Which is more important to you, human life or your guns?

Some innocent people may be killed

But at least we have our guns

Collateral damage
Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killed
Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.

As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.

We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.

So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.

Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
 
Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killed
Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.

As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.

We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.

So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.

Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.

People kill people always have always will.

It is a truth that needs to be accepted like gravity
 
Since he was an atheist, I bet a dollar to your doughnut he was a leftist nutjob

-Geaux
Because Trump is a man of God, right?

I mean, an atheist wouldn't fuck everything that casts a shadow, make his fortune off casinos, marry three times, and abuse his celebrity to grab pussies and bust into underaged girls dressing rooms.

Only a godly man would do that.


But obviously you know what's in his heart right?
His actions reveal what he is.

Yet making a “comment” to another guy in what many would view as “locker room talk” back in the 90s, when the Clinton’s were only to happy to take his money in a donation (while through all Hillary’s “public disgust” none of it was gave back I’m sure), and actually acting out as Harvey Weinstein did in pushing women to be used and grabbed for his pleasure in an abusive behavior are two totally different things. If he claims himself to be a faith based believer, do you happen to know when thatvconversion took place? After all he changed and moved away from the Democrat party, from when he made those comments regarding women.
 
Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killed
Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.

As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.

We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.

So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.

Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
but you only care when it's because of a gun. other methods of ending lives don't bother you it would seem.
 
Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.

As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.

We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.

So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.

Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
but you only care when it's because of a gun. other methods of ending lives don't bother you it would seem.
And it's not even 99% of people who are killed they care about. It's just the 1% that happen to be killed in a mass shooting event
 
Please tell me how having me give up or forcing me to give up my firearms will prevent anyone from being killed
Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.

As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.

We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.

So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.

Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
 
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.

Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
but you only care when it's because of a gun. other methods of ending lives don't bother you it would seem.
And it's not even 99% of people who are killed they care about. It's just the 1% that happen to be killed in a mass shooting event
i get the anger. we all do. what i don't get is the crazy that follows with some. couple that with a passive aggressive "we don't want your guns but give up your guns" bullshit, it makes the problem unsurmountable if only because they offer no compromise. any they do offer is only temporary until they can then come back with even more they want LATER after they get what they want "in a compromise".

"All we want is this flag removed from this courthouse" - and look what they did after that. look what we let them do. needs to end and simply let people be people.
 
Those advanced nations which have banned guns have a much lower homicide rate than we do.

As a general rule, those states with laxer gun laws have higher homicide rates.

We have to be honest and admit that banning guns would result in a lower homicide rate. But that would require the repeal of the Second Amendment.

So it really is a choice between a higher homicide rate and liberty. It is completely dishonest to deny this.
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.

Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
how about the 800 plus deaths in Chicago's south side last year? where is the outrage? simply put, the left doesn't give a shit about human life. There is far too much evidence against them.
 
What is more important to liberals, 'abortions' or 'human life'?

Pick one.
 
What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

chart_1.jpg

chart_2.jpg
 
and you know that is factually incorrect. been debunked in here again and again. but that is who you are, posting lies. why don't you post statistics that agree with your position? don't ask me or anyone else to debunk again. You post it this time.

Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
how about the 800 plus deaths in Chicago's south side last year? where is the outrage? simply put, the left doesn't give a shit about human life. There is far too much evidence against them.
What a crock of shit.

You are projecting. Your kind has made it very clear that no matter how many Americans are killed by guns each year, you will resist every attempt to mitigate those murders.
 
Oh, come off it, every first world nation has a lower murder rate than the USA and every first world nation has stricter gun laws and less guns in society.

So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
how about the 800 plus deaths in Chicago's south side last year? where is the outrage? simply put, the left doesn't give a shit about human life. There is far too much evidence against them.
What a crock of shit.

You are projecting. Your kind has made it very clear that no matter how many Americans are killed by guns each year, you will resist every attempt to mitigate those murders.
Frivolous gun laws do nothing to stop any type of violent behavior, enforce the laws that we currently have and forget your little pipe dream of a perfect society because of frivolous gun laws.
 
So what?

Quit whining

-Geaux

So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
how about the 800 plus deaths in Chicago's south side last year? where is the outrage? simply put, the left doesn't give a shit about human life. There is far too much evidence against them.
What a crock of shit.

You are projecting. Your kind has made it very clear that no matter how many Americans are killed by guns each year, you will resist every attempt to mitigate those murders.
Frivolous gun laws do nothing to stop any type of violent behavior, enforce the laws that we currently have and forget your little pipe dream of a perfect society because of frivolous gun laws.
I said nothing about "frivolous" gun laws. And I provided solid evidence that the Brady law was effective.

