Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How? You deport the people and their kids. Period. There’s no room for your feelings here.What is less than satisfying for the right about a president who decreased illegal immigration and increased deportations? If he were an R you’d be jubilant. Trump has made immigration his trademark. Demonize, deport, and tear away their children. Surely immigration inforcement can be carried out withou the first and the third.It highlights the problems democrats create when they make stupid decisions.How does that relate to forceably removing children from their mothers while awaiting a hearing? I notice she has her children with her and she said nothing about that policy, only that she can’t blame Trump for enforcing the immigration laws that deported her husband. She says nothing about kids.
I know you’re an honest person who’ll eventually appreciate President Trump for addressing the problems democrats created. You and I both hate the trail of death and pain they’ve paved.
It’s why I’m glad we finally have a president willing to fix this problem.
We dealt with immigrants Obama's way for eight years, and the results were less than satisfying. Trump hasn't been in office for two years, and they are complaining left and right.
Let us do it our way for four years (possibly eight) and see the end results. Let's compare who has the best way to deal with the problems that come to our borders.
It has noting to do with the children, what it has to do with is they know our policies will provide results. That's what scares the hell out of them.
No one has a problem with that. Just keep families intact.
Human rights abuses are not a tool used by America.
No, but by using these children as tools, you have already violated their human rights.
Thanks for playing.
The Trump admin is the only one using children as tools, dope. That's the point.
They're using the threat of seperation as a deterrent.
Seems like a logical deterrent, so unless the parent is so negligent as to knowingly bring a child across the border when they know they will be separated, then it is that parents choice to do so. That is exactly what a deterrent is.
Human rights abuses are not a tool used by America.
No, but by using these children as tools, you have already violated their human rights.
Thanks for playing.
The Trump admin is the only one using children as tools, dope. That's the point.
They're using the threat of seperation as a deterrent.
Seems like a logical deterrent, so unless the parent is so negligent as to knowingly bring a child across the border when they know they will be separated, then it is that parents choice to do so. That is exactly what a deterrent is.
Seems more like unnecessary human rights violations.
So when a cop stops somebody for speeding and DUI, and arrests him, and his kids are separated from him, you'd say this is an "unnecessary human rights violation" ?Seems more like unnecessary human rights violations.
Illegals are being coached on how to ask for asylum at the border.Nope. I want families kept together unless there is a darn good reason to remove the child.What does that have to do with keeping mothers and children together until their hearing?
Because they are illegal aliens and should be deported immediately. You're just trying to fudge your way into keeping criminals in the US
Agreed. Their parents being illegal aliens is a damned good reason, isn't it?
A person showing up at a border crossing and seeking assylum is not an illegal alien.
It's often the only engish they know.
Hilarious to see 'young men' with MS13 tats all over their bodies pleading to be let into the US! And it's happenijg every day."I used to be in MS13 but now I want to attend MIT on a full scholarship".
Human rights abuses are not a tool used by America.
No, but by using these children as tools, you have already violated their human rights.
Thanks for playing.
The Trump admin is the only one using children as tools, dope. That's the point.
They're using the threat of seperation as a deterrent.
Seems like a logical deterrent, so unless the parent is so negligent as to knowingly bring a child across the border when they know they will be separated, then it is that parents choice to do so. That is exactly what a deterrent is.
Seems more like unnecessary human rights violations.
Illegals are being coached on how to ask for asylum at the border.Nope. I want families kept together unless there is a darn good reason to remove the child.Because they are illegal aliens and should be deported immediately. You're just trying to fudge your way into keeping criminals in the US
Agreed. Their parents being illegal aliens is a damned good reason, isn't it?
A person showing up at a border crossing and seeking assylum is not an illegal alien.
It's often the only engish they know.
Hilarious to see 'young men' with MS13 tats all over their bodies pleading to be let into the US! And it's happenijg every day."I used to be in MS13 but now I want to attend MIT on a full scholarship".
Liar.
Seeking asylum is a legal process. The admin is charging applicants as illegal crossers and separating families as a deterrent to future applicants. That is a policy move and not the law.
It's all new.I think policies like this one are dragging us down to that level. You do not need a policy like this in order to successfully maintain law and order at the border.Coyote
You thanked post #523, where the author said and I quote "Trump's policies are dragging us down with the two bit dictators".
Do you think Trump is a "two bit dictator"? Simply for wanting our national sovereignty to be respected?
Families can be and have been detained together. This move is meant to inflict the maximum pain as a deterrant. It is using human rights violations as a tool. The tools of dictators.
Forcing a child to break the law will typically result in separation of the parent from the child. It deters those that would force a child into criminal activities.
There is nothing new here.
An additional response to this post would be:What if your daughter was raped by a gang and your other daughter threatened with the same if you did not pay up? What if the police were bankrolled by that gang? Not fictional, these are the sorts of things recounted. What would you do?What would you do as a parent in that situation TK?
