Why Are Dems Scared Of Fox News?

[maineman]

I never said all Dems watched Fox - some do - not all Dems are as nutty and hate filled as you

To you it was a joke - Jay asked a question and a valid one

The numbers for San Fran nan (the self appointed Speaker of State) are starting to drop - I wonder why?

why can't you answer my question?????

I asked you if you thought that a majority of hard core democratic primary voters watched faux...and did you think that those voters would stay on the faux channel and watch O'Liely rather than find the scheduled televised debate of their party's presidential candidate on some other network?

 

[red states rule]

why can't you answer my question?????

I asked you if you thought that a majority of hard core democratic primary voters watched faux...and did you think that those voters would stay on the faux channel and watch O'Liely rather than find the scheduled televised debate of their party's presidential candidate on some other network?

Fox had great rating during their coverage of the Dems convention and Bills State of the Union addreess

Libs did not have a problem with the last set of Dem primaries being ob Fox

It seems they are playing their hate card - and hate filled libs like you are buying into it

Or, it is, no "real" liberal would ever watch Fox News or appear on the network?

 

[Vintij]

Fox had great rating during their coverage of the Dems convention and Bills State of the Union addreess

Libs did not have a problem with the last set of Dem primaries being ob Fox

It seems they are playing their hate card - and hate filled libs like you are buying into it

Or, it is, no "real" liberal would ever watch Fox News or appear on the network?

Fox news has no choice but to be conservative. The name FOX is a brand that is commited to the fact that anyone of any age can watch, which means ratings. You dont get ratings with Liberal controversy. You get ratings, with safe conservatism. Everyone knows that. There is no argument here. The most controversy with fox is wether or not sinjaya deserves to be in the top 9!

 

[red states rule]

Fox news has no choice but to be conservative. The name FOX is a brand that is commited to the fact that anyone of any age can watch, which means ratings. You dont get ratings with Liberal controversy. You get ratings, with safe conservatism. Everyone knows that. There is no argument here. The most controversy with fox is wether or not sinjaya deserves to be in the top 9!

Fair and balanced reporting of the news get ratings

That is why Fox News is #1

 

[maineman]

Fox had great rating during their coverage of the Dems convention and Bills State of the Union addreess

Libs did not have a problem with the last set of Dem primaries being ob Fox

It seems they are playing their hate card - and hate filled libs like you are buying into it

Or, it is, no "real" liberal would ever watch Fox News or appear on the network?

why can't answer my questions instead of tap dancing around them?

 

[red states rule]

why can't answer my questions instead of tap dancing around them?

I have - you can't take the dose of reality and truth

 

[maineman]

I have - you can't take the dose of reality and truth

you never answer my questions...yoiu tap dance around them.

WHY would democrats give a shit about Fox news in a primary? Do you honestly think that any democrat is going to give any democratic candidate a black mark and not vote for them simply because they chose not to debate on Fox?

you're a fool.... a koolaid soaked fool.

 

[red states rule]

you never answer my questions...yoiu tap dance around them.

WHY would democrats give a shit about Fox news in a primary? Do you honestly think that any democrat is going to give any democratic candidate a black mark and not vote for them simply because they chose not to debate on Fox?

you're a fool.... a koolaid soaked fool.

It shows how petty the Dems are - that is why their aproval numbers are sinking

 

[maineman]

It shows how petty the Dems are - that is why their aproval numbers are sinking

good for you.... you keep believing that.

don't try to change your fucked up party....you can beat us without changing a thing. you hold onto that. please.

 

[red states rule]

good for you.... you keep believing that.

don't try to change your fucked up party....you can beat us without changing a thing. you hold onto that. please.

Seems you do not like the latest polls showing the Dems approval numbers are sinking

Please keep San Fran Nan out in public

 

[maineman]

Seems you do not like the latest polls showing the Dems approval numbers are sinking

Please keep San Fran Nan out in public

whatever.... your prognostications are worth less than a bucket of warm spit.

who cares to read crap like that. Talk policy...answer questions.... lay off the bullshit.

 

[red states rule]

whatever.... your prognostications are worth less than a bucket of warm spit.

who cares to read crap like that. Talk policy...answer questions.... lay off the bullshit.

Those polls must be the work of the vast right wing conspiracy

 

[Rosotar]

Fox had great rating during their coverage of the Dems convention and Bills State of the Union addreess

Libs did not have a problem with the last set of Dem primaries being ob Fox

It seems they are playing their hate card - and hate filled libs like you are buying into it

Or, it is, no "real" liberal would ever watch Fox News or appear on the network?

I'm left of the Kennedys and I read FOX's website everyday.

