Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes; we have those Standards, third world economies do not. Only the right, never gets it.yes, it does; we have one of the highest standards of living in the world.a minimum wage is a price control. so is the cost of money. socialism can be wonderful, if Only we could be moral enough for free, to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that takes a moral of Goodness and not a moral of Badness.Nixon tried price controls. They didn't work. When price cannot adjust to meet market reality, shortages ensue. We're not talking about any war on drugs, we're talking about the horrors of socialism.
a minimum wage is a price control.
And it doesn't work.
A wage that impacts 2% of workers is the reason for our high standards? LOL!
You're hilarious!
You mean the socialistic policies that prolonged the depression and made it worse?We Only have our first world economy due to Socialism, not Capitalism. 1929 proved it.That can only be done when a nation is tremendously wealthy, and the greater the degree of socialism, the greater the drain on the economy, and the less wealth a nation can generate. Socialism, as always, fails.only in right wing fantasy. we resort to Yankee forms of ingenuity. we have the Best form of Socialism in the Entire World (and some on the left are proud of it); not Only can the rich keep their mulitmillion dollar bonuses while on means tested corporate welfare, but even the least wealthy can still have steak and lobster on their EBT cards.Completely unsustainable. It's been tried and millions died.Ok. It is providing for the general welfare; through equal protection of the law.Then be honest and admit you want a guaranteed income, provided by welfare. Stop trying to call it something else.
You need high taxes to fund your socialist utopia. In fact, you need them so high you kill the economy.it is about lowering Taxes; only right, never gets it.I've not been talking about the drug war. That's something you're trying to inject into the discussion.i am advocating ending our drug war; you only talk about it.So, since you advocate such high tax rates, you are advocating constant warfare to justify them?It takes wartime tax rates to have a necessary and proper warfare-State. Only the fantastical right wing, never gets it.You're wandering off the reservation now, and making even less sense than before. Why is it that when I pin you down on an issue, you wander off onto another subject? Run out of platitudes and talking points?
lousy reading comprehension is not worth much.It really is as simple as employment, at the will of either party; your appeal to ignorance speaks volumes.dude read the law for yourself and stop appealing to ignorance.employment at will is the law. the only error is your ignorance of the law.
Ca Labor Code 2922 is declared the law in California regarding employment relationships. EDD has to prove for-Cause employment to deny benefits.
employment at will is the law.
And the employment at will law doesn't cover unemployment benefits.
So your silly claim is wrong.
EDD has to prove for-Cause employment
Ohhh.....you've invented a new term "For-Cause Employment".
Show me where it is defined in California law.
there is a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.
dude read the law for yourself
Post it. I'll be happy to show you your error.
stop appealing to ignorance.
You made a claim, of course I appeal to you for proof.
Your inability to provide it speaks volumes.
An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.
It really is as simple as.....
Your failure to post the law that supposedly is not protecting equally.
may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other.
That's weird, no mention there of unemployment benefits.
yes, even democracy is a form of socialism not capitalism.lousy management, you mean.even Hostess had that problem.just lousy management; socialism works fine in the US.
Lousy socialists, lousy managers. In Venezuela, in the US, everywhere.......
They're doing better now that they eliminated their socialists.
Lousy economics, lousy management....that's socialism.
How many of our health and safety and environmental standards do they also have; a first world economy costs first world bucks.yes; we have those Standards, third world economies do not. Only the right, never gets it.yes, it does; we have one of the highest standards of living in the world.a minimum wage is a price control. so is the cost of money. socialism can be wonderful, if Only we could be moral enough for free, to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth. But, that takes a moral of Goodness and not a moral of Badness.
a minimum wage is a price control.
And it doesn't work.
A wage that impacts 2% of workers is the reason for our high standards? LOL!
You're hilarious!
yes; we have those Standards
That cover 2% of workers. Big deal.
third world economies do not.
Venezuela didn't have minimum wage standards? Are you sure?
What good is a sucky socialist economy without a minimum wage?
