Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm still waiting . . . . has a single Leftard given just ONE clear example yet of exactly where and when Russia affected and changed votes as per the OP of this thread?
Nah, still didn't think so. . . .
Actually the thread is full of links to what Russia did. What intelligence agencies did not do was ascertain whether or not the coordinated Russian attack on our election had any impact.
No, the Wikileaks emails led to the truth about Hillary being released, and the Russians weren't responsible for that. Douchebags like you deliberately conflate a whole lot of things that have no connection with each other to make your imbecile claims seem credible.Their hacking led to a tidal wave of BS against Hillary and lost her the election along with James Comey the big mouth Republican Straight Arrow.Well then, Russia had no influence on the election and as they actually expected her to win, just as the Democrats did, Trump won fair and square, by the Electoral College, which those voters actually signed their votes and handed them in.Bernie said she won fair and square... Good enough for me.Please specify the exact "mountain of evidence," beyond exposing the Democrats deliberate wrongdoing with regards to Bernie Sanders.
One might remember that Vladimir Putin is former KGB and thus of Communist (Marxist) background and our new Democratic left is pro-Marxist, so it stands to reason the Russians preferred Clinton, rather than a pro-Capitalist, Constitutional Republic Presidential candidate.
Of course they did...The Russians did NOT do anything to help Trump win, they were simply causing chaos and you dumb asses have continued it for 2 years after.Answer the question, did the truth about Hilary make her lose?Ok, lets assume that the Russians hacked the DNC servers and made public the information that showed corruption and cheating by Hillary and the dem party. Are you lefties saying that the truth caused Hillary to lose?
That would be the Russian intelligence operation, retard.
Answer mine, dope.
Was that the purpose of the Russian intelligence operation designed to help Trump win?
I ask because you can't have it both ways. If the "truth" as you say caused her to lose, then the Russian operation was successful.
They provided Trump with leaked emails. Trump used those emails in his “Crooked HIllary” campaign
Trump gleefully reported on each leaked emailExcept the emails hacked were between powerless staffers and Meant garbage except to Fox.So you’re saying hitlery’s emails were RussianOk, lets assume that the Russians hacked the DNC servers and made public the information that showed corruption and cheating by Hillary and the dem party. Are you lefties saying that the truth caused Hillary to lose?
That would be the Russian intelligence operation, retard.
I'm still waiting . . . . has a single Leftard given just ONE clear example yet of exactly where and when Russia affected and changed votes as per the OP of this thread?
Nah, still didn't think so. . . .
Actually the thread is full of links to what Russia did. What intelligence agencies did not do was ascertain whether or not the coordinated Russian attack on our election had any impact. It doesn’t matter. If someone plans to rob a bank, but fails to get any money, a crime is still committed.
LOLOLOLOLYes, we do mind. The FBI's word isn't worth jack shit.I hope you don’t mind if I take the FBI’s word about it over an Internet freak like you. They say it’s an appropriate substitute./——/ Those copies were never verified, no one can claim they were exact copies or were not altered, completely inadmissible in court. No chain of custody.You’re an idiot. The FBI investigated exact copies of the DNC’s hard drives and phishing IS hacking.Prove it! No us agency looked at them. And podesta’s was phishing. Fk, I hate it when you fks don’t know factsThey hacked the DNC and podesta servers and gave it to
the gotcha MSM media, not to mention the fox Rush etc etc propaganda machine.
Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
When it comes to digital duplicates, the copy is identical to the original. Fingerprints aren’t needed in this case since the Russian hackers didn’t physically touch the servers.You’re an idiot. The FBI investigated exact copies of the DNC’s hard drives and phishing IS hacking.Prove it! No us agency looked at them. And podesta’s was phishing. Fk, I hate it when you fks don’t know factsThey hacked the DNC and podesta servers and gave it toWe keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.
this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?
Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?
the gotcha MSM media, not to mention the fox Rush etc etc propaganda machine.
Exact copies? When it comes to forensics, nothing beats the originals, even down to fingerprints on hard drives to determine who handled them. And phishing is social engineering, not hacking. It's the difference between breaking a window and convincing the home owner to give you the key.
"Trust the FBI" is the moron's motto.LOLOLOLOLYes, we do mind. The FBI's word isn't worth jack shit.I hope you don’t mind if I take the FBI’s word about it over an Internet freak like you. They say it’s an appropriate substitute./——/ Those copies were never verified, no one can claim they were exact copies or were not altered, completely inadmissible in court. No chain of custody.You’re an idiot. The FBI investigated exact copies of the DNC’s hard drives and phishing IS hacking.Prove it! No us agency looked at them. And podesta’s was phishing. Fk, I hate it when you fks don’t know facts
Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
Cries the USMB’s fuckingest fucking moron.
Fucking moron... nothing you say means anything, you’ve so completely discredited yourself over the years.
