When is the time to talk about gun violence?

[ClosedCaption]

Go play this crybaby blogger proof game with someone else. They havent proven dick so the question is bullshit

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I hear people on both sides of the aisle saying, now is not the time to talk about guns. Well, when is the time? What is the answer?

Is it more guns? Is it less guns? Is it more gun restrictions or is it less gun laws?

WHY CAN'T THESE POLITICIANS, WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE INTELLIGENT, SIT DOWN AND FIGURE THIS OUT?

There is nothing to figure out. Read the 2nd Amendment and adhere to it. Period.

Oregon is a perfect example of what happens when anti-gun policies are in place. Gun-free zones. Might as well call them shooting spree zones.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Gun-free zones.

Except the part about there was no gun free zone. Other than that I guess your punctuation was correct.

 

[jc456]

According to The Gateway Pundit andConservative Treehouse, CNN altered a photo of Chris Harper-Mercer, the Oregon shooter, to make him look white.


According to bloggers? LMAO

well was it or not? Is he white?

You have to do better than "according to bloggers" and have something more reputable.

wasn't what I asked. i asked you is he white?

Why? Are your eyes fucked up?

oh, ok so you confirm the blogs were right. Thanks!

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Gun-free zones.

Except the part about there was no gun free zone. Other than that I guess your punctuation was correct.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Gun-free zones.

Except the part about there was no gun free zone. Other than that I guess your punctuation was correct.

But they can ban guns from various building and facilities.

 

[jc456]

Go play this crybaby blogger proof game with someone else. They havent proven dick so the question is bullshit

again, thanks for proving for me.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Gun-free zones.

Except the part about there was no gun free zone. Other than that I guess your punctuation was correct.

But they can ban guns from various building and facilities.

It wasnt a gun free zone no matter how you spin it

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Australians Call For International Boycott Of U.S. Travel Until Gun Reform Is Passed
Americans delude themselves into thinking we are the world’s moral authority, but in times like these, it might be a good idea to listen to everyone else. An Australian gun control group is calling for an international boycott of non-essential travel to the United States, as well as other measures designed to aid President Obama’s attempts to promote stronger gun control laws in the wake of the recent mass shooting at Umpqua Community College in Oregon.

Samantha Lee, director of Gun Control Australia, delivered the message in an interview with Australia’s Today Show.

“We have 2.1 million Australians visiting the U.S. every year and over 200,000 expats in America. So I believe we have a duty to respond to this tragedy in the U.S. And the way to do this is have a boycott of non-essential travel to the U.S.”

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Gun-free zones.

Except the part about there was no gun free zone. Other than that I guess your punctuation was correct.

But they can ban guns from various building and facilities.

It wasnt a gun free zone no matter how you spin it

Guns not allowed in certain buildings, makes those specific areas gun free zones. No spin, just cold hard facts.

 

[Rustic]

Buy more guns and ammo...

 

[dannyboys]

You happy with this chart?
View attachment 51292

are those countries proud of the innocent civilians murdered by their governments……Europe sent 12 million people to death in German death camps…….Russia 25 million, China 70 million, and that doesn't include the Armenian genocide the or any of the other mass murders by governments against unarmed people around the world.

Europe? That isn't a country. And your claim is obviously false.

France and other countries handed over their citizens to Germans to be murdered in their death camps……almost all of them did……..to the tune of 12 million people.

France isn't almost all of them. And france was completely taken over by the Germans.

Yes…because they disarmed their citizens after World War 1 and after the French military was defeated the people were helpless to resist the Germans, and surrendered their Jewish citizens, and others, to be murdered in German death camps….Switzerland…with over 400,000 people with rifles and pistols…not invaded or conquered…...

Hitler would have gotten around to Switzerland sooner or later.
The ONLY reason he didn't bother was he had enough on his plate the day he invaded Poland. That and the average Swiss citizens were (and still are) an entire nation of Jew haters. They only tolerate the Jewish run banking system b/c it brings in so much in government taxes. Which means pristine roads, parks, cities, etc etc.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Gun-free zones.

Except the part about there was no gun free zone. Other than that I guess your punctuation was correct.

But they can ban guns from various building and facilities.

It wasnt a gun free zone no matter how you spin it

Guns not allowed in certain buildings, makes those specific areas gun free zones. No spin, just cold hard facts.

No it doesnt morph into something its not because you want to pretend it is. There was no gun free zone and yet it was targeted. There were people there armed because its a CC state.

If you want to pretend it was a gun free zone go ahead. But you know its not so you are forced into a tortured explanation

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Gun-free zones.

Except the part about there was no gun free zone. Other than that I guess your punctuation was correct.

But they can ban guns from various building and facilities.

