Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/---- Let me dumb it down for you. Hollywood Libs hate Trump. If Trump said something that they personally could testify was not true then they would have jumped on the opportunity 5 seconds after the tape was released. Of course they didn't because they know it's true.Your argument that "everyone else is doing it, Mom!" is pretty lame./---- And yet not one Hollywood superstar has stepped forward to say that never happens to them. Not one. Interesting.Grabbin' pussy was the winner for me.
Trump was JOKING, sarcastically.
For heavens sake.
So you are a stupid treasonous Libtard asshole that didn't want the truth about that Crooked Hillary bitch's corruption to be exposed?
Moron.......if you're searching for the "truth" about Hillary.....DO IT DOMESTICALLY and not ask for a foreign, adversarial power to do it for you.....Find a grown up to explain this to you.....LOL
Here's an example of why Trump is WRONG......
If the orange clown "thinks" that too many illegals voted, should he REQUEST that our voting be monitored by Russian observers??????
LOL
I REALLY would like a response from right wingers IF they'd think it was perfectly OK for Trump to ask Putin to "monitor" our voting so that illegals would not vote against his fat ass.................LOL
that's a Republican lie.... you are regurgitating....like a good little Trumpster...Of course, Trump ass-kissers will shrug this off....or worse, think that Trump is just the cutest pumpkin when he opens his tiny mouth......but for others with a few more brain cells.
Here's what I consider to be the WORST of the orange clown's moments, when asking a FOREIGN and ADVERSARIAL power to "help" his sorry ass in the election.
“Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said in reference to the emails deleted by Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.
“I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Are you talking about the 30,000 emails that were deleted AFTER Congress told that stupid bitch to turn them over?
The 30k of emails she had her staff delete were personal emails, of which government rules dictate her TO NOT TURN THEM IN... Do NOT send any personal emails or records to the government archives unless they are government documents or government related.
Congress did not ask or subpoena her for ALL of her emails or even her server, they subpoenaed her for government records/ regarding Benghazi....no judge in America would approve Congress for a subpoena for her own personal emails....
Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.According to right wingers......Openly asking a foreign and adversarial power to help Trump win, will ....from now on ......be regarded as "sarcasm"; of course, only if you're an orange demagogue.
It was obviously sarcasm.
Be less sad and pathetic.
SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.
It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.
Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?
Let me get this straight. You are challenging whether the emails were subpoenaed?Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?
......but, but, Rush and Sean said there was one...........LOL
Hillary Clinton ✔ @HillaryClinton 
So you are a stupid treasonous Libtard asshole that didn't want the truth about that Crooked Hillary bitch's corruption to be exposed?
Moron.......if you're searching for the "truth" about Hillary.....DO IT DOMESTICALLY and not ask for a foreign, adversarial power to do it for you.....Find a grown up to explain this to you.....LOL
Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.According to right wingers......Openly asking a foreign and adversarial power to help Trump win, will ....from now on ......be regarded as "sarcasm"; of course, only if you're an orange demagogue.
It was obviously sarcasm.
Be less sad and pathetic.
Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.
SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.
It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.
Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?
Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.It was obviously sarcasm.
Be less sad and pathetic.
Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.
SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.
It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.
Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?
Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.
My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.
Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.
Let me get this straight. You are challenging whether the emails were subpoenaed?
I am curious....when was your sense of humor removed....? Was it when they removed your brain, or after?
Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.
SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.
It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.
Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?
Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.
My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.
Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.
She doesn't have character to assassinate.......comey doesn't either..........
no lol. Here we go again...Of course, Trump ass-kissers will shrug this off....or worse, think that Trump is just the cutest pumpkin when he opens his tiny mouth......but for others with a few more brain cells.
Here's what I consider to be the WORST of the orange clown's moments, when asking a FOREIGN and ADVERSARIAL power to "help" his sorry ass in the election.
“Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said in reference to the emails deleted by Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.
“I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Are you talking about the 30,000 emails that were deleted AFTER Congress told that stupid bitch to turn them over?
Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.It was obviously sarcasm.
Be less sad and pathetic.
Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.
SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.
It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.
Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?
Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.
My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.
Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.
Another great example of dupes being brainwashed by RW BS. Including many Indies and Dems. The pile of Pubcrappe is like Everest...Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.
SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.
It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.
Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?
Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.
My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.
Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.
FBI: No evidence Clinton ordered deletion of subpoenaed email archive
According to right wingers......Openly asking a foreign and adversarial power to help Trump win, will ....from now on ......be regarded as "sarcasm"; of course, only if you're an orange demagogue.
It was obviously sarcasm.
Be less sad and pathetic.