Meanwhile, the FBI remains one of our trusted law enforcement agencies, despite your delusions. When they say we’ve been hacked — we’ve been hacked. And no amount of shaking your cane at the sky is going to change that.
Even funnier — trust bripat9643 is yours."Trust the FBI" is the moron's motto.LOLOLOLOLYes, we do mind. The FBI's word isn't worth jack shit.I hope you don’t mind if I take the FBI’s word about it over an Internet freak like you. They say it’s an appropriate substitute./——/ Those copies were never verified, no one can claim they were exact copies or were not altered, completely inadmissible in court. No chain of custody.You’re an idiot. The FBI investigated exact copies of the DNC’s hard drives and phishing IS hacking.
Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
Cries the USMB’s fuckingest fucking moron.
Fucking moron... nothing you say means anything, you’ve so completely discredited yourself over the years.
Meanwhile, the FBI remains one of our trusted law enforcement agencies, despite your delusions. When they say we’ve been hacked — we’ve been hacked. And no amount of shaking your cane at the sky is going to change that.
Like Russia Russia that scam? Yeah cause that’s make believe and yet without any evidence you believe. Not sure your logic just cause a poor loser lost! WOW!!!This is about political news, stupid. Yes I definitely wish our CNN and MSNBC and fox and ABC and CBS and Etc would spend some money on reporting around the world instead of these ridiculous gabfests. But they don't spend their time discussing phony scandals that have no basis in fact and no evidence to support them. Breaking for silly dupes like you... Hillary the foundation Obama Etc have been investigated endlessly and nothing anywhere near criminal has been found. It's all garbage propaganda. The rich don't pay enough in taxes so we have to cut services for regular people. After 35 years of GOP dominance, we have the worst inequality and upward Mobility in our history. Great job, scumbag GOP and silly dupes like you.based on what? news, anything is news fking idiot. car driving 100 miles an hour down a freeway is news. someone eating a pizza is news. cnn reporting fake news thinks it is news. It isn't, it's just fake. see the difference?They are reporting BS character assassination and Hate propaganda, dumbass. You are the biggest waste of time on hereyou should learn who to do battle with, you still haven't answered why you think those companies aren't reporting news.then why are you in here?
because i am. & i don't need your permission either. you ok?
lol....
Why does it matter? It’s foreign interference. Doesn’t that matter to you? Why would an ally interfere?Its really just as simple as this:it's still collusion with a foreign government. dude are you truly that stupid? oh fk, yeah you are.Fusion GPS is a US company, and UK is an ally country.Here it is again.^^^ fake news ^^^ debunked 1000x. why do you need to lie in order to support your 'president'?
Hillary is clean. Trump is a criminal.
How does one hold those two opinions in their mind?
Partisanship warps the brain.
The Russians who met with the Trumps were operatives of a hostile foreign power.
Turns out Philip Bump at the Washington Post decided to explain that very thing on Monday, and the simplest way to illustrate the difference is to ask, "Which way is the money going? Is it going to the campaign? Or is it going away from the campaign?"
Campaign expenditure vs campaign contribution.
"federal law doesn't just ban contributions of actual money dollars to campaigns from foreign governments, but also donations of goods, services, outside advocacy -- in short, anything of value given that can help a candidate"
Paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal.
if that foreign national is from a hostile adversarial nation it is.
No there is no links with evidence. You should wake up you’re dreamingI'm still waiting . . . . has a single Leftard given just ONE clear example yet of exactly where and when Russia affected and changed votes as per the OP of this thread?
Nah, still didn't think so. . . .
Actually the thread is full of links to what Russia did. What intelligence agencies did not do was ascertain whether or not the coordinated Russian attack on our election had any impact. It doesn’t matter. If someone plans to rob a bank, but fails to get any money, a crime is still committed.
Who did that?Its really just as simple as this:it's still collusion with a foreign government. dude are you truly that stupid? oh fk, yeah you are.Fusion GPS is a US company, and UK is an ally country.Here it is again.She did. She got even more rich from the uranium deal.
Who colluded with Russia other than Hillary?
^^^ fake news ^^^ debunked 1000x. why do you need to lie in order to support your 'president'?
Hillary is clean. Trump is a criminal.
How does one hold those two opinions in their mind?
Partisanship warps the brain.
The Russians who met with the Trumps were operatives of a hostile foreign power.
Turns out Philip Bump at the Washington Post decided to explain that very thing on Monday, and the simplest way to illustrate the difference is to ask, "Which way is the money going? Is it going to the campaign? Or is it going away from the campaign?"
Campaign expenditure vs campaign contribution.
"federal law doesn't just ban contributions of actual money dollars to campaigns from foreign governments, but also donations of goods, services, outside advocacy -- in short, anything of value given that can help a candidate"
Paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal.
Enough that we have to wait for classified documentsActually the thread is full of links to what Russia did. What intelligence agencies did not do was ascertain whether or not the coordinated Russian attack on our election had any impact.
