What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com

The shooter was a radical-right wing hate monger killer.


He ran for Congress as a DEMOCRAT in 2006, bub.

Sometimes a FREAK is just a FREAK, as in this case. He doesn't represent anything but his own twisted world view.

But if you want to discuss TOTALITARIANS, you might want to take a look at your moonbat leadership.

So...he didn't run as a Republican later on?


He ran as a Republican before then, and earlier than that as a Democrat. But his party affiliation is not the cause of his twisted world view. Sometimes a FREAK is just a FREAK.
 
November 2008.

way before that, but they did remove all pretense in that election.

Well in 2002 they were shilling for the Bush led invasion and occupation of Iraq, full steam(ing piles of shit) ahead.

They barely questioned Papa Bush and the need to use force against Iraq. Nothing on the lead up to the Iraq/Kuwait crisis, which had been brewing for months yet the US Press ignored it. So when GWH Bush announce that it was a surprise attack that day, to Americans, it was.

No, the MSM is in it for themselves. Always have been looking to get their biscuit buttered, by whom? Meh, they don't care as long as it's buttered.

ok, show me any contentious reporting of Obama from the mainstream media. I'll take video or print.

No vetting on Obama, WHY?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzMas1bVidw]Brokaw and Rose Admit They Don't Know Much About Obama. - YouTube[/ame]
 
this piece of shit thread is still here while two others.... Update: THREE others (started by known conservatives) have been moved.

In a couple of them, there was some actual discussion going on.

Can't have that, I guess.

This thread is a pile of fucking shit, just like the OP is a pile of fucking shit.

But it stays.

Funny how that works, huh?
 
Walter Cronkite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Political activism


Walter Cronkite speaks at a NASA ceremony in February 2004


Cronkite wrote a syndicated opinion column for King Features Syndicate. In 2005 and 2006, he contributed to The Huffington Post.[58] Cronkite was the honorary chairman of The Interfaith Alliance.[59] In 2006, he presented the Walter Cronkite Faith and Freedom Award to actor and activist George Clooney on behalf of his organization at its annual dinner in New York.[60]
Cronkite was a vocal advocate for free airtime for political candidates.[4] He worked with the Alliance for Better Campaigns[4] and Common Cause,[6] for instance, on an unsuccessful lobbying effort to have an amendment added to the McCain-Feingold-Shays-Meehan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2001 that would have required TV broadcast companies to provide free airtime to candidates. Cronkite criticized the present system of campaign finance which allows elections to "be purchased" by special interests, and he noted that all the European democracies "provide their candidates with extensive free airtime."[61] "In fact," Cronkite pointed out, "of all the major nations worldwide that profess to have democracies, only seven – just seven – do not offer free airtime"[61] This put the United States on a list with Ecuador, Honduras, Malaysia, Taiwan, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago. Cronkite concluded that "The failure to give free airtime for our political campaigns endangers our democracy."[61] During the elections held in 2000, the amount spent by candidates in the major TV markets approached $1 billion. "What our campaign asks is that the television industry yield just a tiny percentage of that windfall, less than 1 percent, to fund free airtime."[61]
He was a member of the Constitution Project's bipartisan Liberty and Security Committee.[62] He also supported the nonprofit world hunger organization Heifer International.
In 1998, he supported President Bill Clinton during Clinton's impeachment trial. He was also a proponent of limited world government on the American federalist model, writing fund-raising letters for the World Federalist Association (now Citizens for Global Solutions). In accepting the 1999 Norman Cousins Global Governance Award at the ceremony at the United Nations, Cronkite said:
"It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order. But the American colonies did it once and brought forth one of the most nearly perfect unions the world has ever seen."[63][64][65] Cronkite contrasted his support for accountable global government with the opposition to it by politically active Christian fundamentalists in the United States:
"Even as with the American rejection of the League of Nations, our failure to live up to our obligations to the United Nations is led by a handful of willful senators who choose to pursue their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our nation’s conscience. They pander to and are supported by the Christian Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing. Their leader, Pat Robertson, has written that we should have a world government but only when the messiah arrives. Any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the Devil! Well join me... I'm glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan."[63][64] In 2003, Cronkite, who owned property on Martha's Vineyard, became involved in a long-running debate over his opposition to the construction of a wind farm in that area. In his column, he repeatedly condemned President George W. Bush and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Cronkite appeared in the 2004 Robert Greenwald film Outfoxed, where he offered commentary on what he said were unethical and overtly political practices at the Fox News Channel. Cronkite remarked that when Fox News was founded by Rupert Murdoch, "it was intended to be a conservative organization – beyond that; a far-right-wing organization". In January 2006, during a press conference to promote the PBS documentary about his career, Cronkite said that he felt the same way about America's presence in Iraq as he had about their presence in Vietnam in 1968 and that he felt America should recall its troops.[66]
Cronkite spoke out against the War on Drugs in support of the Drug Policy Alliance, writing a fundraising letter and appearing in advertisements on behalf of the DPA.[67] In the letter, Cronkite wrote: "Today, our nation is fighting two wars: one abroad and one at home. While the war in Iraq is in the headlines, the other war is still being fought on our own streets. Its casualties are the wasted lives of our own citizens. I am speaking of the war on drugs. And I cannot help but wonder how many more lives, and how much more money, will be wasted before another Robert McNamara admits what is plain for all to see: the war on drugs is a failure."[67]

