Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[Phoenall]

Hollie, P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, Negative Propaganda can be an ugly business. The amplification in public, as well as in private, and can be direct and explicit --- as well as implicit indirect. One of the aspect levels of propaganda is its its character as a ‘‘inchoate’’ type crime. Encouragement through adoration and praise by prominent leaders like Mahmoud Abbas and Khaled Mashal can not be a intellectually felt by opponents to violence; but, cannot be directly tied to a fatal event as the principle initiating cause or primary agent which leads to Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence.

The notion of incitement to violence by Arab Palestinian Leaders implies that there is no possibility to hold these Arab Palestinians accountable. This is actually the primary weakness and flaw in the system of Human Rights promotion.

Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), described as being “among the strongest condemnations of hate speech” and the prohibition on incitement, states:

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
​

The "Electronic Intifada" (ei) is a classic example (but by far not the only one) of an outlet prinicple designed to incite hatred and violence on a mass media level. While the Human Rights Law (Article 20) does not to prohibit advocacy of hatred in private --- that instigates non-violent acts of racial or religious discrimination;” effective remedies applies further prohibition enforcement of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred? by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) toward the Jewish People is non-existent. This is called tunnel vision by selective enforcement by the pro-Arab Palestinian movement.

Just as the HoAP advocates (among many things) that the Arab League did not attack (commit acts of aggression) against Israel in 1948, it communicate the idea that the HoAP fight to retrieve that which was taken; the instigation of an International Armed Conflict (IAC) by the HoAP and leaders is denied, overlooked or ignored. While the Israeli defense against HoAP activity is condemned, the attacks by the HoAP carried out with the aim of seriously intimidating the citizens of Israel, or intimidation a frightened Government or an international organization to perform or abstain from performing any act, or seriously destabilizing or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organization.

Who are the Palestinians?

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

(COMMENT)

In a conflict induced by the HoAP (in its various incarnations) for nearly seven decades, there is no question that Israel can be found to have taken improper actions and make poor decisions. And it is no big deal and hardly surprising, that of the thousands of interactions each day with Arab Palestinians, some adverse events will occur that the Electronic Intifada (ei) might capitalize on. But at the end of the day, the confrontations could stop if the Arab Palestinians actually wanted to focus their attentions to nationalization development projects that the West Bank and Gaza Strip need.

Who are the Palestinians? They are the culture that would rather glorify Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence than seek a peaceful solutions.

Most Respectfully,
R

​

Who are the Zionist Jews? They are the culture that utilized violent Zionism, Zealotry, Hostile Insurgency Operations, radicalized Jewish Behaviors and Asymmetric Violence to achieve their goals rather than seeking a peaceful solution. Who do you think the Palestinians learned from?

So in effect they only exist in your warped fantasy world that you have built inside your head so you can justify to yourself your hatred of the Jews.
There is no violent Zionism like violent Catholicism, look at the Catholic nations that are embroiled in violent behaviour
There are very few radicalised Jews and they are mostly the Jews that you claim are the real Jews because they are anti Israel ( yet still live there claiming welfare because they are too lazy to work)
The Jews have tried time and time again to reach a peaceful conclusion only to be told that the only solution is the ethnic cleansing of all the Jews and the destruction of Israel.
From the koran of course that is just above the Catholic bible when it comes to being a manual for violent actions

 

[Phoenall]

Hollie, P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, Negative Propaganda can be an ugly business. The amplification in public, as well as in private, and can be direct and explicit --- as well as implicit indirect. One of the aspect levels of propaganda is its its character as a ‘‘inchoate’’ type crime. Encouragement through adoration and praise by prominent leaders like Mahmoud Abbas and Khaled Mashal can not be a intellectually felt by opponents to violence; but, cannot be directly tied to a fatal event as the principle initiating cause or primary agent which leads to Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence.