 

[Rosotar]

Fair and balanced reporting of the news get ratings

That is why Fox News is #1

So just because something is popular that means it's good quality?

I guess you'd say the say the same thing about American Idol?

Lots of Americans are attracted to trash. That's more a testament to FOX's marketing and mass appeal than to its quality.

Next time you watch FOX news ask yourself if it doesn't remind you of a trip through the mall. Lots of flash, glitter, and color and bells and "swooshes." Not only that but they keep all their "news" very brief for short attention spans.

You're right...FOX is #1 for a reason but it doesn't have anything to do with quality.

 

[Rosotar]

Seems you do not like the latest polls showing the Dems approval numbers are sinking

Please keep San Fran Nan out in public

Your polls are bullshit!

They aren't credible.

 

[red states rule]

I'm left of the Kennedys and I read FOX's website everyday.

In that case, you are so far left you have left the planet

 

[red states rule]

Your polls are bullshit!

They aren't credible.

So all those polls are wrong and you are right?

 

[red states rule]

So just because something is popular that means it's good quality?

I guess you'd say the say the same thing about American Idol?

Lots of Americans are attracted to trash. That's more a testament to FOX's marketing and mass appeal than to its quality.

Next time you watch FOX news ask yourself if it doesn't remind you of a trip through the mall. Lots of flash, glitter, and color and bells and "swooshes." Not only that but they keep all their "news" very brief for short attention spans.

You're right...FOX is #1 for a reason but it doesn't have anything to do with quality.

Yea, CNN does straight news reporting..............

from a liberal point of view



CNN Cheers Kucinich Slam On Oil Companies: 'Go to It!'
Posted by Matthew Balan on April 11, 2007 - 17:24.
Mainstream media anchors occasionally do some explicit cheerleading for a liberal politician. That's exactly what CNN host Miles O'Brien did on Wednesday's "American Morning." He reported that dark horse Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich "flexes his muscle with big oil over the skyrocketing price of gas, and we say go to it."

Kucinich flexing his muscle? Now, that's a mental image that doesn't immediately come to mind.

O'Brien's remark was made during a lead-in to a segment by CNN senior business correspondent Ali Velshi. Velshi's report gave some details of the ultra-liberal congressman's efforts.

ALI VELSHI: Dennis Kucinich, he's the chairman of the domestic policy subcommittee, has written letters to seven major oil companies, asking them a question we would like an answer to - explaining the high price of gas....

So Kucinich is asking these oil companies to explain particularly refining. He cited examples in California where he says prices of refining a barrel of oil have jumped from $17 a barrel five years ago to $39 a barrel, and that's creating a big upward swing in the price of gasoline.


He also wants to know about refining capacity in California. Again, he says that in 1985, the refineries were operating at 76 percent of capacity, so lots of room to grow. Now, they're running at 92 percent of capacity, which means that there's not enough room. If a refinery has to go down for maintenance or repair or switch over blends of gasoline, what happens is then they can't refine more gas, and it becomes a supply and demand issue. Gas prices spike. We see this every spring. This is what happens. We're not growing refineries in this country. So he would like responses. He's asked for detailed and documented answers to a series of questions that he has laid out in a letter by April the 25th. We will be eager to hear what those responses are.

As the segment closed, O'Brien and Velshi listed some of the reasons why new refineries have not been built.

M. O'BRIEN: No one wants a refinery in their backyard.


VELSHI: They're dirty. They're hard to get approval for, but they are - and they're expensive, but we got to do something. We got to use less gasoline or build more refineries.

Notice, though, that both O'Brien and Velshi fail to mention two other major reasons there aren't any new refineries - too many regulations and litigation costs.

The mainstream media's laser beam-focus on oil companies as the leading reason for high oil prices only serves to forward the agenda of liberals like Kucinich.

http://newsbusters.org/node/11980

 

[maineman]

It shows how petty the Dems are - that is why their aproval numbers are sinking

we are not petty...we just know where our target audience is on the dial, and we know it is not faux. We'll go on faux for the general election, but why go on faux now? a very small percentage of committed democratic primary voters are faux viewers. Why let the faux viewers see us fighting with one another? We'll show them our top candidate when the time comes...

and your top candidate is a pro-choice, pro-gun control, pro-gay rights New York moderate whose on his third wife..... methinks that the religious right won't have much reason to come and vote for Rudy....and the bottom of the republican ticket is a bunch of congressional yahoos who got us into the Iraq war. Why WILL republicans even bother to vote in '08? lol

 

[maineman]

Those polls must be the work of the vast right wing conspiracy

like the poll from November where your party lost control of both houses of congress?

lol