Mortimer
Gold Member
The right wingers here accuse the "liberals" to be intolerant of political opponents, but are they any better?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Got any videos of mobs of republicans attacking innocent democrats? I can provide MANY of the opposite. I win.The right wingers here accuse the "liberals" to be intolerant of political opponents, but are they any better?
The right wingers here accuse the "liberals" to be intolerant of political opponents, but are they any better?
The right wingers here accuse the "liberals" to be intolerant of political opponents, but are they any better?
Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
'Natural law'? What a load. As ludicrous as the rest of it.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.
You said her "post"; not a hand picked sentence from her post.'Natural law'? What a load. As ludicrous as the rest of it.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.
Gods. Did you read her post? Or mine? If you did read them, did you manage to comprehend them?You said her "post"; not a hand picked sentence from her post.
Your post demonstrates a difference between right wing posts and others.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
dont know if they are any better or more tolerant but they do portray themselves in a more dignified manner for the most part.The right wingers here accuse the "liberals" to be intolerant of political opponents, but are they any better?
Have you not heard any democrats speak on this board? "Intellectually deficient" doesnt come close to the insults hurled our direction, and for the record, cnm was implying the exact same thing about emily, so you can just settle down with your obvious bias.Your post demonstrates a difference between right wing posts and others.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
cnm asked if anyone could make sense the content in the post of EMILYNGHIEM and you attacked cnm by implying that he was intellectually deficient. Attacking the person rather than what he says is characteristic of the Right.
I disagree, at least on this forum, the left is constantly trying to suggest that those on the right have less education than those on the left.Your post demonstrates a difference between right wing posts and others.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
cnm asked if anyone could make sense the content in the post of EMILYNGHIEM and you attacked cnm by implying that he was intellectually deficient. Attacking the person rather than what he says is characteristic of the Right.
All you did was say "her post makes no sense", but you have yet to present an argument to defeat her post. .Gods. Did you read her post? Or mine? If you did read them, did you manage to comprehend them?You said her "post"; not a hand picked sentence from her post.
Like what do you think 'As ludicrous as the rest of it' means?
You proved once again what I wrote is true.Have you not heard any democrats speak on this board? "Intellectually deficient" doesnt come close to the insults hurled our direction, and for the record, cnm was implying the exact same thing about emily, so you can just settle down with your obvious bias.Your post demonstrates a difference between right wing posts and others.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
cnm asked if anyone could make sense the content in the post of EMILYNGHIEM and you attacked cnm by implying that he was intellectually deficient. Attacking the person rather than what he says is characteristic of the Right.
As did you.You proved once again what I wrote is true.Have you not heard any democrats speak on this board? "Intellectually deficient" doesnt come close to the insults hurled our direction, and for the record, cnm was implying the exact same thing about emily, so you can just settle down with your obvious bias.Your post demonstrates a difference between right wing posts and others.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
cnm asked if anyone could make sense the content in the post of EMILYNGHIEM and you attacked cnm by implying that he was intellectually deficient. Attacking the person rather than what he says is characteristic of the Right.
I am prepared to believe this.I disagree, at least on this forum, the left is constantly trying to suggest that those on the right have less education than those on the left.Your post demonstrates a difference between right wing posts and others.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
cnm asked if anyone could make sense the content in the post of EMILYNGHIEM and you attacked cnm by implying that he was intellectually deficient. Attacking the person rather than what he says is characteristic of the Right.
Interesting observation though, you as a (Im assuming) supporter of the left see it as the right exerting or suggesting intellectual superiority, we, or at least I on the right see it the opposite way.
maybe we just discount what someone is going to say before we read it because we know they are liberal or conservative and assume that we are not going to agree.
thats because you are an idiot..I am prepared to believe this.I disagree, at least on this forum, the left is constantly trying to suggest that those on the right have less education than those on the left.Your post demonstrates a difference between right wing posts and others.Anyone with a brain and an ounce of honesty can make sense of her post.Any one able to make sense of the mass of assumptions and contradictions in that post?The leftwing are not taught or empowered to enforce natural laws and rights directly by following and exercising them,
so they have defined their rights and agenda based on political force by party.
cnm asked if anyone could make sense the content in the post of EMILYNGHIEM and you attacked cnm by implying that he was intellectually deficient. Attacking the person rather than what he says is characteristic of the Right.
Interesting observation though, you as a (Im assuming) supporter of the left see it as the right exerting or suggesting intellectual superiority, we, or at least I on the right see it the opposite way.
maybe we just discount what someone is going to say before we read it because we know they are liberal or conservative and assume that we are not going to agree.