Whites do have a role in stopping racism

[Indeependent]

Would you agree that you are a racist? Do you agree that the black race is morally superior to the white race?

Yes I agree the Black race is morally superior to the white race. Blacks taught the white race civilization on two occasions. Blacks never attempted to enslave whites nor hold them back in any manner like whites did and still do.

According to your history no. But according to history that is generally accepted, blacks sold their brothers into slavery.

I'm curious, do you have any evidence to the contrary?

Even if that was true whites sold their brothers into slavery as well. Thats where we get the term "slave" in the first place. Whites selling other whites.

Wrong. Slav s existed throughout Africa and Egypt for thousands of years.

Still do.
Hell there are more slaves in africa right now than there ever was in America.
When you are a hack and have to come up with excuses constantly, you tend to cherry pick history and lie your ass off.

I’ve been through this with AssLips and MeToo!
They have PhDs in Revisionist History and Current Events.

 

[Indeependent]

No. I am only trying to make the point that race is not the issue. The issue is greed.

Blacks kidnapped and sold their brothers for money, and then whites came and took them as slaves to make money.

It's just that simple.

Sounds like you're trying to jump, hop and skip past the insidious bigotry and racism that America's known for.

Did those blacks who sold their brothers due to greed, according to your theory, did they consider them to be less than human, say, 3/5ths of a human too?

Its really not that simple.

The 3/5 compromise was forced on the Southern states because the Northern states didn't want all slaves counted for the purpose of representation. It had nothing to do with whether they are less than human. However, the Southern slave owners did delude themselves into thinking slaves were not human because slavery was such a disgusting institution that they did not want to force themselves to face the moral consequences of their actions.

Actually to think a person is counted as 3/5ths human does mean they think of a person as less than human.

Which is why you adore the Muslims and Black War Lords.
Let’s see how tough American Blacks are over there.

 

[Votto]

Yes I agree the Black race is morally superior to the white race. Blacks taught the white race civilization on two occasions. Blacks never attempted to enslave whites nor hold them back in any manner like whites did and still do.

According to your history no. But according to history that is generally accepted, blacks sold their brothers into slavery.

I'm curious, do you have any evidence to the contrary?

Even if that was true whites sold their brothers into slavery as well. Thats where we get the term "slave" in the first place. Whites selling other whites.

Wrong. Slav s existed throughout Africa and Egypt for thousands of years.

Still do.
Hell there are more slaves in africa right now than there ever was in America.
When you are a hack and have to come up with excuses constantly, you tend to cherry pick history and lie your ass off.

I’ve been through this with AssLips and MeToo!
They have PhDs in Revisionist History and Current Events.

It's like my pappy used to say, if you don't like history then rewrite it!

Sure beats trying to learn it and you can turn yourself into a god in the process

 

[IM2]

Why don't you do a search using the words white on white crime and find out for yourself? You whites here should be ashamed. You live under such delusions of grandeur and actually think you are sane.

I already did and know the truth. However, the only shame is that you are a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. So, since you don't want an honest discussion, I have bowed out. Adieu to you, as well.

I am the OP and the OP was about a white person who was protesting the murder of a black woman who was stabbed to death by a white man. It was not abut blacks killing each other or whites doing it. But blacks killing each other always gets bought up when you maggots can't deal with the truth of white crime. And if you already knew the truth, then you knew I wasn't making a claim with no evidence.

LOL! You think being the OP means you don't have to prove your points? I think you're at best a lazy thinker and at worse, you're not interested in a real discussion. It's obvious you are just as closed minded as that old racist, Bull Connor. I am sad for you.

It's obvious that you are another dumb ass white racist looking for a reason to call someone black a racist. I feel sorry for you that you suffer from such a severe case of psychosis. Harley always wants blacks to show proof then when he gets shown it he wants more poof, then you show him more proof and then you get told how you've never shown proof. So fuck that. I'm not playing racist white boy run around.. For you did not ask him tp prove anything when he made his comment on blacks killing each other.

You will, of course, believe what you want. And, sadly, I didn't see Harley's post. So, while I apologize for not calling Harley down, I still feel you are a a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. I RARELY call anyone a racist, but you are certainly a wonderful example of one.

I rally could care less what you think. If you didn't see Harleys post why are you grilling me because I didn't show him what he wanted? You knew what I said was true, but you assumed was providing information without evidence. So when you figure out the right lie, let me know.

 

[IM2]

No. I am only trying to make the point that race is not the issue. The issue is greed.

Blacks kidnapped and sold their brothers for money, and then whites came and took them as slaves to make money.

It's just that simple.

Sounds like you're trying to jump, hop and skip past the insidious bigotry and racism that America's known for.

Did those blacks who sold their brothers due to greed, according to your theory, did they consider them to be less than human, say, 3/5ths of a human too?

Its really not that simple.

The 3/5 compromise was forced on the Southern states because the Northern states didn't want all slaves counted for the purpose of representation. It had nothing to do with whether they are less than human. However, the Southern slave owners did delude themselves into thinking slaves were not human because slavery was such a disgusting institution that they did not want to force themselves to face the moral consequences of their actions.

Actually to think a person is counted as 3/5ths human does mean they think of a person as less than human.

Which is why you adore the Muslims and Black War Lords.
Let’s see how tough American Blacks are over there.

Who says I adore these guys?

We'd have it better over there than you whites.

 

[TNHarley]

I already did and know the truth. However, the only shame is that you are a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. So, since you don't want an honest discussion, I have bowed out. Adieu to you, as well.