The notion of incitement to violence by Arab Palestinian Leaders implies that there is no possibility to hold these Arab Palestinians accountable. This is actually the primary weakness and flaw in the system of Human Rights promotion.

Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), described as being “among the strongest condemnations of hate speech” and the prohibition on incitement, states:

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
​

The "Electronic Intifada" (ei) is a classic example (but by far not the only one) of an outlet prinicple designed to incite hatred and violence on a mass media level. While the Human Rights Law (Article 20) does not to prohibit advocacy of hatred in private --- that instigates non-violent acts of racial or religious discrimination;” effective remedies applies further prohibition enforcement of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred? by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) toward the Jewish People is non-existent. This is called tunnel vision by selective enforcement by the pro-Arab Palestinian movement.

Just as the HoAP advocates (among many things) that the Arab League did not attack (commit acts of aggression) against Israel in 1948, it communicate the idea that the HoAP fight to retrieve that which was taken; the instigation of an International Armed Conflict (IAC) by the HoAP and leaders is denied, overlooked or ignored. While the Israeli defense against HoAP activity is condemned, the attacks by the HoAP carried out with the aim of seriously intimidating the citizens of Israel, or intimidation a frightened Government or an international organization to perform or abstain from performing any act, or seriously destabilizing or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organization.

Who are the Palestinians?

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

(COMMENT)

In a conflict induced by the HoAP (in its various incarnations) for nearly seven decades, there is no question that Israel can be found to have taken improper actions and make poor decisions. And it is no big deal and hardly surprising, that of the thousands of interactions each day with Arab Palestinians, some adverse events will occur that the Electronic Intifada (ei) might capitalize on. But at the end of the day, the confrontations could stop if the Arab Palestinians actually wanted to focus their attentions to nationalization development projects that the West Bank and Gaza Strip need.

Who are the Palestinians? They are the culture that would rather glorify Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence than seek a peaceful solutions.

Most Respectfully,
R

​

You are ignoring the fact the Zionist/Israeli settler colonialism was/is the initial and continuing aggression against a peaceful people.

So what was the problem prior to the invention of Zionism in 1875 and the settler/colonialism prior to 1925 by arab muslims. Questions you constantly refuse to answer due to the answers showing that you are just spreading propaganda to incite violence against the Jews

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hollie, P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, Negative Propaganda can be an ugly business. The amplification in public, as well as in private, and can be direct and explicit --- as well as implicit indirect. One of the aspect levels of propaganda is its its character as a ‘‘inchoate’’ type crime. Encouragement through adoration and praise by prominent leaders like Mahmoud Abbas and Khaled Mashal can not be a intellectually felt by opponents to violence; but, cannot be directly tied to a fatal event as the principle initiating cause or primary agent which leads to Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence.

The notion of incitement to violence by Arab Palestinian Leaders implies that there is no possibility to hold these Arab Palestinians accountable. This is actually the primary weakness and flaw in the system of Human Rights promotion.

Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), described as being “among the strongest condemnations of hate speech” and the prohibition on incitement, states:

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
​

The "Electronic Intifada" (ei) is a classic example (but by far not the only one) of an outlet prinicple designed to incite hatred and violence on a mass media level. While the Human Rights Law (Article 20) does not to prohibit advocacy of hatred in private --- that instigates non-violent acts of racial or religious discrimination;” effective remedies applies further prohibition enforcement of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred? by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) toward the Jewish People is non-existent. This is called tunnel vision by selective enforcement by the pro-Arab Palestinian movement.

Just as the HoAP advocates (among many things) that the Arab League did not attack (commit acts of aggression) against Israel in 1948, it communicate the idea that the HoAP fight to retrieve that which was taken; the instigation of an International Armed Conflict (IAC) by the HoAP and leaders is denied, overlooked or ignored. While the Israeli defense against HoAP activity is condemned, the attacks by the HoAP carried out with the aim of seriously intimidating the citizens of Israel, or intimidation a frightened Government or an international organization to perform or abstain from performing any act, or seriously destabilizing or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organization.

