SniperFire
Senior Member
My 'argument' is not whether or not God created us.
I am pointing out the absurdity and logical fail of any claim that our rights are 'unalienable' if they are just an abstract construct of the fertile imagination of mankind.
That argument is stupid on its face.
You're right. That is an absurd and illogical argument. But its only you who is making it. The rest of us are saying that unalienable freedom is the default state of any being with volition. It's not a 'construct', it's the nature of the existence of a conscious mind.
If you believe that God created us, and the world we live in - then it makes sense for you to believe he is the source of that state of freedom. But even if you don't, freedom is still the default state of being. The question of god, or natural vs. supernatural is utterly irrelevant to that observation.
That is ridiculous.
Explain to me how carbon atoms have such a 'default state of being. '
I will wait.