I really like this one

He was also a proponent of limited world government on the American federalist model,
 
Walter Cronkite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Political activism


Walter Cronkite speaks at a NASA ceremony in February 2004


Cronkite wrote a syndicated opinion column for King Features Syndicate. In 2005 and 2006, he contributed to The Huffington Post.[58] Cronkite was the honorary chairman of The Interfaith Alliance.[59] In 2006, he presented the Walter Cronkite Faith and Freedom Award to actor and activist George Clooney on behalf of his organization at its annual dinner in New York.[60]
Cronkite was a vocal advocate for free airtime for political candidates.[4] He worked with the Alliance for Better Campaigns[4] and Common Cause,[6] for instance, on an unsuccessful lobbying effort to have an amendment added to the McCain-Feingold-Shays-Meehan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2001 that would have required TV broadcast companies to provide free airtime to candidates. Cronkite criticized the present system of campaign finance which allows elections to "be purchased" by special interests, and he noted that all the European democracies "provide their candidates with extensive free airtime."[61] "In fact," Cronkite pointed out, "of all the major nations worldwide that profess to have democracies, only seven – just seven – do not offer free airtime"[61] This put the United States on a list with Ecuador, Honduras, Malaysia, Taiwan, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago. Cronkite concluded that "The failure to give free airtime for our political campaigns endangers our democracy."[61] During the elections held in 2000, the amount spent by candidates in the major TV markets approached $1 billion. "What our campaign asks is that the television industry yield just a tiny percentage of that windfall, less than 1 percent, to fund free airtime."[61]
He was a member of the Constitution Project's bipartisan Liberty and Security Committee.[62] He also supported the nonprofit world hunger organization Heifer International.
In 1998, he supported President Bill Clinton during Clinton's impeachment trial. He was also a proponent of limited world government on the American federalist model, writing fund-raising letters for the World Federalist Association (now Citizens for Global Solutions). In accepting the 1999 Norman Cousins Global Governance Award at the ceremony at the United Nations, Cronkite said:
"It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order. But the American colonies did it once and brought forth one of the most nearly perfect unions the world has ever seen."[63][64][65] Cronkite contrasted his support for accountable global government with the opposition to it by politically active Christian fundamentalists in the United States:
"Even as with the American rejection of the League of Nations, our failure to live up to our obligations to the United Nations is led by a handful of willful senators who choose to pursue their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our nation’s conscience. They pander to and are supported by the Christian Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing. Their leader, Pat Robertson, has written that we should have a world government but only when the messiah arrives. Any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the Devil! Well join me... I'm glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan."[63][64] In 2003, Cronkite, who owned property on Martha's Vineyard, became involved in a long-running debate over his opposition to the construction of a wind farm in that area. In his column, he repeatedly condemned President George W. Bush and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Cronkite appeared in the 2004 Robert Greenwald film Outfoxed, where he offered commentary on what he said were unethical and overtly political practices at the Fox News Channel. Cronkite remarked that when Fox News was founded by Rupert Murdoch, "it was intended to be a conservative organization – beyond that; a far-right-wing organization". In January 2006, during a press conference to promote the PBS documentary about his career, Cronkite said that he felt the same way about America's presence in Iraq as he had about their presence in Vietnam in 1968 and that he felt America should recall its troops.[66]
Cronkite spoke out against the War on Drugs in support of the Drug Policy Alliance, writing a fundraising letter and appearing in advertisements on behalf of the DPA.[67] In the letter, Cronkite wrote: "Today, our nation is fighting two wars: one abroad and one at home. While the war in Iraq is in the headlines, the other war is still being fought on our own streets. Its casualties are the wasted lives of our own citizens. I am speaking of the war on drugs. And I cannot help but wonder how many more lives, and how much more money, will be wasted before another Robert McNamara admits what is plain for all to see: the war on drugs is a failure."[67]

I really like this one

He was also a proponent of limited world government on the American federalist model,
 
Want proof that the radical-right still remains highly dangerous? Killings at the Kansas Jewish sites should suffice. Read on...






What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com* * * *

In a word: nothing. The shooter was a fucking Democrap.

Go figure.




FACT: The shooter was a Republican who ran for the U.S. Senate in the 1986 North Carolina Primary election. He got 6662 Republican votes.


The guy ran as a Democrat and later he ran as a Republican...and both parties kicked his ass directly to the curb. From then on he ran as an independent. In 2005 he wrote an op-ed letter to the Springfield News Leader excoriating Bush and the Republican Party.

Now please STFU, crawl back under your rock, and desist in your disgusting attempt to score political points by standing on the dead bodies of the innocent victims of a deranged psychopath.
 