Who are the Palestinians?

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

(COMMENT)

In a conflict induced by the HoAP (in its various incarnations) for nearly seven decades, there is no question that Israel can be found to have taken improper actions and make poor decisions. And it is no big deal and hardly surprising, that of the thousands of interactions each day with Arab Palestinians, some adverse events will occur that the Electronic Intifada (ei) might capitalize on. But at the end of the day, the confrontations could stop if the Arab Palestinians actually wanted to focus their attentions to nationalization development projects that the West Bank and Gaza Strip need.

Who are the Palestinians? They are the culture that would rather glorify Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence than seek a peaceful solutions.

Most Respectfully,
R

​

You are ignoring the fact the Zionist/Israeli settler colonialism was/is the initial and continuing aggression against a peaceful people.

So what was the problem prior to the invention of Zionism in 1875 and the settler/colonialism prior to 1925 by arab muslims. Questions you constantly refuse to answer due to the answers showing that you are just spreading propaganda to incite violence against the Jews

So, what aggression have the Palestinians initiated?

 

[Shusha]

So, what aggression have the Palestinians initiated?

The presence of Jewish people in their own homeland, whether by long residence or return, is not an aggression.

 

[montelatici]

The invasion of a place with the intent to either rule over, expel or otherwise eliminate the native people of that place is aggression. How can it not be?

 

[Shusha]

The invasion of a place with the intent to either rule over, expel or otherwise eliminate the native people of that place is aggression. How can it not be?

Well, the Jewish people better get on with ending the Arab Muslim aggression then, don't you think? Its been a few hundred years, after all.

 

[montelatici]

The Jews can try whatever they want. The non-Jews will continue to resist until the Jews manage to kill every last one of them.

 

[Hollie]

The Jews can try whatever they want. The non-Jews will continue to resist until the Jews manage to kill every last one of them.

I'm afraid your understanding of the situation with the Arab-Moslem terrorists is little more than juvenile and simplistic. The Islamist gee-had is entirely about a perceived entitlement to mayhem and murder in furtherance of the fascist Hamas charter. Of course, the Hamas charter is little more than a re-statement of Islamist ideology.

The Islamic fascists have met a much more capable and determined foe in the state of Israel. If the Islamic fascists choose to die in pursuit of their fascism, that is their choice.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Who are the Palestinians?

Linda Sarsour

 

[Hollie]

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

Drop in the bucket compared to Israel.

 

[Phoenall]

Hollie, P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, Negative Propaganda can be an ugly business. The amplification in public, as well as in private, and can be direct and explicit --- as well as implicit indirect. One of the aspect levels of propaganda is its its character as a ‘‘inchoate’’ type crime. Encouragement through adoration and praise by prominent leaders like Mahmoud Abbas and Khaled Mashal can not be a intellectually felt by opponents to violence; but, cannot be directly tied to a fatal event as the principle initiating cause or primary agent which leads to Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence.

The notion of incitement to violence by Arab Palestinian Leaders implies that there is no possibility to hold these Arab Palestinians accountable. This is actually the primary weakness and flaw in the system of Human Rights promotion.

Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), described as being “among the strongest condemnations of hate speech” and the prohibition on incitement, states:

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
​

The "Electronic Intifada" (ei) is a classic example (but by far not the only one) of an outlet prinicple designed to incite hatred and violence on a mass media level. While the Human Rights Law (Article 20) does not to prohibit advocacy of hatred in private --- that instigates non-violent acts of racial or religious discrimination;” effective remedies applies further prohibition enforcement of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred? by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) toward the Jewish People is non-existent. This is called tunnel vision by selective enforcement by the pro-Arab Palestinian movement.

