

[Ambivalent1]

Nope

 

[AntonToo]

That's entertainment for you. Pretty amusing considering the 8 year rhetorical war waged by the Fauxrage machine against Obama. Hell they're still keeping that fucking cell warm for old Hillary, Obama, Holder, or anyone, even Lerner.

The dog was easy to fool because she could see shadows, but she would always sniff out where I threw that smelly old pull toy of hers..........unless we washed it!

Kharma looks like a ravenous beast here in America, but we always like to supersize shit!

What does FOX News have to do with the fact that all you lefty Trump haters are supremely gullible morons who believe whatever your propaganda organs feed you?

Kwc was playing on the meme about "Any Day Now...." and I reminded him that Fauxfans still have a cell ready to jail any number Obama administration officials. I mean, you believe old Hillary and all of them should be jailed, don't you?

I have confidence we will eventually get to see all the non-classified data from the investigation.

Wrong. It's illegal to release Grand Jury testimony.

Report will be made avaiable in classified version to Congress and un-classified version to the public and you,as always, will be wrong yet again.

so let me get this straight - you were swearing trump would go down for his activities with russia and you're now telling someone who said that he would NOT that THEY are wrong?

you should start writing for the onion man.

I don't know wtf you are talking about and what it has to do with what you quoted.

 

[AntonToo]

The DOJ "office" reviewed and summarized. It is over. Rosenstein was in on the summay. They quoted the Mule team.

No one from the Mules 20 DEMs are squaking, "the summary is wrong"!

Even dodo-brain Brennan-Clapper are saying "musta been bad info" huh?
And many more.....

What more do you stay-ar-home-red-commie SSDI posters need?
Land O' Goshen!

"Russia Hoax"?? After all of our intelligence and Mueller's report found that Russia was absolutely running an illegal election interference campaign??

After the investigation resulted in indictments of specific Russian nationals and companies for hacking our political organizations and running politico troll farms?

 

[ColonelAngus]

The DOJ "office" reviewed and summarized. It is over. Rosenstein was in on the summay. They quoted the Mule team.

No one from the Mules 20 DEMs are squaking, "the summary is wrong"!

Even dodo-brain Brennan-Clapper are saying "musta been bad info" huh?
And many more.....

What more do you stay-ar-home-red-commie SSDI posters need?
Land O' Goshen!

"Russia Hoax"?? After all of our intelligence and Mueller's report found that Russia was absolutely running an illegal election interference campaign??

After the investigation resulted in indictments of specific Russian nationals and companies for hacking our political organizations and running politico troll farms?

Trump did not steal the election from HIllary. Get over it. It was a lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The DOJ "office" reviewed and summarized. It is over. Rosenstein was in on the summay. They quoted the Mule team.

No one from the Mules 20 DEMs are squaking, "the summary is wrong"!

Even dodo-brain Brennan-Clapper are saying "musta been bad info" huh?
And many more.....

What more do you stay-ar-home-red-commie SSDI posters need?
Land O' Goshen!

"Russia Hoax"?? After all of our intelligence and Mueller's report found that Russia was absolutely running an illegal election interference campaign??

After the investigation resulted in indictments of specific Russian nationals and companies for hacking our political organizations and running politico troll farms?

Of course they weren't, you dunce.

"… the $100,000 spent by the Russian government is laughably small, no matter how precisely targeted. In contrast, the official Trump campaign spent $90 million on digital ads — and, unlike the Russians, had assistance from Facebook employees to target and deploy them effectively. “There’s no way $100,000 in ad budget impacted the election. It’s ridiculous,” García Martínez said."
Did Russia’s Facebook Ads Actually Swing the Election?




Don't be an imbecile your whole life.....

.....take a day off.

 

[M14 Shooter]

[
"Russia Hoax"?? After all of our intelligence and Mueller's report found that Russia was absolutely running an illegal election interference campaign??

"Hoax" refers to the incessant insistence by the left and the media (as if there is a difference) that Trump, et al, were involved in this interference.
Surely, you knew that.

 

[bripat9643]

The DOJ "office" reviewed and summarized. It is over. Rosenstein was in on the summay. They quoted the Mule team.

No one from the Mules 20 DEMs are squaking, "the summary is wrong"!

Even dodo-brain Brennan-Clapper are saying "musta been bad info" huh?
And many more.....

What more do you stay-ar-home-red-commie SSDI posters need?
Land O' Goshen!

You are conflating Conspiracy and Obstruction.

On conspiracy it looks like Donnie is off the hook but Obstruction case is basically open for Congress to take up.

All of that is subject to full Mueller report review by the Congress..

Congress can't indict anyone, so there's nothing it can do short of impeachment, and we all know that isn't going to happen. Piglosi has already said as much.

 

[bripat9643]

Seems to me, this caught the left flat-footed -- they really and truly believed this was a slam-dunk case conspiracy and obstruction.