I am the OP and the OP was about a white person who was protesting the murder of a black woman who was stabbed to death by a white man. It was not abut blacks killing each other or whites doing it. But blacks killing each other always gets bought up when you maggots can't deal with the truth of white crime. And if you already knew the truth, then you knew I wasn't making a claim with no evidence.

LOL! You think being the OP means you don't have to prove your points? I think you're at best a lazy thinker and at worse, you're not interested in a real discussion. It's obvious you are just as closed minded as that old racist, Bull Connor. I am sad for you.

It's obvious that you are another dumb ass white racist looking for a reason to call someone black a racist. I feel sorry for you that you suffer from such a severe case of psychosis. Harley always wants blacks to show proof then when he gets shown it he wants more poof, then you show him more proof and then you get told how you've never shown proof. So fuck that. I'm not playing racist white boy run around.. For you did not ask him tp prove anything when he made his comment on blacks killing each other.

You will, of course, believe what you want. And, sadly, I didn't see Harley's post. So, while I apologize for not calling Harley down, I still feel you are a a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. I RARELY call anyone a racist, but you are certainly a wonderful example of one.

I rally could care less what you think. If you didn't see Harleys post why are you grilling me because I didn't show him what he wanted? You knew what I said was true, but you assumed was providing information without evidence. So when you figure out the right lie, let me know.

You didnt show me any proof you damn liar.
You cant rape the meaning of words, use that as an argument and call it proof.
Us white racists call that intellectual dishonesty

 

[Votto]

I am the OP and the OP was about a white person who was protesting the murder of a black woman who was stabbed to death by a white man. It was not abut blacks killing each other or whites doing it. But blacks killing each other always gets bought up when you maggots can't deal with the truth of white crime. And if you already knew the truth, then you knew I wasn't making a claim with no evidence.

LOL! You think being the OP means you don't have to prove your points? I think you're at best a lazy thinker and at worse, you're not interested in a real discussion. It's obvious you are just as closed minded as that old racist, Bull Connor. I am sad for you.

It's obvious that you are another dumb ass white racist looking for a reason to call someone black a racist. I feel sorry for you that you suffer from such a severe case of psychosis. Harley always wants blacks to show proof then when he gets shown it he wants more poof, then you show him more proof and then you get told how you've never shown proof. So fuck that. I'm not playing racist white boy run around.. For you did not ask him tp prove anything when he made his comment on blacks killing each other.

You will, of course, believe what you want. And, sadly, I didn't see Harley's post. So, while I apologize for not calling Harley down, I still feel you are a a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. I RARELY call anyone a racist, but you are certainly a wonderful example of one.

I rally could care less what you think. If you didn't see Harleys post why are you grilling me because I didn't show him what he wanted? You knew what I said was true, but you assumed was providing information without evidence. So when you figure out the right lie, let me know.

You didnt show me any proof you damn liar.
You cant rape the meaning of words, use that as an argument and call it proof.
Us white racists call that intellectual dishonesty

Yes but we are white devils

What do we know?

 

[TNHarley]

LOL! You think being the OP means you don't have to prove your points? I think you're at best a lazy thinker and at worse, you're not interested in a real discussion. It's obvious you are just as closed minded as that old racist, Bull Connor. I am sad for you.

It's obvious that you are another dumb ass white racist looking for a reason to call someone black a racist. I feel sorry for you that you suffer from such a severe case of psychosis. Harley always wants blacks to show proof then when he gets shown it he wants more poof, then you show him more proof and then you get told how you've never shown proof. So fuck that. I'm not playing racist white boy run around.. For you did not ask him tp prove anything when he made his comment on blacks killing each other.

You will, of course, believe what you want. And, sadly, I didn't see Harley's post. So, while I apologize for not calling Harley down, I still feel you are a a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. I RARELY call anyone a racist, but you are certainly a wonderful example of one.

I rally could care less what you think. If you didn't see Harleys post why are you grilling me because I didn't show him what he wanted? You knew what I said was true, but you assumed was providing information without evidence. So when you figure out the right lie, let me know.

You didnt show me any proof you damn liar.
You cant rape the meaning of words, use that as an argument and call it proof.
Us white racists call that intellectual dishonesty

Yes but we are white devils

What do we know?

Right? We are so evil we cant understand why actions that happened 3 generations ago cant make a person alive today do stupid shit..

 

[MarcATL]

Whites do have a role in stopping racism.

Anne Hathaway calls out white privilege in passionate post about 'unspeakable' murder of Nia Wilson
Erin Donnelly,Yahoo Lifestyle 7 hours ago

Anne Hathaway is using her platform for a powerful cause.

Outraged by the fatal stabbing of 18-year-old Nia Wilson by a white man, the Oscar-winning actress dedicated an Instagram post to honoring the young black woman. Wilson and her sister, who survived the attack, were stabbed at the BART MacArthur Station in Oakland, Calif., on July 22.

But Hathaway’s post was more than a passive tribute to Wilson — it was a call to arms and condemnation of those who hide behind their “white privilege” and fail to take action in the face of violence and racism.

Describing Wilson’s murder as “unspeakable,” the Ocean’s 8 star acknowledged her own privilege while calling for white people to step up.

Anne Hathaway paid tribute to the late Nia Wilson on social media. (Photo: Theo Wargo/FilmMagic)
“White people — including me, including you — must take into the marrow of our privileged bones the truth that ALL black people fear for their lives DAILY in America and have done so for GENERATIONS,” she wrote. “White people DO NOT have equivalence for this fear of violence. Given those givens, we must ask our (white) selves — how ‘decent’ are we really? Not in our intent, but in our actions? In our lack of action?”