It wasnt a gun free zone no matter how you spin it

Guns not allowed in certain buildings, makes those specific areas gun free zones. No spin, just cold hard facts.

No it doesnt morph into something its not because you want to pretend it is. There was no gun free zone and yet it was targeted. There were people there armed because its a CC state.

If you want to pretend it was a gun free zone go ahead. But you know its not so you are forced into a tortured explanation

Hey dumbass, if guns are not allowed in certain areas wouldn't those be gun free areas?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Except the part about there was no gun free zone. Other than that I guess your punctuation was correct.

But they can ban guns from various building and facilities.

It wasnt a gun free zone no matter how you spin it

Guns not allowed in certain buildings, makes those specific areas gun free zones. No spin, just cold hard facts.

No it doesnt morph into something its not because you want to pretend it is. There was no gun free zone and yet it was targeted. There were people there armed because its a CC state.

If you want to pretend it was a gun free zone go ahead. But you know its not so you are forced into a tortured explanation

Hey dumbass, if guns are not allowed in certain areas wouldn't those be gun free areas?

Depends on if you are saying its a gun free zone or an area where guns are discouraged from being there? You're trying to say that both are the same just that the last one is missing the GUN FREE ZONE designation.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

But they can ban guns from various building and facilities.

It wasnt a gun free zone no matter how you spin it

Guns not allowed in certain buildings, makes those specific areas gun free zones. No spin, just cold hard facts.

No it doesnt morph into something its not because you want to pretend it is. There was no gun free zone and yet it was targeted. There were people there armed because its a CC state.

If you want to pretend it was a gun free zone go ahead. But you know its not so you are forced into a tortured explanation

Hey dumbass, if guns are not allowed in certain areas wouldn't those be gun free areas?

Depends on if you are saying its a gun free zone or an area where guns are discouraged from being there? You're trying to say that both are the same just that the last one is missing the GUN FREE ZONE designation.

Zone and area have pretty much the same meaning. If guns are banned in certain areas, it makes those areas gun free zones by design.

 

[ClosedCaption]

It wasnt a gun free zone no matter how you spin it

Guns not allowed in certain buildings, makes those specific areas gun free zones. No spin, just cold hard facts.

No it doesnt morph into something its not because you want to pretend it is. There was no gun free zone and yet it was targeted. There were people there armed because its a CC state.

If you want to pretend it was a gun free zone go ahead. But you know its not so you are forced into a tortured explanation

Hey dumbass, if guns are not allowed in certain areas wouldn't those be gun free areas?

Depends on if you are saying its a gun free zone or an area where guns are discouraged from being there? You're trying to say that both are the same just that the last one is missing the GUN FREE ZONE designation.

Zone and area have pretty much the same meaning. If guns are banned in certain areas, it makes those areas gun free zones by design.

Pretty much except no

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Guns not allowed in certain buildings, makes those specific areas gun free zones. No spin, just cold hard facts.

No it doesnt morph into something its not because you want to pretend it is. There was no gun free zone and yet it was targeted. There were people there armed because its a CC state.

If you want to pretend it was a gun free zone go ahead. But you know its not so you are forced into a tortured explanation

Hey dumbass, if guns are not allowed in certain areas wouldn't those be gun free areas?

Depends on if you are saying its a gun free zone or an area where guns are discouraged from being there? You're trying to say that both are the same just that the last one is missing the GUN FREE ZONE designation.

Zone and area have pretty much the same meaning. If guns are banned in certain areas, it makes those areas gun free zones by design.

Pretty much except no

Thanks for admitting your intellectually dishonest.

 

[ClosedCaption]

No it doesnt morph into something its not because you want to pretend it is. There was no gun free zone and yet it was targeted. There were people there armed because its a CC state.

If you want to pretend it was a gun free zone go ahead. But you know its not so you are forced into a tortured explanation

Hey dumbass, if guns are not allowed in certain areas wouldn't those be gun free areas?

Depends on if you are saying its a gun free zone or an area where guns are discouraged from being there? You're trying to say that both are the same just that the last one is missing the GUN FREE ZONE designation.

Zone and area have pretty much the same meaning. If guns are banned in certain areas, it makes those areas gun free zones by design.

Pretty much except no

Thanks for admitting your intellectually dishonest.

One is a law the other isnt. So yeah, not the same at all

 

[mudwhistle]

I hear people on both sides of the aisle saying, now is not the time to talk about guns. Well, when is the time? What is the answer?

Is it more guns? Is it less guns? Is it more gun restrictions or is it less gun laws?

WHY CAN'T THESE POLITICIANS, WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE INTELLIGENT, SIT DOWN AND FIGURE THIS OUT?

Uh......when are you fuckers going to stop talking about gun violence?