People who write this shit know so littleThere's a good article, an opinion piece, that lays out a number of questions / scenarios for the Middle East with the eventual demise of the dictators of the West Bank and Iran. There are a number of similar articles around the web and most raise lots of alarms about the power struggles that will likely take place when the replacement dictators position for control. Especially with regard to the West Bank, it seems difficult to believe that anything less than a civil war will decide what group will eventually take a measure of control.
Dramatic changes ahead: US election, succession of Iranian, Palestinian leaders
His death, however, when it happens will create a vacuum that will bring to the fore a power struggle within the PA, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and Fatah (formerly the Palestinian National Liberation Movement), as well as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
This is not true. The Palestinian constitution is written to avoid power vacuums. If Abbas leaves office for any reason, the speaker of parliament is to temporarily assume the office of president and call for elections within 60 days.
Of course the US will not allow this to happen, they will just go in and fuck it up like they always do.
Maybe it's just me but a largely lawless enclave ruled by an islamic terrorist dictatorship doesn't have much incentive to follow rule of law.
Maybe the "Pal'istanian National Congress" will meet.
I think what you're unwilling to address is that the competing islamic terrorist franchises have no use for rule of law. With Iran seeing an opportunity to install a Shia army in the West Bank, they will have the assistance of Hamas and Islamic Jihad, at least until those competing Shia franchises go to war against each other.
It's just remarkable that you would propose the competing islamic terrorist franchises (especially those funded and controlled by Iran), are going to follow some irrelevant constitution.