Just as the HoAP advocates (among many things) that the Arab League did not attack (commit acts of aggression) against Israel in 1948, it communicate the idea that the HoAP fight to retrieve that which was taken; the instigation of an International Armed Conflict (IAC) by the HoAP and leaders is denied, overlooked or ignored. While the Israeli defense against HoAP activity is condemned, the attacks by the HoAP carried out with the aim of seriously intimidating the citizens of Israel, or intimidation a frightened Government or an international organization to perform or abstain from performing any act, or seriously destabilizing or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organization.

Who are the Palestinians?

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

(COMMENT)

In a conflict induced by the HoAP (in its various incarnations) for nearly seven decades, there is no question that Israel can be found to have taken improper actions and make poor decisions. And it is no big deal and hardly surprising, that of the thousands of interactions each day with Arab Palestinians, some adverse events will occur that the Electronic Intifada (ei) might capitalize on. But at the end of the day, the confrontations could stop if the Arab Palestinians actually wanted to focus their attentions to nationalization development projects that the West Bank and Gaza Strip need.

Who are the Palestinians? They are the culture that would rather glorify Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence than seek a peaceful solutions.

Most Respectfully,
R

​

You are ignoring the fact the Zionist/Israeli settler colonialism was/is the initial and continuing aggression against a peaceful people.

So what was the problem prior to the invention of Zionism in 1875 and the settler/colonialism prior to 1925 by arab muslims. Questions you constantly refuse to answer due to the answers showing that you are just spreading propaganda to incite violence against the Jews

So, what aggression have the Palestinians initiated?

Depending on what you class as a palestinian, but going on any arab muslim that lives in the former mandate of palestine is a palestinian then I will start back in 1929


1 1929 the mufti ( a palaestinian ) instigated an attack on the Jews of Hebron and Jerusalem that led to a massacre.
2 1930 the mufti instigated a civil war that led to arabs killing Jews
3 1931 another civil war
4 1947 a civil uprising in protest at the UN reccomendation that was a cover for attacks on the Jews and British
5 1948 an invasion of Israel with the intent to wipe out the Jews
6 1967 an invasion of Israel to wipe out the Jews




Do you want the 3 terrorism campaigns from gaza, the 3 intifada's and the recent attacks on unarmed children, about 3000 incidents in all

 

[Phoenall]

The invasion of a place with the intent to either rule over, expel or otherwise eliminate the native people of that place is aggression. How can it not be?

Then tell it to the Roman Catholics and the arab muslims as they are not from palestine

 

[Phoenall]

The Jews can try whatever they want. The non-Jews will continue to resist until the Jews manage to kill every last one of them.

It is not resistance though is it, it is aggression in an attempt at stealing the land

 

[Phoenall]

Who are the Palestinians?

Linda Sarsour

AND ! ! ! ! !

 

[Phoenall]

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

Drop in the bucket compared to Israel.

How many children have Israeli terrorists killed then, and you cant count those killed in war because hamas placed them as human shields.

Guess your numbers just went way below the ones for hamas and fatah terrorists

 

[Hollie]

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

Drop in the bucket compared to Israel.

Arab-Moslem terrorists choose violence and depravity vs. a productive life.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hollie, P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, Negative Propaganda can be an ugly business. The amplification in public, as well as in private, and can be direct and explicit --- as well as implicit indirect. One of the aspect levels of propaganda is its its character as a ‘‘inchoate’’ type crime. Encouragement through adoration and praise by prominent leaders like Mahmoud Abbas and Khaled Mashal can not be a intellectually felt by opponents to violence; but, cannot be directly tied to a fatal event as the principle initiating cause or primary agent which leads to Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence.

The notion of incitement to violence by Arab Palestinian Leaders implies that there is no possibility to hold these Arab Palestinians accountable. This is actually the primary weakness and flaw in the system of Human Rights promotion.

Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), described as being “among the strongest condemnations of hate speech” and the prohibition on incitement, states:

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
​

The "Electronic Intifada" (ei) is a classic example (but by far not the only one) of an outlet prinicple designed to incite hatred and violence on a mass media level. While the Human Rights Law (Article 20) does not to prohibit advocacy of hatred in private --- that instigates non-violent acts of racial or religious discrimination;” effective remedies applies further prohibition enforcement of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred? by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) toward the Jewish People is non-existent. This is called tunnel vision by selective enforcement by the pro-Arab Palestinian movement.

Just as the HoAP advocates (among many things) that the Arab League did not attack (commit acts of aggression) against Israel in 1948, it communicate the idea that the HoAP fight to retrieve that which was taken; the instigation of an International Armed Conflict (IAC) by the HoAP and leaders is denied, overlooked or ignored. While the Israeli defense against HoAP activity is condemned, the attacks by the HoAP carried out with the aim of seriously intimidating the citizens of Israel, or intimidation a frightened Government or an international organization to perform or abstain from performing any act, or seriously destabilizing or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organization.

Who are the Arab-Moslem Death Cultists?

(COMMENT)

In a conflict induced by the HoAP (in its various incarnations) for nearly seven decades, there is no question that Israel can be found to have taken improper actions and make poor decisions. And it is no big deal and hardly surprising, that of the thousands of interactions each day with Arab Palestinians, some adverse events will occur that the Electronic Intifada (ei) might capitalize on. But at the end of the day, the confrontations could stop if the Arab Palestinians actually wanted to focus their attentions to nationalization development projects that the West Bank and Gaza Strip need.

Who are the Palestinians? They are the culture that would rather glorify Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence than seek a peaceful solutions.

Most Respectfully,
R

​

You are ignoring the fact the Zionist/Israeli settler colonialism was/is the initial and continuing aggression against a peaceful people.

So what was the problem prior to the invention of Zionism in 1875 and the settler/colonialism prior to 1925 by arab muslims. Questions you constantly refuse to answer due to the answers showing that you are just spreading propaganda to incite violence against the Jews

So, what aggression have the Palestinians initiated?

Depending on what you class as a palestinian, but going on any arab muslim that lives in the former mandate of palestine is a palestinian then I will start back in 1929


1 1929 the mufti ( a palaestinian ) instigated an attack on the Jews of Hebron and Jerusalem that led to a massacre.
2 1930 the mufti instigated a civil war that led to arabs killing Jews
3 1931 another civil war
4 1947 a civil uprising in protest at the UN reccomendation that was a cover for attacks on the Jews and British
5 1948 an invasion of Israel with the intent to wipe out the Jews
6 1967 an invasion of Israel to wipe out the Jews




Do you want the 3 terrorism campaigns from gaza, the 3 intifada's and the recent attacks on unarmed children, about 3000 incidents in all

We were discussing pre Zionist colonization.

 

[Phoenall]

Hollie, P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, Negative Propaganda can be an ugly business. The amplification in public, as well as in private, and can be direct and explicit --- as well as implicit indirect. One of the aspect levels of propaganda is its its character as a ‘‘inchoate’’ type crime. Encouragement through adoration and praise by prominent leaders like Mahmoud Abbas and Khaled Mashal can not be a intellectually felt by opponents to violence; but, cannot be directly tied to a fatal event as the principle initiating cause or primary agent which leads to Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence.

The notion of incitement to violence by Arab Palestinian Leaders implies that there is no possibility to hold these Arab Palestinians accountable. This is actually the primary weakness and flaw in the system of Human Rights promotion.

Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), described as being “among the strongest condemnations of hate speech” and the prohibition on incitement, states:

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
​

The "Electronic Intifada" (ei) is a classic example (but by far not the only one) of an outlet prinicple designed to incite hatred and violence on a mass media level. While the Human Rights Law (Article 20) does not to prohibit advocacy of hatred in private --- that instigates non-violent acts of racial or religious discrimination;” effective remedies applies further prohibition enforcement of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred? by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) toward the Jewish People is non-existent. This is called tunnel vision by selective enforcement by the pro-Arab Palestinian movement.

