bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,166
- 47,312
- 2,180
.The reason the TP'ers failed to accomplish their stated goals is because they are far more interested in pursuing their partisan agenda than their principles. Taking down "RINOs" is yet another fool's errand. All of those RINOs backed the insanity of the TP'ers when they shut down the government and you you intend to repay them by throwing them out of office? That is called a betrayal and that is why the establishment GOP now sees the TP as a threat instead of an ally
Principles................The TEA Party principles are right in line with their stated principles......Less Gov't, and full repeal of Obamacare..............
Those "principles" are just LIBERTARIAN dogma!.
They are common sense, in other words.
The goals of eliminating corruption and reducing spending were SACRIFICED on the partisan alter of unrealistic libertarian idealism which is why the Tea Party ended up being rejected by We the People.
The corruption issue is a red herring. It's a side issue. You harp on solely so you have an excuse to harp on the TEA party. Spending is the big issue, and turds like you have opposed the TEA party at every step.
In essence you are calling everyone a RINO who doesn't embrace extremist Libertarianism. Your real agenda is to hijack the GOP and turn it into the Libertarian Party instead. No wonder there is a civil war inside the Republican party.
But thanks for being honest. I do appreciate knowing where you actually stand politically speaking.
Yeah, cutting spending by even 1% is "extremist." That's what all the squealing about the sequester showed. Libturds simply have no credibility when it comes to calling their critics "extremists."