She ended the message with the #BlackLivesMatter hashtag, as well as #AntiRacist, #NoExcuse,
#SayHerName, and #EarnTheRightToSayHerName.

Hathaway shut off the comments for the post, but that hasn’t stopped fans from responding. Many are now praising her as an ally.

Of course, Hathaway’s passionate plea received a fair share of critics. One troll called her a “self-hating white bitch who constantly does the most to get the acceptance and approval of black people online… so f***ing pathetic and cringey.”

“Saying white people will never feel fear like black people is wrong,” another critic commented under one of Hathaway’s older posts. “There’s thousands of white girls in the world who are too scared to leave their homes after they’ve been abused, raped, and trafficked by men. There’s many white girls who have been murdered by men. Like I get it you’re privileged as hell and think every white woman is the same as you but that’s now how it works. Racism is disgusting and white supremacy needs to die but some of the stuff you said is just wrong.”

Hathaway’s not the only celebrity to speak out for Wilson. Amber Tamblyn also posted about her murder this week, though some accused her of shaming white women.

Anne Hathaway calls out white privilege in passionate post about 'unspeakable' murder of Nia Wilson

I'll just add AH to my list of celebrities,
that can kiss my white ass!

I've asked before and I'll ask again....
What is this privilege, I'm missing out on?

Senseless murders occur every day,
this homicide isn't any different.

Black people live in fear...and white people don't
Is that so, maybe she'd like to leave her cushy confines,
and live in my area and then talk that shit!

White america is not racist, white individuals are racist

You can not stop hate, anymore than, you can create love

It's easy for these celebrities, to sit in the lap of luxury,
and use social media as an outlet to sound off,
but, until they step out from their own privileged world,
and step into the real world, where the rest of us live,
they need to shut their fucking pieholes!

Fuck Instagram, bitch....
take your ass to the inner cities,
to a homeless shelter, to a rehab,
to a soup kitchen/food pantry,...

Deal with your own demons of guilt,
instead of throwing the white race under the bus,
as you question your own decency, for lack of action!

Fucking bitch

Why are you so angry?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

[Votto]

It's obvious that you are another dumb ass white racist looking for a reason to call someone black a racist. I feel sorry for you that you suffer from such a severe case of psychosis. Harley always wants blacks to show proof then when he gets shown it he wants more poof, then you show him more proof and then you get told how you've never shown proof. So fuck that. I'm not playing racist white boy run around.. For you did not ask him tp prove anything when he made his comment on blacks killing each other.

You will, of course, believe what you want. And, sadly, I didn't see Harley's post. So, while I apologize for not calling Harley down, I still feel you are a a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. I RARELY call anyone a racist, but you are certainly a wonderful example of one.

I rally could care less what you think. If you didn't see Harleys post why are you grilling me because I didn't show him what he wanted? You knew what I said was true, but you assumed was providing information without evidence. So when you figure out the right lie, let me know.

You didnt show me any proof you damn liar.
You cant rape the meaning of words, use that as an argument and call it proof.
Us white racists call that intellectual dishonesty

Yes but we are white devils

What do we know?

Right? We are so evil we cant understand why actions that happened 3 generations ago cant make a person alive today do stupid shit..

Speak for yourself. I may not have been born back then but I was secretly sending them thoughts and dreams to influence whitey to take those blacky slaves.

I may not remember it, but it says so in IM2's history book.

Thank God for that or we would never know the truth.

 

[Indeependent]

No. I am only trying to make the point that race is not the issue. The issue is greed.

Blacks kidnapped and sold their brothers for money, and then whites came and took them as slaves to make money.

It's just that simple.

Sounds like you're trying to jump, hop and skip past the insidious bigotry and racism that America's known for.

Did those blacks who sold their brothers due to greed, according to your theory, did they consider them to be less than human, say, 3/5ths of a human too?

Its really not that simple.

The 3/5 compromise was forced on the Southern states because the Northern states didn't want all slaves counted for the purpose of representation. It had nothing to do with whether they are less than human. However, the Southern slave owners did delude themselves into thinking slaves were not human because slavery was such a disgusting institution that they did not want to force themselves to face the moral consequences of their actions.

Actually to think a person is counted as 3/5ths human does mean they think of a person as less than human.

Which is why you adore the Muslims and Black War Lords.
Let’s see how tough American Blacks are over there.

Who says I adore these guys?

We'd have it better over there than you whites.

Actually...no.
Muslims use Blacks to blow themselves up and the African War Lords consider you worthless because Blacks would never bail each other out of a jam.

 

[IM2]

Look, stop trying to play the party game. YOU are talking to black people. We say whites have been the problem. Both parties. Republicans haven't done shit and we were republicans first. Out of the150 years since we released from slavery, we were republican for almost 100 years and ended up leaving the party. So drop that political party bullshit because you republicans are not the ones.

The first Civil Rights legislation was passed under Eisenhower, a Republican

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

Following the Supreme Court ruling in Brown, which eventually led to the integration, also called desegregation, of public schools,[1] Southern whites began a campaign of "Massive Resistance." Violence against blacks rose; in Little Rock, Arkansas where US President Dwight D. Eisenhower had to order in federal troops to protect nine children integrating into a public school, the first time the US federal government ordered troops in the South since the Reconstruction era.[2] There had been continued physical assaults against suspected activists and bombings of schools and churches in the South. The Eisenhower administration proposed legislation to protect blacks' right to vote.