If the evidence of a coordinated attack was so clear the impact would be evident or at least partially evident.
Its not foreign influence, read it again.Why does it matter? It’s foreign interference. Doesn’t that matter to you? Why would an ally interfere?Its really just as simple as this:it's still collusion with a foreign government. dude are you truly that stupid? oh fk, yeah you are.Fusion GPS is a US company, and UK is an ally country.Here it is again.
Hillary is clean. Trump is a criminal.
How does one hold those two opinions in their mind?
Partisanship warps the brain.
The Russians who met with the Trumps were operatives of a hostile foreign power.
Turns out Philip Bump at the Washington Post decided to explain that very thing on Monday, and the simplest way to illustrate the difference is to ask, "Which way is the money going? Is it going to the campaign? Or is it going away from the campaign?"
Campaign expenditure vs campaign contribution.
"federal law doesn't just ban contributions of actual money dollars to campaigns from foreign governments, but also donations of goods, services, outside advocacy -- in short, anything of value given that can help a candidate"
Paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal.
if that foreign national is from a hostile adversarial nation it is.
And how did they get golden shower info except from Russia. Huh? Russia isn’t supposed to be an ally. You ok?
Used in a campaign, yeah interference what else was it for but to influence the election. You need to remember who you’re talking with! I’m educatedIts not foreign influence, read it again.Why does it matter? It’s foreign interference. Doesn’t that matter to you? Why would an ally interfere?Its really just as simple as this:it's still collusion with a foreign government. dude are you truly that stupid? oh fk, yeah you are.Fusion GPS is a US company, and UK is an ally country.
The Russians who met with the Trumps were operatives of a hostile foreign power.
Turns out Philip Bump at the Washington Post decided to explain that very thing on Monday, and the simplest way to illustrate the difference is to ask, "Which way is the money going? Is it going to the campaign? Or is it going away from the campaign?"
Campaign expenditure vs campaign contribution.
"federal law doesn't just ban contributions of actual money dollars to campaigns from foreign governments, but also donations of goods, services, outside advocacy -- in short, anything of value given that can help a candidate"
Paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal.
if that foreign national is from a hostile adversarial nation it is.
And how did they get golden shower info except from Russia. Huh? Russia isn’t supposed to be an ally. You ok?
Fusion GPS paid Steele for services rendered, perfectly legal services.
Nothing was found except a lot of Gossip between DNC and podesta staffers, blown out of all proportion at Twisted for the Dupes, who are now all conspiracy nut jobs who believe the FBI and the CIA had in for the the Trump Meister.No, the Wikileaks emails led to the truth about Hillary being released, and the Russians weren't responsible for that. Douchebags like you deliberately conflate a whole lot of things that have no connection with each other to make your imbecile claims seem credible.Their hacking led to a tidal wave of BS against Hillary and lost her the election along with James Comey the big mouth Republican Straight Arrow.Well then, Russia had no influence on the election and as they actually expected her to win, just as the Democrats did, Trump won fair and square, by the Electoral College, which those voters actually signed their votes and handed them in.Bernie said she won fair and square... Good enough for me.Please specify the exact "mountain of evidence," beyond exposing the Democrats deliberate wrongdoing with regards to Bernie Sanders.
One might remember that Vladimir Putin is former KGB and thus of Communist (Marxist) background and our new Democratic left is pro-Marxist, so it stands to reason the Russians preferred Clinton, rather than a pro-Capitalist, Constitutional Republic Presidential candidate.
Yeah a master's in GOP BS propaganda, super duper.Used in a campaign, yeah interference what else was it for but to influence the election. You need to remember who you’re talking with! I’m educatedIts not foreign influence, read it again.Why does it matter? It’s foreign interference. Doesn’t that matter to you? Why would an ally interfere?Its really just as simple as this:it's still collusion with a foreign government. dude are you truly that stupid? oh fk, yeah you are.
Turns out Philip Bump at the Washington Post decided to explain that very thing on Monday, and the simplest way to illustrate the difference is to ask, "Which way is the money going? Is it going to the campaign? Or is it going away from the campaign?"
Campaign expenditure vs campaign contribution.
"federal law doesn't just ban contributions of actual money dollars to campaigns from foreign governments, but also donations of goods, services, outside advocacy -- in short, anything of value given that can help a candidate"
Paying a foreign national fair market value for opposition research is generally not illegal.
if that foreign national is from a hostile adversarial nation it is.
And how did they get golden shower info except from Russia. Huh? Russia isn’t supposed to be an ally. You ok?
Fusion GPS paid Steele for services rendered, perfectly legal services.
Actually the thread is full of links to what Russia did. What intelligence agencies did not do was ascertain whether or not the coordinated Russian attack on our election had any impact.
If the evidence of a coordinated attack was so clear the impact would be evident or at least partially evident.
