Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Eliteist" "Scum" "Evil". These are buzz words that keep bubbling up to the surface of the argument against political Progressivism. Why are these hot button terms used? Why is there an underlying hatred for Progressive politics? Why would someone see the results of Progressive policies with such vitriol? Once the results are examined honestly, would anyone call for the elimination of those policies and call it fair, beneficial and liberating?
Would someone say that there should be American citizens seen as second class Americans? Would anyone want to see explicit discrimination, repression and exploitation of our fellow citizens?
Is there a reason for such animus? Such is the position of those who have enjoyed an advantage through repression. Have you ever noticed that whenever a repressed group, Women, minorities, homosexuals, finally speak up and demand the equality they deserve, those enjoying the advantage borne by repression always say "They want 'special' rights!".
Special rights? Hardly. They want the same rights as any other American. Asking for them is seen as rabble rousing and an uppity attitude. Repression results in demands for egalitarianism, something the repressing class sees as a vice rather than a virtue.
Perhaps the repressive class has painted themselves into an awkward corner. Perhaps the idea of equality is something they fear. Perhaps it's real competition for egalitarianism the repressive classes fear most. Ironic because the bedrock of their beliefs lays in the notion of healthy competition will provide the greatest good for the individual. They understand this from exploiting individuals and reaping the rewards they deny.
Is taxation now Fascism?"Eliteist" "Scum" "Evil". These are buzz words that keep bubbling up to the surface of the argument against political Progressivism. Why are these hot button terms used? .
Progressives use FASCISM - the police powers of the state - to enforce their dogma.
The "liberal" elitists do it in the name of the fatherland and the "conservatives" do it in the name of a god.
Either way the power is centralized in DC which is used to tyrannize and enslave.
.
Is the call for equal rights for all Americans become a tenet of Fascism?
We fought a war against Fascism in the middle of the twentieth century.
Progressives use FASCISM - the police powers of the state - to enforce their dogma.
The "liberal" elitists do it in the name of the fatherland and the "conservatives" do it in the name of a god.
Either way the power is centralized in DC which is used to tyrannize and enslave.
.
Okay, you're not an elitists, you're officially a nutjob
Elitists tend to say that INDIVIDUALISTS are nutjobs. Since we tend to resist tyranny we get in your way.
.
Okay, you're not an elitists, you're officially a nutjob
Elitists tend to say that INDIVIDUALISTS are nutjobs. Since we tend to resist tyranny we get in your way.
.
Ted? Ted Kaczynski, is that you? Would you like me to post your individual ideas for all to read? Let's do that and let us let others decide if you are an INDIVIDUALIST, a nutjob or both.
http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt
Elitists tend to say that INDIVIDUALISTS are nutjobs. Since we tend to resist tyranny we get in your way.
.
Ted? Ted Kaczynski, is that you? Would you like me to post your individual ideas for all to read? Let's do that and let us let others decide if you are an INDIVIDUALIST, a nutjob or both.
http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt
I believe that you meant to say : Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Patrick Henry is that you?
I fail to say the connection between individualism and serial murderers.
.
Elitists tend to say that INDIVIDUALISTS are nutjobs. Since we tend to resist tyranny we get in your way.
.
Ted? Ted Kaczynski, is that you? Would you like me to post your individual ideas for all to read? Let's do that and let us let others decide if you are an INDIVIDUALIST, a nutjob or both.
http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt
I believe that you meant to say : Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Patrick Henry is that you?
I fail to say the connection between individualism and serial murderers.
.
[MENTION=26616]kaz[/MENTION],Hmmm, the ones who advocated Socialism and Soviet Central Planning are "Progressives"
If leftists, progressives and Democrats are in fact different in any way, then it is their job to explain how by showing actual issues and policies they differ on. I ask one after another, like [MENTION=15512]Dante[/MENTION] what the difference is, and they can't name any specific difference at all. Not even one.
poor kaz, never paying attention. always attacking from a kneejerk syndrome
Dante is neither a leftist, a progressive nor a Democrat. The fact that I may side with any combination of those on specific issues is irrelevant and part of the ideological battles set up from extremists who want to position people into two warring camps. Ideological purity is so overrated.
[MENTION=44192]Vox[/MENTION]If leftists, progressives and Democrats are in fact different in any way, then it is their job to explain how by showing actual issues and policies they differ on. I ask one after another, like [MENTION=15512]Dante[/MENTION] what the difference is, and they can't name any specific difference at all. Not even one.
because there is no difference at all.
they ARE the same.
dum de dum dum
see the last response to [MENTION=26616]kaz[/MENTION]
Elitists tend to say that INDIVIDUALISTS are nutjobs. Since we tend to resist tyranny we get in your way.
.
You're not in my way. You couldn't be more irrelevant if you tried
Fascists always know that individualists are never irrelevant. They are the ones that start revolutions , and are armed to their teeth. We never roll over and play dead.
.
