rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,317
- 158,333
- 2,615
History has decided, 40 years on.Let's leave the dingbat equation aside. There is no way Carter can be represented as a strong leader then, anymore than Obama can be today.Carter was way over his head. He brought in a Georgia mafia that was only fit to goven a state governemnt. He never had the merest clue how to conduct foriegn policy. Obama at least brought in some who understood something beyond community organizing. Unfortunately, Obama did not.I did the same.
Carter was in over his head but was under appreciated
I disagree
Carter manged to get a peace accord between Egypt and Israel. A major foreign policy accomplishment
He ran his economy on a balanced budget. Something conservatives claim to worship but never do
Inflation and unemployment wrecked his economy. Carter took the blame but held a balanced budget. Reagan came in and tripled th deficit and then took credit for the resulting economic surge
Iran brought down Carters Presidency. The Hostage situation made America look weak. If Carter had invaded or bombed them, he would have looked like a strong president. Instead he negotiated behind the scenes and brought everyone back alive
History will have to decide
If Carter had gone batshit crazy and invaded Iran, the people would have loved him. It may have resulted in hundreds of deaths and possibly killed all the hostages.
Instead, Carter swallowed his pride. Worked behind the scenes and got the hostages released alive.
Cost him a second term
Carter will be viewed on how he responded to the hand he was dealt
Carter dealt with a recession with fiscal responsibility. The economy faltered
He dealt with Iran with patience and held off on military action
Bush 43 dealt with his recession with tax cuts and massive debt
He dealt with 9-11 by invading Iraq and Afghanistan
Bush 43 is viewed much worse than Carter