Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it is not defined as nor by an “adult in the area” aloneSays you. The generally recognized legal definition of peer is just an adult citizen in the same general area.
peer
www.law.cornell.edu
You're rejecting that, and insist you know better. Why are you a better source than decades of legal precedent?
based on? Are you using the new fauci rules? it just appeared?Ironically, republicans are more likely to convict someone, than democrats are.
No it is not defined as nor by an “adult in the area” alone
well facts are important and the fact is demofks were and are the kkk. No matter how much they wished they could get out from underneath it.Then we can agree that half the country are racists and possible Klanners. I have no interest in arguing their politics.
It's all good!
Says you. The generally recognized legal definition of peer is just an adult citizen in the same general area.
peer
You're rejecting that, and insist you know better. Why are you a better source than decades of legal precedent?
So you are saying party isn't peer.Ironically, republicans are more likely to convict someone, than democrats are.
post that legal linky thingyAn adult.
In a legal context, peer most often refers to anyone who is an adult citizen, such as in “a jury of one’s peers.” Generally, a jury of one’s peers is a random selection of other citizens from a similar geographic location.
These individuals do not necessarily share traits similar to a defendant’s. As such, there is no guarantee that those who hear a defendant’s case will be of a similar age, race, socio-economic background, or gender as the defendant, though these traits alone cannot disqualify someone from serving as a juror.
Yes, there's no way of escaping political corruption when choosing a jury in America. Choosing the location according to the political map is the biggest consideration by far.I'm just pointing out that a jury of your peers is a crock of shit.
No it is not defined as nor by an “adult in the area” alone
blacks have known this since they existed.I'm just pointing out that a jury of your peers is a crock of shit.
post that legal linky thingy
No more so, than a plumbers peers, have to be other plumbers.So you are saying party isn't peer.
so when a child is at trial, are there children in the jury? Don't you just love how a rubberband snaps back in your puss?An adult.
In a legal context, peer most often refers to anyone who is an adult citizen, such as in “a jury of one’s peers.” Generally, a jury of one’s peers is a random selection of other citizens from a similar geographic location.
These individuals do not necessarily share traits similar to a defendant’s. As such, there is no guarantee that those who hear a defendant’s case will be of a similar age, race, socio-economic background, or gender as the defendant, though these traits alone cannot disqualify someone from serving as a juror.
so there is no such thing as peer.No more so, than a plumbers peers, have to be other plumbers.
I understand your reading disability.I totally agree. That's why you have a jury of your peers where the jury is not tainted with bias, as well as the DA, the prosecutors, and the judge. But, I do appreciate you admitting that the trial wasn't fair because it was 100% from some deep blue, city in the North. That was very man of you to admit.
Trump isn’t black. He got 14.5% of the vote in Manhattan, which means he should have had 1 or 2 of his people on the jury, but they convicted him anyway.LOL. Thanks for admitting how biased the whole thing was.
Tell that to the black person on trial. I doubt they would agree with you.
Ummmmmmmmmmm, there hasn't even been an appeal yet.
Trump isn’t black. He got 14.5% of the vote in Manhattan, which means he should have had 1 or 2 of his people on the jury, but they convicted him anyway.
#PRISONER45
It was rejected, because he had no grounds. There are enough Trump voters in Manhattan that the jury could have been hung, but they realized he’s a criminal and convicted anyway.He did