Last edited:
Jewish Center shooter 'knocked family to its knees,' relative says - CNN.com
The shooter:
He is the founder and former leader of the Carolina Knights of the Ku Klux Klan and the White Patriot Party...According to the SPLC, Cross founded and ran the Carolina Knights of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1980s. He was forced to shut down after the SPLC sued him for operating an illegal paramilitary organization and intimidating African-Americans.

He then formed another group, the White Patriot Party.

In the late 1980s, Cross spent three years in prison on weapons charges and for plotting the assassination of SPLC founder Morris Dees. The short sentence was a result of a plea bargain he struck with federal prosecutors. In exchange, he testified against 14 white supremacists in a sedition trial in Arkansas in 1988.

"He was reviled in white supremacist circles as a 'race traitor,' and, for a while, kept a low profile," according to an SPLC profile of him. "Now he's making a comeback with The Aryan Alternative, a racist tabloid he's been printing since 2005."
He doesn't appear to be a Democrat.


Why do you say so? HE was:
Racist felon running for the Dem nomination in MO-7
 
Want proof that the radical-right still remains highly dangerous? Killings at the Kansas Jewish sites should suffice. Read on...






What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com

"None of this is to suggest that the radical right in America does not remain highly dangerous," the SPLC warned in its report earlier this year. "The weakening of groups often has the effect of fostering, rather than retarding, followers' decisions to finally act out violently."

"Despite the decline, there are still enormous numbers of radical groups operating -- more than 2,000 of them, including hate and Patriot organizations. The single most important factor that has driven the growth of the radical right over the last five years, the ongoing demographic change to a non-white majority over the course of the next three decades, is still a source of enormous angst and rage for many."

The guy is not a conservative you douche, he is a left wing bush hater that ran for office as a democrat, repiublican and an independent. Big Bush Hater
 
Last edited:
He ran for Congress as a DEMOCRAT in 2006, bub.

Sometimes a FREAK is just a FREAK, as in this case. He doesn't represent anything but his own twisted world view.

But if you want to discuss TOTALITARIANS, you might want to take a look at your moonbat leadership.

So...he didn't run as a Republican later on?


He ran as a Republican before then, and earlier than that as a Democrat. But his party affiliation is not the cause of his twisted world view. Sometimes a FREAK is just a FREAK.

He ran as a Republican BEFORE? Or after? But...if his party affiliation isn't important, why did you bring it up?
 
Want proof that the radical-right still remains highly dangerous? Killings at the Kansas Jewish sites should suffice. Read on...






What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com* * * *

In a word: nothing. The shooter was a fucking Democrap.

Go figure.



The shooter was a radical-right wing hate monger killer.

What an ignoranus. You might want to look a little deeper into this story.
 
What can we agree on regarding this loser? Considering only the facts, of course.

Anything?

Who wants to make a statement about this fucking asshole that cannot be disputed?
 
Want proof that the radical-right still remains highly dangerous? Killings at the Kansas Jewish sites should suffice. Read on...






What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com

"None of this is to suggest that the radical right in America does not remain highly dangerous," the SPLC warned in its report earlier this year. "The weakening of groups often has the effect of fostering, rather than retarding, followers' decisions to finally act out violently."

"Despite the decline, there are still enormous numbers of radical groups operating -- more than 2,000 of them, including hate and Patriot organizations. The single most important factor that has driven the growth of the radical right over the last five years, the ongoing demographic change to a non-white majority over the course of the next three decades, is still a source of enormous angst and rage for many."


You're mistaken. Frazier Cross, the nazi sympathizer, is a Leftist. In fact, he ran for governor of South Carolina as a democrat candidate.
 
What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups -

Hater hate, losers lose.
 
Want proof that the radical-right still remains highly dangerous? Killings at the Kansas Jewish sites should suffice. Read on...






What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com* * * *

In a word: nothing. The shooter was a fucking Democrap.

Go figure.



The shooter was a radical-right wing hate monger killer.
You're seriously mistaken. Wikipedia didn't have time to white wash his record. He's a democrat.
 
Last edited:
Last edited by a moderator:
November 2008.

way before that, but they did remove all pretense in that election.

Well in 2002 they were shilling for the Bush led invasion and occupation of Iraq, full steam(ing piles of shit) ahead.

They barely questioned Papa Bush and the need to use force against Iraq. Nothing on the lead up to the Iraq/Kuwait crisis, which had been brewing for months yet the US Press ignored it. So when GWH Bush announce that it was a surprise attack that day, to Americans, it was.


No it wasn't. Look champ, this stuff was not long enough ago for you to lie so blatantly about it. Maybe you were stoned for all of 2002, but the press covered the increasing likelihood and build-up of forces prior to the war EXTENSIVELY. The media has been biased toward the left for a looooong time now.
 
Its really fucking pathetic how assholes try and take a tragedy and turn into a left vs right shit throwing contest to try and score some kind of cheap political points the victims aren't even buried yet and your using them to try and demonize people you disagree with politically it does not get any more sorry than that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top