The goal of the 1957 Civil Rights Act was to ensure that all Americans could exercise their right to vote. By 1957, only about 20% of blacks were registered to vote. Despite being the majority in numerous counties and congressional districts in the South, most blacks had been effectively disfranchised by discriminatory voter registration rules and laws in those states since the late 19th and early 20th centuries that were heavily instituted and propagated by Southern Democrats. Civil rights organizations had collected evidence of discriminatory practices, such as the administration of literacy and comprehension tests and poll taxes. While the states had the right to establish rules for voter registration and elections, the federal government found an oversight role in ensuring that citizens could exercise the constitutional right to vote for federal officers: electors for president and vice president and members of the US Congress.

Passage[edit]
The Democratic Senate Majority Leader, Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas, realized that the bill and its journey through Congress could tear apart his party, as its southern members opposed civil rights, and its northern members were more favorable. Southern senators occupied chairs of numerous important committees because of their long seniority. Johnson sent the bill to the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Senator James Eastland of Mississippi, who drastically altered the bill. Senator Richard Russell, Jr., of Georgia had denounced the bill as an example of the federal government seeking to impose its laws on states. Johnson sought recognition from civil rights advocates for passing the bill as well as recognition from the mostly-Southern Democrats against civil rights for weakening the bill so much as to make it toothless.[3]

The bill passed 285-126 in the House of Representatives with a majority of both parties' support (Republicans 167–19, Democrats 118–107)[4] It then passed 72-18 in the Senate, again with a majority of both parties (Republicans 43–0, Democrats 29–18).[5][clarification needed] Eisenhower signed the bill on September 9, 1957.

Nice try.

Although the Act's passage through seemed to indicate a growing federal commitment to the cause of civil rights, the legislation was limited. Alterations to the bill made the Act difficult to enforce; by 1960, black voting had increased by only 3%.

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

By 1964 you had a republican who was against civil rights- Goldwater. Todays republican party would not be for civil rights.

You had people in both parties against it. So what? You asked what the GOP had done since they freed the slaves and I presented something to you, but now that it does not fit your partisan belief system you ignore it.

Well Ok then, just keep voting D and see where that gets ya!

Am I saying that voting Republican is the answer? No, but what I am saying is that voting D is definitely not the answer either.

Why is it that Democrats like Harry Reid can say that Obama was elected because he was light skinned and without a negro dialect, and he can get away with that? However, someone like Trump never used such language or racist talk and he is a racist?

When was Harry Reid elected president? And Trump has done worse and made worse comments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's What the Record Shows

Is Donald Trump racist? That question has hung over the presumptive Republican nominee for president as he has called Mexicans “rapists” and proposed a ban on Muslims entering the U.S. Lately, though, the question has taken on more urgency as Trump has repeatedly publicly attacked the judge who presides over Trump University class-action lawsuits. Calling the American-born Gonzalo Curiel a “Mexican,” he said Curiel was therefore biased against him, and he added to the flurry of objections by suggesting that a Muslim judge might also be incapable of hearing a lawsuit involving any Trump entity.

In between these remarks he managed to offend by singling out a black man at one of his rallies, calling him “my African American” as if the fellow’s presence proved Trump was on the right side of the race issue.

For the long followers of Trump’s career, however, none of these incendiary remarks are especially surprising. Trump has a long record as a provocateur on matters of race and ethnicity.

It starts in 1973, when the United States Department of Justice went to court with a discrimination complaint against the Trump family business, which rented apartments across Brooklyn and Queens. Coming from the administration of Richard Nixon, who was hardly a civil rights agitator, the complaint was based on an investigation that found four different Trump employees confirming that applicants for leases were screened by race. One rental agent said Trump’s father had told him not to rent to blacks and that he actually wanted to reduce the number of African Americans in his buildings. Three doormen said they had been instructed to deflect blacks who came to Trump buildings to apply for apartments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's what the record shows

Trump has been misquoted. He did not put a travel ban on Muslims, despite what all the news sources you listen to may say. No, he implemented travel bans on certain terrorist countries which just so happen to be mostly Muslim, the same kind of ban Obama made without a peep from anyone. In fact, the ban does not effect about 90% of Muslims in the world today.

Secondly, Trump has never said that all Mexicans are rapists. No, he has repeatedly mentioned that criminals are coming over and need to be stopped. This does not mean that all Mexicans are rapists, but gangs like MS 13 are coming to the US and killing our kids. Again, he was misquoted.

As for the family business issue in 1973, this was against the family business, not against Trump directly. I could see Trump allowing some sort of segregation if he thought it could make him money, but I don't see him being a racist just because he hates minorities.

The bottom line is, Trump is nothing more than a money man who is a man whore. Before running for President, no one associated him as being a racist.

Sorry, I just don't believe it. As I said, Dims like Harry Reid have said much worse things with no peep from the media or people like you.

Again, look at the unemployment rate of blacks under Trump than before Trump. Are blacks doing better or worse?

How are blacks suffering under Trump?

I don't care what you don't believe. Trump has not been misquoted. Trump was associated wit racism long before he ran for president.

Trump has nothing to do with black unemployment. OK? And it's still double that of whites. So if Trump makes it that back and white unemployment are both below the national rate like the white unemployment rate currently is, then we can talk about what Trump has done.

 

[Votto]

The first Civil Rights legislation was passed under Eisenhower, a Republican

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

Following the Supreme Court ruling in Brown, which eventually led to the integration, also called desegregation, of public schools,[1] Southern whites began a campaign of "Massive Resistance." Violence against blacks rose; in Little Rock, Arkansas where US President Dwight D. Eisenhower had to order in federal troops to protect nine children integrating into a public school, the first time the US federal government ordered troops in the South since the Reconstruction era.[2] There had been continued physical assaults against suspected activists and bombings of schools and churches in the South. The Eisenhower administration proposed legislation to protect blacks' right to vote.

