Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is the term for people who have an irrational fear of being without a firearm?
Zimmerman was a good example of premeditated 'self defense'. If he hadn't had a gun, no one would have died. There was no crime being carried out before he intervened in a manner he wouldn't have if he hadn't been armed. There was no need for more than politely asking what the young man was doing.
Yes the gun lobby is playing you goobers like violins, buy more guns buy more guns!!!hmmm,....
Concealed Carry can still take their guns in...
Sounds like an Equal Protection case to me
Looks like there will be more.....
Gun sales spike in June
Gun sales spike in June - Jul. 7 2015
Zimmerman was a good example of premeditated 'self defense'. If he hadn't had a gun, no one would have died.
There was no crime being carried out before he intervened in a manner he wouldn't have if he hadn't been armed. There was no need for more than politely asking what the young man was doing.
Yes the gun lobby is playing you goobers like violins, buy more guns buy more guns!!!
The National Rifleman Association s KOOKY KIDZ KORNER - chickenhead.com
Zimmerman was a good example of premeditated 'self defense'. If he hadn't had a gun, no one would have died. There was no crime being carried out before he intervened in a manner he wouldn't have if he hadn't been armed. There was no need for more than politely asking what the young man was doing.
Yes the gun lobby is playing you goobers like violins, buy more guns buy more guns!!!hmmm,....
Concealed Carry can still take their guns in...
Sounds like an Equal Protection case to me
Looks like there will be more.....
Gun sales spike in June
Gun sales spike in June - Jul. 7 2015
The National Rifleman Association s KOOKY KIDZ KORNER - chickenhead.com
If he hadn't had a gun he may have died. LMAO "would you please stop beating my head into the pavement?"
What is funny is that I go to Chik Fil A quite a bit and there are never any of those morons with their assault rifles in there. They always are trying to come into Chipolte or In and Out. You nailed it bycalling them fruitcakes.
And yet you'd never know if anyone was carrying a concealed weapon would you.
So I can only assume you'd rather not know who is armed and who isn't
Your assumptions are your own business and that's fine.
I'll put it to you this way. If I'm at an Applebees or a Chilis or Five Guys or whatever and this group of guys comes in brandishing their weapons (we have a couple of groups who walk around carrying loaded weapons to spread "information"), I will pay my check and leave.
Because I know the situation is more dangerous than it was before. As stated over and over, if guns made us safe, we'd have the safest society ever since we, by far, have the most guns. Instead, the opposite is true, we live in one of the most violent advanced societies on earth.
If the guys are carrying concealed, you're right, I wouldn't know that the danger level just increased.
"Your assumptions are your own business and that's fine."
As are yours.
"I'll put it to you this way. If I'm at an Applebees or a Chilis or Five Guys or whatever and this group of guys comes in brandishing their weapons (we have a couple of groups who walk around carrying loaded weapons to spread "information"), I will pay my check and leave. "
Your choice.
Won't bother those carrying anyway.
(Course, they may laugh their asses off at you.)
"If the guys are carrying concealed, you're right, I wouldn't know that the danger level just increased"
Actually, the only place the 'danger level' increased is in your mind.
The place is more likely safer.
Statistics tell a much different story. Again, if guns made you safer, we'd have the safest society in the world. We don't. Case closed.
Too bad for you guns are not the only factor in determining whether or not a society is safe.
Why are you lumping in law abiding citizens with crazy criminals? Do you need someone to point out the difference?
Going only by the people I know personally. The only ones wanting to open carry are people trying to prove their masculinity. They hope someone will question their choice so they will have an opportunity to loudly give their practiced speech about how they are patriots trying to take back the country. In other words.......fruitcakes. I suspect it is the same with most of the goobers.
What is funny is that I go to Chik Fil A quite a bit and there are never any of those morons with their assault rifles in there. They always are trying to come into Chipolte or In and Out. You nailed it bycalling them fruitcakes.
And yet you'd never know if anyone was carrying a concealed weapon would you.
So I can only assume you'd rather not know who is armed and who isn't
Your assumptions are your own business and that's fine.
I'll put it to you this way. If I'm at an Applebees or a Chilis or Five Guys or whatever and this group of guys comes in brandishing their weapons (we have a couple of groups who walk around carrying loaded weapons to spread "information"), I will pay my check and leave.
Because I know the situation is more dangerous than it was before. As stated over and over, if guns made us safe, we'd have the safest society ever since we, by far, have the most guns. Instead, the opposite is true, we live in one of the most violent advanced societies on earth.