I also provided evidence that a total gun ban and confiscation would result in a lower homicide rate.

I do not support a total gun ban and confiscation, but I expect you tards to at least be honest in any gun debates. You aren't.
 
So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
how about the 800 plus deaths in Chicago's south side last year? where is the outrage? simply put, the left doesn't give a shit about human life. There is far too much evidence against them.
What a crock of shit.

You are projecting. Your kind has made it very clear that no matter how many Americans are killed by guns each year, you will resist every attempt to mitigate those murders.
Frivolous gun laws do nothing to stop any type of violent behavior, enforce the laws that we currently have and forget your little pipe dream of a perfect society because of frivolous gun laws.
I said nothing about "frivolous" gun laws. And I provided solid evidence that the Brady law was effective.

I also provided evidence that a total gun ban and confiscation would result in a lower homicide rate.

I do not support a total gun ban and confiscation, but I expect you tards to at least be honest in any gun debates. You aren't.
AR15’s are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less… Just a symbol that scares little progressives at night.

Gun confiscation would result in millions dead on both sides… Fact
 
A simple question.

Yesterday 26 people were shot and killed, some of them kids.

Life is going down the drain for lots of people in the US due to guns.

Which would you prefer, to keep your guns or to keep your life?

False choice.
 
So what?

These are PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDING for fuck's sake.
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
how about the 800 plus deaths in Chicago's south side last year? where is the outrage? simply put, the left doesn't give a shit about human life. There is far too much evidence against them.
What a crock of shit.

You are projecting. Your kind has made it very clear that no matter how many Americans are killed by guns each year, you will resist every attempt to mitigate those murders.
Frivolous gun laws do nothing to stop any type of violent behavior, enforce the laws that we currently have and forget your little pipe dream of a perfect society because of frivolous gun laws.
I said nothing about "frivolous" gun laws. And I provided solid evidence that the Brady law was effective.

I also provided evidence that a total gun ban and confiscation would result in a lower homicide rate.

I do not support a total gun ban and confiscation, but I expect you tards to at least be honest in any gun debates. You aren't.
I also provided evidence that a total gun ban and confiscation would result in a lower homicide rate.

No you didn't. Myself and others debunked your data.

I do not support a total gun ban and confiscation, but I expect you tards to at least be honest in any gun debates. You aren't.
What do you want to be honest about? It seems it is you that isn't honest you posted all sorts of crazy information regarding Australia and it was all debunked. So wish to debate admit that your data doesn't support your position. without that, you can't debate. Cause that was the debate.
 
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
how about the 800 plus deaths in Chicago's south side last year? where is the outrage? simply put, the left doesn't give a shit about human life. There is far too much evidence against them.
What a crock of shit.

You are projecting. Your kind has made it very clear that no matter how many Americans are killed by guns each year, you will resist every attempt to mitigate those murders.
Frivolous gun laws do nothing to stop any type of violent behavior, enforce the laws that we currently have and forget your little pipe dream of a perfect society because of frivolous gun laws.
I said nothing about "frivolous" gun laws. And I provided solid evidence that the Brady law was effective.

I also provided evidence that a total gun ban and confiscation would result in a lower homicide rate.

I do not support a total gun ban and confiscation, but I expect you tards to at least be honest in any gun debates. You aren't.
AR15’s are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less… Just a symbol that scares little progressives at night.

Gun confiscation would result in millions dead on both sides… Fact
I'm very much against an AWB, retard.

Trump, however, is in favor of one.... Fact.
 
You mean like how thousands of babies lives are ended every year? Or don't they matter?
how about the 800 plus deaths in Chicago's south side last year? where is the outrage? simply put, the left doesn't give a shit about human life. There is far too much evidence against them.
What a crock of shit.

You are projecting. Your kind has made it very clear that no matter how many Americans are killed by guns each year, you will resist every attempt to mitigate those murders.
Frivolous gun laws do nothing to stop any type of violent behavior, enforce the laws that we currently have and forget your little pipe dream of a perfect society because of frivolous gun laws.
I said nothing about "frivolous" gun laws. And I provided solid evidence that the Brady law was effective.

I also provided evidence that a total gun ban and confiscation would result in a lower homicide rate.

I do not support a total gun ban and confiscation, but I expect you tards to at least be honest in any gun debates. You aren't.
I also provided evidence that a total gun ban and confiscation would result in a lower homicide rate.

No you didn't. Myself and others debunked your data.

No you didn't. You just denied the facts. It's what you tards do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top