Just as the HoAP advocates (among many things) that the Arab League did not attack (commit acts of aggression) against Israel in 1948, it communicate the idea that the HoAP fight to retrieve that which was taken; the instigation of an International Armed Conflict (IAC) by the HoAP and leaders is denied, overlooked or ignored. While the Israeli defense against HoAP activity is condemned, the attacks by the HoAP carried out with the aim of seriously intimidating the citizens of Israel, or intimidation a frightened Government or an international organization to perform or abstain from performing any act, or seriously destabilizing or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organization.

(COMMENT)

In a conflict induced by the HoAP (in its various incarnations) for nearly seven decades, there is no question that Israel can be found to have taken improper actions and make poor decisions. And it is no big deal and hardly surprising, that of the thousands of interactions each day with Arab Palestinians, some adverse events will occur that the Electronic Intifada (ei) might capitalize on. But at the end of the day, the confrontations could stop if the Arab Palestinians actually wanted to focus their attentions to nationalization development projects that the West Bank and Gaza Strip need.

Who are the Palestinians? They are the culture that would rather glorify Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence than seek a peaceful solutions.

Most Respectfully,
R

​

You are ignoring the fact the Zionist/Israeli settler colonialism was/is the initial and continuing aggression against a peaceful people.

So what was the problem prior to the invention of Zionism in 1875 and the settler/colonialism prior to 1925 by arab muslims. Questions you constantly refuse to answer due to the answers showing that you are just spreading propaganda to incite violence against the Jews

So, what aggression have the Palestinians initiated?

Depending on what you class as a palestinian, but going on any arab muslim that lives in the former mandate of palestine is a palestinian then I will start back in 1929


1 1929 the mufti ( a palaestinian ) instigated an attack on the Jews of Hebron and Jerusalem that led to a massacre.
2 1930 the mufti instigated a civil war that led to arabs killing Jews
3 1931 another civil war
4 1947 a civil uprising in protest at the UN reccomendation that was a cover for attacks on the Jews and British
5 1948 an invasion of Israel with the intent to wipe out the Jews
6 1967 an invasion of Israel to wipe out the Jews




Do you want the 3 terrorism campaigns from gaza, the 3 intifada's and the recent attacks on unarmed children, about 3000 incidents in all

We were discussing pre Zionist colonization.

Not in your question so you lose again for trying to change the rules because you were beaten

But that would go back to 1850 and the arab muslims were rampaging through palestine then raping, stealing and killing

 

[P F Tinmore]

You are ignoring the fact the Zionist/Israeli settler colonialism was/is the initial and continuing aggression against a peaceful people.

So what was the problem prior to the invention of Zionism in 1875 and the settler/colonialism prior to 1925 by arab muslims. Questions you constantly refuse to answer due to the answers showing that you are just spreading propaganda to incite violence against the Jews

So, what aggression have the Palestinians initiated?

Depending on what you class as a palestinian, but going on any arab muslim that lives in the former mandate of palestine is a palestinian then I will start back in 1929


1 1929 the mufti ( a palaestinian ) instigated an attack on the Jews of Hebron and Jerusalem that led to a massacre.
2 1930 the mufti instigated a civil war that led to arabs killing Jews
3 1931 another civil war
4 1947 a civil uprising in protest at the UN reccomendation that was a cover for attacks on the Jews and British
5 1948 an invasion of Israel with the intent to wipe out the Jews
6 1967 an invasion of Israel to wipe out the Jews




Do you want the 3 terrorism campaigns from gaza, the 3 intifada's and the recent attacks on unarmed children, about 3000 incidents in all

We were discussing pre Zionist colonization.

Not in your question so you lose again for trying to change the rules because you were beaten

But that would go back to 1850 and the arab muslims were rampaging through palestine then raping, stealing and killing

Which arab muslims are you talking about?

Link?