Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ence said that somebody can go to a judge and the judge can respond to that petitioner. Pence reiterated that the president, and the president alone, has the authority to act on that issue.
The president has the authority, and the knowledge, to make that determination.
But Federal judges have the last word on whether it is constitutional or not. Or if it causes undo harm to American citizens.
Trump lost in court twice now. Quit believing false things. It's dangerous.
ence said that somebody can go to a judge and the judge can respond to that petitioner. Pence reiterated that the president, and the president alone, has the authority to act on that issue.
You are incredibly stupid if that is all you heard.
I hope Anericans like you are a very slim majority.
You are dangerous to the well being of freedom and democracy or you are like eleven years old or something.
How is a judge NOT a threat to democracy and freedom when he issues rulings based upon HIS opinion of a policy of a president? How is somebody who thinks a judge has that authority NOT a threat to democracy and freedom?
Or Congress could strip the courts authority to rule on certain subjects.
There can be a constitutional amendment.
How is a judge NOT a threat to democracy and freedom when he issues rulings based upon HIS opinion of a policy of a president? How is somebody who thinks a judge has that authority NOT a threat to democracy and freedom?
We do not live in a dictatorship where the President is above the law.
You are stupid and not listening.
That is what Federal judges are sworn to do.
You are saying that no Federal judge can rule on any matter regarding national security. That is absurd. That is ignorant. That is dangerous.
As presidente, Trump could write an executive order for Federal Marshals, to sieze a bank supposedly involved in funding terrorists merely because Trump's kleptocrat buddies here and abroad could not get a cheap loan or they wouldn't launder money.
So in your dream dictatorship no judge could restrain that order and havoc because it was made on the grounds of a threat to national security.
The bank would have no means to defend themselves from your dictator.
You are dangerous to liberty, capitalism and the American way.
Horseshit. The SCOTUS ruled that the American taxpayer had to give every single illegal alien an education. And, medical care. So do not give us that horse shit that only congress passes laws on spending! The American taxpayer is fucked!
Athanasius68, post: 16503903.Or Congress could strip the courts authority to rule on certain subjects.
NFW! You are going insane over this. Congress can't rewrite the Constitution. The Federal Courts would destroy that if it were mentioned as a thought.
I could fight that in court and win simply as a citizen. No need for a lawyer.
There seems to be no worry here about a judge being above the law
The Constitution gives Congress the authority to determine jurisdiction of the courts.
Athanasius68, post: 16504254There seems to be no worry here about a judge being above the law
No judge is above the law - they cannot break the law. Doing the job of upholding and protecting the Constitution is the mainstay of our Republic.
This judge and his decision should be highly respected.
We can't expect Trumpees to have that much courage and character. They want a dictator. They are steeped in fear and no longer love freedom.
Because you fail to take into account that Islam is more than just a religion, it is law and ideology! They are abusive to women, children, infidels and Christians and gays. and I do not understand why you support that ideology! Can you explain that?
Athanasius68, post: 16504280The Constitution gives Congress the authority to determine jurisdiction of the courts.
Explain to me what you think determining jurisdiction means.
Idiot!WillowTree, post: 16499113Because you fail to take into account that Islam is more than just a religion, it is law and ideology! They are abusive to women, children, infidels and Christians and gays. and I do not understand why you support that ideology! Can you explain that?
I do not support that ideology. I already told you that. Are you stupid or something.
I lived in Dearborn for a few years. I was a roomate with a young Muslim medical student from Egypt. He was very kind respectful and dedicated to becoming a surgeon.
That was a long time ago, but my townhouse subdivision near DC is very diverse. My Pakistani neighbor just moved out and I will greatly them and their two teenaged sons.
I have watched them grow up into two of the most respectful male teens I have ever met.
Stop lying about what I support.
Well, no the judges can't break the law. But that is rather easy to achieve when people argue the judge is the final arbiter as to what the law is.
Athanasius68, post: 16504409Well, no the judges can't break the law. But that is rather easy to achieve when people argue the judge is the final arbiter as to what the law is.
No single judge is the arbitor of what the law is. Now you are fabricating arguments that don't exist.
The President is the only branch that has unitary power.
Because it's a band on only Muslims from those seven areas..If it's a Muslim ban, why does the ban only involve seven nations?
The judge in Washington just arbitrated thus.