The goal of the 1957 Civil Rights Act was to ensure that all Americans could exercise their right to vote. By 1957, only about 20% of blacks were registered to vote. Despite being the majority in numerous counties and congressional districts in the South, most blacks had been effectively disfranchised by discriminatory voter registration rules and laws in those states since the late 19th and early 20th centuries that were heavily instituted and propagated by Southern Democrats. Civil rights organizations had collected evidence of discriminatory practices, such as the administration of literacy and comprehension tests and poll taxes. While the states had the right to establish rules for voter registration and elections, the federal government found an oversight role in ensuring that citizens could exercise the constitutional right to vote for federal officers: electors for president and vice president and members of the US Congress.

Passage[edit]
The Democratic Senate Majority Leader, Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas, realized that the bill and its journey through Congress could tear apart his party, as its southern members opposed civil rights, and its northern members were more favorable. Southern senators occupied chairs of numerous important committees because of their long seniority. Johnson sent the bill to the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Senator James Eastland of Mississippi, who drastically altered the bill. Senator Richard Russell, Jr., of Georgia had denounced the bill as an example of the federal government seeking to impose its laws on states. Johnson sought recognition from civil rights advocates for passing the bill as well as recognition from the mostly-Southern Democrats against civil rights for weakening the bill so much as to make it toothless.[3]

The bill passed 285-126 in the House of Representatives with a majority of both parties' support (Republicans 167–19, Democrats 118–107)[4] It then passed 72-18 in the Senate, again with a majority of both parties (Republicans 43–0, Democrats 29–18).[5][clarification needed] Eisenhower signed the bill on September 9, 1957.

Nice try.

Although the Act's passage through seemed to indicate a growing federal commitment to the cause of civil rights, the legislation was limited. Alterations to the bill made the Act difficult to enforce; by 1960, black voting had increased by only 3%.

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

By 1964 you had a republican who was against civil rights- Goldwater. Todays republican party would not be for civil rights.

You had people in both parties against it. So what? You asked what the GOP had done since they freed the slaves and I presented something to you, but now that it does not fit your partisan belief system you ignore it.

Well Ok then, just keep voting D and see where that gets ya!

Am I saying that voting Republican is the answer? No, but what I am saying is that voting D is definitely not the answer either.

Why is it that Democrats like Harry Reid can say that Obama was elected because he was light skinned and without a negro dialect, and he can get away with that? However, someone like Trump never used such language or racist talk and he is a racist?

When was Harry Reid elected president? And Trump has done worse and made worse comments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's What the Record Shows

Is Donald Trump racist? That question has hung over the presumptive Republican nominee for president as he has called Mexicans “rapists” and proposed a ban on Muslims entering the U.S. Lately, though, the question has taken on more urgency as Trump has repeatedly publicly attacked the judge who presides over Trump University class-action lawsuits. Calling the American-born Gonzalo Curiel a “Mexican,” he said Curiel was therefore biased against him, and he added to the flurry of objections by suggesting that a Muslim judge might also be incapable of hearing a lawsuit involving any Trump entity.

In between these remarks he managed to offend by singling out a black man at one of his rallies, calling him “my African American” as if the fellow’s presence proved Trump was on the right side of the race issue.

For the long followers of Trump’s career, however, none of these incendiary remarks are especially surprising. Trump has a long record as a provocateur on matters of race and ethnicity.

It starts in 1973, when the United States Department of Justice went to court with a discrimination complaint against the Trump family business, which rented apartments across Brooklyn and Queens. Coming from the administration of Richard Nixon, who was hardly a civil rights agitator, the complaint was based on an investigation that found four different Trump employees confirming that applicants for leases were screened by race. One rental agent said Trump’s father had told him not to rent to blacks and that he actually wanted to reduce the number of African Americans in his buildings. Three doormen said they had been instructed to deflect blacks who came to Trump buildings to apply for apartments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's what the record shows

Trump has been misquoted. He did not put a travel ban on Muslims, despite what all the news sources you listen to may say. No, he implemented travel bans on certain terrorist countries which just so happen to be mostly Muslim, the same kind of ban Obama made without a peep from anyone. In fact, the ban does not effect about 90% of Muslims in the world today.

Secondly, Trump has never said that all Mexicans are rapists. No, he has repeatedly mentioned that criminals are coming over and need to be stopped. This does not mean that all Mexicans are rapists, but gangs like MS 13 are coming to the US and killing our kids. Again, he was misquoted.

As for the family business issue in 1973, this was against the family business, not against Trump directly. I could see Trump allowing some sort of segregation if he thought it could make him money, but I don't see him being a racist just because he hates minorities.

The bottom line is, Trump is nothing more than a money man who is a man whore. Before running for President, no one associated him as being a racist.

Sorry, I just don't believe it. As I said, Dims like Harry Reid have said much worse things with no peep from the media or people like you.

Again, look at the unemployment rate of blacks under Trump than before Trump. Are blacks doing better or worse?

How are blacks suffering under Trump?

I don't care what you don't believe. Trump has not been misquoted. Trump was associated wit racism long before he ran for president.

Trump has nothing to do with black unemployment. OK? And it's still double that of whites. So if Trump makes it that back and white unemployment are both below the national rate like the white unemployment rate currently is, then we can talk about what Trump has done.

Again, how has Trump hurt blacks?

 

[IM2]

Yes I agree the Black race is morally superior to the white race. Blacks taught the white race civilization on two occasions. Blacks never attempted to enslave whites nor hold them back in any manner like whites did and still do.

According to your history no. But according to history that is generally accepted, blacks sold their brothers into slavery.

