Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
Only retards and social conservatives think being gay is a choice one can simply repress.
The best minds now believe it's the result of genetic and environmental influences, and those same minds theorize that they will eventually find all of the influences to be genetic.
So what does it matter if it's genetic, or not completely, if it isn't a choice?
Furthermore, why is it a choice you wan't to prevent people from making? How does a gay couple down the street affect yur life at all unless you chose to be part of theirs.
Opposing gay marriage, and worse yet, opposing being gay....is wrong in so many ways.
It just doesn't hurt you....I don't get it
Actually, you're right: you just don't get it.
You've been a sucker for the Left's propaganda....
The CDC made some points that add up to the fact that it may very well be a choice.
1. "This study asks us to consider is whether impressionable young people could be persuaded by seductive others that they are “genetically” homosexual, when in fact they are not–they have simply been sexually aroused by a member of their own sex. The findings of the CDC study seem to indicate that people, especially young people, can be aroused by a member of the same sex without that arousal signaling that they are “genetically” homosexual. Indeed, that so high a percentage of homosexuals have had sex with members of the opposite sex means that such arousal with a person you are not “naturally” attracted to is possible. After all, you can’t have sex without any arousal whatsoever (at least for men).
The take-away, then, is not about numbers like 1.4% (though that’s pretty illuminating)–the take-away, and it is a very important one for young people, is that if you feel aroused by a member of the same sex, that does not necessarily mean that you are “genetically” homosexual. There’s a small chance you are, but a much, much larger chance that you are not. You are not stuck thinking you are gay even if you have had a same-sex encounter.
Free Debt Management Plan Advice - Get help with your debt.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
2. "In fact, numbers show huge majorities of those who "ever had same sex sexual contact" do not identify long-term as gay.Among women 18-44, for instance, 12.5% report some form of same sex contact at some point in their lives, but among the older segment of that group (35-44),only 0.7% identify as homosexual and 1.1% as bisexual.
In other words, for the minority who may have experimented with gay relationships at some juncture in their lives, well over 80% explicitly renounced homosexual (or even bisexual) self-identification by age of 35. For the clear majority of males (as well as women) who report gay encounters, homosexual activity appears to represent a passing phase, or even a fleeting episode, rather than an unshakable, genetically pre-determined orientation."
Column Does it matter if only 1.4 of people are gay - USATODAY.com
Your comment, "Only retards and social conservatives think being gay is a choice one can simply repress" was pretty disgusting.
Glad I could rub your face in it.
That CDC article doesn't support your contention that being gay is a choice.
So we're still at retards and social conservatives that believe gay is a choice.
No, apparently it's a disease since gay is analyzed by the ... CDC ... Maybe you should take anti-biotics
Nah, my biotics are fine. Just had them calibrated.
Maybe some hormone therapy? Keep trying. My nephew is a biomedical engineer, he says there's a lot of hope to cure gays
Nope...I can make a whore and a virgin moan just fine, thanks for your concern though.
Gays don't need a cure, we're not a disease...but keep telling us how you're a libertarian and not an anti gay bigot why don't you?