Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
- Nov 1, 2015
- 60,125
- 14,890
This is a valid point.They don't have to read them to you. However, any information they get from you cannot be used as evidence in court until you have been read your rights.
But it still doesn't answer the more basic question: WHY can't the cops use the info they get from you in court, simply because they haven't READ YOUR RIGHTS TO YOU? If they have scrupulously obeyed what the Constitution actually says, not coerced you, etc., and you announce you know where the murder weapon is and they use your tip to find it... why can they not use the fact in court that you knew where the weapon was, to support their case that you are the murderer?
The Constitution requires that you must have the right to remain silent and all the rest... as it should. But where does it say those rights must be explained to you by the police? As I said in the OP, there is no other instance where cops must explain the law to you.
Cops know liberals slept through school and are not aware of their rights, so they give them a refresher course before they admit to being the second shooter on the grassy knoll.