I'm curious, do you have any evidence to the contrary?

Even if that was true whites sold their brothers into slavery as well. Thats where we get the term "slave" in the first place. Whites selling other whites.

Wrong. Slav s existed throughout Africa and Egypt for thousands of years.

Still do.
Hell there are more slaves in africa right now than there ever was in America.
When you are a hack and have to come up with excuses constantly, you tend to cherry pick history and lie your ass off.

I’ve been through this with AssLips and MeToo!
They have PhDs in Revisionist History and Current Events.

White history is revisionist history.

 

[Indeependent]

The first Civil Rights legislation was passed under Eisenhower, a Republican

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

Following the Supreme Court ruling in Brown, which eventually led to the integration, also called desegregation, of public schools,[1] Southern whites began a campaign of "Massive Resistance." Violence against blacks rose; in Little Rock, Arkansas where US President Dwight D. Eisenhower had to order in federal troops to protect nine children integrating into a public school, the first time the US federal government ordered troops in the South since the Reconstruction era.[2] There had been continued physical assaults against suspected activists and bombings of schools and churches in the South. The Eisenhower administration proposed legislation to protect blacks' right to vote.

The goal of the 1957 Civil Rights Act was to ensure that all Americans could exercise their right to vote. By 1957, only about 20% of blacks were registered to vote. Despite being the majority in numerous counties and congressional districts in the South, most blacks had been effectively disfranchised by discriminatory voter registration rules and laws in those states since the late 19th and early 20th centuries that were heavily instituted and propagated by Southern Democrats. Civil rights organizations had collected evidence of discriminatory practices, such as the administration of literacy and comprehension tests and poll taxes. While the states had the right to establish rules for voter registration and elections, the federal government found an oversight role in ensuring that citizens could exercise the constitutional right to vote for federal officers: electors for president and vice president and members of the US Congress.

Passage[edit]
The Democratic Senate Majority Leader, Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas, realized that the bill and its journey through Congress could tear apart his party, as its southern members opposed civil rights, and its northern members were more favorable. Southern senators occupied chairs of numerous important committees because of their long seniority. Johnson sent the bill to the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Senator James Eastland of Mississippi, who drastically altered the bill. Senator Richard Russell, Jr., of Georgia had denounced the bill as an example of the federal government seeking to impose its laws on states. Johnson sought recognition from civil rights advocates for passing the bill as well as recognition from the mostly-Southern Democrats against civil rights for weakening the bill so much as to make it toothless.[3]

The bill passed 285-126 in the House of Representatives with a majority of both parties' support (Republicans 167–19, Democrats 118–107)[4] It then passed 72-18 in the Senate, again with a majority of both parties (Republicans 43–0, Democrats 29–18).[5][clarification needed] Eisenhower signed the bill on September 9, 1957.

Nice try.

Although the Act's passage through seemed to indicate a growing federal commitment to the cause of civil rights, the legislation was limited. Alterations to the bill made the Act difficult to enforce; by 1960, black voting had increased by only 3%.

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

By 1964 you had a republican who was against civil rights- Goldwater. Todays republican party would not be for civil rights.

You had people in both parties against it. So what? You asked what the GOP had done since they freed the slaves and I presented something to you, but now that it does not fit your partisan belief system you ignore it.

Well Ok then, just keep voting D and see where that gets ya!

Am I saying that voting Republican is the answer? No, but what I am saying is that voting D is definitely not the answer either.

Why is it that Democrats like Harry Reid can say that Obama was elected because he was light skinned and without a negro dialect, and he can get away with that? However, someone like Trump never used such language or racist talk and he is a racist?

When was Harry Reid elected president? And Trump has done worse and made worse comments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's What the Record Shows

Is Donald Trump racist? That question has hung over the presumptive Republican nominee for president as he has called Mexicans “rapists” and proposed a ban on Muslims entering the U.S. Lately, though, the question has taken on more urgency as Trump has repeatedly publicly attacked the judge who presides over Trump University class-action lawsuits. Calling the American-born Gonzalo Curiel a “Mexican,” he said Curiel was therefore biased against him, and he added to the flurry of objections by suggesting that a Muslim judge might also be incapable of hearing a lawsuit involving any Trump entity.

In between these remarks he managed to offend by singling out a black man at one of his rallies, calling him “my African American” as if the fellow’s presence proved Trump was on the right side of the race issue.

For the long followers of Trump’s career, however, none of these incendiary remarks are especially surprising. Trump has a long record as a provocateur on matters of race and ethnicity.

It starts in 1973, when the United States Department of Justice went to court with a discrimination complaint against the Trump family business, which rented apartments across Brooklyn and Queens. Coming from the administration of Richard Nixon, who was hardly a civil rights agitator, the complaint was based on an investigation that found four different Trump employees confirming that applicants for leases were screened by race. One rental agent said Trump’s father had told him not to rent to blacks and that he actually wanted to reduce the number of African Americans in his buildings. Three doormen said they had been instructed to deflect blacks who came to Trump buildings to apply for apartments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's what the record shows

Trump has been misquoted. He did not put a travel ban on Muslims, despite what all the news sources you listen to may say. No, he implemented travel bans on certain terrorist countries which just so happen to be mostly Muslim, the same kind of ban Obama made without a peep from anyone. In fact, the ban does not effect about 90% of Muslims in the world today.

Secondly, Trump has never said that all Mexicans are rapists. No, he has repeatedly mentioned that criminals are coming over and need to be stopped. This does not mean that all Mexicans are rapists, but gangs like MS 13 are coming to the US and killing our kids. Again, he was misquoted.