I would obey the friggun law, Coyote. I'd much rather maintain my relationship with my child than to use them as a tool to leverage another government for my illegal presence within their borders. I will have none of it. Children are not tools, they are children. Innocent children who essentially have no control over their situations. Ultimately the onus lies on the parents, they set such a vicious cycle in motion.
Not even in a moment of sheer desperation would I ever dare to subject my child to that. I would have to have gone completely insane to do something so barbarous.
I would get my kids the hell out of Dodge any way I can.
Seek asylum, don't break our laws.
Don't use asylum as a means to circumvent our immigration laws. If your situation is that severe, our government has a means for you to get here and be safe from your malefactors. Asylum. A-s-y-l-u-m.
Seek asylum, don't break our laws.
ACLU: Trump administration forcibly separating asylum-seekers from their children
AWESOME!
Hutch Starskey please forward this letter to the White House. Thanks in advance.
Dear U.S. Government,
Please separate every child from every illegal, criminal wetback parent you capture. It’s time we get and stay extremely aggressive in the WAR with the illegal cockroaches from the dirty brown south. Don’t worry about how ignorant, bleeding heart fools may perceive this action, they hate accountability and law and order. They can not understand basic principles such as cause and effect....ALL good Americans that matter fully support this effort.
Signed,
All good, real Americans
No you are defending human trafficking.Is anybody else wondering why busy bee is a child trafficking advocate?
I am advocating for families you worthless piece of shit. Apparently you don't have a brain in your head. If these were traffickers they wouldn't be in detention.
It's all new.I think policies like this one are dragging us down to that level. You do not need a policy like this in order to successfully maintain law and order at the border.Coyote
You thanked post #523, where the author said and I quote "Trump's policies are dragging us down with the two bit dictators".
Do you think Trump is a "two bit dictator"? Simply for wanting our national sovereignty to be respected?
Families can be and have been detained together. This move is meant to inflict the maximum pain as a deterrant. It is using human rights violations as a tool. The tools of dictators.
Forcing a child to break the law will typically result in separation of the parent from the child. It deters those that would force a child into criminal activities.
There is nothing new here.
Those seeking asylum are not breaking the law. It is a legal process.
You got a link to the LAW, to show that ? And a source for the claim of charging asylum applicants as illegal crossers ?Liar.
Seeking asylum is a legal process. The admin is charging applicants as illegal crossers and separating families as a deterrent to future applicants. That is a policy move and not the law.
Crossing the border EWI is a crime. It carries a 6 month federal prison penalty (1st offense) and 2 year prison penalties for subsequent offenses.No one is going to jail for crossing the border unless they are a convicted felon. There is no reason for separating children from their parents. You cannot compare major felonies with crossing the border illegally.
Birthright citizenship is not false. A plain reading of the Amendment does support what the courts have said. If he didn't like it then he should have written it better.
Birthright citizenship for kids of foreigners is false. The 14th amendment's intention is to give BC to kids of Americans, but not to foreigners.
Illegals are being coached on how to ask for asylum at the border.Nope. I want families kept together unless there is a darn good reason to remove the child.
Agreed. Their parents being illegal aliens is a damned good reason, isn't it?
A person showing up at a border crossing and seeking assylum is not an illegal alien.
It's often the only engish they know.
Hilarious to see 'young men' with MS13 tats all over their bodies pleading to be let into the US! And it's happenijg every day."I used to be in MS13 but now I want to attend MIT on a full scholarship".
Liar.
Seeking asylum is a legal process. The admin is charging applicants as illegal crossers and separating families as a deterrent to future applicants. That is a policy move and not the law.
Asylum seekers....the new illegal immigrant.
Forcing a child to break the law will typically result in separation of the parent from the child. It deters those that would force a child into criminal activities.
There is nothing new here.
Asylum seekers....the new illegal immigrant.
She will tolerate anything in the name of tolerance...Is it safe for me to assume that you’re good with democrats allowing people to be lured into unspeakable circumstances?No Tycho our reverent President is to busy tweeting. In fact, it’s been so noisy I suspect there are birds nesting in his toupe.Can you understand why President Trump is working hard to fix this problem, Coyote?
Except protection of children. She won't tolerate that.
I think you are a robot. You can only say what you are told.
I get the same impression reading your postsI think you are a robot. You can only say what you are told.
Legally liable relative to what law ?We hold law enforcement to the same standards we hold everyone else. The people who are implementing this policy are responsible and should be held legally liable. Take your trash elsewhere.
Human rights abuses are not a tool used by America.
No, but by using these children as tools, you have already violated their human rights.
Thanks for playing.
The Trump admin is the only one using children as tools, dope. That's the point.
They're using the threat of seperation as a deterrent.
Seems like a logical deterrent, so unless the parent is so negligent as to knowingly bring a child across the border when they know they will be separated, then it is that parents choice to do so. That is exactly what a deterrent is.
Seems more like unnecessary human rights violations.
So whats your solution?