Venezuela hikes minimum wage 40% -- to $67 a month
Damn, Daniel proves his idiocy, yet again.....LOL!
no; i mean the socialism that prevented a "second wave" in the future.You mean the socialistic policies that prolonged the depression and made it worse?We Only have our first world economy due to Socialism, not Capitalism. 1929 proved it.That can only be done when a nation is tremendously wealthy, and the greater the degree of socialism, the greater the drain on the economy, and the less wealth a nation can generate. Socialism, as always, fails.only in right wing fantasy. we resort to Yankee forms of ingenuity. we have the Best form of Socialism in the Entire World (and some on the left are proud of it); not Only can the rich keep their mulitmillion dollar bonuses while on means tested corporate welfare, but even the least wealthy can still have steak and lobster on their EBT cards.Completely unsustainable. It's been tried and millions died.Ok. It is providing for the general welfare; through equal protection of the law.
only bad management needs high taxes.You need high taxes to fund your socialist utopia. In fact, you need them so high you kill the economy.it is about lowering Taxes; only right, never gets it.I've not been talking about the drug war. That's something you're trying to inject into the discussion.i am advocating ending our drug war; you only talk about it.So, since you advocate such high tax rates, you are advocating constant warfare to justify them?It takes wartime tax rates to have a necessary and proper warfare-State. Only the fantastical right wing, never gets it.
lousy reading comprehension is not worth much.It really is as simple as employment, at the will of either party; your appeal to ignorance speaks volumes.dude read the law for yourself and stop appealing to ignorance.employment at will is the law.
And the employment at will law doesn't cover unemployment benefits.
So your silly claim is wrong.
EDD has to prove for-Cause employment
Ohhh.....you've invented a new term "For-Cause Employment".
Show me where it is defined in California law.
there is a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.
dude read the law for yourself
Post it. I'll be happy to show you your error.
stop appealing to ignorance.
You made a claim, of course I appeal to you for proof.
Your inability to provide it speaks volumes.
An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.
It really is as simple as.....
Your failure to post the law that supposedly is not protecting equally.
may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other.
That's weird, no mention there of unemployment benefits.
yes, even democracy is a form of socialism not capitalism.lousy management, you mean.even Hostess had that problem.Lousy socialists, lousy managers. In Venezuela, in the US, everywhere.......
They're doing better now that they eliminated their socialists.
Lousy economics, lousy management....that's socialism.
I am making progress on the Constitutional law, front.lousy reading comprehension is not worth much.It really is as simple as employment, at the will of either party; your appeal to ignorance speaks volumes.dude read the law for yourself and stop appealing to ignorance.
there is a federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.
dude read the law for yourself
Post it. I'll be happy to show you your error.
stop appealing to ignorance.
You made a claim, of course I appeal to you for proof.
Your inability to provide it speaks volumes.
An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.
It really is as simple as.....
Your failure to post the law that supposedly is not protecting equally.
may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other.
That's weird, no mention there of unemployment benefits.
Is that why you can't find a job?
too bad capital-ism isn't as easy to find as social-ism.yes, even democracy is a form of socialism not capitalism.lousy management, you mean.even Hostess had that problem.
They're doing better now that they eliminated their socialists.
Lousy economics, lousy management....that's socialism.
Yes, socialism is lousy....all around.
A bull elk is a large animal, a tick is a small animal. The elk does not even notice when a tick fastens on and drinks his blood. When, however, untold thousands of ticks fasten on and drink his blood, he is weakened and becomes a target for a wolf pack. Likewise, a society may be wealthy enough to sustain itself if a small number of individuals who otherwise cannot contribute instead are given what they need to sustain themselves. But, should that number of takers become large enough, society will become weakened and eventually collapse. Far better for society to expect the able bodied to work and take care of only those who cannot take care of themselves and have no one to help.only bad management needs high taxes.You need high taxes to fund your socialist utopia. In fact, you need them so high you kill the economy.it is about lowering Taxes; only right, never gets it.I've not been talking about the drug war. That's something you're trying to inject into the discussion.i am advocating ending our drug war; you only talk about it.So, since you advocate such high tax rates, you are advocating constant warfare to justify them?
some on the left are learning to merely use Capitalism for all of its worth in modern times.
We merely need more public sector means of production like Hoover Dam and the Fed; there are capital opportunities all around; only the right, prefers socialism to capitalism.
IOW, you need capitalism to thrive in order for socialism to survive. We knew that.only bad management needs high taxes.You need high taxes to fund your socialist utopia. In fact, you need them so high you kill the economy.it is about lowering Taxes; only right, never gets it.I've not been talking about the drug war. That's something you're trying to inject into the discussion.i am advocating ending our drug war; you only talk about it.So, since you advocate such high tax rates, you are advocating constant warfare to justify them?
some on the left are learning to merely use Capitalism for all of its worth in modern times.