As for the family business issue in 1973, this was against the family business, not against Trump directly. I could see Trump allowing some sort of segregation if he thought it could make him money, but I don't see him being a racist just because he hates minorities.

The bottom line is, Trump is nothing more than a money man who is a man whore. Before running for President, no one associated him as being a racist.

Sorry, I just don't believe it. As I said, Dims like Harry Reid have said much worse things with no peep from the media or people like you.

Again, look at the unemployment rate of blacks under Trump than before Trump. Are blacks doing better or worse?

How are blacks suffering under Trump?

I don't care what you don't believe. Trump has not been misquoted. Trump was associated wit racism long before he ran for president.

Trump has nothing to do with black unemployment. OK? And it's still double that of whites. So if Trump makes it that back and white unemployment are both below the national rate like the white unemployment rate currently is, then we can talk about what Trump has done.

Tell me, moron...
Why do you think Blacks can’t get even menial jobs?
Illegals are cheaper and don’t have an attitude.

 

[Indeependent]

According to your history no. But according to history that is generally accepted, blacks sold their brothers into slavery.

I'm curious, do you have any evidence to the contrary?

Even if that was true whites sold their brothers into slavery as well. Thats where we get the term "slave" in the first place. Whites selling other whites.

Wrong. Slav s existed throughout Africa and Egypt for thousands of years.

Still do.
Hell there are more slaves in africa right now than there ever was in America.
When you are a hack and have to come up with excuses constantly, you tend to cherry pick history and lie your ass off.

I’ve been through this with AssLips and MeToo!
They have PhDs in Revisionist History and Current Events.

White history is revisionist history.

To a point.
Your history is fiction.

 

[IM2]

It's obvious that you are another dumb ass white racist looking for a reason to call someone black a racist. I feel sorry for you that you suffer from such a severe case of psychosis. Harley always wants blacks to show proof then when he gets shown it he wants more poof, then you show him more proof and then you get told how you've never shown proof. So fuck that. I'm not playing racist white boy run around.. For you did not ask him tp prove anything when he made his comment on blacks killing each other.

You will, of course, believe what you want. And, sadly, I didn't see Harley's post. So, while I apologize for not calling Harley down, I still feel you are a a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. I RARELY call anyone a racist, but you are certainly a wonderful example of one.

I rally could care less what you think. If you didn't see Harleys post why are you grilling me because I didn't show him what he wanted? You knew what I said was true, but you assumed was providing information without evidence. So when you figure out the right lie, let me know.

You didnt show me any proof you damn liar.
You cant rape the meaning of words, use that as an argument and call it proof.
Us white racists call that intellectual dishonesty

Yes but we are white devils

What do we know?

Right? We are so evil we cant understand why actions that happened 3 generations ago cant make a person alive today do stupid shit..

And you are so stupid that you think that while you commit the same actions now you can claim we are talking about something that happened 3 generations ago.

 

[Indeependent]

You will, of course, believe what you want. And, sadly, I didn't see Harley's post. So, while I apologize for not calling Harley down, I still feel you are a a closed minded racist who doesn't want to hear any other point of view than yours. I RARELY call anyone a racist, but you are certainly a wonderful example of one.

I rally could care less what you think. If you didn't see Harleys post why are you grilling me because I didn't show him what he wanted? You knew what I said was true, but you assumed was providing information without evidence. So when you figure out the right lie, let me know.

You didnt show me any proof you damn liar.
You cant rape the meaning of words, use that as an argument and call it proof.
Us white racists call that intellectual dishonesty

Yes but we are white devils

What do we know?

Right? We are so evil we cant understand why actions that happened 3 generations ago cant make a person alive today do stupid shit..

And you are so stupid that you think that while you commit the same actions now you can claim we are talking about something that happened 3 generations ago.

You’re stuck in “Gimme” gear.

 

[Asclepias]

Nice try.

Although the Act's passage through seemed to indicate a growing federal commitment to the cause of civil rights, the legislation was limited. Alterations to the bill made the Act difficult to enforce; by 1960, black voting had increased by only 3%.

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

By 1964 you had a republican who was against civil rights- Goldwater. Todays republican party would not be for civil rights.

You had people in both parties against it. So what? You asked what the GOP had done since they freed the slaves and I presented something to you, but now that it does not fit your partisan belief system you ignore it.

Well Ok then, just keep voting D and see where that gets ya!

Am I saying that voting Republican is the answer? No, but what I am saying is that voting D is definitely not the answer either.

Why is it that Democrats like Harry Reid can say that Obama was elected because he was light skinned and without a negro dialect, and he can get away with that? However, someone like Trump never used such language or racist talk and he is a racist?

When was Harry Reid elected president? And Trump has done worse and made worse comments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's What the Record Shows

Is Donald Trump racist? That question has hung over the presumptive Republican nominee for president as he has called Mexicans “rapists” and proposed a ban on Muslims entering the U.S. Lately, though, the question has taken on more urgency as Trump has repeatedly publicly attacked the judge who presides over Trump University class-action lawsuits. Calling the American-born Gonzalo Curiel a “Mexican,” he said Curiel was therefore biased against him, and he added to the flurry of objections by suggesting that a Muslim judge might also be incapable of hearing a lawsuit involving any Trump entity.

In between these remarks he managed to offend by singling out a black man at one of his rallies, calling him “my African American” as if the fellow’s presence proved Trump was on the right side of the race issue.

For the long followers of Trump’s career, however, none of these incendiary remarks are especially surprising. Trump has a long record as a provocateur on matters of race and ethnicity.

