Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you graduate from high school. Where do you get your information on how our government works. You be dumb./——/ The President has no control on spending or paying government debts. Only Congress can do those things.Yes, Reagan was a true expert on expanding the government and inflating the national debt without paying for any of it. Good for you.The only way is to starve the beast, which I learned from President Reagan long before Trump was on the scene.
/—-/ Thanks for making my point. The president supposes and Congress imposes. Otherwise Trump would just spend all money as he pleases.Did you graduate from high school. Where do you get your information on how our government works. You be dumb./——/ The President has no control on spending or paying government debts. Only Congress can do those things.Yes, Reagan was a true expert on expanding the government and inflating the national debt without paying for any of it. Good for you.The only way is to starve the beast, which I learned from President Reagan long before Trump was on the scene.
How the budget works.
- The President submits a budget request to Congress
- The House and Senate pass budget resolutions
- House and Senate Appropriations subcommittees "markup" appropriations bills
- The House and Senate vote on appropriations bills and reconcile differences
- The President signs each appropriations bill and the budget becomes law
Where do you get your facts? You make things up just like Trump. Dumb is dumb is dumb./—-/ DemocRATs spent the money, not the President. Why can’t libtards understand how things work?How were they going to cut spending when Reagan won the cold war by outspending Russia?/——/ Congress stabbed Reagan in the back. They were supposed to cut spending but never did because they are lying weaselsThe deficit increased substantially under Reagan. He had the intent but his strategy did not work, supply side economics. Supply side economics ends up with the rich receiving the largest tax breaks but they do not reinvest all of the tax savings so the rich benefit more than the overall economy./——-/. Congress has proven they can’t restrain themselves. The only way is to starve the beast, which I learned from President Reagan long before Trump was on the scene.This explanation of supply side economics confused cellblock. He receives his fake facts through Trump and company.
Look at number 5, the last step before any budget becomes law requires a President's signature. You are beyond dumb./—-/ Thanks for making my point. The president supposes and Congress imposes. Otherwise Trump would just spend all money as he pleases.Did you graduate from high school. Where do you get your information on how our government works. You be dumb./——/ The President has no control on spending or paying government debts. Only Congress can do those things.Yes, Reagan was a true expert on expanding the government and inflating the national debt without paying for any of it. Good for you.The only way is to starve the beast, which I learned from President Reagan long before Trump was on the scene.
How the budget works.
- The President submits a budget request to Congress
- The House and Senate pass budget resolutions
- House and Senate Appropriations subcommittees "markup" appropriations bills
- The House and Senate vote on appropriations bills and reconcile differences
- The President signs each appropriations bill and the budget becomes law
/——-/ I get my facts from places like this :Where do you get your facts? You make things up just like Trump. Dumb is dumb is dumb./—-/ DemocRATs spent the money, not the President. Why can’t libtards understand how things work?How were they going to cut spending when Reagan won the cold war by outspending Russia?/——/ Congress stabbed Reagan in the back. They were supposed to cut spending but never did because they are lying weaselsThe deficit increased substantially under Reagan. He had the intent but his strategy did not work, supply side economics. Supply side economics ends up with the rich receiving the largest tax breaks but they do not reinvest all of the tax savings so the rich benefit more than the overall economy./——-/. Congress has proven they can’t restrain themselves. The only way is to starve the beast, which I learned from President Reagan long before Trump was on the scene.
/——/ places like this: Power of the Purse | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesWhere do you get your facts? You make things up just like Trump. Dumb is dumb is dumb./—-/ DemocRATs spent the money, not the President. Why can’t libtards understand how things work?How were they going to cut spending when Reagan won the cold war by outspending Russia?/——/ Congress stabbed Reagan in the back. They were supposed to cut spending but never did because they are lying weaselsThe deficit increased substantially under Reagan. He had the intent but his strategy did not work, supply side economics. Supply side economics ends up with the rich receiving the largest tax breaks but they do not reinvest all of the tax savings so the rich benefit more than the overall economy./——-/. Congress has proven they can’t restrain themselves. The only way is to starve the beast, which I learned from President Reagan long before Trump was on the scene.
