AmericanFirst
Gold Member
- Dec 17, 2009
- 12,204
- 1,062
Because sharia law is wrong.Obviously the citizens of Egypt want a Islamic state governed by Sharia law.
Who are we to say this is wrong?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because sharia law is wrong.Obviously the citizens of Egypt want a Islamic state governed by Sharia law.
Who are we to say this is wrong?
Obviously the citizens of Egypt want a Islamic state governed by Sharia law.
Who are we to say this is wrong?
Neo-con adventurism failed in Vietnam. It has failed in Iran as it grows closer and will ally with Iraq. The point is this: neo-con imperialism will always fail.
After we gave up on Vietnam, the communists killed millions, if we would have finished the job less people would have died, but the liberals got their way.
What evidence do you have that Iraq and Iran are becoming allies??
if we'd stayed the fuck out, far fewer would have died, including 56,000 americans.
After we gave up on Vietnam, the communists killed millions, if we would have finished the job less people would have died, but the liberals got their way.
What evidence do you have that Iraq and Iran are becoming allies??
if we'd stayed the fuck out, far fewer would have died, including 56,000 americans.
that cannot be proved.
if we'd stayed the fuck out, far fewer would have died, including 56,000 americans.
that cannot be proved.
Yes, it can. Go to DC and read the names on the wall.
some idiots cant even admitt the Vietnam war was a mistake?
What utter idiocy we have to deal with in this country.
that cannot be proved.
Yes, it can. Go to DC and read the names on the wall.
I'm talking about the far fewer people would have died part.
BTW Jake neo-cons are more prevelent than you think, on both sides of the aisle....What do think winning over hearts and minds actually means??
pissing away american lives and money for the gratification of armchair warriors.
why do you ask?
Or using military force to try change the culture of thought, so the world is a safer place.
Yes, it can. Go to DC and read the names on the wall.
I'm talking about the far fewer people would have died part.
Well, stop and think for a moment. 56 thousand equals far fewer in my book.
After we gave up on Vietnam, the communists killed millions, if we would have finished the job less people would have died, but the liberals got their way.
What evidence do you have that Iraq and Iran are becoming allies??
if we'd stayed the fuck out, far fewer would have died, including 56,000 americans.
that cannot be proved.
I'm talking about the far fewer people would have died part.
Well, stop and think for a moment. 56 thousand equals far fewer in my book.
the millions of vietnamiese killed by the commies.
how many true democracies are there in the muslim world?democracy is not easy.
Some in any society are going to have problems understanding it and practicing it fully.
Dont forget our own history of slavery and civil war.
Democracy is hard but worth the hard work.
Do you think we should have kept egypt from giving democracy a try?
how many true democracies are there in the muslim world?democracy is not easy.
Some in any society are going to have problems understanding it and practicing it fully.
Dont forget our own history of slavery and civil war.
Democracy is hard but worth the hard work.
Do you think we should have kept egypt from giving democracy a try?
0
if we'd stayed the fuck out, far fewer would have died, including 56,000 americans.
that cannot be proved.
well, yeah it can.
if we didn't deploy troops to nam, 56,000 of them wouldn't have been killed there.
are you this stupid in real life?
pissing away american lives and money for the gratification of armchair warriors.
why do you ask?
Or using military force to try change the culture of thought, so the world is a safer place.
yeah, that's worked out swimmingly, hasn't it?
because you can always force people to change the way they think: that's true democracy in action.
the scary part is you people believe this horseshit.
that cannot be proved.
well, yeah it can.
if we didn't deploy troops to nam, 56,000 of them wouldn't have been killed there.
are you this stupid in real life?
Its funny that u ask me that, because u obviously believe this is the land of make believe.
You claimed fewer than the millions killed, which can't be proved...I don't dispute that 56,000 troops would not have died...whats so hard to understand?
Or using military force to try change the culture of thought, so the world is a safer place.
yeah, that's worked out swimmingly, hasn't it?
because you can always force people to change the way they think: that's true democracy in action.
the scary part is you people believe this horseshit.
look at the products of British colonization, they helped civilize the world...
yeah, that's worked out swimmingly, hasn't it?
because you can always force people to change the way they think: that's true democracy in action.
the scary part is you people believe this horseshit.
look at the products of British colonization, they helped civilize the world...
yeah
pakistan is a beacon of democracy
you might want to put down your shovel