If the guys are carrying concealed, you're right, I wouldn't know that the danger level just increased.
Like I said people who carry concealed as I do on occasion will usually ignore any no open carry policy and will eat anywhere we want and you'd never know.
And yet you'd never know if anyone was carrying a concealed weapon would you.
So I can only assume you'd rather not know who is armed and who isn't
Your assumptions are your own business and that's fine.
I'll put it to you this way. If I'm at an Applebees or a Chilis or Five Guys or whatever and this group of guys comes in brandishing their weapons (we have a couple of groups who walk around carrying loaded weapons to spread "information"), I will pay my check and leave.
Because I know the situation is more dangerous than it was before. As stated over and over, if guns made us safe, we'd have the safest society ever since we, by far, have the most guns. Instead, the opposite is true, we live in one of the most violent advanced societies on earth.
If the guys are carrying concealed, you're right, I wouldn't know that the danger level just increased.
"Your assumptions are your own business and that's fine."
As are yours.
"I'll put it to you this way. If I'm at an Applebees or a Chilis or Five Guys or whatever and this group of guys comes in brandishing their weapons (we have a couple of groups who walk around carrying loaded weapons to spread "information"), I will pay my check and leave. "
Your choice.
Won't bother those carrying anyway.
(Course, they may laugh their asses off at you.)
"If the guys are carrying concealed, you're right, I wouldn't know that the danger level just increased"
Actually, the only place the 'danger level' increased is in your mind.
The place is more likely safer.
Statistics tell a much different story. Again, if guns made you safer, we'd have the safest society in the world. We don't. Case closed.
Too bad for you guns are not the only factor in determining whether or not a society is safe.
We also have the thousands of deaths that are a direct result of guns. That's true.
Your assumptions are your own business and that's fine.
I'll put it to you this way. If I'm at an Applebees or a Chilis or Five Guys or whatever and this group of guys comes in brandishing their weapons (we have a couple of groups who walk around carrying loaded weapons to spread "information"), I will pay my check and leave.
Because I know the situation is more dangerous than it was before. As stated over and over, if guns made us safe, we'd have the safest society ever since we, by far, have the most guns. Instead, the opposite is true, we live in one of the most violent advanced societies on earth.
If the guys are carrying concealed, you're right, I wouldn't know that the danger level just increased.
"Your assumptions are your own business and that's fine."
As are yours.
"I'll put it to you this way. If I'm at an Applebees or a Chilis or Five Guys or whatever and this group of guys comes in brandishing their weapons (we have a couple of groups who walk around carrying loaded weapons to spread "information"), I will pay my check and leave. "
Your choice.
Won't bother those carrying anyway.
(Course, they may laugh their asses off at you.)
"If the guys are carrying concealed, you're right, I wouldn't know that the danger level just increased"
Actually, the only place the 'danger level' increased is in your mind.
The place is more likely safer.
Statistics tell a much different story. Again, if guns made you safer, we'd have the safest society in the world. We don't. Case closed.
Too bad for you guns are not the only factor in determining whether or not a society is safe.
We also have the thousands of deaths that are a direct result of guns. That's true.
Your fallacy is blaming the gun. If you gave a gun to gave thousands of sane, rational, responsible adults who had a working knowledge of and respect for firearms, would they all shoot each other? Not likely. You seem to lump all firearms owners in with criminals, which is the furthest thing from the truth.
I'll tell ya what. I'll give up my guns when you abortionists stop murdering millions of innocent babies.
"Your assumptions are your own business and that's fine."
As are yours.
"I'll put it to you this way. If I'm at an Applebees or a Chilis or Five Guys or whatever and this group of guys comes in brandishing their weapons (we have a couple of groups who walk around carrying loaded weapons to spread "information"), I will pay my check and leave. "
Your choice.
Won't bother those carrying anyway.
(Course, they may laugh their asses off at you.)
"If the guys are carrying concealed, you're right, I wouldn't know that the danger level just increased"
Actually, the only place the 'danger level' increased is in your mind.
The place is more likely safer.
Statistics tell a much different story. Again, if guns made you safer, we'd have the safest society in the world. We don't. Case closed.
Too bad for you guns are not the only factor in determining whether or not a society is safe.
We also have the thousands of deaths that are a direct result of guns. That's true.
Your fallacy is blaming the gun. If you gave a gun to gave thousands of sane, rational, responsible adults who had a working knowledge of and respect for firearms, would they all shoot each other? Not likely. You seem to lump all firearms owners in with criminals, which is the furthest thing from the truth.