I will give you credit for referring to reputable resources. The below is directly from your referenced article./——-/ I get my facts from places like this :Where do you get your facts? You make things up just like Trump. Dumb is dumb is dumb./—-/ DemocRATs spent the money, not the President. Why can’t libtards understand how things work?How were they going to cut spending when Reagan won the cold war by outspending Russia?/——/ Congress stabbed Reagan in the back. They were supposed to cut spending but never did because they are lying weaselsThe deficit increased substantially under Reagan. He had the intent but his strategy did not work, supply side economics. Supply side economics ends up with the rich receiving the largest tax breaks but they do not reinvest all of the tax savings so the rich benefit more than the overall economy.
/——/ places like this: Power of the Purse | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesWhere do you get your facts? You make things up just like Trump. Dumb is dumb is dumb./—-/ DemocRATs spent the money, not the President. Why can’t libtards understand how things work?How were they going to cut spending when Reagan won the cold war by outspending Russia?/——/ Congress stabbed Reagan in the back. They were supposed to cut spending but never did because they are lying weaselsThe deficit increased substantially under Reagan. He had the intent but his strategy did not work, supply side economics. Supply side economics ends up with the rich receiving the largest tax breaks but they do not reinvest all of the tax savings so the rich benefit more than the overall economy.
Congress—and in particular, the House of Representatives—is invested with the “power of the purse,” the ability to tax and spend public money for the national government. Massachusetts’ Elbridge Gerrysaid at the Federal Constitutional Convention that the House “was more immediately the representatives of the people, and it was a maxim that the people ought to hold the purse-strings.”
Now where do you get your facts?
Then how did Reagan "starve the beast"?The President has no control on spending or paying government debts.
It was the 19th and 20th centuries that saw the transition to an industrialized nation not the 18th century. As our economy grew we became the largest consuming nation in the world. The US could not produce enough goods to fill our own demand. Thus the start of globalization.Correl does not know economics or history.The US consumer has been given the choice of paying higher prices and supporting US manufacturers or lower prices for goods manufactured in other countries that have lower wages. The US consumers support choose the lower priced item the vast majority of the time.THose issues get a lot of attention because they are very identifiable. But the over all use of their manufacture of products using vastly cheaper labor than legal in the US, is likely to be an advantage to their manufacturers, that American manufacturers will struggle to compete against.
The idea of having First World workers compete against Third World labor, on a level playing field has been tried. And the results have been a freaking disaster for US.
Trump is proposing we will no longer give the US consumer the choice of lower priced foreign manufactured goods. Trump is closing the US market. Capitalism was not built on cl0sed markets.
Trade policy is a government function. The US economy was built on being somewhat closed. This idea of Free Trade, especially non reciprocate "free trade" is not how we grew to our current size and wealth.
You are not so much making an argument, as spouting some libertarian buzzwords trying to get an emotional reaction from me.
You have failed.
The process of opening world markets and expanding trade, initiated in the United States in 1934 and consistently pursued since the end of the Second World War, has played an important role in the development of American prosperity. According to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, American real incomes are 9% higher than they would otherwise have been as a result of trade liberalizing efforts since the Second World War. In terms of the U.S. economy in 2013, that 9% represents $1.5 trillion in additional American income.
1. And you just ignored the entire 18th century of massive growth, when a small agricultural nation, grew to rival the whole continent of Europe in industry.
2. And you just ignored the last 3 years of massive discussion on how those good macro-economic numbers hide a large and real cost to a lot of people and communities.
I agree with you that as our economy has evolved many segments of our society have been left out. They have always included minorities and immigrants but now includes a large group of workers in the Midwest that are mostly white.