It starts in 1973, when the United States Department of Justice went to court with a discrimination complaint against the Trump family business, which rented apartments across Brooklyn and Queens. Coming from the administration of Richard Nixon, who was hardly a civil rights agitator, the complaint was based on an investigation that found four different Trump employees confirming that applicants for leases were screened by race. One rental agent said Trump’s father had told him not to rent to blacks and that he actually wanted to reduce the number of African Americans in his buildings. Three doormen said they had been instructed to deflect blacks who came to Trump buildings to apply for apartments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's what the record shows

Trump has been misquoted. He did not put a travel ban on Muslims, despite what all the news sources you listen to may say. No, he implemented travel bans on certain terrorist countries which just so happen to be mostly Muslim, the same kind of ban Obama made without a peep from anyone. In fact, the ban does not effect about 90% of Muslims in the world today.

Secondly, Trump has never said that all Mexicans are rapists. No, he has repeatedly mentioned that criminals are coming over and need to be stopped. This does not mean that all Mexicans are rapists, but gangs like MS 13 are coming to the US and killing our kids. Again, he was misquoted.

As for the family business issue in 1973, this was against the family business, not against Trump directly. I could see Trump allowing some sort of segregation if he thought it could make him money, but I don't see him being a racist just because he hates minorities.

The bottom line is, Trump is nothing more than a money man who is a man whore. Before running for President, no one associated him as being a racist.

Sorry, I just don't believe it. As I said, Dims like Harry Reid have said much worse things with no peep from the media or people like you.

Again, look at the unemployment rate of blacks under Trump than before Trump. Are blacks doing better or worse?

How are blacks suffering under Trump?

I don't care what you don't believe. Trump has not been misquoted. Trump was associated wit racism long before he ran for president.

Trump has nothing to do with black unemployment. OK? And it's still double that of whites. So if Trump makes it that back and white unemployment are both below the national rate like the white unemployment rate currently is, then we can talk about what Trump has done.

Again, how has Trump hurt blacks?

Who said Drumpf has hurt Blacks? Just because he is a racist buffoon doesn't mean he is physically hurting someone. Indirectly I am sure he has inspired some of the racists that have gone out and killed Black people though.

 

[Indeependent]

You had people in both parties against it. So what? You asked what the GOP had done since they freed the slaves and I presented something to you, but now that it does not fit your partisan belief system you ignore it.

Well Ok then, just keep voting D and see where that gets ya!

Am I saying that voting Republican is the answer? No, but what I am saying is that voting D is definitely not the answer either.

Why is it that Democrats like Harry Reid can say that Obama was elected because he was light skinned and without a negro dialect, and he can get away with that? However, someone like Trump never used such language or racist talk and he is a racist?

When was Harry Reid elected president? And Trump has done worse and made worse comments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's What the Record Shows

Is Donald Trump racist? That question has hung over the presumptive Republican nominee for president as he has called Mexicans “rapists” and proposed a ban on Muslims entering the U.S. Lately, though, the question has taken on more urgency as Trump has repeatedly publicly attacked the judge who presides over Trump University class-action lawsuits. Calling the American-born Gonzalo Curiel a “Mexican,” he said Curiel was therefore biased against him, and he added to the flurry of objections by suggesting that a Muslim judge might also be incapable of hearing a lawsuit involving any Trump entity.

In between these remarks he managed to offend by singling out a black man at one of his rallies, calling him “my African American” as if the fellow’s presence proved Trump was on the right side of the race issue.

For the long followers of Trump’s career, however, none of these incendiary remarks are especially surprising. Trump has a long record as a provocateur on matters of race and ethnicity.

It starts in 1973, when the United States Department of Justice went to court with a discrimination complaint against the Trump family business, which rented apartments across Brooklyn and Queens. Coming from the administration of Richard Nixon, who was hardly a civil rights agitator, the complaint was based on an investigation that found four different Trump employees confirming that applicants for leases were screened by race. One rental agent said Trump’s father had told him not to rent to blacks and that he actually wanted to reduce the number of African Americans in his buildings. Three doormen said they had been instructed to deflect blacks who came to Trump buildings to apply for apartments.

Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's what the record shows

Trump has been misquoted. He did not put a travel ban on Muslims, despite what all the news sources you listen to may say. No, he implemented travel bans on certain terrorist countries which just so happen to be mostly Muslim, the same kind of ban Obama made without a peep from anyone. In fact, the ban does not effect about 90% of Muslims in the world today.

Secondly, Trump has never said that all Mexicans are rapists. No, he has repeatedly mentioned that criminals are coming over and need to be stopped. This does not mean that all Mexicans are rapists, but gangs like MS 13 are coming to the US and killing our kids. Again, he was misquoted.

As for the family business issue in 1973, this was against the family business, not against Trump directly. I could see Trump allowing some sort of segregation if he thought it could make him money, but I don't see him being a racist just because he hates minorities.

The bottom line is, Trump is nothing more than a money man who is a man whore. Before running for President, no one associated him as being a racist.

Sorry, I just don't believe it. As I said, Dims like Harry Reid have said much worse things with no peep from the media or people like you.

Again, look at the unemployment rate of blacks under Trump than before Trump. Are blacks doing better or worse?

How are blacks suffering under Trump?

I don't care what you don't believe. Trump has not been misquoted. Trump was associated wit racism long before he ran for president.

Trump has nothing to do with black unemployment. OK? And it's still double that of whites. So if Trump makes it that back and white unemployment are both below the national rate like the white unemployment rate currently is, then we can talk about what Trump has done.

Again, how has Trump hurt blacks?

Who said Drumpf has hurt Blacks? Just because he is a racist buffoon doesn't mean he is physically hurting someone.

Trump is a Honky!