We merely need more public sector means of production like Hoover Dam and the Fed; there are capital opportunities all around; only the right, prefers socialism to capitalism.
too bad capital-ism isn't as easy to find as social-ism.yes, even democracy is a form of socialism not capitalism.lousy management, you mean.They're doing better now that they eliminated their socialists.
Lousy economics, lousy management....that's socialism.
Yes, socialism is lousy....all around.
It is why a minimum wage for a work ethic should compete favorably with the cost of social services.A bull elk is a large animal, a tick is a small animal. The elk does not even notice when a tick fastens on and drinks his blood. When, however, untold thousands of ticks fasten on and drink his blood, he is weakened and becomes a target for a wolf pack. Likewise, a society may be wealthy enough to sustain itself if a small number of individuals who otherwise cannot contribute instead are given what they need to sustain themselves. But, should that number of takers become large enough, society will become weakened and eventually collapse. Far better for society to expect the able bodied to work and take care of only those who cannot take care of themselves and have no one to help.only bad management needs high taxes.You need high taxes to fund your socialist utopia. In fact, you need them so high you kill the economy.it is about lowering Taxes; only right, never gets it.I've not been talking about the drug war. That's something you're trying to inject into the discussion.i am advocating ending our drug war; you only talk about it.
some on the left are learning to merely use Capitalism for all of its worth in modern times.
We merely need more public sector means of production like Hoover Dam and the Fed; there are capital opportunities all around; only the right, prefers socialism to capitalism.
Socialism requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.IOW, you need capitalism to thrive in order for socialism to survive. We knew that.only bad management needs high taxes.You need high taxes to fund your socialist utopia. In fact, you need them so high you kill the economy.it is about lowering Taxes; only right, never gets it.I've not been talking about the drug war. That's something you're trying to inject into the discussion.i am advocating ending our drug war; you only talk about it.
some on the left are learning to merely use Capitalism for all of its worth in modern times.
We merely need more public sector means of production like Hoover Dam and the Fed; there are capital opportunities all around; only the right, prefers socialism to capitalism.
why is that? not enough moral of "goodwill toward men" to around.too bad capital-ism isn't as easy to find as social-ism.yes, even democracy is a form of socialism not capitalism.lousy management, you mean.
Lousy economics, lousy management....that's socialism.
Yes, socialism is lousy....all around.
It is too bad, because socialism is so awful.
Not without means testing. Too many takers to too few producers is unsustainable. That's the bottom line.It is why a minimum wage for a work ethic should compete favorably with the cost of social services.A bull elk is a large animal, a tick is a small animal. The elk does not even notice when a tick fastens on and drinks his blood. When, however, untold thousands of ticks fasten on and drink his blood, he is weakened and becomes a target for a wolf pack. Likewise, a society may be wealthy enough to sustain itself if a small number of individuals who otherwise cannot contribute instead are given what they need to sustain themselves. But, should that number of takers become large enough, society will become weakened and eventually collapse. Far better for society to expect the able bodied to work and take care of only those who cannot take care of themselves and have no one to help.only bad management needs high taxes.You need high taxes to fund your socialist utopia. In fact, you need them so high you kill the economy.it is about lowering Taxes; only right, never gets it.I've not been talking about the drug war. That's something you're trying to inject into the discussion.
some on the left are learning to merely use Capitalism for all of its worth in modern times.
We merely need more public sector means of production like Hoover Dam and the Fed; there are capital opportunities all around; only the right, prefers socialism to capitalism.
And therein lies the rub. Man is inherently immoral and selfish. That's why socialism always fails. Capitalism leverages man's selfishness for the greater good.Socialism requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth.IOW, you need capitalism to thrive in order for socialism to survive. We knew that.only bad management needs high taxes.You need high taxes to fund your socialist utopia. In fact, you need them so high you kill the economy.it is about lowering Taxes; only right, never gets it.I've not been talking about the drug war. That's something you're trying to inject into the discussion.
some on the left are learning to merely use Capitalism for all of its worth in modern times.
We merely need more public sector means of production like Hoover Dam and the Fed; there are capital opportunities all around; only the right, prefers socialism to capitalism.
Capitalism only needs capital morals for a price.
