Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Naw bro. Thats how it got interpreted later on. In the beginning stages of the govt, that shit got shot down quick. Even things such as flood relief. But now, because of people that think like you, they can do whatever in the fuck they want. So much for restricting federal power, ey?Ok meanwhile the REALITY is that government can constitutionally spend on pretty much w/e it wants to.
It's in black and white that federal government can spend for the general improvement of our country, it is the very meaning of the words.
“The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.”
Clearly United States government has vested interest in limiting the proliferation of hate groups and consistently with Constitution can spend on that.
First of all that portion of Article 1, Section 8 does not end in a period and those powers are limited by the remainder of the paragraph. Here's what the Father of the Constitution said on the subject.
The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45
Now explain how you know more about it than the guy who wrote it.
.
"Father of constitution" SIGNED THAT LANGUAGE.
WHY would he write that which did not clearly agree with what he meant? Because your premise is bullshit and insinuations that Madison singlehandedly formed the constitution is total bullshit - he was but one signature of many who had much more expansive view of Federal powers and did not want to make it so small as to be impotent to deal with country's problems.
It's a damn shame you have a modern education and lack the ability to read a document written so simply even the least educated farmer could understand it 230 years ago. As I said earlier, Common Defense and General Welfare are two spending categories that are limited to specific expenditures by the remainder of the paragraph. I guess education is wasted on people like you, but they sure got their monies worth on the brainwashing side.
.
The govt already funds groups that fight White Supremacy - they are called the FBI and DOJ. When laws are broken by these white supremacist groups - or anyone else - the FBI, DOJ, and state and local law enforcement groups are supposed to step in and do their jobs - arrest / indict / charge / convict them for their crimes.
Last I checked they have not been de-funded.
Meanwhile, in Va, the police, Mayor, and governor failed to plan / prepare / prevent / protect / enforce the law. While 3 people were being murdered and dozens injured the police safely stayed behind their barricades and WATCHED as the violence unfolded and the crimes were committed.
McAuliffe, like you want to blame the President for what happened. Of course McAuliffe also declared the police - who did nothing while 3 people were killed and dozens were wounded - 'did a great job.' Of course McAuliffe immediately after the event began pushing his Anti-Gun agenda despite no gun having been used during the violence.
Naw bro. Thats how it got interpreted later on. In the beginning stages of the govt, that shit got shot down quick. Even things such as flood relief. But now, because of people that think like you, they can do whatever in the fuck they want. So much for restricting federal power, ey?
It's in black and white that federal government can spend for the general improvement of our country, it is the very meaning of the words.
“The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.”
Clearly United States government has vested interest in limiting the proliferation of hate groups and consistently with Constitution can spend on that.
First of all that portion of Article 1, Section 8 does not end in a period and those powers are limited by the remainder of the paragraph. Here's what the Father of the Constitution said on the subject.
The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45
Now explain how you know more about it than the guy who wrote it.
.
"Father of constitution" SIGNED THAT LANGUAGE.
WHY would he write that which did not clearly agree with what he meant? Because your premise is bullshit and insinuations that Madison singlehandedly formed the constitution is total bullshit - he was but one signature of many who had much more expansive view of Federal powers and did not want to make it so small as to be impotent to deal with country's problems.
It's a damn shame you have a modern education and lack the ability to read a document written so simply even the least educated farmer could understand it 230 years ago. As I said earlier, Common Defense and General Welfare are two spending categories that are limited to specific expenditures by the remainder of the paragraph. I guess education is wasted on people like you, but they sure got their monies worth on the brainwashing side.
.
Nonsense.
Did Hamilton not know how to read too? Perhaps Supreme Court judges that agree with my interpretation of those words and disagree with your interpretation, just can't read as good you?
Check yourself against some basic reality, this is CLEARLY not reading issue you'd like to pretend it is..
It's in black and white that federal government can spend for the general improvement of our country, it is the very meaning of the words.
“The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.”
Clearly United States government has vested interest in limiting the proliferation of hate groups and consistently with Constitution can spend on that.
First of all that portion of Article 1, Section 8 does not end in a period and those powers are limited by the remainder of the paragraph. Here's what the Father of the Constitution said on the subject.
The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45
Now explain how you know more about it than the guy who wrote it.
.
"Father of constitution" SIGNED THAT LANGUAGE.
WHY would he write that which did not clearly agree with what he meant? Because your premise is bullshit and insinuations that Madison singlehandedly formed the constitution is total bullshit - he was but one signature of many who had much more expansive view of Federal powers and did not want to make it so small as to be impotent to deal with country's problems.
It's a damn shame you have a modern education and lack the ability to read a document written so simply even the least educated farmer could understand it 230 years ago. As I said earlier, Common Defense and General Welfare are two spending categories that are limited to specific expenditures by the remainder of the paragraph. I guess education is wasted on people like you, but they sure got their monies worth on the brainwashing side.
.
Nonsense.
Did Hamilton not know how to read too? Perhaps Supreme Court judges that agree with my interpretation of those words and disagree with your interpretation, just can't read as good you?
Check yourself against some basic reality, this is CLEARLY not reading issue you'd like to pretend it is..
Hamilton was a POS and lost the argument at the convention. The supremes overturned 120 years of court president to grant the government and themselves more power. Just one of the many times they got it WRONG.
.
First of all that portion of Article 1, Section 8 does not end in a period and those powers are limited by the remainder of the paragraph. Here's what the Father of the Constitution said on the subject.
The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45
Now explain how you know more about it than the guy who wrote it.
.
"Father of constitution" SIGNED THAT LANGUAGE.
WHY would he write that which did not clearly agree with what he meant? Because your premise is bullshit and insinuations that Madison singlehandedly formed the constitution is total bullshit - he was but one signature of many who had much more expansive view of Federal powers and did not want to make it so small as to be impotent to deal with country's problems.
It's a damn shame you have a modern education and lack the ability to read a document written so simply even the least educated farmer could understand it 230 years ago. As I said earlier, Common Defense and General Welfare are two spending categories that are limited to specific expenditures by the remainder of the paragraph. I guess education is wasted on people like you, but they sure got their monies worth on the brainwashing side.
.
Nonsense.
Did Hamilton not know how to read too? Perhaps Supreme Court judges that agree with my interpretation of those words and disagree with your interpretation, just can't read as good you?
Check yourself against some basic reality, this is CLEARLY not reading issue you'd like to pretend it is..
Hamilton was a POS and lost the argument at the convention. The supremes overturned 120 years of court president to grant the government and themselves more power. Just one of the many times they got it WRONG.
.
You are a combination of ignorant and delirious.
Hamilton's interpretation was in practice even under Washington and Jefferson.
The fact is that Trump has created a atmosphere where white supremacists feel emboldened.