- Did you allow your partisan rage to cloud your objectivity?
- Did you believe your own hype and that fed to you by the likes on MSNBC, CNN, and ABC?
- Were you more surprised by this than the 2016 election?
- Are you more emotionally let down by this than the 2016 election?
- If this - after 2 years of waiting with baited breath for the report, telling us daily that Mueller had the goods and it was a matter of time - does not convince you there was no collusion w/ Russia and/or obstruction of justice, what will?
- Why should we believe you?

Those of us who are familiar with the criminal code know that there is no law that criminalizes the act of a PRIVATE CITIZEN DJT for "colluding" with the Russians.

Yes there is dummy. It's called criminal conspiracy.

To have a criminal conspiracy, you first have to intend to commit a crime. What's the crime, listening to people talk? Reading publicly available emails?

 

[deanrd]

Seems to me, this caught the left flat-footed -- they really and truly believed this was a slam-dunk case conspiracy and obstruction.

- Did you allow your partisan rage to cloud your objectivity?
- Did you believe your own hype and that fed to you by the likes on MSNBC, CNN, and ABC?
- Were you more surprised by this than the 2016 election?
- Are you more emotionally let down by this than the 2016 election?
- If this - after 2 years of waiting with baited breath for the report, telling us daily that Mueller had the goods and it was a matter of time - does not convince you there was no collusion w/ Russia and/or obstruction of justice, what will?
- Why should we believe you?

Those of us who are familiar with the criminal code know that there is no law that criminalizes the act of a PRIVATE CITIZEN DJT for "colluding" with the Russians.

Yes there is dummy. It's called criminal conspiracy.

To have a criminal conspiracy, you first have to intend to commit a crime. What's the crime, listening to people talk? Reading publicly available emails?

That’s where it begins. That’s why Trump was investigated in the first place. Now all they have to do is release the report and let the American people decide.

 

[OldLady]

The DOJ "office" reviewed and summarized. It is over. Rosenstein was in on the summay. They quoted the Mule team.

No one from the Mules 20 DEMs are squaking, "the summary is wrong"!

Even dodo-brain Brennan-Clapper are saying "musta been bad info" huh?
And many more.....

What more do you stay-ar-home-red-commie SSDI posters need?
Land O' Goshen!

"Russia Hoax"?? After all of our intelligence and Mueller's report found that Russia was absolutely running an illegal election interference campaign??

After the investigation resulted in indictments of specific Russian nationals and companies for hacking our political organizations and running politico troll farms?

Yes, it was NOT a hoax and it was not a lie. It was an investigation which has concluded and found that the Pres was not involved in Russian interference. Instead of being relieved about that, the President's supporters have to continue being ignorant partisans.

 

[bripat9643]

Seems to me, this caught the left flat-footed -- they really and truly believed this was a slam-dunk case conspiracy and obstruction.

- Did you allow your partisan rage to cloud your objectivity?
- Did you believe your own hype and that fed to you by the likes on MSNBC, CNN, and ABC?
- Were you more surprised by this than the 2016 election?
- Are you more emotionally let down by this than the 2016 election?
- If this - after 2 years of waiting with baited breath for the report, telling us daily that Mueller had the goods and it was a matter of time - does not convince you there was no collusion w/ Russia and/or obstruction of justice, what will?
- Why should we believe you?

Those of us who are familiar with the criminal code know that there is no law that criminalizes the act of a PRIVATE CITIZEN DJT for "colluding" with the Russians.

Yes there is dummy. It's called criminal conspiracy.

To have a criminal conspiracy, you first have to intend to commit a crime. What's the crime, listening to people talk? Reading publicly available emails?

That’s where it begins. That’s why Trump was investigated in the first place. Now all they have to do is release the report and let the American people decide.

Trump was investigated in the first place because of a criminal conspiracy that used fraudulent documents to deprive him of his Constitutional rights.

The full report isn't getting released. The AG decides whether any crimes were committed, moron. Live with it.

 

[Richard-H]

Trump's failure to respond appropriately to Russia's interference in our elections constitutes dereliction of Duty. A failure to uphold his oath of office.

He should be removed from office on those grounds.

However, Pelosi wants Trump to run in 2020 so bad that she refuses to impeach him.

If the Repugs had a brain, they'd want to remove him as soon as possible. 2020 is going to be a disaster for the Repugs if Trump runs.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump's failure to respond appropriately to Russia's interference in our elections constitutes dereliction of Duty. A failure to uphold his oath of office.

He should be removed from office on those grounds.

However, Pelosi wants Trump to run in 2020 so bad that she refuses to impeach him.

If the Repugs had a brain, they'd want to remove him as soon as possible. 2020 is going to be a disaster for the Repugs if Trump runs.

What would be an appropriate response, in your view?

 

[easyt65]

Political Cartoons by AF Branco