Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still haven't gathered the emotional maturity to answer the questions, eh?Hate?
A little sensitive there huh bunky
Nope......![]()
Look at you, desperately trying to avoid my question.Funny. Are you saying you've seen the results, or is it that you fully except the AG's summation?All I see is your inability to be honest with yourself.No problem. Did you see it yet?Sorry - I didn't see your answer to my question.Successful obstruction would result in what?
Well?
That, in an of itself, answers it quite clearly.
Thanks.
Huh. You must be ignorant of the fact that, by law, the AG determines the results of the investigation.The only thing to come out is the AG's summation letter, not the results of the investigation.
Hyper-partisan bigots are like that.What is sad is there seems to be people genuinely upset and disappointed that the President of the United States did not collude or consipire with a foreign power to steal an election.
All I see is your inability to be honest with yourself.No problem. Did you see it yet?Sorry - I didn't see your answer to my question.Successful obstruction would result in what?Why are you angered by the very very real possibility that Trump did not conspire with the Russians or commit obstruction?
Well?
Funny. Are you saying you've seen the results, or is it that you fully except the AG's summation?
Were you surprised by the result of the Mueller investigation?
Yes, we do know the results. The details are irrelevant. The result is that Trump was exonerated of every sleazy accusation.We don't KNOW what the results of the Mueller Probe sare since Barr has so far refused to release it
Why would anyone be surprised life-long Republicans "cleared"Seems to me, this caught the left flat-footed -- they really and truly believed this was a slam-dunk case conspiracy and obstruction.
- Did you allow your partisan rage to cloud your objectivity?
- Did you believe your own hype and that fed to you by the likes on MSNBC, CNN, and ABC?
- Were you more surprised by this than the 2016 election?
- Are you more emotionally let down by this than the 2016 election?
- If this - after 2 years of waiting with baited breath for the report, telling us daily that Mueller had the goods and it was a matter of time - does not convince you there was no collusion w/ Russia and/or obstruction of justice, what will?
- Why should we believe you?
I don't know. I haven't read the report yet.Were you surprised by the result of the Mueller investigation?
And neither have you.
just 4 pages?I don't know. I haven't read the report yet.Were you surprised by the result of the Mueller investigation?
And neither have you.
Yeah....the 4 page conclusion said he colluded....wait.
Are you really that stupid ?
just 4 pages?I don't know. I haven't read the report yet.Were you surprised by the result of the Mueller investigation?
And neither have you.
Yeah....the 4 page conclusion said he colluded....wait.
Are you really that stupid ?![]()
It doesn't take as many pages to list "No evidence"just 4 pages?![]()
Seems to me, this caught the left flat-footed -- they really and truly believed this was a slam-dunk case conspiracy and obstruction.
- Did you allow your partisan rage to cloud your objectivity?
- Did you believe your own hype and that fed to you by the likes on MSNBC, CNN, and ABC?
- Were you more surprised by this than the 2016 election?
- Are you more emotionally let down by this than the 2016 election?
- If this - after 2 years of waiting with baited breath for the report, telling us daily that Mueller had the goods and it was a matter of time - does not convince you there was no collusion w/ Russia and/or obstruction of justice, what will?
- Why should we believe you?
No. But then I’m not stupid
Do you still think health insurance is a “luxury”?
Well it sure isn’t a right
Now you have a chance. Let us know. Thanks.Didn’t read them. Just the OP.Why?Yep…very surprised.
And the other questions?
Are you angered or relieved by the very very real possibility that Trump did not conspire with the Russians or commit obstruction?
And then:
Are you angered or relieved by the very very real possibility that Trump did not conspire with the Russians or commit obstruction?
Neutral pending the following:
Why didn’t he speak to the OIC? IF you were investigating any organization be it the local PTA, General Motors, the New England Patriots, etc… you’d want to talk to whomever was in charge when the allegations of alleged impropriety took place. Since the “CEO” of the campaign didn’t sit through any questioning (as Clinton did when he had an OIC on him)…I have to wonder why that didn’t happen?
Does the absence invalidate the investigation? No. Mueller took a lot of felonious Trump hires off of the street; good on him. Hacking of the DNC and people around HRC has been yet again confirmed. Good on him. The Obstruction of Justice in firing Comey is still in play as is the persecution of Roger Stone.
A good day at work for Mr. Mueller.
Also neutral pending the uncovering of the evidence save for the summary (whitewash?) by AG Barr. If the report is released, perhaps the opinion would change. If not…well…we will just have to assume that Trump is hiding records yet again as he did with his taxes, the translator’s notes when he met with….the RUSSIAN Premier….etc…
The fish rots from the head down. Multiple investigations into Mara-Lard-ass are still ongoing.