I'll tell ya what. I'll give up my guns when you abortionists stop murdering millions of innocent babies.
Someone who thinks they need to bring a gun to dinner isn't someone I would conclude is responsible.
Your mileage my vary.
*snicker*Statistics tell a much different story. Again, if guns made you safer, we'd have the safest society in the world. We don't. Case closed.
Too bad for you guns are not the only factor in determining whether or not a society is safe.
We also have the thousands of deaths that are a direct result of guns. That's true.
Your fallacy is blaming the gun. If you gave a gun to gave thousands of sane, rational, responsible adults who had a working knowledge of and respect for firearms, would they all shoot each other? Not likely. You seem to lump all firearms owners in with criminals, which is the furthest thing from the truth.
I'll tell ya what. I'll give up my guns when you abortionists stop murdering millions of innocent babies.
Someone who thinks they need to bring a gun to dinner isn't someone I would conclude is responsible.
Your mileage my vary.
Why's that? Are my chances of being murdered lower because I'm eating dinner in a public place? How about church? I also carry in church. Are my chances of being murdered in church any lower because well by golly, it's a church? As for being "responsible", yes I am. The state I live in and my law-enforcement agencies seem to think I'm a responsible person, seeing as how I can pass a criminal background check. I'm actually more trustworthy than you are. Have you passed a criminal background check lately?
Your argument doesn't hold water. I carry a weapon every time I leave the house and will continue to do so. And there's nothing you can do about it.
Statistics tell a much different story. Again, if guns made you safer, we'd have the safest society in the world. We don't. Case closed.
Too bad for you guns are not the only factor in determining whether or not a society is safe.
We also have the thousands of deaths that are a direct result of guns. That's true.
Your fallacy is blaming the gun. If you gave a gun to gave thousands of sane, rational, responsible adults who had a working knowledge of and respect for firearms, would they all shoot each other? Not likely. You seem to lump all firearms owners in with criminals, which is the furthest thing from the truth.
I'll tell ya what. I'll give up my guns when you abortionists stop murdering millions of innocent babies.
Someone who thinks they need to bring a gun to dinner isn't someone I would conclude is responsible.
Your mileage my vary.
Why's that? Are my chances of being murdered lower because I'm eating dinner in a public place? How about church? I also carry in church. Are my chances of being murdered in church any lower because well by golly, it's a church? As for being "responsible", yes I am. The state I live in and my law-enforcement agencies seem to think I'm a responsible person, seeing as how I can pass a criminal background check. I'm actually more trustworthy than you are. Have you passed a criminal background check lately?
Your argument doesn't hold water. I carry a weapon every time I leave the house and will continue to do so. And there's nothing you can do about it.
It's amazing how many people actually think criminals care about signs like this:
*snicker*Too bad for you guns are not the only factor in determining whether or not a society is safe.
We also have the thousands of deaths that are a direct result of guns. That's true.
Your fallacy is blaming the gun. If you gave a gun to gave thousands of sane, rational, responsible adults who had a working knowledge of and respect for firearms, would they all shoot each other? Not likely. You seem to lump all firearms owners in with criminals, which is the furthest thing from the truth.
I'll tell ya what. I'll give up my guns when you abortionists stop murdering millions of innocent babies.
Someone who thinks they need to bring a gun to dinner isn't someone I would conclude is responsible.
Your mileage my vary.
Why's that? Are my chances of being murdered lower because I'm eating dinner in a public place? How about church? I also carry in church. Are my chances of being murdered in church any lower because well by golly, it's a church? As for being "responsible", yes I am. The state I live in and my law-enforcement agencies seem to think I'm a responsible person, seeing as how I can pass a criminal background check. I'm actually more trustworthy than you are. Have you passed a criminal background check lately?
Your argument doesn't hold water. I carry a weapon every time I leave the house and will continue to do so. And there's nothing you can do about it.
Basically the definition of a gun nut. Notice he didn't talk about his minutes of training and zero situational training?
Some are uneducated about firearms therefore they have an irrational fear of guns. When they see one, they piss all over themselves, and for what reason, I can only speculate
-Geaux
Speculate is what you do on every issue. In this case "irrational fear of guns" isn't speculation, it's a personal attack on those who respect the power of a gun, and understand that not everyone who owns, possess or has in his or her custody and control is rational, trained, sober, sane or trust worthy,
